Hindfoot Flexibility Influences the Biomechanical Effects of Laterally Wedged Insoles and Ankle-Foot Orthoses in Medial Knee Osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship of frontal plane ankle mobility with the effects of an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) and a laterally wedged insole (LWI) on knee adduction moment (KAM) in the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis. DESIGN: Randomized, nonblinded crossover trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinic of university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Referred sample of 20 patients (N=20) with medial knee osteoarthritis stage 1-3 (Kellgren and Lawrence), aged 56.4±6.5 years; 58 patients were assessed, 21 were included, and 1 was a dropout. There were 14 healthy reference participants without knee osteoarthritis (convenience sample) who were matched by age. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received AFO and LWI for 6 weeks each with gait analysis after each 6-week intervention. Patients underwent additional barefoot gait analysis, walking on even ground and on a cross slope of 5° lateral elevation and standing on inclinations of 0°, 5°, 10°, and 20°. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Spearman correlation between the immediate change in first peak of KAM with each aid and the change in hindfoot varus on the cross slope relative to level ground. RESULTS: The KAM reduction with AFO correlated significantly with hindfoot varus reaction to the cross slope during walking: the greater the hindfoot valgization on the cross slope, the greater the KAM reduction with AFO (Spearman ρ=0.53, P=.02). The KAM reduction with LWI correlated moderately negatively with the change in hindfoot varus: the greater the hindfoot valgization on the cross slope, the smaller the KAM reduction with LWI (r=-0.31 P=.18). CONCLUSIONS: LWI may be suitable for patients with limited to normal frontal plane ankle mobility. Patients with greater frontal plane ankle mobility benefit most from frontal plane ankle bridging with AFO. Studies with larger samples are necessary.

Recommended motor assessments based on psychometric properties in individuals with dementia: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Motor assessments are important to determine effectiveness of physical activity in individuals with dementia (IWD). However, inappropriate and non-standardised assessments without sound psychometric properties have been used. This systematic review aims to examine psychometric properties of motor assessments in IWD combined with frequency of use and effect sizes and to provide recommendations based on observed findings.We performed a two-stage systematic literature search using Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ALOIS, and Scopus (inception - July/September 2018, English and German). The first search purposed to identify motor assessments used in randomised controlled trials assessing effectiveness of physical activity in IWD and to display their frequency of use and effect sizes. The second search focused on psychometric properties considering influence of severity and aetiology of dementia and cueing on test-retest reliability. Two reviewers independently extracted and analysed findings of eligible studies in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Literature searches identified 46 randomised controlled trials and 21 psychometric property studies. While insufficient information was available for validity, we observed sufficient inter-rater and relative test-retest reliability but unacceptable absolute test-retest reliability for most assessments. Combining these findings with frequency of use and effect sizes, we recommend Functional Reach Test, Groningen Meander Walking Test (time), Berg Balance Scale, Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment, Timed Up & Go Test, instrumented gait analysis (spatiotemporal parameters), Sit-to-Stand assessments (repetitions> 1), and 6-min walk test. It is important to consider that severity and aetiology of dementia and cueing influenced test-retest reliability of some assessments. CONCLUSION: This review establishes an important foundation for future investigations. Sufficient relative reliability supports the conclusiveness of recommended assessments at group level, while unacceptable absolute reliability advices caution in assessing intra-individual changes. Moreover, influences on test-retest reliability suggest tailoring assessments and instructions to IWD and applying cueing only where it is inevitable. Considering heterogeneity of included studies and insufficient examination in various areas, these recommendations are not comprehensive. Further research, especially on validity and influences on test-retest reliability, as well as standardisation and development of tailored assessments for IWD is crucial.This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018105399).