Characterization of nuclear foci-targeting of Luman/CREB3 recruitment factor (LRF/CREBRF) and its potential role in inhibition of herpes simplex virus-1 replication.

The recently identified Luman/CREB3-binding partner LRF (Luman/CREB3 recruitment factor) was shown to localize to discrete sub-nuclear foci. Luman is implicated in herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) latency/reactivation and the unfolded protein response (UPR) pathway; therefore, we sought to characterize the formation of the LRF nuclear foci in the context of cellular signaling and HSV-1 replication. Here, we mapped the nuclear foci-targeting sequence to the central region containing the first leucine zipper (a.a.415-519), and found that the integrity of the whole region appears essential for LRF foci formation. LRF foci integrity was unaffected by inhibition of cellular DNA replication and translation, however, disruption of transcription resulted in altered LRF localization. When compared to other cellular and viral foci LRF co-localized with the nuclear receptor co-activator GRIP1, while the HSV-1 gene products ICP4, ICP27 and VP13/14 disrupted foci formation to varying degrees. Interestingly, cells over-expressing LRF were resistant to productive HSV-1 infection and this resistance was dependent upon protein targeting and an N-terminal transactivation domain. When LRF knockdown cells were subjected to primary infection, HSV-1 gene expression and progeny virus yield were enhanced by ∼3 fold compared to wildtype cells. Taken together, these results indicate that LRF is a key regulator that may act direct or indirectly as a repressor of essential genes required for productive viral infection.

Luman is capable of binding and activating transcription from the unfolded protein response element.

Luman (or LZIP, CREB3) is a transcription factor with an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-transmembrane domain. Due to its structural similarities with ATF6, it is thought that Luman might also be involved in cellular stress responses. Here we report that Luman can bind and activate transcription from the consensus unfolded protein response element (UPRE). Mutations that disrupted the binding of Luman to the UPREs impaired its ability to activate transcription from these sites. Overexpression of Luman stimulated transcription of EDEM, a downstream effector of the mammalian unfolded protein response involved in ER-associated degradation (ERAD). Unlike ATF6, however, Luman was not activated by proteolytic cleavage in response to endoplasmic reticulum stressors such as tunicamycin and thapsigargin. These results suggest that the activation of ERAD by Luman is likely through a pathway different from the common ER stress response, and that additional factor(s) are required for the activation of this Luman-mediated pathway.