Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 30(1): 136-140, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38147063

RESUMEN

We assessed tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic delays among patients with TB and COVID-19 in California, USA. Among 58 persons, 43% experienced TB diagnostic delays, and a high proportion (83%) required hospitalization for TB. Even when viral respiratory pathogens circulate widely, timely TB diagnostic workup for at-risk persons remains critical for reducing TB-related illness.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Tuberculosis , Humanos , Diagnóstico Tardío , COVID-19/diagnóstico , California/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis/epidemiología , Prueba de COVID-19
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 73(8): 175-179, 2024 Feb 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38421946

RESUMEN

Surveillance data can provide rapid, within-season influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates to guide public health recommendations. Mandatory reporting of influenza vaccine administration to California's immunization information registry began January 1, 2023, and mandatory reporting of all influenza laboratory test results, including negative results, was instituted in California on June 15, 2023. These data, collected by the California Department of Public Health during October 1, 2023-January 31, 2024, were used to calculate interim influenza VE against laboratory-confirmed influenza by comparing the odds of vaccination among case-patients (persons who received a positive influenza laboratory test result) and control patients (those who received a negative influenza laboratory test result). VE was calculated as 1 - adjusted odds ratio using mixed-effects logistic regression, with age, race, and ethnicity as fixed effects and specimen collection week and county as random effects. Overall, during October 1, 2023-January 31, 2024, estimated VE was 45% among persons aged ≥6 months, 56% among children and adolescents aged 6 months-17 years, 48% among adults aged 18-49 years, 36% among those aged 50-64 years, and 30% among those aged ≥65 years. Consistent with some previous influenza seasons, influenza vaccination provided moderate protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza among infants, children, adolescents, and adults. All persons aged ≥6 months without a contraindication to vaccination should receive annual influenza vaccination to reduce influenza illness, severe influenza, and strain on health care resources. Influenza vaccination remains the best way to prevent influenza.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Lactante , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Vacunación , California/epidemiología
3.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 24(1): 120, 2024 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802749

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To describe the methodology for conducting the CalScope study, a remote, population-based survey launched by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) to estimate SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and understand COVID-19 disease burden in California. METHODS: Between April 2021 and August 2022, 666,857 randomly selected households were invited by mail to complete an online survey and at-home test kit for up to one adult and one child. A gift card was given for each completed survey and test kit. Multiple customized REDCap databases were used to create a data system which provided task automation and scalable data management through API integrations. Support infrastructure was developed to manage follow-up for participant questions and a communications plan was used for outreach through local partners. RESULTS: Across 3 waves, 32,671 out of 666,857 (4.9%) households registered, 6.3% by phone using an interactive voice response (IVR) system and 95.7% in English. Overall, 25,488 (78.0%) households completed surveys, while 23,396 (71.6%) households returned blood samples for testing. Support requests (n = 5,807) received through the web-based form (36.3%), by email (34.1%), and voicemail (29.7%) were mostly concerned with the test kit (31.6%), test result (26.8%), and gift card (21.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Ensuring a well-integrated and scalable data system, responsive support infrastructure for participant follow-up, and appropriate academic and local health department partnerships for study management and communication allowed for successful rollout of a large population-based survey. Remote data collection utilizing online surveys and at-home test kits can complement routine surveillance data for a state health department.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pruebas con Sangre Seca , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , California/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Pruebas con Sangre Seca/métodos , Pruebas con Sangre Seca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente
4.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1822, 2024 Jul 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38977988

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is limited information on the extent and patterns of disparities in COVID-19 mortality throughout the pandemic. We aimed to examine trends in disparities by demographics over variants in the pre- and post-vaccine availability period among Californian workers using a social determinants of health lens. METHODS: Using death certificates, we identified all COVID-19 deaths that occurred between January 2020 and May 2022 among workers aged 18-64 years in California (CA). We derived estimates for at-risk worker populations using the Current Population Survey. The waves of COVID-19 mortality in the pre-vaccine availability period were March 2020-June 2020 (wave 1), and July 2020-November 2020 (wave 2), and in the post-vaccine availability period: December 2020-May 2021 (wave 3), June 2021-January 2022 (wave 4), and February 2022-May 2022 (wave 5). Poisson regression models with robust standard errors were used to determine wave-specific mortality rate ratios (MRRs). We examined the change in MRR across waves by including an interaction term between each demographic characteristic and wave period in different models. The role of potential misclassification of Race/ethnicity on death certificates was examined using probabilistic quantitative bias analysis as sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Among the 24.1 million working age CA population included in the study, there were 26,068 COVID-19 deaths in the period between January 2020 and May 2022. Compared with their respective reference groups, workers who were 50-64 years old, male, Native Hawaiian, Latino, or African American, foreign-born; individuals who had lower education; and unmarried were disproportionately affected by COVID-19 mortality. While disparities by sex, race/ethnicity and foreign-born status narrowed in later waves (post-vaccine availability), disparities by age, education level and marital status did not change substantially across waves. CONCLUSION: Demographic disparities in COVID-19 mortality narrowed in the post-vaccine availability waves. However, the existence of disparities across all waves of the pandemic, even in an era of widespread vaccine coverage, could indicate remaining gaps in prevention and differential vulnerability. Addressing the underlying social, structural, and occupational factors that contribute to these disparities is critical for achieving health equity.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/epidemiología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , California/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud
5.
Cureus ; 16(4): e58844, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38784317

RESUMEN

Introduction Diabetes is a long-term condition that necessitates ongoing medical attention and self-care to prevent immediate complications and minimize the likelihood of long-term issues. Early diagnosis is one of the most important steps for people living with diabetes to take. Public awareness regarding the importance of lifestyle modification in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus is a crucial preventive measure. Despite continuous efforts to raise public awareness, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes continues to increase, with most people overlooking the importance of a healthy lifestyle. Our goal was to assess the impact of lifestyle modification on glycemic control in newly diagnosed diabetic patients. Materials and methods A total of 503 adults aged 30 years and above who were nondiabetic or were unaware of their diabetic status were assessed for their fasting blood glucose levels. Individuals identified as diabetic based on their fasting blood glucose levels were subjected to lifestyle modification for a period of three months. Glycemic levels were measured at the beginning and the end of the study period for comparison. Results Of the study participants, 7.6% were undiagnosed diabetics with increased blood sugar levels who were unaware of their diabetic status. Mean anthropometric measurements from pre- to postintervention values improved overall. Overall reduction was observed in weight (66.21±12.97 to 63.18±11.48), waist circumference (96.21±13.01 to 91.77±11.82), hip circumference (105.16±11.91 to 103.58±10.88), waist-hip ratio (0.91±0.09 to 0.88±0.08) and body mass index (27.48±6.04 to 26.18±5.30). Significant reductions were observed in the mean glycemic values, including fasting blood sugar (180.19±55.81 to 152.56±45.74) and glycosylated hemoglobin levels (8.61±1.97 to 6.68±1.67). Conclusion Lifestyle modification plays a crucial role in managing diabetes, both in preventing its onset and controlling its progression. The present study highlights the importance of early diagnosis and lifestyle interventions in the management of diabetes, thereby stressing the necessity of comprehensive strategies to combat this situation.

6.
Health Equity ; 8(1): 32-38, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38250304

RESUMEN

Introduction: Lack of childcare has been linked to missed health care appointments for adult women, especially for lower-income women. The COVID-19 pandemic created additional stressors for many low-income families that already struggled to meet childcare and health care needs. By exploring the experiences of women who were referred for childcare services at a U.S. safety-net health system, we aimed to understand the challenges women faced in managing their health and childcare needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with participants in Dallas County, TX between August 2021 and February 2022. All participants were referred from women's health clinics at the county's safety-net hospital system to an on-site drop-off childcare center by hospital staff who identified lack of childcare as a barrier to health care access. Participants were the primary caregiver for at least one child ≤age 13. Interviews were conducted in English or Spanish. We analyzed data using thematic content analysis. Results: We interviewed 22 participants (mean age 34); participants were adult women, had on average 3 children, and primarily identified as Hispanic or African American. Three interrelated themes emerged: disruptions in access, competing priorities, and exacerbated psychological distress. Conclusions: Findings demonstrate how low-income women with young children in a safety-net health system struggle to address their own health needs amid childcare and other household demands. Our study advances our understanding of childcare as a social domain of health, a necessary step to inform how we build structural support systems and drive policy interventions.

7.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 13(5): 2037-2043, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38948635

RESUMEN

Background: Hypertension is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, affecting over one billion people. It is responsible for roughly half of all heart disease and stroke-related deaths globally. Because hypertension does not cause any symptoms on its own, it is commonly referred to as "the silent killer." Objective: This study aimed to determine (1) the prevalence of hypertension and its associated risk factors and (2) the level of awareness of hypertension status among study participants. Material and Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional analytical study was conducted for 3 months during January-March 2023 at the teaching institution in Etawah District, Uttar Pradesh. It was conducted among 392 study participants who were ≥18 years old. Data were collected through a predesigned, pretested, semi-structured questionnaire, and anthropometric measurement was determined using standard guidelines. Results: The overall prevalence of hypertension screening was 69.4% (male: 33.8% and female: 66.2%), respectively. The majority of hypertensives were found in female participants. Tobacco and alcohol consumption, obesity, physical inactivity, stress and strain, and an unhealthy diet were also associated with hypertension. Among 392 study participants, only 67 (24.6%) were aware of their hypertension status. Conclusion: We conclude that hypertension has been described as an "Iceberg disease" as those who suffer are usually unaware and hence usually seek healthcare services at a very late stage. Preventive measures should be needed to improve hypertension screening, awareness, treatment, and control.

8.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 43(5): 632-640, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709962

RESUMEN

In March 2021, California implemented a vaccine equity policy that prioritized COVID-19 vaccine allocation to communities identified as least advantaged by an area-based socioeconomic measure, the Healthy Places Index. We conducted quasi-experimental and counterfactual analyses to estimate the effect of this policy on COVID-19 vaccination, case, hospitalization, and death rates. Among prioritized communities, vaccination rates increased 28.4 percent after policy implementation. Furthermore, an estimated 160,892 COVID-19 cases, 10,248 hospitalizations, and 679 deaths in the least-advantaged communities were averted by the policy. Despite these improvements, the share of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in prioritized communities remained elevated. These estimates were robust in sensitivity analyses that tested exchangeability between prioritized communities and those not prioritized by the policy; model specifications; and potential temporal confounders, including prior infections. Correcting for disparities by strategically allocating limited resources to the least-advantaged or most-affected communities can reduce the impacts of COVID-19 and other diseases but might not eliminate health disparities.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Política de Salud , Hospitalización , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/mortalidad , California/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Equidad en Salud , Femenino , SARS-CoV-2 , Masculino , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Factores Socioeconómicos , Persona de Mediana Edad
9.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0301070, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38771784

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation of a test-negative design case-control study in California during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: Test-negative case-control study. METHODS: Between February 24, 2021 - February 24, 2022, a team of 34 interviewers called 38,470 Californians, enrolling 1,885 that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (cases) and 1,871 testing negative for SARS-CoV-2 (controls) for 20-minute telephone survey. We estimated adjusted odds ratios for answering the phone and consenting to participate using mixed effects logistic regression. We used a web-based anonymous survey to compile interviewer experiences. RESULTS: Cases had 1.29-fold (95% CI: 1.24-1.35) higher adjusted odds of answering the phone and 1.69-fold (1.56-1.83) higher adjusted odds of consenting to participate compared to controls. Calls placed from 4pm to 6pm had the highest adjusted odds of being answered. Some interviewers experienced mental wellness challenges interacting with participants with physical (e.g., food, shelter, etc.) and emotional (e.g., grief counseling) needs, and enduring verbal harassment from individuals called. CONCLUSIONS: Calls placed during afternoon hours may optimize response rate when enrolling controls to a case-control study during a public health emergency response. Proactive check-ins and continual collection of interviewer experience(s) and may help maintain mental wellbeing of investigation workforce. Remaining adaptive to the dynamic needs of the investigation team is critical to a successful study, especially in emergent public health crises, like that represented by the COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Teléfono , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , California/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Pandemias , Adolescente , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Prueba de COVID-19/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA