Capecitabine plus paclitaxel versus epirubicin plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer: efficacy and safety results of a randomized, phase III trial by the AGO Breast Cancer Study Group.

Capecitabine/taxane combinations are highly active in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted a randomized, phase III, noninferiority trial comparing capecitabine plus paclitaxel (XP) with epirubicin plus paclitaxel (EP) as first-line therapy for MBC, regarding progression-free survival (PFS) as primary efficacy endpoint. Females who had received no prior chemotherapy for MBC were randomized to six 3-weekly cycles of XP (capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d., days 1-14; paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) 3-h infusion, day 1) or EP (epirubicin 60 mg/m(2) 1-h infusion, day 1; paclitaxel as above). Secondary endpoints included response rate, overall survival, tolerability, and quality of life (QoL). Each arm included 170 patients, most of whom received all six cycles as planned. The difference in means of (logarithmic) PFS times (-0.205) did not meet the pre-defined level for noninferiority (-0.186). However, PFS was similar in the two arms [HR: XP vs. EP: 1.012 (95 % CI 0.785-1.304); median 10.4 months XP vs. 9.2 months EP]. Overall survival was also similar [HR 1.027 (95 % CI 0.740-1.424); median 22.0 vs. 26.1 months], and response rate was 47 % versus 42 %. Both regimens were tolerable: there were more grade 3/4 diarrhea and grade 3 hand-foot syndromes with XP and more grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities with EP. There were no major differences in QoL. Although, noninferiority of XP to EP was formally not proven, first-line XP was active and feasible. XP is a valid first-line alternative to anthracycline/taxane regimens, especially in patients previously treated with adjuvant anthracyclines.

Final results of a phase I/II pilot study of capecitabine with or without vinorelbine after sequential dose-dense epirubicin and paclitaxel in high-risk early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The integration of the non-cross-resistant chemotherapeutic agents capecitabine and vinorelbine into an intensified dose-dense sequential anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimen in high-risk early breast cancer (EBC) could improve efficacy, but this combination was not examined in this context so far. METHODS: Patients with stage II/IIIA EBC (four or more positive lymph nodes) received post-operative intensified dose-dense sequential epirubicin (150 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks) and paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks) with filgrastim and darbepoetin alpha, followed by capecitabine alone (dose levels 1 and 3) or with vinorelbine (dose levels 2 and 4). Capecitabine was given on days 1-14 every 21 days at 1000 or 1250 mg/m2 twice daily (dose levels 1/2 and 3/4, respectively). Vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 was given on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day course (dose levels 2 and 4). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were treated. There was one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at dose level 1. At dose level 2 (capecitabine and vinorelbine), five of 10 patients experienced DLTs. Therefore evaluation of vinorelbine was abandoned and dose level 3 (capecitabine monotherapy) was expanded. Hand-foot syndrome and diarrhoea were dose limiting with capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 twice daily. At 35.2 months' median follow-up, the estimated 3-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were 82% and 91%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of capecitabine monotherapy after sequential dose-dense epirubicin and paclitaxel is feasible in node-positive EBC, while the combination of capecitabine and vinorelbine as used here caused more DLTs.

Prognostic impact of satellite-lymphovascular space involvement in early-stage cervical cancer.

Currently the prognostic value of lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI) in patients with cervical cancer is unclear. We evaluated the prognostic impact of different categories of LVSI on overall survival (OAS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in a Middle-European population of women with surgically staged, early cervical cancer. The records of 281 women with clinically and histologically diagnosed early cervical cancer undergoing primary surgical treatment at the University of Ulm School of Medicine between 1992 and 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. LVSI as determined by hematoxylin-eosin staining was topographically categorized as conjoined-LVSI and satellite-LVSI. The effect of LVSI, tumor stage, lymph node metastases, and histology on OAS and DFS was assessed by Cox regression analyses. Tumor size and nodal status could be confirmed as significant prognostic factors for OAS and DFS in early-stage cervical cancer. While no significant effect of LVSI in general (satellite-LVSI or conjoined-LVSI) on OAS and DFS was calculated, the presence of satellite-LVSI was associated with significant decreased rates of both, OAS and DFS. We propose satellite-LVSI as new risk factor for patients with early-stage cervical cancer, in order to better identify the patients urgently needing adjuvant therapy.

Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.

BACKGROUND: Cervical carcinoma is clinically staged according to the criteria of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can also be used in pretreatment evaluation of tumor extension and size; however, the diagnostic value and the impact on clinical decisions of cross-sectional imaging have been questioned. METHODS: The files of 255 patients with biopsy-proven cervical carcinoma receiving primary surgical treatment at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Ulm University between 1992 and 2003 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had a clinical pelvic examination; additionally, 164 underwent CT, 101 had an MRI, and 90 had both CT and MRI. Surgicopathologic findings were used as the standard of reference. RESULTS: To evaluate detection of parametrial involvement, patients were divided into those with stage IIA or less disease (n = 171; 67%) and those with stage IIB or more disease (n = 84; 33%). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 75%, 66%, and 81% for clinical staging, 59%, 43%, and 71% for CT, and 58%, 52%, and 63% for MRI, respectively. After stratification for palpation, the results with CT and MRI were no better than with palpation (accuracy: CT 61% and 54%, MRI 61% and 56%, respectively). The sensitivity of CT and MRI for detecting lymph node metastasis was also poor (36% and 35%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Clinical examination was better than CT and MRI for pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer.

Up-front tandem high-dose chemotherapy compared with standard chemotherapy with doxorubicin and paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized trial.

PURPOSE: The role of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in metastatic breast cancer remains controversial. Trials with late intensification HDCT have failed to show an advantage in overall survival. This study was initiated to compare up-front tandem HDCT and standard combination therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients without prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomly assigned to standard combination therapy with doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) or double HDCT with cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and etoposide followed by peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation. HDCT was repeated after 6 weeks. Patients were stratified by menopausal and hormone-receptor status. The primary objective was to compare complete response (CR) rates. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were enrolled onto the trial. Intent-to-treat CR rates for patients randomized to HDCT and AT were 12.5% and 11.1%, respectively (P = .84). Objective response rates were 66.7% for patients in the high-dose group and 64.4% for patients in the AT arm (P = .82). In an intent-to-treat analysis, there were no significant differences between the two treatments in median time to progression (HDCT, 11.1 months; AT, 10.6 months; P = .67), duration of response (HDCT, 13.9 months; AT, 14.3 months; P = .98), and overall survival (HDCT, 26.9 months; AT, 23.4 months; P = .60). HDCT was associated with significantly more myelosuppression, infection, diarrhea, stomatitis, and nausea and vomiting, whereas patients treated with AT developed more neurotoxicity. CONCLUSION: This trial failed to show a benefit for up-front tandem HDCT compared with standard combination therapy. HDCT was associated with more acute adverse effects.

Changes in the circulating plasma levels of VEGF and VEGF-D after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer and 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes.

BACKGROUND: The goal of the present study was to investigate the changes in concentration of the important lymph-angiogenesis factors vascular endothelium-derived growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF-D under adjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The blood plasma of a total of 142 patients with breast carcinoma and with 1 to 3 affected lymph nodes was investigated, using the quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay technique, prior to and following chemotherapy, within the framework of a randomized phase III study: the patients received either conventional or dose-intensified chemotherapy. RESULTS: In general, there was a significant reduction in VEGF levels after chemotherapy only in patients with large tumors (T3) (p = 0.043). There was also an almost significant reduction in patients with an overexpression of c-erbB-2 (Dako Score +3, p = 0.052). In contrast, the clearest reduction in VEGF-D occurred in patients with a positive hormone receptor status (p = 0.04) or in patients with a low expression of c-erbB-2 (Dako Score +1, p = 0.05). A significant effect of chemotherapy on VEGF-D was determined only in patients who had a baseline level that was above the normal (conventionel treatment p = 0.005; dose-intensified treatment p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Both VEGF and VEGF-D levels changed after chemotherapy, depending on the patient and tumor characteristics. With respect to changes in the plasma levels of VEGF and VEGF-D, there were no significant differences between dose-intensified and conventional chemotherapy.

