Practice patterns in revision dacryocystorhinostomy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to report the practice patterns while performing revision dacryocystorhinostomy (RevDCR) amongst oculoplastic surgeons from several regions across the globe. METHODS: The survey consisted of 41 specific questions sent via email that contained a link to the Google forms. The questions covered several aspects of the respondents' practice profiles, evaluation methods, pre-operative choices, surgical techniques, and follow-up preferences while dealing with patients of prior failed DCRs. Questions were answerable either as multiple choice or free text typing. The survey respondents were anonymized. The responses were collected and analyzed, and data were tabulated to understand the preferred practice trends. RESULTS: A total of 137 surgeons completed the survey. Most respondents identified themselves as experienced surgeons managing failed DCRs (76.6%, total respondents (n) = 137). The commonly preferred modalities for evaluation of a failed DCR were lacrimal irrigation (91.2%) and nasal endoscopy (66.9%). About 64% (87/137) of the respondents performed a combination of nasal endoscopy, lacrimal irrigation, and probing to localize the area of the failed DCR. A majority of the respondents used anti-metabolites (73.3%, n = 131) and stents (96.4%, 132/137) during the revision surgery. Most surgeons preferred endoscopic approach (44.5%), (61/137) for revising a failed DCR and most preferred general anaesthesia with local infiltration (70.1%, 96/137). Aggressive fibrosis with cicatricial closure was identified as the most frequently encountered cause of failure (84.6%, 115/137). The osteotomy was performed on an as-needed basis by 59.1% (81/137) of the surgeons. Only 10.9% of the respondents used navigation guidance while performing a revision DCR, mainly for post-trauma scenarios. Most of the surgeons completed the revision procedure within 30-60 minutes (77.4%, 106/137). The self-reported outcomes of revision DCRs were good (80-95%, median-90%, n = 137). CONCLUSION: A significantly high percentage of oculoplastic surgeons who responded to this survey from across the globe performed nasal endoscopy in their pre-operative evaluations, preferred endoscopic surgical approach, and used antimetabolites and stents while performing revision DCRs.

Cadaveric Evaluation of the Canalicular-Lacrimal Sac-Mucosal Folds and Clinical Implications.

PURPOSE: The purpose is to study the anatomical variations of the characteristic mucosal folds at the canalicular-lacrimal sac junction and their potential clinical implications. METHODS: Twelve lacrimal drainage systems of six fresh frozen Caucasian cadavers were studied to assess the openings of the common canaliculus into the lacrimal sac. A standard endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy was performed until complete lacrimal sac marsupialization and reflection of the flaps. All specimens were subjected to clinical assessment of lacrimal patency via irrigation. A high-definition nasal endoscopy assessed the internal common opening and the mucosal folds in its close vicinity. Probing at the internal common opening was performed to aid in the assessment of the folds. Videography and photo documentation was performed. RESULTS: All 12 specimens had a single common canalicular opening. Ten of the 12 specimens (83.3%) were noted to have canalicular/lacrimal sac-mucosal folds (CLS-MF). Anatomical variations were noted across these 10 specimens and included inferior 180° (n = 6), anterior 270° (n = 2), posterior 180° (n = 1), and 360° CLS-MF (n = 1). Cases were randomly chosen to demonstrate the clinical implications of misinterpreting them as canalicular obstructions or the potential to cause an inadvertent false passage. CONCLUSION: The inferior 180° was the most common CLS-MF noted in the cadaveric study. It is helpful for clinicians to recognize the prominent CLS-MF and their clinical implications intraoperatively. Further fundamental work is needed to characterize the anatomy and the possible physiological role of CLS-MFs.

Porocarcinoma with orbital metastasis, a case report with review of literature.

We present a patient who presented with an orbital mass lesion which was a metastatic lesion from a porocarcinoma of the scalp with progressive deterioration of the patient.A 78-year-old male presented with functional decline and a rapidly growing scalp lesion of 3 months duration. In addition to the scalp lesion, Computed Tomography showed an incidental finding of a left lateral orbital wall tumour. Fine-needle aspiration of the two lesions revealed malignant cells with similar morphologies. Punch biopsy of the scalp lesion showed histological features suggestive of a porocarcinoma. Patient underwent palliative radiotherapy and immunotherapy and subsequently succumbed to the disease.

Scanning electron microscopic features of lacrimal drainage silastic stents: Comparison of various Crawford and large-diameter stents.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the differences in the biofilms and physical deposits on Crawford stents compared to large-diameter stents. METHODS: A prospective interventional study was performed on a series of patients undergoing external or endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and endoluminal lacrimal duct recanalization (ELDR) with either Crawford or large-diameter stents. All the Crawford stents were retrieved at six weeks and the large-diameter ones at eight weeks following the surgical intervention. There was no evidence of post-operative infection in any of the patients. Following extubation, standard protocols of scanning electron microscopy were used to assess the biofilms and physical deposits on the stents. RESULTS: A total of 15 stents were studied. Of these, twelve were Crawford, and three were large-diameter stents. The Crawford stents were from two different manufacturers. All the stents demonstrated evidence of biofilm formation and physical deposits. The Crawford stents showed thin biofilms and sparse physical deposits, but there were no demonstrable differences amongst stents from different manufacturers. However, the deposits and biofilms were thicker and more extensive in the large-diameter stents than the Crawford ones. The biofilms from all stents showed the presence of polymicrobial communities within the exopolysaccharide matrix. CONCLUSIONS: The present study found differences in biofilms and physical deposits between Crawford and large-diameter stents. These differences can be partly explained by stent duration, size, and their tissue interactions.