Medical student INtervention to promote effective nicotine dependence and tobacco HEalthcare (MIND-THE-GAP): single-centre feasibility randomised trial results.

BACKGROUND: Although brief cessation advice from healthcare professionals increases quit rates, smokers typically do not get this advice during hospitalisation, possibly due to resource issues, lack of training and professionals' own attitudes to providing such counselling. Medical students are a potentially untapped resource who could deliver cessation counselling, while upskilling themselves and changing their own attitudes to delivering such advice in the future; however, no studies have investigated this. We aimed to determine if brief student-led counselling could enhance motivation to quit and smoking cessation behaviours among hospitalised patients. METHODS: A mixed-methods, 2-arm pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial with qualitative process evaluation enrolled 67 hospitalised adult smokers, who were recruited and randomized to receive a brief medical student-delivered cessation intervention (n = 33) or usual care (n = 34); 61 medical students received standardised cessation training and 33 were randomly assigned to provide a brief in-hospital consultation and follow-up support by phone or in-person one week post-discharge. Telephone follow-up at 3- and 6-months assessed scores on the Motivation to Stop Smoking Scale (MTSS; primary outcome) and several other outcomes, including 7-day point prevalent abstinence, quit attempts, use of cessation medication, and ratings of student's knowledge and efficacy. Data were analysed as intention to treat (ITT) using penalised imputation, per protocol, and random effects repeated measures. Focus group interviews were conducted with students post-intervention to elicit their views on the training and intervention process. RESULTS: Analyses for primary and most secondary outcomes favoured the intervention group, although results were not statistically significant. Point prevalence abstinence rates were significantly higher for the intervention group during follow-up for all analyses except 6-month ITT analysis. Fidelity was variable. Patients rated students as being "very" knowledgeable about quitting and "somewhat" helpful. Qualitative results showed students were glad to deliver the intervention; were critical of current cessation care; felt constrained by their inability to prescribe cessation medications and wanted to include cessation and other behavioural counselling in their normal history taking. CONCLUSIONS: It appears feasible for medical students to be smoking cessation interventionists during their training, although their fidelity to the intervention requires further investigation. A definitive trial is needed to determine if medical students are effective cessation counsellors and if student-led intervention could be tailored for other health behaviours. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02601599 (retrospectively registered 1 day after first participant recruited on November 3rd 2015).

Effectiveness of motivational interviewing in influencing smoking cessation in pregnant and postpartum disadvantaged women.

INTRODUCTION: Systematic assessments of Motivational Interviewing (MI) in smoking behavior have been rare to date. This study aimed to determine whether an integrated approach, involving staff training in MI techniques, was sufficient to affect change in smoking status or intensity in low-income pregnant and postpartum women. METHODS: Overall, 500 consecutive smokers were recruited at first prenatal visit to public antenatal clinics. Following staff training, 500 more were recruited (intervention group). Data were recorded at 28-32 weeks gestation, after birth, at 3-4 and 7-9 months postpartum. The primary outcome measure was self-reported continued abstinence from smoking verified by urinary cotinine analysis. Changes in smoking intensity were also measured. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of smokers in the intervention and control groups who reported stopping smoking at 28-32 weeks gestation (8.2% vs. 8.8%; p = .73), 1 week after birth (8.6% vs. 11.4%; p = .14), 3-4 months after birth (5.8% vs. 4.8%; p = .48), or 7-9 months after birth (5.2% vs. 4.0%; p = .36). Although more cases were nonsmoking at the second visit, 14.8% [95% CI = 11.8-18.5] vs. 13.1% controls [95% CI = 10.3-16.6], this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: MI delivered at a number of time points during pregnancy and up to 9 months postpartum failed to affect quit rates. It may have had a small effect in preventing relapse among spontaneous quitters in late pregnancy though the validity of this remains uncertain.