Radium-223 in the Treatment of Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Background Radium 223 (Ra-223) has been successfully utilised for the treatment of men with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). To date, no real world outcomes from its use in the Irish population have been described. Methods All men referred to our institution for Ra-223 from September 2016 to March 2019 were included. Patient demographics, treatments received, toxicities and outcomes were recorded. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Complete data was available for 54 men. Median age was 75 years (range 61-86 years). The median number of prior systemic treatments for mCRPC was 2 (range 0-4). Median ECOG performance status was 1 at the start of treatment and 2 at completion. The median number of Ra-223 cycles received was 4 with 37%(n=20) completing all 6 planned cycles. The most common treatment-related toxicity was fatigue seen in 52% of patients ( n=28). Improved pain scores were documented in 76% of men requiring opioid analgesia at the start of treatment. The median OS was 7 months. A good ECOG performance status, fewer than 6 bone metastases, normal alkaline phosphatase level at start of treatment and chemotherapy naivety were associated with improved OS. Conclusions Ra-223 is a moderately well tolerated palliative treatment amongst Irish men with mCRPC.

Intraoperative factors associated with stranded source placement accuracy in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: The quality of a low-dose rate prostate brachytherapy implant depends on the accurate placement of sources in their planned locations. This study investigates intraoperative factors that potentially contribute to stranded source placement inaccuracy in prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Intraoperative video images of the brachytherapist's hand motions and needle insertions during the implant procedure were acquired for analysis. Using video analysis software, maximum and average needle insertion velocities were determined. The number of needle insertion attempts and the use of the brachytherapist's other hand to manipulate the needle direction were also recorded. Sources misplacements were analyzed using an ultrasound-based method described elsewhere. RESULTS: Fifteen patients agreed to undergo this study; 1619 125I seeds were inserted using 357 needles; 1197 seeds were confidently identified using ultrasound images and included in the analysis. The mean overall misplacement was 0.49 cm (0-2 cm, 95% CI = 0.47-0.51); 614 seeds were delivered with a single pass and 583 seeds with >1 passes (range 2-6). The mean maximum needle velocity was 12.34 cm s-1 (range 4-28 cm s-1) and mean average velocity was 4.76 cm s-1 (range 0.4-17.4 cm s-1); 747 seeds were delivered with manipulation of the needle. The generalized linear model test was used to analyze factors contributing to seed misplacement, and it was found that a maximum speed <12 cm s-1 was associated with a decrease in seed misplacement by 0.049 cm vs. a maximum speed >12 cm s-1, p = 0.0121). Other evaluated factors were found to have no statistically significant correlation with seed misplacement: average speed (p = 0.4947), manual manipulation of needle (p = 0.9264), and number of needle passes (p = 0.8907). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified that needles inserted with lower maximum velocity were associated with less seed misplacement. Manual manipulation of the needle, number of passes, and average speed did not show statistically significant correlation with seed misplacement.