Unlike CD4+ T-cell help, CD28 costimulation is necessary for effective primary CD8+ T-cell influenza-specific immunity.

The importance of costimulation on CD4(+) T cells has been well documented. However, primary CTLs against many infections including influenza can be generated in the absence of CD4(+) T-cell help. The role of costimulation under such "helpless" circumstances is not fully elucidated. Here, we investigated such a role for CD28 using CTLA4Ig transgenic (Tg) mice. To ensure valid comparison across the genotypes, we showed that all mice had similar naïve precursor frequencies and similar peak viral loads. In the absence of help, viral clearance was significantly reduced in CTLA4Ig Tg mice compared with WT mice. CD44(+) BrdU(+) influenza-specific CD8(+) T cells were diminished in CTLA4Ig Tg mice at days 5 and 8 postinfection. Adoptive transfer of ovalbumin-specific transgenic CD8(+) T cells (OT-I)-I cells into WT or CTLA4Ig Tg mice revealed that loss of CD28 costimulation resulted in impairment in OT-I cell division. As shown previously, neither viral clearance nor the generation of influenza-specific CD8(+) T cells was affected by the absence of CD4(+) T cells alone. In contrast, both were markedly impaired by CD28 blockade of "helpless" CD8(+) T cells. We suggest that direct CD28 costimulation of CD8(+) T cells is more critical in their priming during primary influenza infection than previously appreciated.

Influenza-induced, helper-independent CD8+ T cell responses use CD40 costimulation at the late phase of the primary response.

The helper-dependent pathway of priming CD8(+) T cells involves "licensing" of DCs by CD40L on CD4(+) T cells. The helper-independent ("helpless") pathways elicited by many viruses, including influenza, are less widely understood. We have postulated that CD40L can be up-regulated on DCs by such viruses, and this promotes priming of CD8(+) T cells via CD40. Most studies on costimulation have been performed in the presence of CD4(+) T cells, and so the role of CD40L costimulation under helpless circumstances has not been fully elucidated. Here, we investigated such a role for CD40L using CD40L KO mice. Although the number of influenza-specific CD8(+) T cells was unaffected by the absence of CD4(+) T cells, it was markedly decreased in the absence of CD40L. Proliferation (the number of CD44(+)BrdU(+) influenza-specific CD8(+) T cells) in the primary response was diminished in CD40L KO mice at Day 8 but not at Day 5 after infection. MLR studies indicated that CD40L expression on DCs was critical for CD8(+) T cell activation. Adoptive transfer of CD40 KO CD8(+) T cells compared with WT cells confirmed that CD40 on such cells was critical for the generation of primary anti-influenza CD8(+) T cell responses. The late effect also corresponded with the late expression of CD40 by influenza-specific CD8(+) T cells. We suggest that costimulation via CD40L on DCs and CD40 on CD8(+) T cells is important in optimizing primary CD8(+) T cell responses during influenza infection.