SARS-CoV-2 antibody immunoassays in serial samples reveal earlier seroconversion in acutely ill COVID-19 patients developing ARDS.

OBJECTIVES: During the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing has been suggested for (1) screening populations for disease prevalence, (2) diagnostics, and (3) guiding therapeutic applications. Here, we conducted a detailed clinical evaluation of four Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays in samples from acutely ill COVID-19 patients and in two negative cohorts. METHODS: 443 serum specimens from serial sampling of 29 COVID-19 patients were used to determine clinical sensitivities. Patients were stratified for the presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Individual serum specimens from a pre-COVID-19 cohort of 238 healthy subjects and from a PCR-negative clinical cohort of 257 patients were used to determine clinical specificities. All samples were measured side-by-side with the Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA (IgG), Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA (IgA) and Anti-SARS-CoV-2-NCP-ELISA (IgG) (Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany) and the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ECLIA (Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). RESULTS: Median seroconversion occurred earlier in ARDS patients (8-9 days) than in non-ARDS patients (11-17 days), except for EUR N-IgG. Rates of positivity and mean signal ratios in the ARDS group were significantly higher than in the non-ARDS group. Sensitivities between the four tested immunoassays were equivalent. In the set of negative samples, the specificity of the Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA (IgA) was lower (93.9%) compared to all other assays (≥98.8%) and the specificity of Anti-SARS-CoV-2-NCP-ELISA (IgG) was lower (98.8%) than that of Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (100%). CONCLUSIONS: Serial sampling in COVID-19 patients revealed earlier seroconversion and higher signal ratios of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies as a potential risk marker for the development of ARDS, suggesting a utility for antibody testing in acutely diseased patients.

Treating Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis with Short-Term Prednisone and Itraconazole in Cystic Fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is a hypersensitivity reaction to Aspergillus fumigatus contributing to cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the combination of oral prednisone for 18 days together with itraconazole therapy for at least 12 months in CF-related ABPA with regard to long-term pulmonary function and side effects. METHODS: Sixty-five patients with CF treated for ABPA and 127 patients with CF without ABPA serving as matched controls were retrospectively analyzed for a median period of 4.8 years. Serial lung functions were analyzed alongside clinical, microbiological, and laboratory data including itraconazole therapeutic drug monitoring. RESULTS: The used ABPA treatment regimen restored FEV1 values to pre-ABPA levels within 3 months (P < .0001). Long-term FEV1 courses of patients showed no difference when compared with those of ABPA-free controls. Glucocorticoid treatment was not associated with increased CF-related diabetes incidence, growth restriction, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa acquisition. Patients who experienced ABPA relapses displayed lower itraconazole trough levels during the first 3 months of treatment (P < .05). A decreased risk of ABPA recurrence was further associated with P aeruginosa colonization. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed treatment scheme for CF-related ABPA is effective in preserving lung function capacity over years in affected individuals without the known glucocorticoid-associated side effects. Itraconazole therapeutic drug monitoring seems useful to prevent disease flares, for which P aeruginosa-negative patients with CF might be particularly susceptible.