Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Lancet Oncol ; 17(6): 822-835, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27132212

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fewer than half of the patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are cured. Since the introduction of adjuvant chemotherapy in 2004, no substantial progress has been made in adjuvant treatment. We aimed to assess the efficacy of the MAGE-A3 cancer immunotherapeutic in surgically resected NSCLC. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited patients aged at least 18 years with completely resected stage IB, II, and IIIA MAGE-A3-positive NSCLC who did or did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy from 443 centres in 34 countries (Europe, the Americas, and Asia Pacific). Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive 13 intramuscular injections of recMAGE-A3 with AS15 immunostimulant (MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic) or placebo during 27 months. Randomisation and treatment allocation at the investigator site was done centrally via internet with stratification for chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy. Participants, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were masked to group assignment. A minimisation algorithm accounted for the number of chemotherapy cycles received, disease stage, lymph node sampling procedure, performance status score, and lifetime smoking status. The primary endpoint was broken up into three co-primary objectives: disease-free survival in the overall population, the no-chemotherapy population, and patients with a potentially predictive gene signature. The final analyses included the total treated population (all patients who had received at least one treatment dose). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00480025. FINDINGS: Between Oct 18, 2007, and July 17, 2012, we screened 13 849 patients for MAGE-A3 expression; 12 820 had a valid sample and of these, 4210 (33%) had a MAGE-A3-positive tumour. 2312 of these patients met all eligibility criteria and were randomly assigned to treatment: 1515 received MAGE-A3 and 757 received placebo and 40 were randomly assigned but never started treatment. 784 patients in the MAGE-A3 group also received chemotherapy, as did 392 in the placebo group. Median follow-up was 38·1 months (IQR 27·9-48·4) in the MAGE-A3 group and 39·5 months (27·9-50·4) in the placebo group. In the overall population, median disease-free survival was 60·5 months (95% CI 57·2-not reached) for the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic group and 57·9 months (55·7-not reached) for the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·02, 95% CI 0·89-1·18; p=0·74). Of the patients who did not receive chemotherapy, median disease-free survival was 58·0 months (95% CI 56·6-not reached) in those in the MAGE-A3 group and 56·9 months (44·4-not reached) in the placebo group (HR 0·97, 95% CI 0·80-1·18; p=0·76). Because of the absence of treatment effect, we could not identify a gene signature predictive of clinical benefit to MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic. The frequency of grade 3 or worse adverse events was similar between treatment groups (246 [16%] of 1515 patients in the MAGE-A3 group and 122 [16%] of 757 in the placebo group). The most frequently reported grade 3 or higher adverse events were infections and infestations (37 [2%] in the MAGE-A3 group and 19 [3%] in the placebo group), vascular disorders (30 [2%] vs 17 [3%]), and neoplasm (benign, malignant, and unspecified (29 [2%] vs 16 [2%]). INTERPRETATION: Adjuvant treatment with the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic did not increase disease-free survival compared with placebo in patients with MAGE-A3-positive surgically resected NSCLC. Based on our results, further development of the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic for use in NSCLC has been stopped. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Neoplasias/inmunología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas de Neoplasias/inmunología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antígenos de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/inmunología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inmunología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/inmunología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/metabolismo , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia
2.
bioRxiv ; 2020 Sep 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32935095

RESUMEN

SARS-CoV-2 primarily infects cells at mucosal surfaces. Serum neutralizing antibody responses are variable and generally low in individuals that suffer mild forms of the illness. Although potent IgG antibodies can neutralize the virus, less is known about secretory antibodies such as IgA that might impact the initial viral spread and transmissibility from the mucosa. Here we characterize the IgA response to SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of 149 individuals. IgA responses in plasma generally correlate with IgG responses and clones of IgM, IgG and IgA producing B cells that are derived from common progenitors are evident. Plasma IgA monomers are 2-fold less potent than IgG equivalents. However, IgA dimers, the primary form in the nasopharynx, are on average 15 times more potent than IgA monomers. Thus, secretory IgA responses may be particularly valuable for protection against SARS-CoV-2 and for vaccine efficacy.

3.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 8(2): 108-352, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29438602

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR). METHODS: Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. RESULTS: The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR. CONCLUSION: This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding.


Asunto(s)
Rinitis Alérgica/diagnóstico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Alérgenos/análisis , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Terapias Complementarias/métodos , Citocinas/fisiología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Quimioterapia Combinada , Endoscopía/métodos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/fisiología , Microbiota , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Examen Físico/métodos , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Mucosa Respiratoria/fisiología , Rinitis Alérgica/etiología , Rinitis Alérgica/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Solución Salina/uso terapéutico , Pruebas Cutáneas/métodos , Factores Socioeconómicos
5.
Am J Ind Med ; 46(4): 416-8, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15376221

RESUMEN

Working Group 3 (Sensitivity to Organic Dusts-Atopy and Gene Polymorphisms) was convened to review the current understanding of how effects of inhaled organic dust may be modified by genetic factors-both those that increase as well as those that may reduce susceptibility. Furthermore, the group was asked to suggest areas that require more investigation in this field. The discussion focused on individual sensitivity to inhaled agents as the most important determinant of inter-individual heterogeneiety in responses to exposures. Genetic modifiers are known for a number of pathologic conditions (including asthma, atopy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis) associated with inhalation of organic dusts; modifiers are likely to be identified for a number of other disease states. Further studies are required to delineate more precisely the contribution (and the role in inflammatory cascade modulation) of these known polymorphisms, as well as to identify novel genetic factors.


Asunto(s)
Asma/etiología , Polvo , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/genética , Citocinas/genética , Citocinas/inmunología , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/genética , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Polimorfismo Genético , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
6.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 42(5): 563-5, 2004 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15202796

RESUMEN

The European Communities Confederation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EC4) opened a Register for European Specialists in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine in 1997. The operation of the Register is undertaken by a Register Committee (EC4RC). During the last 6 years more than 1500 specialists in clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine have joined the Register. In this article a Code of Conduct for Registrants which was approved at the EC4 Register Committee meeting in Amsterdam, 8 November 2003 is presented.


Asunto(s)
Química Clínica/ética , Códigos de Ética , Sociedades/ética , Europa (Continente) , Sistema de Registros , Especialización
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA