Regimens for eradicating early Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in children do not promote antibiotic resistance in this organism.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to address the concern that intensive regimens to eradicate early Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in patients with cystic fibrosis may lead to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant isolates. METHODS: Data was analysed retrospectively over a 10 year period at the Leeds Regional Paediatric Cystic Fibrosis Centre. All patients with first-ever isolation of P. aeruginosa who successfully completed an eradication regimen were included. Antibiotic sensitivities of P. aeruginosa were compared between initial and subsequent re-isolations in patients where eradication was successful and in those where treatment had failed. RESULTS: Forty one patients with first acquisitions for P. aeruginosa and who completed eradication treatment were identified. Eradication treatments consisted of oral, intravenous, nebulised antibiotics or a combination of these. The antibiotic sensitivity of P. aeruginosa in first growths was high and remained so on subsequent re-isolations. A repeated measures logistic model found no significant difference with time of isolation. There was no statistically significant difference in antibiotic sensitivity between P. aeruginosa isolated after successful and failed eradication. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated intensive regimens for P. aeruginosa eradication did not result in a significant increase in overall antibiotic resistance between initial and subsequent growths of this organism over the period of this study.

Clinical indications and scanning protocols for chest CT in children with cystic fibrosis: a survey of UK tertiary centres.

OBJECTIVES: Chest CT is increasingly used to monitor disease progression in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) but there is no national guideline regarding its use. Our objective was to assess the indications for undertaking chest CT and the protocols used to obtain scans. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: An electronic questionnaire was developed to assess clinicians views on chest CT in children with CF. It included general questions on perceived benefits and specific questions about its role in five clinical scenarios. It was sent to the clinical lead in 27 UK paediatric CF centres. A separate questionnaire was developed to collect the technical details of chest CT in children with CF. It was sent to the superintendent radiographer at each of the 27 centres. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 27 (100%) clinical leads and 22 (81%) superintendent radiographers. 93% clinicians reported chest CT useful in monitoring disease progression and 70% said it frequently altered management. Only 5 (19%) undertook routine scans. To aid diagnosis, 81% performed chest CT in non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease and 15% in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. There was wide variation in the perceived need for and/or timing of chest CT in children with reduced lung function with no benefit from intravenous antibiotics, new cystic changes on chest X-ray, and lobar collapse. The radiographers reported using a mixture of helical (volumetric) and axial scans depending on the clinical question, the age and the cooperation of the child. When indicated, 6 (27%) used sedation and 16 (73%) general anaesthetic. Only 1 (5%) used intravenous contrast routinely and 3 (14%) obtained expiratory images routinely. CONCLUSIONS: There is marked variation in the use of chest CT in children with CF and in the scan protocols. The lack of a national guideline is likely to be contributing to this lack of standardisation.

Radiation dose from common radiological investigations and cumulative exposure in children with cystic fibrosis: an observational study from a single UK centre.

OBJECTIVES: Cumulative radiation exposure is associated with increased risk of malignancy. This is important in cystic fibrosis (CF) as frequent imaging is required to monitor disease progression and diagnose complications. Previous estimates of cumulative radiation are outdated as the imaging was performed on older equipment likely to deliver higher radiation. Our objectives were to determine the radiation dose delivered to children during common radiological investigations using modern equipment and to identify the number of such investigations performed in a cohort of children with CF to calculate their cumulative radiation exposure. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data including age at investigation and radiation exposure measured as estimated effective dose (EED) were collected on 2827 radiological studies performed on children at one UK paediatric centre. These were combined with the details of all radiological investigations performed on 65 children with CF attending the same centre to enable calculation of each child's cumulative radiation exposure. RESULTS: The mean EED for the common radiological investigations varied according to age. The range was 0.01-0.02 mSv for chest X-rays, 0.03-0.11 mSv for abdominal X-rays, 0.57-1.69 mSv for CT chest, 2.9-3.9 mSv for abdominal and pelvic CT, 0.20-0.21 mSv for sinus CT and 0.15-0.52 mSv for fluoroscopy-guided procedures. The mean EED was three to five times higher for helical compared with axial chest CT scans. The mean annual cumulative EED for our cohort of children with CF was 0.15 mSv/year with an estimated cumulative paediatric lifetime EED (0-18 years) of 3.5 mSv. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides up-to-date estimations of the radiation exposure when using common radiological investigations. These doses and the estimates of cumulative radiation exposure in children with CF are lower than previously reported. This reflects the reduced EED associated with modern equipment and the use of age-specific scanning protocols.