S100A4-neutralizing monoclonal antibody 6B12 counteracts the established experimental skin fibrosis induced by bleomycin.

OBJECTIVES: Our previous studies have demonstrated that the Damage Associated Molecular Pattern (DAMP) protein, S100A4, is overexpressed in the involved skin and peripheral blood of patients with SSc. It is associated with skin and lung involvement, and disease activity. By contrast, lack of S100A4 prevented the development of experimental dermal fibrosis. Herein we aimed to evaluate the effect of murine anti-S100A4 mAb 6B12 in the treatment of preestablished experimental dermal fibrosis. METHODS: The effects of 6B12 were assessed at therapeutic dosages in a modified bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis mouse model by evaluating fibrotic (dermal thickness, proliferation of myofibroblasts, hydroxyproline content, phosphorylated Smad3-positive cell count) and inflammatory (leukocytes infiltrating the lesional skin, systemic levels of selected cytokines and chemokines) outcomes, and transcriptional profiling (RNA sequencing). RESULTS: Treatment with 7.5 mg/kg 6B12 attenuated and might even reduce pre-existing dermal fibrosis induced by bleomycin as evidenced by reduction in dermal thickness, myofibroblast count and collagen content. These antifibrotic effects were mediated by the downregulation of TGF-ß/Smad signalling and partially by reducing the number of leukocytes infiltrating the lesional skin and decrease in the systemic levels of IL-1α, eotaxin, CCL2 and CCL5. Moreover, transcriptional profiling demonstrated that 7.5 mg/kg 6B12 also modulated several profibrotic and proinflammatory processes relevant to the pathogenesis of SSc. CONCLUSION: Targeting S100A4 by the 6B12 mAb demonstrated potent antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory effects on bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis and provided further evidence for the vital role of S100A4 in the pathophysiology of SSc.

Clinical and pathogenic significance of S100A4 overexpression in systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: We have studied the damage-associated molecular pattern protein S100A4 as a driver of fibroblast activation in systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: S100A4 protein concentration was measured by ELISA in serum of SSc (n=94) and healthy controls (n=15). Protein expression in skin fibroblast cultures from diffuse cutaneous SSc (SScF, n=6) and healthy controls (normal fibroblasts (NF), n=6) was assessed. Recombinant S100A4 and a high affinity anti-S100A4 neutralising monoclonal antibody (AX-202) were tested on SScF and NF. RESULTS: Median (range) S100A4 (ng/mL) was higher in serum of SSc (89.9 (15.0-240.0)) than healthy controls (71.4 (7.9-131.8); p=0.027). There was association with SSc-interstitial lung disease (p=0.025, n=55), scleroderma renal crisis (p=0.026, n=4). Median (range) S100A4 (ng/mL) was higher in culture supernatants of SScF (4.19 (0.52-8.42)) than NF controls (0.28 (0.02-3.29); p<0.0001). AX-202 reduced the constitutive profibrotic gene and protein expression phenotype of SScF. Genome-wide RNA sequencing analysis identified an S100A4 activated signature in NF overlapping the hallmark gene expression signature of SScF. Thus, 464 differentially expressed genes (false discovery rate (FDR) <0.001 and fold change (FC) >1.5) induced in NF by S100A4 were also constitutively overexpressed, and downregulated by AX-202, in SScF. Pathway mapping of these S100A4 dependent genes in SSc showed the most significant enriched Kegg pathways (FDR <0.001) were regulation of stem cell pluripotency (4.6-fold) and metabolic pathways (1.9-fold). CONCLUSION: Our findings provide compelling evidence for a profibrotic role for S100A4 in SSc and suggest that serum level may be a biomarker of major organ manifestations and disease severity. This study supports examining the therapeutic potential of targeting S100A4 in SSc.

CaMKII in addition to MLCK contributes to phosphorylation of regulatory light chain in cardiomyocytes.

The aim was to identify kinase activities involved in the phosphorylation of regulatory light chain (RLC) in situ in cardiomyocytes. In electrically stimulated rat cardiomyocytes, phosphatase inhibition by calyculin A unmasked kinase activities evoking an increase of phosphorylated RLC (P-RLC) from about 16% to about 80% after 80 min. The phosphorylation rate in cardiomyocytes was reduced by about 40% by the myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) inhibitor, ML-7. In rat ventricular muscle strips, calyculin A induced a positive inotropic effect that correlated with P-RLC levels. The inotropic effect and P-RLC elevation were abolished by ML-7 treatment. The kinase activities phosphorylating RLC in cardiomyocytes were reduced by about 60% by the non-selective kinase inhibitor staurosporine and by about 50% by the calmodulin antagonist W7. W7 eliminated the inhibitory effect of ML-7, suggesting that the cardiac MLCK is Ca(2+)/calmodulin (CaM)-dependent. The CaM-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) inhibitor KN-93 attenuated the calyculin A-induced RLC phosphorylation by about 40%, indicating a contribution from CaMKII. The residual phosphorylation in the presence of W7 indicated that also CaM-independent kinase activities might contribute. RLC phosphorylation was insensitive to protein kinase C inhibition. In conclusion, in addition to MLCK, CaMKII phosphorylates RLC in cardiomyocytes. Involvement of other kinases cannot be excluded.

Utilization of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: real-world data from the ARIADNE registry.

AIMS: To compare baseline characteristics of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) initiated on sacubitril/valsartan compared with patients continued on conventional heart failure (HF)-treatment in a European out-patient setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between July 2016 and July 2019, ARIADNE enrolled 8787 outpatients aged ≥18 years with HFrEF from 17 European countries. Choice of therapy was solely at the investigators' discretion. In total, 4173 patients were on conventional HF-treatment (non-S/V group), while 4614 patients were on sacubitril/valsartan either at enrolment or started sacubitril/valsartan within 1 month of enrolment (S/V group). Of these, 2108 patients started sacubitril/valsartan treatment ±1 month around enrolment [restricted S/V (rS/V) group]. The average age of the patients was 68 years. Patients on S/V were more likely to have New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV symptoms (50.3%, 44.6%, 32.1% in rS/V, S/V, and non-S/V, respectively) and had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; 32.3%, 32.7%, and 35.4% in rS/V, S/V, and non-S/V, respectively; P < 0.0001). The most frequently received HF treatments were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB; ∼84% in non-S/V), followed by ß-blockers (∼80%) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs; 53%). The use of triple HF therapy (ACEI/ARB/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor with ß-blockers and MRA) was higher in the S/V groups than non-S/V group (48.2%, 48.2%, and 40.2% in rS/V, S/V, and non-S/V, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this large multinational HFrEF registry, patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan tended to be younger with lower LVEF and higher NYHA class. Fewer than half of the patients received triple HF therapy.

Outcomes with sacubitril/valsartan in outpatients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: The ARIADNE registry.

AIMS: ARIADNE aimed to assess the association between effects of sacubitril/valsartan and no sacubitril/valsartan treatment and clinical characteristics, functional capacity, and clinical outcomes (cause-specific mortality and hospitalizations) in outpatients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: ARIADNE was a prospective European registry of 9069 patients with HFrEF treated by office-based cardiologists or selected primary care physicians. Of the 8787 eligible for analysis, 4173 patients were on conventional HF treatment (non-S/V group), whereas 4614 patients were either on sacubitril/valsartan treatment at enrolment or started sacubitril/valsartan within 1 month of enrolment (S/V group). We also generated a restricted analysis set (rS/V) including only those 2108 patients who started sacubitril/valsartan treatment within the month prior to or after enrolment. RESULTS: At the baseline, average age of patients enrolled in the study was 68 years, and 23.9% (2099/8787) were female. At the baseline, the proportions of patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III symptoms were 30.9 (1288/4173), 42.8 (1974/4614), and 48.2% (1015/2108), in non-S/V, S/V, and rS/V groups, respectively. After 12 months of treatment, the proportion of patients with NYHA Class III at baseline who improved to Class II was 32.0% (290/907) in the non-S/V group vs. 46.3% (648/1399) in S/V group and 48.7% (349/717) in rS/V group. The overall mortality rate was 5.0 per 100 patient-years. Rates of HF hospitalizations were high (20.9, 20.3, and 21.2 per 100 patient-years in the non-S/V, S/V, and rS/V groups, respectively). Emergency room visits without hospitalization occurred in 3.9, 3.2, and 3.9% of patients in the non-S/V, S/V, and rS/V groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This large HFrEF European registry provides a contemporary outcome profile of outpatients with HFrEF treated with or without sacubitril/valsartan. In a real-world setting, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with an improvement of symptoms in patients with HFrEF compared with the conventional HFrEF treatment.

OUTSTEP-HF: randomised controlled trial comparing short-term effects of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril on daily physical activity in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

AIMS: OUTSTEP-HF compared the effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril on 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance, non-sedentary daytime physical activity and heart failure (HF) symptoms in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Ambulatory patients (n = 621) with stable symptomatic HFrEF were randomised 1:1 to sacubitril/valsartan (n = 310) or enalapril (n = 311). Changes in physical activity and mean daily non-sedentary daytime activity from baseline to Week 12 were measured using 6MWT and a wrist-worn accelerometer device, respectively. After 12 weeks, 6MWT improved by 35.09 m with sacubitril/valsartan [97.5% confidence interval (CI) 27.85, 42.32] and by 26.11 m with enalapril (97.5% CI 18.78, 33.43); however, there was no significant difference between groups [least squares means treatment difference: 8.98 m (97.5% CI -1.31, 19.27); P = 0.0503]. Mean daily non-sedentary daytime activity decreased by 27 min with sacubitril/valsartan and by 21 min with enalapril [least squares means treatment difference: -6 min (97.5% CI -25.7, 13.4), P = 0.4769] after 12 weeks. 6MWT improved by ≥30 m in 51% of patients in the sacubitril/valsartan group vs. 44% of patients treated with enalapril (odds ratio 1.251, 95% CI 0.895, 1.748). At Week 4, non-sedentary daytime activity increased by ≥10% in 58% of patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan vs. 64% with enalapril; 58% of patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan reported improved HF symptoms as assessed by patient global assessment vs. 43% with enalapril. However, these differences did not persist at Week 12. CONCLUSION: After 12 weeks of treatment, there was no significant benefit of sacubitril/valsartan on either 6MWT or daytime physical activity measured by actigraphy compared with enalapril.

PRospective Evaluation of natriuretic peptide-based reFERral of patients with chronic heart failure in primary care (PREFER): a real-world study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess current management practice of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in multinational primary care (PC) and determine whether N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP)-guided referral of HFrEF patients from PC to a cardiologist could improve care, defined as adherence to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy. METHODS: PRospective Evaluation of natriuretic peptide-based reFERral of patients with chronic HF in PC (PREFER) study enrolled HFrEF patients from PC considered clinically stable and those with NT-pro-BNP ≥600 pg/mL were referred to a cardiologist for optimisation of HF treatment. The primary outcome of adherence to ESC HF guidelines after referral to specialist was assessed at the second visit within 4 weeks of cardiologist's referral and no later than 6 months after the baseline visit. Based on futility interim analysis, the study was terminated early. RESULTS: In total, 1415 HFrEF patients from 223 PCs from 18 countries in Europe were enrolled. Of these, 1324 (96.9%) were considered clinically stable and 920 (65.0%) had NT-pro-BNP ≥600 pg/mL (mean: 2631 pg/mL). In total, 861 (60.8%) patients fulfilled both criteria and were referred to a cardiologist. Before cardiologist consultation, 10.1% of patients were on ESC guideline-recommended HFrEF medications and 2.7% were on recommended dosages of HFrEF medication (defined as ≥50% of ESC guideline-recommended dose). Postreferral, prescribed HFrEF drugs remained largely unchanged except for an increase in diuretics (+4.6%) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (+7.9%). No significant increase in patients' adherence to guideline-defined drug combinations (11.2% post-referral vs 10.1% baseline) or drug combinations and dosages (3.3% postreferral vs 2.7% baseline) was observed after cardiologist consultation. CONCLUSIONS: PREFER demonstrates substantial suboptimal treatment of HFrEF patients in the real world. Referral of patients with elevated NT-pro-BNP levels from PC to cardiologist did not result in meaningful treatment optimisation for treatments with known mortality and morbidity benefit.

Sacubitril/valsartan ameliorates cardiac hypertrophy and preserves diastolic function in cardiac pressure overload.

AIMS: Sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) has shown superior effect compared with blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. We aimed to investigate effects of sac/val compared with valsartan in a pressure overload model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sprague-Dawley rats underwent aortic banding or sham (n = 16) surgery and were randomized to sac/val (n = 28), valsartan (n = 29), or vehicle (n = 26) treatment for 8 weeks. Sac/val reduced left ventricular weight by 11% compared with vehicle (P = 0.01) and 9% compared with valsartan alone (P = 0.04). Only valsartan reduced blood pressure compared with sham (P = 0.02). Longitudinal early diastolic strain rate was preserved in sac/val compared with sham, while it was reduced by 23% in vehicle (P = 0.03) and 24% in valsartan (P = 0.02). Diastolic dysfunction, measured by E/e'SR, increased by 68% in vehicle (P < 0.01) and 80% in valsartan alone (P < 0.001), while sac/val showed no increase. Neither sac/val nor valsartan prevented interstitial fibrosis. Although ejection fraction was preserved, we observed mild systolic dysfunction, with vehicle showing a 28% decrease in longitudinal strain (P < 0.01). Neither sac/val nor valsartan treatment improved this dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: In a model of HFpEF induced by cardiac pressure overload, sac/val reduced hypertrophy compared with valsartan alone and ameliorated diastolic dysfunction. These effects were independent of blood pressure. Early systolic dysfunction was not affected, supporting the notion that sac/val has the largest potential in conditions characterized by reduced ejection fraction. Observed anti-hypertrophic effects in preserved ejection fraction implicate potential benefit of sac/val in the clinical setting of hypertrophic remodelling and impaired diastolic function.

Rationale and study design of OUTSTEP-HF: a randomised controlled study to assess the effect of sacubitril/valsartan and enalapril on physical activity measured by accelerometry in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

AIM: In PARADIGM-HF, sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated superiority to enalapril in reducing mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Several patient-centred outcomes like improved physical activity and quality of life have been emphasised as important treatment goals in HF management. OUTSTEP-HF has been designed to evaluate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril on non-sedentary daytime physical activity in patients with HFrEF. METHODS: OUTSTEP-HF is a randomised, actively controlled, double-blind, double-dummy study that plans to enrol 600 ambulatory patients with symptomatic HFrEF in 19 European countries. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to receive sacubitril/valsartan 97/103 mg bid or enalapril 10 mg bid. The primary objective of the study is to assess changes from baseline (Week 0) to Week 12 in exercise capacity measured by the 6-min walk test and in daily non-sedentary daytime activity. Physical activity and objective sleep parameters will be measured by accelerometry using a wrist-worn device, worn continuously from screening (Week -2) until the end of study (Week 12). As a co-primary outcome, changes from baseline in sub-maximal exercise capacity will be assessed by the 6-min walk test. Patient- and physician-reported questionnaires will be used to assess quality of life, changes in signs and symptoms of HF and sleep parameters. CONCLUSION: OUTSTEP-HF will be the largest randomised trial in HF to date to use non-invasive accelerometry to assess whether treatment with sacubitril/valsartan improves patients' daily physical activity and exercise capacity compared with enalapril.

PDE3, but not PDE4, reduces ß1 - and ß2-adrenoceptor-mediated inotropic and lusitropic effects in failing ventricle from metoprolol-treated patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: PDE3 and/or PDE4 control ventricular effects of catecholamines in several species but their relative effects in failing human ventricle are unknown. We investigated whether the PDE3-selective inhibitor cilostamide (0.3-1 µM) or PDE4 inhibitor rolipram (1-10 µM) modified the positive inotropic and lusitropic effects of catecholamines in human failing myocardium. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Right and left ventricular trabeculae from freshly explanted hearts of 5 non-ß-blocker-treated and 15 metoprolol-treated patients with terminal heart failure were paced to contract at 1 Hz. The effects of (-)-noradrenaline, mediated through ß1 adrenoceptors (ß2 adrenoceptors blocked with ICI118551), and (-)-adrenaline, mediated through ß2 adrenoceptors (ß1 adrenoceptors blocked with CGP20712A), were assessed in the absence and presence of PDE inhibitors. Catecholamine potencies were estimated from -logEC50s. KEY RESULTS: Cilostamide did not significantly potentiate the inotropic effects of the catecholamines in non-ß-blocker-treated patients. Cilostamide caused greater potentiation (P = 0.037) of the positive inotropic effects of (-)-adrenaline (0.78 ± 0.12 log units) than (-)-noradrenaline (0.47 ± 0.12 log units) in metoprolol-treated patients. Lusitropic effects of the catecholamines were also potentiated by cilostamide. Rolipram did not affect the inotropic and lusitropic potencies of (-)-noradrenaline or (-)-adrenaline on right and left ventricular trabeculae from metoprolol-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Metoprolol induces a control by PDE3 of ventricular effects mediated through both ß1 and ß2 adrenoceptors, thereby further reducing sympathetic cardiostimulation in patients with terminal heart failure. Concurrent therapy with a PDE3 blocker and metoprolol could conceivably facilitate cardiostimulation evoked by adrenaline through ß2 adrenoceptors. PDE4 does not appear to reduce inotropic and lusitropic effects of catecholamines in failing human ventricle.

Prostanoid-mediated inotropic responses are attenuated in failing human and rat ventricular myocardium.

Prostanoid-modulatory approaches in heart failure patients have displayed effects which may seem to be mutually incompatible. Both treatment with prostanoids and inhibition of prostanoid synthesis have resulted in increased mortality in heart failure patients. Currently, it is unknown if prostanoids mediate contractile effects in failing human heart and if this can explain some of the clinical effects seen after prostanoid modulatory treatments. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to determine if prostanoids could elicit direct inotropic responses in human ventricle, and if so to determine if they are modified in failing ventricle. Contractile force was measured in left ventricular strips from non-failing or failing human and rat hearts. The ratio of phosphorylated to non-phosphorylated myosin light chain 2 (MLC-2) was measured by Western blotting in myocardial strips, and the levels of prostanoid FP receptor mRNA and protein were measured in rat by real-time RT-PCR and receptor binding assays. In non-failing human hearts, prostanoids evoked a positive inotropic effect and an increase of MLC-2 phosphorylation which was absent in failing human hearts. In failing rat heart, the prostanoid FP receptor-mediated inotropic response and prostanoid FP receptor-density was reduced by ~40-50% compared to non-failing rat heart. Prostanoids mediate a sustained positive inotropic response in non-failing heart, which appears to be down regulated in failing heart. The pathophysiological significance of changes in prostanoid-mediated inotropic support in the failing heart remains to be determined.

Expression of mRNA encoding G protein-coupled receptors involved in congestive heart failure--a quantitative RT-PCR study and the question of normalisation.

Congestive heart failure (CHF) induces changes in the neurohumoral system and gene expression in viable myocardium. Several of these genes encode G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) involved in mechanisms which compensate for impaired myocardial function. We used real-time quantitative RT-PCR (Q-RT-PCR) to investigate the expression of mRNA encoding 15 different GPCRs possibly involved in CHF, and the effect of normalisation to GAPDH mRNA (GAPDH) or 18S rRNA (18S). CHF was induced in rats by coronary artery ligation, with sham-operated controls (Sham). After 6 weeks, mRNA expression in viable left ventricular myocardium was determined using both 18S and GAPDH as the normalisation standard. An apparent 30% reduction in GAPDH mRNA levels vs. 18S in CHF compared to Sham, although not significant in itself, influenced the interpretation of regulation of other genes.Thus, levels of mRNA encoding receptors for angiotensin II (AT(1)), endothelin (ET(A), ET(B)) and the muscarinic acetylcholine (mACh) receptor M(1) increased significantly in CHF only when normalised to GAPDH. Levels of mRNA encoding the mACh receptors M(3) and M(4) and the serotonin receptors 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(4) increased, whereas alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor mRNA decreased in CHF irrespective of the normalisation standard. No significant change was detected for M2 and M5 mACh receptors or alpha(1A)-, alpha(1B)-, beta(1)- or beta(2)-adrenoceptors. Q-RT-PCR is a sensitive and powerful method to monitor changes in GPCR mRNA expression in CHF. However, the normalisation standard used is important for the interpretation of mRNA regulation.