Immunotherapy and cancer vaccines in the management of breast cancer.

Besides the traditional therapeutic options, treatment with antibodies specific for the receptor tyrosine kinase HER-2/neu has been established as a standard therapy in the clinical management of advanced breast cancer. Ongoing clinical studies focus on the improvement of application protocols in order to minimize side effects and evaluate the potential therapeutic benefit of anti-HER-2/neu antibodies in combination with conventional chemotherapy. Various similar strategies to target other tumour-associated antigens or proangiogenic factors with inhibitory antibodies are currently investigated in promising preclinical and clinical trials. In addition, research efforts are made to develop procedures to generate tumour-specific cellular immune responses in breast cancer patients. Therapeutic vaccination is, however, still at an early stage of development, despite encouraging results of animal studies. We summarise and discuss vaccination strategies with tumour-specific proteins or peptides, pulsed dendritic cells, and modified tumour cells as well as antibody-based therapeutic concepts to target HER-2/neu, EGF receptor, MUC-1, uPA/uPAR, and VEGF.

Gemcitabine as prolonged infusion and vinorelbine in anthracycline and/or taxane pretreated metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine and vinorelbine are active agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine can result in higher levels of active metabolites compared to shorter administration. This phase II trial was initiated to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine as prolonged infusion in combination with vinorelbine in anthracycline and/or taxane pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had received one prior line of chemotherapy for metastatic disease were treated with gemcitabine (350 mg/m2 as 4 h infusion) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: Of 26 patients enrolled, 84% had received prior anthracycline treatment and 50% prior taxane therapy. In total, one complete and six partial responses were achieved, accounting for an overall response rate of 30.4%. The clinical benefit rate was 47.8%. Median duration of response and median time to progression were 7.3 months and 4.6 months, respectively. Median overall survival was 14.5 months. Although the predominant toxicity was myelosuppression with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 42% of patients, few neutropenic complications resulted. Non-hematological toxicity was generally moderate. Most common non-hematologic toxicities were nausea, vomiting, alopecia, peripheral neuropathy and elevation of liver enzymes. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine as prolonged infusion and vinorelbine are a safe and effective combination treatment in anthracycline and/or taxane pretreated patients. Approximately 47.8% of patients derived clinical benefit from treatment. This regimen represents a therapeutic option for patients receiving second-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Progression of cervical carcinomas is associated with down-regulation of CD9 but strong local re-expression at sites of transendothelial invasion.

PURPOSE AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Lymphovascular space invasion plays a critical role in the progression of cervical cancer and is an indicator of an unfavorable prognosis, even in patients with early-stage disease. Identification and functional characterization of molecules that are predominantly expressed in tumors able to penetrate lymphatic vessels may therefore help to improve the clinical assessment of cervical neoplasias with unclear prognosis. We used immunohistochemical staining to assess expression of the tetraspanin adapter protein CD9 in cervical tumors because inverse correlations with tumor invasiveness, ability to form metastases, and poor clinical outcome have been described for several other tumor types. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We found that CD9, strongly expressed by cells forming the basal layer of normal squamous epithelium of the cervix, is down-regulated in most invasive cervical carcinomas (correlation with stage, P = 0.015) but apparently re-expressed at distinct regions during tumor progression. Tumor sites with pronounced localized expression of CD9 (CD9 hotspots) include cones growing into blood or lymphatic vessels, pointing to a functional role of CD9 in transendothelial migration as a crucial step in the formation of lymph node metastases. Remarkably, CD9 hotspots were found to be a highly significant (P < 10(-5)) indicator of lymphangiosis: they were observed in 15 of 18 cases with histopathologically confirmed lymphangiosis compared with 4 of 26 other cervical carcinomas. We postulate, therefore, that clusters of tumor cells characterized by strong expression of CD9 may be useful as an indicator of high risk of recurrence in early-stage cervical cancer, providing a basis for clinical decisions in favor of additional treatment.

Receptor for hyaluronan acid-mediated motility (RHAMM) is a new immunogenic leukemia-associated antigen in acute and chronic myeloid leukemia.

OBJECTIVE: Identification of leukemia-associated antigens (LAA) eliciting an immune response in patients is a prerequisite for specific immunotherapy of leukemias. To identify new LAA, we used the method of serologic screening of cDNA expression libraries (SEREX). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A SEREX library of the cell line K562 was subjected to allogeneic screening with sera from patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) vs sera from healthy volunteers. RESULTS: The receptor for hyaluronan acid-mediated motility (RHAMM) involved in cell growth and metastasis was identified as a new LAA. Serologic responses to RHAMM were observed in patients with AML (42%), CML (31%), melanoma (83%), renal cell carcinoma (40%), breast cancer (67%), and ovarian carcinoma (50%), but not in HV or patients with autoimmune diseases. RHAMM mRNA was detectable in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMN) of 60% of newly diagnosed AML patients. Western blotting stained positive for RHAMM protein in 70% of AML patients. mRNA expression of RHAMM also was found in patients with CML (40%), renal cell carcinoma (73%), breast carcinoma (60%), and ovarian carcinoma (50%). In melanoma, RHAMM mRNA expression was detected in metastases (80%) but not in primary tumors. RHAMM is differentially expressed: significant mRNA expression was not found in normal tissues, except from testis, placenta, and thymus, or in PBMN- and CD34-separated cell samples of healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: RHAMM is an immunogenic antigen in leukemias and solid tumors and might be a potential target structure for cellular immunotherapies and antibody therapies.

Trastuzumab in the treatment of elderly patients with early breast cancer: Results from an observational study in Germany.

BACKGROUND: In elderly patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, few data on efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant trastuzumab treatment exists since older patients were in general excluded from large randomized studies. This prospective observational study aimed to confirm the beneficial findings from pivotal trials in age cohorts ≥65 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were no restrictions for recruitment with respect to age or concomitant/sequential adjuvant medication. Long-term relapse/survival status of the patients was assessed once a year. RESULTS: Among the 3940 evaluable patients enrolled between 2006 and 2012 at 339 institutions, 507 were aged between 65 and 69 years, with another 507 patients ≥70 years. Elderly patients suffered from significantly more advanced primary tumors. Preceding or concomitant chemotherapy showed decreasing aggressiveness with patient's age. Trastuzumab treatment was stopped prematurely in only 11% of the elderly, but more often than in younger patients (p=0.0008). With 453 events hitherto reported, elderly patients did not exhibit an inferior relapse-free survival when adjusted for other relevant prognostic factors (hazard ratio: 1.01 per year; p=0.24). Three-year overall survival was significantly lower in the population older than 64 years than in younger patients (94.2% vs. 96.8%, p=0.0011). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, our population of elderly patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab is the largest analyzed so far. The beneficial long-term results were comparable to those in the younger cohorts. Although the risk of cardiotoxicity increased significantly with age, it also remained manageable in older patients. Thus, chronological age alone should not preclude HER2 antibody treatment.

Effect of primary anthracycline-based chemotherapy on disseminated tumor cells in locally advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The leading cause of death from epithelial cancer is metastatic tumor relapse due to early dissemination of tumor cells. In this study we investigated the elimination rate of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow and the clinical response under primary chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients underwent primary anthracycline-containing chemotherapy for breast cancer. For immunocytochemical tumor cell detection in bone marrow, the monoclonal antibody 5D3 was used. RESULTS: At time of diagnosis, 10/30 (33%) patients had cytokeratin-positive tumor cells in bone marrow. After primary and chemotherapy, 8/30 (27%) patients still tested positive. Clinical complete response (cCR) was observed in 5/30 (17%) patients partial response (cPR) in 12/30 (40%) patients, resulting in an overall rate of clinical response to primary chemotherapy in 57%. CONCLUSION: Primary chemotherapy in breast cancer is effective regarding the reduction of tumor size but seems incapable of reducing the burden of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow.

Gemcitabine and mitoxantrone in metastatic breast cancer: a phase-I-study.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine and mitoxantrone are active agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Due to different modes of action and a favorable toxicity profile they are suitable for combination therapy. This phase I trial was initiated to determine the optimal doses for the combination in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Secondary objectives included the evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with gemcitabine (1000-1400 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8 and 15 and mitoxantrone (10-14 mg/m(2)) on day 8. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks for a maximum of 8 cycles. Doses were assigned at registration according to the escalation scheme. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received a total of 93 cycles at 5 different dose levels. The maximum tolerated doses were 1200 mg/m(2) gemcitabine and 14 mg/m(2) mitoxantrone with grade 4 neutropenia being the dose limiting toxicity. Recommended phase II doses, however, are gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2) and mitoxantrone 12 mg/m(2) based on a similar median dose intensity and a more favorable toxicity profile. Predominant toxicity was myelosuppression. Most common non-hematological toxicities were nausea, vomiting, alopecia and elevation of liver enzymes. Twenty-one patients were assessable for response. Four patients achieved a partial response accounting for an overall response rate of 19%. In addition, 12 patients (57%) had stable disease and 5 patients (24%) failed to response to the treatment. Median duration of response and duration of clinical benefit were 14 and 9 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this phase I study of gemcitabine and mitoxantrone, the DLT was neutropenia. Recommended phase II doses are gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2) and mitoxantrone 12 mg/m(2).

Primary chemotherapy with gemcitabine, liposomal doxorubicin and docetaxel in patients with locally advanced breast cancer: results of a phase I trial.

The primary objective was to determine the optimal doses for gemcitabine (prolonged infusion), liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet) and docetaxel as primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the regimen. Patients (n=19) with histologically confirmed stage II or III breast cancer were treated with liposomal doxorubicin (50-60 mg/m2) and docetaxel (60-75 mg/m2) on day 1, and gemcitabine as 4-h infusion (350-400 mg/m2) on day 4. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. The maximum tolerated doses were gemcitabine 350 mg/m2, liposomal doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities were stomatitis, diarrhea and infection. The predominant hematologic toxicity was mild-to-moderate myelosuppression with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 20% of cycles. Non-hematologic toxicity was generally mild, with no grade 4 toxicities being observed. Predominant non-hematologic toxicity was stomatitis, which occurred in 95% of patients. Grade 3 toxicities were reported for stomatitis, nausea, diarrhea, infection and constipation. No cases of cardiac, renal, pulmonary or neurotoxicity were observed. The clinical response rate was 83% and histologically confirmed, clinically complete remissions occurred in two patients (11%). We conclude that the combination of gemcitabine (prolonged infusion), liposomal doxorubicin and docetaxel is safe and highly effective in patients with locally advanced breast cancer as defined by maximum tolerated doses. The evaluated schedule is suitable for phase II studies.

Molecular biology of cervical cancer and its precursors.

There is strong clinical and experimental evidence that the human papilloma virus (HPV) plays a central role in the development and growth of cervical cancer. However, it is known that the carcinogenesis is a multistep process. Changes in the cytogenetic equilibrium, such as chromosomal imbalances, allelic loss, and structural aberrations, happen during the transformation from normal epithelium to cervical cancer. Numerous studies support the hypothesis that HPV infection is associated with development of malignant or pre-malignant changes of the lower genital tract. However, there is little clinical evidence that HPV detection would allow prediction of development of cervical cancer. Regarding the "human aspect" of carcinogenesis, there are efforts to detect markers that predict the risk of progression.