RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Hardikar syndrome (HS, MIM #301068) is a female-specific multiple congenital anomaly syndrome characterized by retinopathy, orofacial clefting, aortic coarctation, biliary dysgenesis, genitourinary malformations, and intestinal malrotation. We previously showed that heterozygous nonsense and frameshift variants in MED12 cause HS. The phenotypic spectrum of disease and the mechanism by which MED12 variants cause disease is unknown. We aim to expand the phenotypic and molecular landscape of HS and elucidate the mechanism by which MED12 variants cause disease. METHODS: We clinically assembled and molecularly characterized a cohort of 11 previously unreported individuals with HS. Additionally, we studied the effect of MED12 deficiency on ciliary biology, hedgehog, and yes-associated protein (YAP) signaling; pathways implicated in diseases with phenotypic overlap with HS. RESULTS: We report novel phenotypes associated with HS, including cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, and vascular anomalies, and expand the molecular landscape of HS to include splice site variants. We additionally demonstrate that MED12 deficiency causes decreased cell ciliation, and impairs hedgehog and YAP signaling. CONCLUSION: Our data support updating HS standard-of-care to include regular cardiac imaging, arrhythmia screening, and vascular imaging. We further propose that dysregulation of ciliogenesis and YAP and hedgehog signaling contributes to the pathogenesis of HS.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a global health emergency since December 2019, leading to millions of deaths worldwide and placing significant pressures, including economic burden, on individual patients and healthcare systems. As of February 2022, remdesivir is the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for severe COVID-19. This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to summarise economic evaluations, and cost and resource use (CRU) evidence related to remdesivir during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Searches of MEDLINE, Embase the International Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database, reference lists, congresses and grey literature were performed in May 2021. Articles were reviewed for relevance against pre-specified criteria by two independent reviewers and study quality was assessed using published checklists. RESULTS: Eight studies reported resource use and five reported costs related to remdesivir. Over time, the prescription rate of remdesivir increased and time from disease onset to remdesivir initiation decreased. Remdesivir was associated with a 6% to 21.3% decrease in bed occupancy. Cost estimates for remdesivir ranged widely, from $10 to $780 for a 10-day course. In three out of four included economic evaluations, remdesivir treatment scenarios were cost-effective, ranging from ~ 8 to ~ 23% of the willingness-to-pay threshold for the respective country. CONCLUSIONS: Economic evidence relating to remdesivir should be interpreted with consideration of the broader clinical context, including patients' characteristics and the timing of its administration. Nonetheless, remdesivir remains an important option for physicians in aiming to provide optimal care and relieve pressure on healthcare systems through shifting phases of the pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Pandemias , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study attempts to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the antiviral remdesivir, as recommended in the 2021 COVID treatment guidelines for the United Arab Emirates, compared to standard of care (SOC), but also favipiravir (FAVI), which was also recommended for the treatment of hospitalized COVID patients. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness model was built using published efficacy data for RDV, FAVI and SOC as well as local epidemiology data. The outcomes measured included hospital bed days averted, mortality, costs and cost per outcome over one year. One-way, probabilistic and scenario analyses were undertaken to reflect uncertainty in the estimates. RESULTS: When modelled over one year, the results indicated that treatment of adults in need of supplemental oxygen with RDV + SOC could result in 11,338 fewer general ward bed days, 7,003 fewer ICU days and 5,451 fewer ICU + MIV bed days compared to SOC alone and similar results when compared with FAVI + SOC. The model results also showed that there were 374 fewer deaths associated with the use of RDV + SOC compared to SOC alone. The model also estimates substantial potential cost-savings associated with RDV + SOC treatment compared with SOC alone (USD 3,454 per patient). The results of the one-way sensitivity analysis showed that the model was sensitive to estimates of length of stay and the cost of hospitalization. Despite this, the model predicted cost-savings in all scenarios versus all comparators. CONCLUSIONS: The model estimated that using RDV + SOC could result in substantial reductions in HCRU and cost savings regardless of the comparator. However, it should be noted that reliable clinical information on FAVI was limited therefore it is challenging to interpret these results. All the potential benefits modelled here for RDV + SOC can have implications not only for the health of the UAE population but for improving hospital capacity to deal with other conditions.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Emiratos Árabes Unidos , Hospitalización , Antivirales/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Increased walking and cycling in urban areas and reduced use of private cars could have positive effects on many health outcomes. We estimated the potential effect of increased walking and cycling in urban England and Wales on costs to the National Health Service (NHS) for seven diseases--namely, type 2 diabetes, dementia, cerebrovascular disease, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, depression, and ischaemic heart disease--that are associated with physical inactivity. Within 20 years, reductions in the prevalences of type 2 diabetes, dementia, ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and cancer because of increased physical activity would lead to savings of roughly UK£17 billion (in 2010 prices) for the NHS, after adjustment for an increased risk of road traffic injuries. Further costs would be averted after 20 years. Sensitivity analyses show that results are invariably positive but sensitive to assumptions about time lag between the increase in active travel and changes in health outcomes. Increasing the amount of walking and cycling in urban settings could reduce costs to the NHS, permitting decreased government expenditure on health or releasing resources to fund additional health care.
Asunto(s)
Ciclismo/economía , Medicina Estatal/economía , Caminata/economía , Accidentes de Tránsito/economía , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/economía , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/prevención & control , Ahorro de Costo , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Demencia/economía , Demencia/prevención & control , Trastorno Depresivo/economía , Trastorno Depresivo/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economía , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Inglaterra , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Isquemia Miocárdica/economía , Isquemia Miocárdica/prevención & control , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Conducta Sedentaria , Viaje/economía , Salud Urbana , Gales , Heridas y Lesiones/economía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Only one head-to-head comparison of advanced treatments in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) has been published; therefore, there remains a need for further comparisons. AIM: The relative treatment effects of filgotinib and adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, tofacitinib, ustekinumab and vedolizumab were estimated using a network meta-analysis (NMA). METHOD: Systematically identified studies (MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library; searched: inception-May 2019, updated November 2020) investigating treatments for moderately to severely active UC were re-evaluated for inclusion in a Bayesian NMA (fixed-effects model). Relative treatment effects were estimated using different permutations of patient population (biologic-naïve or biologic-experienced), treatment phase (induction or maintenance) and outcomes (MCS response/remission or endoscopic mucosal healing). RESULTS: Seventeen trials (13 induction; 9 maintenance) were included in the NMA; 8 treatment networks were constructed. Most targeted therapies were superior to placebo in terms of MCS response/remission and endoscopic mucosal healing; filgotinib 200 mg was similar to most other treatments. Infliximab 5 mg/kg was superior to filgotinib 200 mg (biologic-naïve; induction) for MCS response/remission (mean relative effect, 0.34 [95% credible interval: 0.05, 0.62]). Filgotinib 200 mg was superior to adalimumab 160/80/40 mg for MCS response/remission (biologic-experienced; induction; - 0.75 [- 1.16, - 0.35]), and endoscopic mucosal healing (biologic-naïve; maintenance; - 0.90 [- 1.89, - 0.01]); and to golimumab 50 mg every 4 weeks (biologic-naïve; maintenance; - 0.46 [- 0.94, 0]) for MCS response/remission. CONCLUSION: The current treatment landscape benefits patients with moderately to severely active UC, improving key outcomes; filgotinib 200 mg was similar to current standard of care in most outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , Colitis Ulcerosa , Humanos , Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnóstico , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Metaanálisis en Red , Teorema de BayesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In addition to significant morbidity and mortality, the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has strained health care systems globally. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of remdesivir + standard of care (SOC) for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the USA. METHODS: This cost-effectiveness analysis considered direct and indirect costs of remdesivir + SOC versus SOC alone among hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the US. Patients entered the model stratified according to their baseline ordinal score. At day 15, patients could transition to another health state, and on day 29, they were assumed to have either died or been discharged. Patients were then followed over a 1-year time horizon, where they could transition to death or be rehospitalized. RESULTS: Treatment with remdesivir + SOC avoided, per patient, a total of 4 hospitalization days: two general ward days and a day for both the intensive care unit and the intensive care unit plus invasive mechanical ventilation compared to SOC alone. Treatment with remdesivir + SOC presented net cost savings due to lower hospitalization and lost productivity costs compared to SOC alone. In increased and decreased hospital capacity scenarios, remdesivir + SOC resulted in more beds and ventilators being available versus SOC alone. CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir + SOC alone represents a cost-effective treatment for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. This analysis can aid in future decisions on the allocation of healthcare resources.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Achondroplasia, caused by a pathogenic variant in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene, is the most common skeletal dysplasia. The Lifetime Impact of Achondroplasia Study in Europe (LIAISE; NCT03449368) aimed to quantify the burden of achondroplasia among individuals across a broad range of ages, including adults. METHODS: Demographic, clinical and healthcare resource use data were collected from medical records of achondroplasia patients enrolled in 13 sites across six European countries in this retrospective, observational study. Descriptive statistics or event rates per 100 person-years were calculated and compared across age groups as well as by history of limb lengthening. Patient-reported outcomes (quality of life [QoL], pain, functional independence, work productivity and activity impairments) were evaluated using questionnaires at the time of enrolment. An exploratory analysis investigated correlations between height (z-score or centimetres) and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 186 study patients were included, with a mean age of 21.7 ± 17.3 years (range 5.0-84.4). At least one complication or surgery was reported for 94.6% and 72.0% of patients, respectively, at a rate of 66.6 and 21.5 events per 100 person-years. Diverse medical and surgical complications were reported for all ages in a bimodal distribution, occurring more frequently in the youngest and oldest age groups. A total of 40 patients had previously undergone limb lengthening (capped at 20% per the study protocol). The most frequent surgery types varied by age, in line with complication profiles. Healthcare resource use was high across all age groups, especially among the youngest and oldest individuals, and did not differ substantially according to history of limb lengthening. Compared to general population values, patients reported impaired QoL particularly for physical functioning domains. In addition, patients reported difficulty carrying out daily activities independently and pain starting in childhood. Patient height correlated with multiple patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that, across an individual's lifetime, achondroplasia is associated with multisystem complications, reduced QoL and functionality, and increased pain. These results highlight the large amount of healthcare resources that individuals with achondroplasia require throughout their lifespans and provide novel insights into current achondroplasia management practices across Europe. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03449368, Submitted 14 December 2017 - prospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03449368.
