An Evaluation of Medication Reconciliation in an Outpatient Nephrology Clinic.

Background: Accreditation Canada recognizes medication reconciliation as a key required organizational practice (ROP) to enhance patient safety. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) carry a high risk for adverse drug events due to multiple co-morbidities, using many medications, and being cared for by many practitioners. Data evaluating the benefits of ambulatory medication reconciliation (AmbMR) in patients with advanced CKD is limited. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated types and rates of medication discrepancies and their potential index for patient harm using the Cornish classification system in a cohort of consecutive non-dialysis-dependent CKD stage 5 patients who received AmbMR. Results: AmbMR was conducted 225 times on 115 patients during the study period. One hundred eighty medication discrepancies were identified. The most common discrepancy identified was incorrect drug followed by discrepant dose, discrepant frequency, and drug omission. Sixty-three percent of discrepancies were classified as unlikely to cause patient discomfort or clinical deterioration, 36% were classified as likely to cause moderate harm, and one percent was classified as potential to cause serious harm. Conclusion: Medication discrepancies are common in patients with advanced CKD. Nearly a quarter of patients may experience moderate discomfort or clinical deterioration from discrepancies. Our study showed that in patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD stage 5, the risk of patient harm associated with medication discrepancies can be reduced by conducting AmbMR.

Piloting an outpatient policy for funding drugs and their administration in rheumatology.

To ensure appropriate use of outpatient clinic resources, an inter-professional group drafted a policy for an equitable, consistent process requiring the use of patients' drug insurance. The authors' organization remains the payer of last resort. A pilot tested and further informed this policy by targeting rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis. Staff were in-serviced, resources were arranged and patients were informed. Thirty-nine pilot patients (87%) had drug insurance, resulting in a savings of $304,700. Fifty-one hospital infusions were administered in private clinics, avoiding $19,125 in clinic costs. Patient and staff/stakeholder satisfaction surveys provided valuable feedback. Lessons learned will be applied to the policy and related processes in preparation for an organizational-wide implementation.

Clinical benefits and economic impact of post-surgical care provided by pharmacists in a Canadian hospital.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical pharmacists improve the quality of patient care by reducing adverse drug events (ADEs), length of stay and mortality. This impact is currently not well described in surgery. The objective was to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes after clinical pharmacist services were added to two general surgical wards in an adult hospital. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study. All clinical interventions to resolve drug therapy problems were documented and assessed for severity, value and the probability of preventing an ADE. Cost avoidance was calculated using two methods: by avoiding additional days in hospital (CA$3593/ADE) or additional hospital costs ($7215/ADE). Two clinical pharmacy specialists and the surgical care pharmacist independently categorized the interventions; disagreements were resolved by consensus. KEY FINDINGS: The pharmacists made 1097 interventions in 6 months with a 98% acceptance rate by surgical staff. Half of the interventions were rated significant for severity (561, 51.1%) and value (559, 51.0%). One-quarter of the interventions had a 40% or greater probability of preventing an ADE (270, 24.6%). Cost avoidance was estimated to be $0.68-1.36 million or $617-1239 per intervention. Pharmacists avoided an additional 867 days in the hospital for surgical patients. CONCLUSION: The pharmacist's role in the management of the drug therapy needs of the post-surgical patient has the potential to improve clinical and patient outcomes and avoid healthcare costs. The inclusion of clinical pharmacists in surgical wards may result in $7 in savings for every $1 invested.