High expression of AlkB homolog 5 suppresses the progression of non-small cell lung cancer by facilitating ferroptosis through m6A demethylation of SLC7A11.

OBJECTIVE: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a prevailing LC characterized by poor outcomes. AlkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5) functions as a tumor suppressor in several cancers. This study delved into the role of ALKBH5 in NSCLC development. METHODS: TCGA database predicted ALKBH5 expression in NSCLC patients. ALKBH5 levels in NSCLC and human bronchial epithelial cells were determined. pcDNA3.1-ALKBH5/NC, pcDNA3.1-SLC7A11/NC, and ferrostatin-1 were used to explore the interactions among ALKBH5, SLC7A11, and ferroptosis. SLC7A11 mRNA and its protein levels were measured by RT-qPCR and Western blot. Cell viability, apoptosis, migration, and invasion were assessed by CCK-8, flow cytometry, and Transwell. Total N6-methyladenosine (m6A) quantification and its enrichment on SLC7A11 mRNA were determined, followed by the observation of Ki67, ALKBH5 and SLC7A11-positive cell numbers. Glutathione (GSH), lipid reactive oxygen species (lipid-ROS), malondialdehyde (MDA), and iron ion contents were determined. Animal experiments further analyzed the role of ALKBH5 in tumor development and glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) expression. RESULTS: Bioinformatics analysis revealed the lowly-expressed ALKBH5 in LC patients. ALKBH5 was downregulated in NSCLC cells and its upregulation repressed proliferation activity, invasion, and migration, and facilitated apoptosis. ALKBH5 upregulation decreased GSH, increased lipid-ROS, MDA, and iron ion contents, and downregulated SLC7A11 by reducing m6A modification. SLC7A11 upregulation partly annulled the effect of ALKBH5 overexpression on cell ferroptosis and malignant behaviors. In vivo assays elucidated the suppression of ALKBH5 upregulation on tumor development and GPX4 levels. CONCLUSION: ALKBH5 upregulation downregulates SLC7A11 transcription by decreasing m6A modification, thus promoting NSCLC cell ferroptosis and ultimately repressing NSCLC progression.

Efficacy and safety of fluzoparib combined with anlotinib in extensive stage small cell lung cancer after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy: a multi-center, single-arm prospective phase II clinical study (STAMP study).

BACKGROUND: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive and lethal malignancy that accounts for 10-15% of lung cancers, and it is generally divided into limited and extensive stage. The standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) is still platinum-based chemotherapy and as maintenance therapy scheme. Although most parts of patients experience a significant tumor response to first-line therapy, the disease recurs invariably. Anlotinib hydrochloride, a novel oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has significant inhibitory activity against angiogenesis-related kinases, such as VEGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, and c-Kit kinase associated with tumor cell proliferation. Fluzoparib is a type of inhibitor of poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP, including PARPl, PARP2 and PARP3). Previous studies have shown that Fluzoparib has a strong inhibitory effect on PARP1 activity at the molecular and cellular levels. METHODS: This is a multi-center, prospective, single-arm phase II clinical study. A total of 50 ES-SCLC patients who experienced disease progression after first-line standard platinum-based chemotherapy with/without immune checkpoint inhibitors scheme, or within 6 months after the completion of treatment will be recruited. Those who had prior treatment with any PARP inhibitor or antiangiogenic agent includes anlotinib, bevacizumab, sorafenib, and thalidomide are excluded. Eligible patients will receive oral anlotinib 8 mg once daily and oral fluzoparib 150 mg twice daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR). DISCUSSION: The addition of fluzoparib to anlotinib is expected to increase the clinical benefit in ES-SCLC patients after platinum-based chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was prospectively registered on June 17, 2021. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT04933175 .

Effects of intrathecal pemetrexed on the survival of patients with leptomeningeal metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.

PURPOSE: To explore the impact of intrathecal pemetrexed (IP) on the survival of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAC) patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM). METHODS: We analyzed patients with LUAC and LM who received systemic therapy after LM diagnosis at the Fujian Cancer Hospital between July 2018 and March 2022. Patients who underwent IP were assigned to the IP group; those without IP treatment were designated as the non-IP group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the two groups. RESULTS: 165 patients were enrolled: 83 and 82 in the IP and non-IP groups, respectively. After 1:1 PSM, we included 114 patients in the matched cohort. Median overall survival (OS) was 13.2 months (95% CI 10.8-15.6 months) in the IP group versus 10.1 months (95% CI 5.3-14.9 months) in the non-IP group (P = 0.488). Only Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) was confirmed as an independent predictor for OS in the matched cohort (hazard ratio (HR) 2.03; P = 0.023). Multivariate competing-risks analysis showed that IP significantly correlated with central nervous system-related death (HR 0.31; P = 0.046). When stratified by ECOG PS, IP improved survival in patients with poor ECOG PS (PS = 2) (14.3 months vs. 1.6 months; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal pemetrexed did not enhance OS for the entire LUAC patient with LM compared to non-intrathecal chemotherapy. However, it exhibited the potential to reduce the risk of central nervous system-related mortality and improve survival in patients with poor ECOG PS.

The deep learning model combining CT image and clinicopathological information for predicting ALK fusion status and response to ALK-TKI therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the deep learning model (DLM) combining computed tomography (CT) images and clinicopathological information for predicting anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion status in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative CT images, clinicopathological information as well as the ALK fusion status from 937 patients in three hospitals were retrospectively collected to train and validate the DLM for the prediction of ALK fusion status in tumors. Another cohort of patients (n = 91) received ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment was also included to evaluate the value of the DLM in predicting the clinical outcomes of the patients. RESULTS: The performances of the DLM trained only by CT images in the primary and validation cohorts were AUC = 0.8046 (95% CI 0.7715-0.8378) and AUC = 0.7754 (95% CI 0.7199-0.8310), respectively, while the DLM trained by both CT images and clinicopathological information exhibited better performance for the prediction of ALK fusion status (AUC = 0.8540, 95% CI 0.8257-0.8823 in the primary cohort, p < 0.001; AUC = 0.8481, 95% CI 0.8036-0.8926 in the validation cohort, p < 0.001). In addition, the deep learning scores of the DLMs showed significant differences between the wild-type and ALK infusion tumors. In the ALK-target therapy cohort (n = 91), the patients predicted as ALK-positive by the DLM showed better performance of progression-free survival than the patients predicted as ALK-negative (16.8 vs. 7.5 months, p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that the DLM trained by both CT images and clinicopathological information could effectively predict the ALK fusion status and treatment responses of patients. For the small size of the ALK-target therapy cohort, larger data sets would be collected to further validate the performance of the model for predicting the response to ALK-TKI treatment.

Ginsenoside compound K inhibits growth of lung cancer cells via HIF-1α-mediated glucose metabolism.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Compound K, an active metabolite of ginsenosides, is reported to exhibit anti-cancer property in various types of human malignancies. The present study investigated the role of compound K on glucose metabolism in NSCLC cells and its underlying mechanism. Our study found that compound K dose-dependently inhibited the cell viability of NSCLC cells. Moreover, administration with compound K decreased glucose uptake and lactate secretion under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Consistently, the expression of key enzymes (HK II, PDK1 and LDHA) involved in glucose metabolism were inhibited in compound K-treated tumor cells. In addition, compound K inhibited the expression of HIF-1α and its downstream gene GLUT1. On the contrary, overexpression of HIF-1α elevated metabolic reactions and partly attenuated the inhibitory role of compound K on NSCLC cell growth. These results demonstrate that compound K suppresses NSCLC cell growth via HIF-1α mediated metabolic alteration, contributing to novel anticancer therapy by targeting glucose metabolism.

Knockdown of circ-RAD23B inhibits non-small cell lung cancer progression via the miR-142-3p/MAP4K3 axis.

BACKGROUND: The development of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with the deregulation of circRNAs. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of circ-RAD23B in NSCLC. METHODS: Circ-RAD23B expression, miR-142-3p and MAP4K3 was detected by qPCR. Cell proliferation was investigated by CCK-8 assay and colony formation assay. Cell migration and invasion were assessed by transwell assay. Angiogenesis ability was assessed by tube formation assay. Cell cycle distribution and cell apoptosis were monitored by flow cytometry. The predicted binding relationship between miR-142-3p and circ-RAD23B or MAP4K3 was verified by dual-luciferase reporter assay. The protein level of MAP4K3 was detected by western blot. Animal models were established to determine the role of circ-RAD23B in vivo. RESULTS: Circ-RAD23B was shown to be upregulated in NSCLC tissues and cells. Knockdown of circ-RAD23B inhibited proliferation, migration, invasion, angiogenesis and promoted cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in NSCLC cells, and circ-RAD23B knockdown also impeded tumor growth in vivo. Circ-RAD23B acted as miR-142-3p sponge to inhibit miR-142-3p expression and thus enrich the expression of MAP4K3, a target of miR-142-3p. Rescue experiments presented that miR-142-3p inhibition reversed the effects of circ-RAD23B knockdown, and MAP4K3 overexpression abolished the effects of miR-142-3p restoration. In addition, we found that circ-RAD23B knockdown led to decreased phosphorylation expression of ERK1/2, JNK and p38, three key groups of the MAPK signaling pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Circ-RAD23B knockdown inhibited NSCLC development by regulating the miR-142-3p/MAP4K3 axis, which might be associated with the inactivation of the MAPK signaling pathway.

Vinpocetine enhances cisplatin sensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer cells by reducing the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 signaling.

Vinpocetine exerts pharmacological effects against cardiovascular diseases, while few studies focused on its roles in cancer. The present study investigated the roles of vinpocetine in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and its relationship with cisplatin resistance. A549 cisplatin-resistant cells (A549/DDP) and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)-overexpressing cell lines were established. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium assay was conducted to determine cell viability. Annexin V-propidium iodide assay was conducted to determine cell apoptosis. RT-quantitative PCR and western blot analysis were conducted to determine the levels of mRNA and protein, respectively. NSCLC cell tumor-bearing model was constructed to determine the effects of vinpocetine on tumor growth. Treatment with vinpocetine inhibited cell proliferation and promoted cisplatin-induced cell apoptosis. In addition, treatment with vinpocetine suppressed protein expression of Nrf2 and inhibited messenger RNA levels of heme oxygenase 1 and NAD(P)H dehydrogenase quinone 1 induced by cisplatin. Interestingly, the overexpression of Nrf2 abolished the antiproliferative effects of vinpocetine on NSCLC cells. In vivo data suggested that vinpocetine (50 mg/kg) inhibited tumor growth and enhanced the antitumor effects of cisplatin in the NSCLC cell tumor-bearing model. Vinpocetine enhances cisplatin sensitivity of NSCLC cells in part by suppressing Nrf2 signaling.

Efficacy and Safety of Sintilimab Plus Anlotinib for PD-L1-Positive Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Prospective Phase II Trial.

PURPOSE: No combined immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy have been investigated in exclusively programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced cervical cancer (CA). We investigated the efficacy and safety of sintilimab plus anlotinib as second-line or later therapy for PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic (R/M) CA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with PD-L1-positive (Combined Positive Score ≥ 1) R/M CA who progressed after at least one prior systemic chemotherapeutic regimen or could not tolerate chemotherapy were eligible for the phase II trial. The patients received 200 mg sintilimab once on day 1 and 10 mg anlotinib once daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was investigator-confirmed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and disease control rate. Biomarkers were explored. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were enrolled. The ORR was 54.8% (95% CI, 38.7 to 70.2). In 39 efficacy-evaluable patients, the ORR was 59.0% (95% CI, 42.1 to 74.4); the disease control rate was 94.9% (95% CI, 82.7 to 99.4). The median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 8.0 to 14.6). The median overall survival was not reached. Furthermore, 85.8% of the patients experienced treatment-related adverse events. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were hypothyroidism (33.3%), elevated aspartate aminotransferase levels (21.4%), and hypertension (19.0%). Patients with altered PIK3CA, PI3K-AKT signaling, or KMT2D had a higher ORR, whereas those with altered STK11 and/or JAK2 had a significantly shorter PFS. CONCLUSION: Sintilimab plus anlotinib as second-line or later therapy is efficacious and safe for patients with advanced CA who have failed prior chemotherapy.

Prognostic Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index May Differ in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Monotherapy or Combined With Chemotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) status was recently developed to predict responses to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatments. However, it is unclear whether LIPI is a prognostic index for both patients treated with ICI monotherapy and patients treated with ICIs combined with chemotherapy (ICIs CC). METHODS: This retrospective study established the patterns of LIPI in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung immune prognostic index based on the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio greater than 3 and lactate dehydrogenase greater than the upper limit of normal was developed to characterize good, intermediate, or poor LIPI status. Associations between LIPI status and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine survival differences. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty patients were included in this study. Of these patients, 216 received ICI monotherapy and 114 received ICIs CC. A good LIPI status was associated with better PFS (6.1 months vs. 2.3 months vs. 2.1 months, P = 0.023) and OS (24.2 months vs. 14.5 months vs. 9.3 months, P < 0.001) in ICI monotherapy compared to intermediate or poor LIPI status. No differences in PFS (17.9 vs. 9.9 months vs. 7.6 months, P = 0.355, respectively) and OS (P = 0.346) were observed in patients who received ICIs CC. Moreover, we found that patients who had an improved LIPI status compared with the baseline value had a longer PFS with ICI monotherapy and LIPI intermediate status (8.4 months vs. 2.1 months vs. 1.4 months, P < 0.001). However, in patients treated with ICIs CC, these dynamic changes were not observed (P = 0.444). CONCLUSIONS: Lung immune prognostic index status and dynamic changes in LIPI could be prognostic markers of treatment response to ICI monotherapy, but not to ICIs CC. In particular, good LIPI status was associated with a better clinical outcome compared with intermediate and poor LIPI status in ICI monotherapy treatment.

[Efficacy of S-1 in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated 
with More Than Two Lines of Chemotherapy].

BACKGROUND: There is no standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after the failure of two lines of chemotherapy, S-1 as the third generation of fluorouracil derivate with well safety and low toxicity, presented some efficacy in lung cancer treatment. The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy of S-1 for advanced NSCLC patients treated with two or more prior chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 105 NSCLC patients treated with S-1 monotherapy or S-1 contained chemotherapy as the third or more line of treatment in our hospital from January 2014 to April 2017. S-1 was administrated orally twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by one week of rest, the dose of drug was determined by body surface area (<1.25 m2, 80 mg/d; 1.25 m2-1.5 m2, 100 mg/d; ≥1.5 m2, 120 mg/d), platinum or the third-generation chemotherapy drugs could be combinedly used. Clinical response was assigned every cycle according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: 42 patients received S-1 monotherapy, the other 63 patients received combined regimens, the median treatment line was 4 (3-11) and the median treatment cycle was 2 (1-14). No complete response (CR) were observed, there were 4 patients with partial response (PR), 34 patients with stable disease (SD) and 67 patients with progressive disease (PD), the objective response rate (ORR) was 3.81%, disease control rate (DCR) was 36.19%. The median PFS was 1.90 months (0.67 months-10.83 months), no difference between monotherapy and combined group (DCR: 28.56% vs 41.27%, P=0.185), the liver metastasis showed poorer PFS (1.40 months vs 1.93 months , P=0.042). CONCLUSIONS: S-1 presented some activity in advanced NSCLC treated with more than two lines of treatment. The addition of other drugs cannot improve efficacy. S-1 monotherapy can be used as a choice for heavily-treated patients.

The Tumor Mutational Burden of Chinese Advanced Cancer Patients Estimated by a 381-cancer-gene Panel.

Purpose: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) calculated by whole-exome sequencing (WES) is proved to be effective to predict the clinical benefit of immune checkpoint blockades. However, WES is not commonly used in China. We aimed to determine if a 381-caner-gene panel (CGP) could be used to estimate TMB, delineate the landscape of TMB of Chinese patients and identify mutated genes and pathways related to higher TMB. Methods: We first evaluated the correlation between the TMB estimated by a 381-cancer-gene panel MasterView and WES using the data from the melanoma sample cohort. 3023 formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 2932 Chinese patients with advanced solid tumor were profiled for 381 gene sequencing, the baits of which covered 4,557 exons of 365 cancer-related genes and 47 introns of 25 genes frequently rearranged in cancer (All performed in a lab who achieved full marks five times in the external quality assessment by College of American Pathologists [CAP]). Using the sequencing data, we estimated the TMB of Chinese advanced solid tumor and identified mutated genes and pathways related to higher TMB level. Results: 381-CGP-mutational burden was strongly associated with those calculated by WES (R2 = 0.978). The median TMB for each tumor type was 5.65 (colorectal cancer), 4.84 (lung cancer), 4.03 (hepatobiliary cancer), 4.03 (gastric carcinoma), 4.03 (breast cancer) mutations/mb respectively. No correlation was observed between TMB level and age (P = 0.577) or gender (P = 0.307). The TMB of patients with mismatch repair (MMR) or DNA repair response (DDR) pathway deficiency was significantly higher than that without MMR or DDR pathway deficiency (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The 381-cancer gene panel is a clinical practicable method to assess tumor mutational burden compared with whole exome sequencing. MMR and DDR deficiency are correlated with higher tumor mutational burden of Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors.

TP53 mutations predict for poor survival in ALK rearrangement lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with crizotinib.

BACKGROUND: Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who harbor anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement are sensitive to an ALK inhibitor (crizotinib), but not all ALK-positive patients benefit equally from crizotinib treatment. We analyze the impact of TP53 mutations on response to crizotinib in patients with ALK rearrangement NSCLC. METHODS: Sixty-six ALK rearrangement NSCLC patients receiving crizotinib were analyzed. 21 cases were detected successfully by the next generation sequencing validation FFPE before crizotinib. TP53 mutations were evaluated in 8 patients in relation to disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: TP53 mutations were observed in 2 (25.00%), 1 (12.50%), 1 (12.50%) and 4 (50.00%) patients in exons 5, 6, 7 and 8, respectively. The majority of patients were male (75.00%, 6/8), less than 65 years old (62.50%, 5/8) and never smokers (75.00%, 6/8). ORR and DCR for crizotinib in the entire case series were 61.90% and 71.43%, respectively. Statistically significant difference was observed in terms of PFS and OS between TP53 gene wild group and mutation group patients (P=0.038, P=0.021, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: TP53 mutations reduce responsiveness to crizotinib and worsen prognosis in ALK rearrangement NSCLC patients.