Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Asunto principal
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Thorac Imaging ; 38(5): 315-324, 2023 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37603106

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The main objective of this study was to identify risk factors for post-percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy (PTLB) pneumothorax and to establish and validate a predictive score for pneumothorax occurrence to identify patients eligible for outpatient care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent PTLB between November 1, 2012 and March 1, 2017 were retrospectively evaluated for clinical and radiologic factors potentially related to pneumothorax occurrence. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors, and the model coefficient for each factor was used to compute a score. Then, a validation cohort was prospectively evaluated from March 2018 to October 2019. RESULTS: Among the 498 eligible patients in the study cohort, pneumothorax occurred in 124 patients (24.9%) and required drainage in 34 patients (6.8%). Pneumothorax risk factors were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 95% CI 2.28[1.18-4.43]), several passages through the pleura (OR 95% CI 7.71[1.95-30.48]), an anterior biopsy approach (OR 95% CI 6.36 3.82-10.58]), skin-to-pleura distance ≤30 mm (OR 95% CI 2.25[1.09-6.65]), and aerial effusion >10 mm (OR 95% CI 9.27 [5.16-16.65]). Among the 236 patients in the prospective validation cohort, pneumothorax occurred in 18% and 8% were drained. A negative score (<73 points) predicted a probability of pneumothorax occurrence of 7.4% and late evacuation of 2.5% (OR 95% CI respectively 0.18[0.08-0.39] and 0.15[0.04-0.55]) and suggested a reduced length of hospital stay (P=0.009). CONCLUSION: This predictive score for pneumothorax secondary to PTLB has high prognostic performance and accuracy to direct patients toward outpatient management. CLINICAL TRIALS: NCT03488043.


Asunto(s)
Neumotórax , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumotórax/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumotórax/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tomografía
2.
Ann Intensive Care ; 11(1): 41, 2021 Mar 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33683480

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The classification of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) issued by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (EORTC/MSGERC) is used for immunocompromised patients. An alternative algorithm adapted to the intensive care unit (ICU) population has been proposed (AspICU), but this algorithm did not include microbial biomarkers such as the galactomannan antigen and the Aspergillus quantitative PCR. The objective of the present pilot study was to evaluate a new algorithm that includes fungal biomarkers (BM-AspICU) for the diagnosis of probable IPA in an ICU population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 35 patients with pathology-proven IPA according to European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycosis Study Group (EORTC/MSGERC)-2008 criteria were extracted from the French multicenter database of the Invasive Fungal Infections Surveillance Network (RESSIF). The patients were investigated according to the AspICU algorithm, and the BM-AspICU algorithm in analyzing the clinical, imaging, and biomarker data available in the records, without taking into account the pathology findings. RESULTS: Eight patients had to be excluded because no imaging data were recorded in the database. Among the 27 proven IPAs with complete data, 16 would have been considered as putative IPA with the AspICU algorithm and 24 would have been considered as probable IPA using the new algorithm BM-AspICU. Seven out of the 8 patients with probable BM-AspICU IPA (and not classified with the AspICU algorithm) had no host factors and no Aspergillus-positive broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) culture. Three patients were non-classifiable with any of the two algorithms, because they did not have any microbial criteria during the course of the infection, and diagnosis of proven aspergillosis was done using autopsy samples. CONCLUSION: Inclusion of biomarkers could be effective to identify probable IPA in the ICU population. A prospective study is needed to validate the routine application of the BM-AspICU algorithm in the ICU population.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA