Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Med Educ ; 21(1): 470, 2021 Sep 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34481485

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the use of the current best evidence for patient care. Medical students should critically appraise the research evidence to help them during their clinical practice in the future. We conducted this study to assess the skills, terms and attitude toward EBM. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional study for medical students from governmental universities. Students completed an online validated questionnaire consisting of several sections to assess skills, attitude and knowledge about terms related to EBM. We used a scale ranging from 1(strongly disagree) to 5(strongly agree) for the 11 questions assessing the attitude and a scale ranging from 1(Poor) to 5(advanced) for EBM skills. RESULTS: A total of 761 medical students with a mean age of 21.97 ± 1.64 participated in the study. 327 (43 %) of them were males. The most commonly used search engines were Google 690 (91 %) and Wikipedia 465 (61 %). Medical books 719 (94 %) and lecture notes 353 (46 %) were the most common sources for health information. The majority of students rated their skills related to EBM as average and below average for all questions (overall = 2.18 ± 0.8). Students rated their skills as poor (31 %) in locating professional literature, as average (34 %) in searching online databases, poor (42 %) in critical appraisal of a scientific publication reporting findings from clinical research and poor (36 %) in Critical appraisal of available scientific literature. Regarding attitude, the overall mean score was 2.83 ± 0.76. There is no significant difference in attitude score between students with or without EBM training (P = 0.2). The terms with the highest understanding were case-control study (45 %) and case report (44 %) for study design. Median (44 %) and sample size (43 %) for statistics. Incidence (46 %) and prevalence (44 %) for epidemiology. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students have a knowledge gap in skills and terms related to EBM and an average attitude towards EBM. The majority of them were using a nonscientific search engine to obtain medical information. There is a need to educate students about the proper steps for getting the scientific literature and EBM skills.


Asunto(s)
Estudiantes de Medicina , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Masculino , Sudán
2.
Radiol Case Rep ; 19(9): 3824-3828, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39021665

RESUMEN

Chilaiditi syndrome is defined as the interposition of the colon between the liver and the diaphragm or abdominal wall and is known as Chilaiditi's sign on X-rays. Although rare, this procedure can lead to serious complications. Due to its infrequency and propensity for severe complications, diagnosing and differentiating this syndrome from other acute abdominal emergencies are very important for preventing unnecessary treatment or surgical procedures. We present a 72-year-old male with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who presented to the emergency department with persistent shortness of breath, abdominal discomfort, and vomiting. Physical examination revealed chest crepitation, tenderness in the left iliac fossa, and high blood pressure. Laboratory tests revealed a positive COVID-19 status, elevated C-reactive protein level, and respiratory alkalosis. Imaging, including a chest X-ray and CT scan, confirmed the presence of bowel loops under the diaphragm, confirming the diagnosis of Chilaiditi syndrome. Collaborative management by surgical and medical teams was essential in navigating this complex condition. This case highlights the complexity of chilaiditi syndrome, which can be episodic and intermittent, in addition to the importance of recognizing Chilaiditi's sign on imaging, particularly on CT scans, to differentiate it from pneumoperitoneum. Vigilance is crucial in identifying potential complications and guiding appropriate treatment to prevent adverse outcomes.

3.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 80: 105321, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33500233

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic omental infraction is a rare cause of acute abdominal symptoms that has been known with growing recurrence in the past ten years. It presents as right iliac fossa pain, and it's sometimes misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis. In this study we present a case Report of idiopathic omental infraction as a cause of acute abdomen. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 25 year old male, presented to the casualty complaing of intermittent worsening pain in the right side of the abdomen, this symptom which mimiced the other commoner causes of acute abdomen. On further investigations he had leukocytosis, high C-reactive protein and ESR levels, A contrast computed tomography suggested acute appendicitis, In due course patient was operated after taking his consent, inside the operation 70 % of the greater omentum was necrotic with a black colour, An omentectomy was performed and he was discharged after two days with good recovery. CONCLUSION: A right side abdominal pain is not only confined to appendeceal diseases, So other disease should be put in consideration.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA