Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy for borderline resectable pancreas adenocarcinoma: influence of vascular margin status and type of chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The influence of chemotherapy type and vascular margin status after sequential chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on BRPC patients treated with chemotherapy and 5-fraction SBRT from 2009 to 2021. Surgical outcomes and SBRT-related toxicity were reported. Clinical outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier with log rank comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 303 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT to a median dose of 40 Gy prescribed to the tumor-vessel interface and median dose of 32.4 Gyto 95% of the gross tumor volume. One hundred and sixty-nine patients (56%) were resected and benefited from improved median OS (41.1 vs 15.5 months, P < 0.001). Close/positive vascular margins were not associated with worse OS or FFLRF. Type of neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not influence OS for resected patients, but FOLFIRINOX was associated with improved median OS in unresected patients (18.2 vs 13.1 months, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: For BRPC, the effect of a positive or close vascular margin may be mitigated by neoadjuvant therapy. Shorter duration neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as the optimal biological effective dose of radiotherapy should be prospectively explored.

Patient-caregiver dyads in pancreatic cancer: identification of patient and caregiver factors associated with caregiver well-being.

We aimed to examine the psychosocial well-being in the pancreas cancer patient-caregiver dyad, and determine patient and caregiver characteristics that predict caregiver distress. This was a cross-sectional, observational study. Demographics and caregiving characteristics were gathered from patients and caregivers. Caregivers completed validated instruments investigating anxiety, depression, perceived stress and caregiver burden. Over a period of eleven months, 128 patient-caregiver dyads were enrolled. Patient and caregiver distress scores were not associated with patient clinical disease burden. Patient distress was a significant predictor of concurrent caregiver distress, anxiety, depression, and perceived burden. Younger caregivers were also associated with higher caregiver anxiety and perceived burden. Additionally, number of caregiving activities and caregiver overall health status were predictors of concurrent caregiver depression and perceived stress. Certain pancreatic cancer patient and caregiver variables may negatively impact the well-being of caregivers. Future efforts should focus on development and implementation of comprehensive caregiver support programs for those at risk for psychosocial distress.

The Impact of Socioeconomic Deprivation on Clinical Outcomes for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma at a High-volume Cancer Center: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a granular measure of SED on pancreatic surgical and cancer-related outcomes at a high-volume cancer center that employs a standardized clinic pathway. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prior research has shown that low socioeconomic status leads to less treatment and worse outcomes for PDAC. However, these studies employed inconsistent definitions and categorizations of socioeconomic status, aggregated individual socioeconomic data using large geographic areas, and lacked detailed clinicopathologic variables. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1552 PDAC patients between 2008 and 2015. Patients were stratified using the area deprivation index, a validated dataset that ranks census block groups based on SED. Multivariable models were used in the curative surgery cohort to predict the impact of SED on (1) grade 3/4 Clavien-Dindo complications, (2) initiation of adjuvant therapy, (3) completion of adjuvant therapy, and (4) overall survival. RESULTS: Patients from high SED neighborhoods constituted 29.9% of the cohort. Median overall survival was 28 months. The rate of Clavien-Dindo grade 3/4 complications was 14.2% and completion of adjuvant therapy was 65.6%. There was no evidence that SED impacted surgical evaluation, receipt of curative-intent surgery, postoperative complications, receipt of adjuvant therapy or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Although nearly one-quarter of curative-intent surgery patients were from high SED neighborhoods, this factor was not associated with measures of treatment quality or survival. These observations suggest that treatment at a high-volume cancer center employing a standardized clinical pathway may in part address socioeconomic disparities in pancreatic cancer.

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, not platelet to lymphocyte or lymphocyte to monocyte ratio, is predictive of patient survival after resection of early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: NLR, PLR, and LMR have been associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) survival. Prognostic value and optimal cutpoints were evaluated to identify underlying significance in surgical PDAC patients. METHODS: NLR, PLR, and LMR preoperative values were available for 277 PDAC patients who underwent resection between 2007 and 2015. OS, RFS, and survival probability estimates were calculated by univariate, multivariable, and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Continuous and dichotomized ratio analysis determined best-fit cutpoints and assessed ratio components to determine primary drivers. RESULTS: Elevated NLR and PLR and decreased LMR represented 14%, 50%, and 50% of the cohort, respectively. OS (P = .002) and RFS (P = .003) were significantly decreased in resected PDAC patients with NLR ≥5 compared to those with NLR < 5. Optimal prognostic OS and RFS cutpoints for NLR, PLR, and LMR were 4.8, 192.6, and 1.7, respectively. Lymphocytes alone were the primary prognostic driver of NLR, demonstrating identical survival to NLR. CONCLUSIONS: NLR is a significant predictor of OS and RFS, with lymphocytes alone as its primary driver; we identified optimal cutpoints that may direct future investigation of their prognostic value. This study contributes to the growing evidence of immune system influence on outcomes in early-stage pancreatic cancer.

Comparison of imaging modalities for measuring the diameter of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are pre-malignant pancreatic cysts detected by imaging. Cyst size is one of many features evaluated on computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) to help guide IPMN management. Our objective was to determine which imaging modality best predicts pathological cyst size. METHODS: We analyzed records for 57 IPMN cases surgically treated at Moffitt Cancer Center from 2008 to 2016 for whom pre-operative CT, MRI, and EUS IPMN cyst size and post-operative pathological cyst size values were available. Long axis cyst diameter measurements were compared to each other and corresponding pathological cyst measurements using within-subjects ANOVA, Bland-Altman analysis, and linear regression. Consensus measurements were also performed on CT and MRI images. RESULTS: Cyst size measured via CT and MRI overestimated pathological size by 0.33 cm and 0.27 cm, respectively, whereas EUS underestimated pathological size by 0.05 cm and had the narrowest 95% limit of agreement (LOA). Among pathologically-confirmed cysts <3 cm, MRI overestimated pathological size by 0.30 cm (P = 0.049) and had the widest LOA, followed by EUS and CT. Among cysts ≥3 cm, EUS underestimated pathological size by 0.35 cm (P = 0.059) and MRI and CT overestimated pathological size by 0.23 cm and 0.51 cm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this small retrospective study, EUS cyst size measurements correlated best with pathologic specimens compared to CT and MRI, especially for cysts < 3 cm. Larger prospective studies are needed to determine which imaging modalities are best to risk-stratify IPMNs and guide surgical versus. Non-surgical management.

Outcomes of Gastric Resection in the Establishment of a Comprehensive Oncologic Robotic Program.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted gastrectomy is increasingly utilized for the treatment of gastric malignancies. However, the benefits of robotic surgery have been questioned. This study describes short-term outcomes in the establishment of a comprehensive robotic program for gastric malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent robotic-assisted gastric resections between 2013 and 2018 were studied. Preoperative measures and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Finally we studied and analyzed robotic and open gastrectomy for the management of gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) at the same institution between 2000 and 2018 for quality benchmarking. RESULTS: Forty six patients (pts.) underwent robotic-assisted gastric resections. 26 (56.5%) were male, with a median age of 62 y (range: 29-87). Pathology included GC, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, neuroendocrine tumors, metastatic lesions, and benign processes. 19 pts. underwent total gastrectomy, 16 distal gastrectomy, four subtotal gastrectomy, and seven wedge resection. Pts. undergoing distal gastrectomy and wedge resection experienced shorter operative times and length of stay than total gastrectomy (P < 0.01; P < 0.01). Four operations (8.8%) were converted to open and 13 pts (28.3%) had postoperative complications, including an 8.7% readmission rate. Median lymph nodes retrieved during total, subtotal, and distal gastrectomy were 20 (13-46), 12.5 (0-26), and 16.5 (0-34), respectively. All pts. underwent margin negative resection. Median follow-up for GC was 21 mo, and 60% of pts. received adjuvant therapy at a median of 59d (range: 23-106). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic gastrectomy is a feasible alternative to open gastrectomy. Our results will help establish benchmarks to improve perioperative outcomes, especially length of stay and time to initiation of therapy.

Cancer outcomes are independent of preoperative CA 19-9 in anatomically resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Current guidelines recommend neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with anatomically resectable tumors but elevated CA 19-9. However, this recommendation is based on data from anatomically resectable and borderline resectable PDAC patients. Therefore, we analyzed the association of preoperative CA 19-9 with oncologic outcomes in a cohort of anatomically resectable PDAC patients. METHODS: A single-institution PDAC database from 2007 to 2015 included patients who underwent guideline-based staging and were anatomically resectable. Patients with bilirubin above 1.5 after decompression, nonsecretors of CA 19-9, and borderline resectable patients were excluded. Statistical analysis included frequency testing and regression modeling for recurrence and survival. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four PDAC patients were identified; 16 (11.1%) had elevated preoperative CA 19-9 ≥ 1000. A CA 19-9 level ≥1000 was not associated with demographic, clinical, or pathological factors. After adjustment for potential confounders, CA 19-9 levels (continuous, median, 500 U/mL, or 1000 U/mL cut-offs) were not associated with recurrence or overall survival (OS). CONCLUSIONS: Although guidelines recommend CA 19-9 to determine the management of anatomically resectable PDAC patients, CA 19-9 was not associated with recurrence or OS in this cohort. Our findings do not suggest that CA 19-9 alone should determine the PDAC treatment strategy.

Completion of adjuvant therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). It is estimated that only 40-80% eligible patients initiate intended adjuvant chemotherapy. Completion rates are largely unknown. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of outcomes of patients with resected PDAC over an 8-year period at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) was performed. RESULTS: From a total of 309 patients, 299 were included for further analysis. 242 (81%) initiated adjuvant therapy (AT) and 195 (65%) completed the intended course. The median time-to-initiation of AT was 53 days (7.6 weeks). The most common reasons for early discontinuation of AT (n = 47) were toxicity (n = 29), disease recurrence (n = 9), patient decision (n = 4), unrelated comorbidities (n = 3), and death (n = 1). Completion of AT was an independent predictor of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) on multivariable analysis (OS: HR 0.41, CI 0.27-0.61, p < 0.001; RFS: HR 0.52, CI 0.36-0.76, p < 0.001). Factors associated with early termination of AT were vascular resection (OR 0.29, CI 0.13-0.67, p = 0.004) and administration of AT with local oncologist as opposed to MCC (OR 0.41, CI 0.21-0.82, p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Completion of AT is associated with improved survival in patients with resected PDAC. Factors associated with an inability to complete AT include vascular resection and administration of AT with local care team in the patient's community.

Endoscopic ultrasonography complements computed tomography in predicting portal or superior mesenteric vein resection in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend computed tomographic (CT) scans for vascular staging of patients with pancreatic carcinoma; however, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in these patients is not required and its utility in combination with CT scan is less well-defined. The purpose of this study is to explore the utility of EUS in addition to CT in identifying patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma (BRPC). METHODS: We reviewed our database of patients with BRPC who went to surgery with curative intent. Inclusion criteria were preoperative staging with CT scan and EUS, completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and surgical resection. RESULTS: We identified 62 patients (average age of 65 ± 9 years, 60% male); 97% of patients underwent R0 resections. We found that 29% of patients were classified as BRPC by EUS alone, 23% by CT alone, and 48% by both modalities. Of 34 patients who required vein resection, EUS alone preoperatively identified 88% of these patients while CT alone identified 67%. EUS identified 11 patients who required vein resection that CT did not identify as BRPC, whereas CT identified 4 patients that EUS did not identify as BRPC. On multivariate analysis, EUS was associated with vein resection (P < 0.02), but CT scan findings, tumor size, and CA19-9 values were not associated (each P > 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: EUS complemented CT in identifying BRPC patients requiring vein resection, with nearly one-third of patients identified with EUS alone, supporting EUS use in addition to CT scan for vascular staging of patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

Predictors and survival for pathologic tumor response grade in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with induction chemotherapy and neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy response correlates with survival in multiple gastrointestinal malignancies. To potentially augment neoadjuvant response for pancreas adenocarcinoma, we intensified treatment with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) following multi-agent chemotherapy. Using this regimen, we analyzed whether the College of American Pathology (CAP) tumor regression grade (TRG) at pancreatectomy correlated with established response biomarkers and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced (LAPC) pancreatic cancer patients treated according to our institutional clinical pathway who underwent surgical resection with reported TRG (n = 81, median follow-up after surgery 24.2 months). Patients had baseline CA19-9, computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound, and FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT then underwent multi-agent chemotherapy (79% with three cycles of gemcitabine, docetaxel and capecitabine) followed by 5-fraction SBRT. They then underwent restaging CT, PET/CT and CA19-9. Overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival were estimated and compared by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. Univariate ordinal logistic regression correlated TRG with baseline, restaging and change in CA19-9 and the PET maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). RESULTS: Restaging level and decrease in CA19-9 correlated with improved TRG (p = .02 for both) as did restaging SUVmax (p < .01), yet there was no TRG correlation with decrease in SUVmax (p = .10) or CT response (p = .30). The TRG groups had similar OS and PFS except the TRG 0 (complete response) group. Compared to partial response levels (TRG 1-3, median OS 33.9 months, median PFS 13.0 months), the six (7%) patients with TRG 0 had no deaths (p = .05) and only one progression (p = .03). A group of 10 (12%) TRG 1 patients with only residual isolated tumor cells had similar outcomes to the other TRG 1-3 patients. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative PET-CT and CA19-9 response correlate with histopathologic tumor regression. Patients with complete pathologic response have superior outcomes, suggesting a rationale for intensification and personalization of neoadjuvant therapy in BRPC and LAPC.

Patterns of recurrence and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent pancreatectomy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with high grade dysplasia: implications for surveillance and future management guidelines.

BACKGROUND: While intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) are thought to represent non-invasive, high-risk lesions, its natural history following resection is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective review of HGD-IPMN patients (1999-2015) was performed. Recurrence patterns and clinical outcomes following pancreatectomy were analyzed and the indications for surgery were explored based on current guidelines. RESULTS: HGD was diagnosed in 100 of 314 patients (32%) following pancreatectomy for IPMN. IPMNs were classified as main duct, branch duct, or mixed in 15, 58 and 27 patients, respectively. Following resection, 25 patients had low-risk residual disease in the remnant pancreas. With a median follow-up of 35 months (range 1-129), 9 patients developed progressive or recurrent disease, 4 of whom underwent additional pancreatectomy. Three patients developed invasive adenocarcinoma. Median time to recurrence was 15 months (range 7-72). Based on the management algorithm from the international consensus guidelines, resection was indicated in 76 patients (76%). Other indications for surgery included mixed-duct IPMN(13), increased cyst size(7) and other(4). CONCLUSION: The prognosis of HGD-IPMN following resection is good; however, HGD may be a marker for developing IPMN recurrence or adenocarcinoma. Current guidelines regarding surgical indications for IPMN can miss a significant number of patients with HGD.

Outcomes of a Clinical Pathway for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Without prospective data establishing a consensus multimodality approach to borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, institutional treatment regimens vary. This study investigated the outcomes of the clinical pathway at the author's institution, which consists of neoadjuvant gemcitabine, docetaxel, capecitabine, and stereotactic radiotherapy followed by surgery. METHODS: The study reviewed all cases that met the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) diagnostic criteria for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 1 January 2006, to 31 December 2013. Pancreatectomy rates, margin status, pathologic response, disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively examined. Standard statistical methods and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Of 121 patients who met criteria, 101 entered the clinical pathway, and 94 (93.1 %) completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Of the 101 patients, 55 (54.5 %) underwent pancreatectomy, with 53 patients (96.4 %) having microscopically negative margins (R0) and 2 patients (3.6 %) having microscopically positive margins (R1). Vascular resection was required for 22 patients (40 %), with rates of 95.5 % for R0 (n = 21) and 4.5 % for R1 (n = 1). A pathologic response to treatment was demonstrated by 45 patients (81.8 %) and a complete response by 10 patients (14.5 %). Pancreatectomy resulted in a median DFS of 23 months (95 % conflidence interval [CI] 14.5-31.5), a median DSS of 43 months (95 % CI, 25.7-60.3), and a median OS of 33 months (95 % CI, 25.0-41.0) versus a median DSS and OS of 14 months (95 % CI, 10.9-17.1) for patients without pancreatectomy (DSS: P = 3.5 × 10(-13); OS: P = 4.7 × 10(-10)). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated high rates for neoajduvant therapy completion (93.1 %) and pancreatectomy (54.5 %). After pancreatectomy, DSS was significantly improved (43 months), with a pathologic response demonstrated by 81.8 % and a complete response by 14.5 % of the patients. The results support further study of this borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma clinical pathway.

Systematic Review and Case Series Report of Acinar Cell Carcinoma of the Pancreas.

BACKGROUND: Acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas is a rare malignancy representing less than 1% of all pancreatic malignancies. METHODS: We report on a case series of 21 patients with acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas treated at a high-volume quaternary center. A systematic review of the medical literature was performed that described typical therapeutic management approaches for acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas and reported on disease control and survival rates. Data for the case series were obtained from a prospective database. RESULTS: In our systematic review of 6 articles, study patients had a median age of 61 years, 66% were male, 52% had stage I/II disease, and 55% of lesions were located in the pancreatic head. The rates of median survival were approximately 47 months after resection with adjuvant therapy, 38 months for nonmetastatic, locally unresectable disease, and 17 months for metastatic disease treated with chemotherapy. Combination fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens had better rates of disease control than other therapies. Our case series included 21 study patients, 14 of whom required resection and 7 who had metastatic disease. The rates of median survival were 40.2 ± 31.9 months in those who underwent surgery and were treated with adjuvant therapy and 13.8 ± 11.3 months for patients with metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary treatment for acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas should be considered due to the rarity of the disease and its lack of high-level therapeutic data. Progress in the molecular analysis of this tumor may improve outcomes through the use of personalized therapy based on underlying tumor mutations.

Clinicopathologic and survival analysis of resected ampullary adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Ampullary adenocarcinoma (AAC) is a rare neoplasm. We sought to determine the clinicopathologic factors contributing to the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free (RFS) survival. METHODS: Patients (pts) with resected AAC were identified from 1996 to 2015 and reviewed for clinicopathologic factors and correlated with outcome. RESULTS: We identified and evaluated 106 pts diagnosed with AAC. The median age was 70.2 years (range 41-86) and 60 (56.6%) were male. Overall, 105 pts (99.1%) had a pancreaticoduodenectomy. An R0 resection was achieved in 101 (95%) pts. Median follow-up was 19 months with a median OS of 49.3 months. Lymph node metastasis and poorly differentiated tumors adversely affected OS on multivariate analysis (MVA). Twenty patients (18.9%) developed recurrence. The median RFS was 27 months. RFS was adversely affected by lymph node count and metastasis, tumor differentiation, and histological subtype on MVA. Survival was not affected by the addition of adjuvant therapy. Retrieval of ≤12 lymph nodes and lymph node ratio ≥0.10 resulted in worse OS on Kaplan-Meier analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show retrieval of ≤12 nodes, involvement of nodes with AAC, moderately or poorly differentiated tumors, and pancreaticobiliary subtype adversely affected survival, while the use of adjuvant therapy demonstrated no significant benefit. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:170-175. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Familial gastrointestinal stromal tumor syndrome: report of 2 cases with KIT exon 11 mutation.

BACKGROUND: As with cases of sporadic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), familial GIST syndrome arises from mutations in KIT or PDGFRA. Only a few dozen such families have been described in the literature. METHODS: Cases of 2 individuals from 2 different newly described kindreds with familial GIST syndrome were retrospectively reviewed. Pertinent immunohistochemical stains, including CD117, CD34, DOG1, desmin, and S100, were performed. Samples from each case were sent to outside facilities for molecular analysis. A review of the relevant literature was performed and the number of familial GIST syndrome cases reported was updated through July 2014. RESULTS: In case 1, a woman 40 years of age with a family history of GIST presented with abdominal pain and gastrointestinal bleeding. Biopsy of a gastric mass revealed spindle-cell type GIST. Molecular analysis revealed a heterozygous mutation of p.Asp579del in exon 11 of KIT. The patient was placed on imatinib therapy and an initial positive response was demonstrated by imaging. Disease regression was seen on computed tomography, and several GIST tumors were surgically resected. The patient has had stable disease since surgery. In case 2, an asymptomatic woman 29 years of age presented for screening due to a family history of GIST. One small nodule was noted in her stomach and another was noted in the duodenum; both were surgically resected. The patient recovered well following surgery. The GIST in this patient was noted to have similar histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings as case 1. CONCLUSIONS: Imatinib has often been shown to be an effective therapy in both the familial and sporadic forms of GIST. There is no standard protocol for addressing the surveillance of patients with spindle-cell type GIST seen in the setting of familial GIST syndrome and with a p.Asp579del mutation of exon 11 on KIT.

Long-term outcomes of induction chemotherapy and neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiotherapy for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Limited data are available to guide neoadjuvant treatment of borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced (LAPC) pancreatic cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We updated our institutional outcomes with a neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) approach. An IRB-approved analysis was performed of all BRPC and LAPC patients treated with our departmental treatment protocol. After staging, medically fit patients underwent chemotherapy for 2-3 months, with regimen at the discretion of the treating medical oncologist. Patients then received SBRT delivered in five consecutive daily fractions with median total radiation doses of 30 Gy to tumor and 40 Gy dose painted to tumor-vessel interfaces. This was followed by restaging imaging for possible resection. Overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS), and locoregional control (LRC) rates were estimated and compared by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. RESULTS: We identified 159 patients, 110 BRPC and 49 LAPC, with 14.0 months median overall follow-up. The resection and margin negative (R0) rate for BRPC patients who completed neoadjuvant therapy was 51% and 96%, respectively. Estimated median OS was 19.2 months for BRPC patients and 15.0 months for LAPC patients (p = 0.402). Median OS was 34.2 months for surgically resected patients versus 14.0 months for unresected patients (p < 0.001). Five of 21 (24%) LAPC patients receiving FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy underwent R0 resection. In LAPC, FOLFIRINOX recipients underwent R0 resection more often than other chemotherapy recipients (5 of 21 vs. 0 of 28, p = 0.011). There was a trend for improved survival in those resected LAPC patients (p = 0.09). For those not undergoing resection, one year LRC was 78%. Any grade ≥ 3 potentially radiation-related toxicity rate was 7%. CONCLUSIONS: These data underscore the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of neoadjuvant SBRT and chemotherapy for BRPC and LAPC.

Real time ex vivo chemosensitivity assay for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) and xenografts (PDXs) have been extensively studied for drug-screening. However, their usage is limited due to lengthy establishment time, high engraftment failure rates and different tumor microenvironment from original tumors. To overcome the limitations, we developed real time-live tissue sensitivity assay (RT-LTSA) using fresh tumor samples. METHODS: Tissue slices from resected pancreatic cancer samples were placed in 96-well plates, and the slices were treated with chemotherapeutic agents. The correlation between the chemo-sensitivity of tissue slices and each patient's clinical outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: The viability and tumor microenvironment of the tissue slices are well-preserved over 5 days. The drug sensitivity assay results are available within 5 days after tissue collection. While all 4 patients who received RT-LTSA sensitive adjuvant regimens did not develop recurrence, 7 of 8 patients who received resistant adjuvant regimens developed recurrence. We observed significantly improved disease-free survival in the patients who received RT-LTSA sensitive adjuvant regimens (median: not reached versus 10.6 months, P = 0.02) compared with the patient who received resistant regimens. A significant negative correlation between RT-LTSA value and relapse-free survival was observed (Somer's D: -0.58; P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: RT-LTSA which maintains the tumor microenvironment and architecture as found in patients may reflect clinical outcome and could be used as a personalized strategy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Further, studies are warranted to verify the findings.

The impact of age and comorbidity on localized pancreatic cancer outcomes: A US retrospective cohort analysis with implications for surgical centralization.

Introduction: Age and comorbidity are independently associated with worse outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the effect of combined age and comorbidity on PDAC outcomes has rarely been studied. This study assessed the impact of age and comorbidity (CACI) and surgical center volume on PDAC 90-day and overall survival (OS). Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016 to evaluate resected stage I/II PDAC patients. The predictor variable, CACI, combined the Charlson/Deyo comorbidity score with additional points for each decade lived ≥50 years. The outcomes were 90-day mortality and OS. Results: The cohort included 29,571 patients. Ninety-day mortality ranged from 2 % for CACI 0 to 13 % for CACI 6+ patients. There was a negligible difference (1 %) in 90-day mortality between high- and low-volume hospitals for CACI 0-2 patients; however, there was greater difference for CACI 3-5 (5 % vs. 9 %) and CACI 6+ (8 % vs. 15 %). The overall survival for CACI 0-2, 3-5, and 6+ cohorts was 24.1, 19.8, and 16.2 months, respectively. Adjusted overall survival showed a 2.7 and 3.1 month survival benefit for care at high-volume vs. low-volume hospitals for CACI 0-2 and 3-5, respectively. However, there was no OS volume benefit for CACI 6+ patients. Conclusions: Combined age and comorbidity are associated with short- and long-term survival for resected PDAC patients. A protective effect of higher-volume care was more impactful for 90-day mortality for patients with a CACI above 3. A centralization policy based on volume may have greater benefit for older, sicker patients. Key message: Combined comorbidity and age are strongly associated with 90-day mortality and overall survival for resected pancreatic cancer patients. When assessing the impact of age and comorbidity on resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma outcomes, 90-day mortality was 7 % higher (8 % vs. 15 %) for older, sicker patients treated at high-volume vs. low-volume centers but only 1 % (3 % vs. 4 %) for younger, healthier patients.