Asunto(s)
Acondroplasia , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Humanos , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Acondroplasia/epidemiología , Acondroplasia/genética , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Europa (Continente)RESUMEN
Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the diffusion of triamcinolone and demeclocycline from an endodontic paste when used unmodified, versus when combined in equal parts with a calcium hydroxide paste, in terms of diffusion through the dentinal tubules versus through the apical foramen. Methodology: Medicaments were placed in endodontically prepared roots that were kept in vials of Milli-Q water. The five experimental groups in the study were (1) control - no medicament, (2) medicament containing triamcinolone and demeclocycline (T&D) and occluded apex, (3) T&D paste and patent apex, (4) T&D + calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) occluded apex, and (5) T&D + Ca(OH)2 and patent apex. The triamcinolone and demeclocycline concentrations were measured with solid-phase extraction and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, after 1, 3, 8, and 24 h, and after 1 week. Results: Most of the triamcinolone and demeclocycline diffused through the apical foramen, with sparse diffusion through the dentinal tubules. The T&D paste mixed with Ca(OH)2 in equal amounts showed greater than the expected 50% reduction in the diffusion of triamcinolone and demeclocycline from mass dilution alone (89% and 80%, respectively). Conclusions: These results stress the importance of maintaining apical patency, for allowing diffusion of active components of the drugs to target tissues in the periapical environment.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Achondroplasia (ACH) is the most common form of skeletal dysplasia, resulting in disproportionate short stature and medical complications. We review the literature on physical functioning, psychosocial function, and quality of life (QoL) in ACH individuals compared to average stature individuals or other short stature conditions. Studies that assess the association between these outcomes and height, limb length/lengthening surgery in ACH patients are also summarized. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were searched through April 2021. Study inclusion criteria were: (1) quantitative design; (2) study population consisting solely/mainly of ACH patients; (3) reports of physical functioning, psychosocial functioning, and/or QoL. Included studies were summarized separately for pediatric and adult populations. RESULTS: Of 1664 records identified, 23 primary studies (sample size 8-437 participants) were included. Multiple tools were used across studies, including the generic PedsQL and SF-36 and height-specific QoLISSY. CONCLUSIONS: The literature demonstrates that ACH patients experience limitations in physical functioning and poorer QoL outcomes compared to average stature people across the life span. This appeared to be at least in part due to disproportionate short stature. Future research to better characterize QoL in ACH patients will assist clinicians to better evaluate the effectiveness of management programs including novel interventions.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPatients with achondroplasia experience limitations in physical functioning and poorer quality of life throughout their life course when compared to average statured individuals.Psychosocial issues are also heightened in adults with achondroplasia compared to average statured peers but are observed less frequently in children and adolescents with achondroplasia.The overall impact that limb lengthening has on physical functioning and QoL remains unclear, although there is some evidence that greater height or upper limb length may lead to an improvement in these parameters.Rehabilitation professionals should regularly assess physical functioning, psychosocial wellbeing, and quality of life in individuals with achondroplasia using condition-specific tools.
Asunto(s)
Acondroplasia , Calidad de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Niño , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Acondroplasia/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly worldwide. Saudi Arabia was significantly impacted by COVID-19. In March 2021, 381,000 cases were reported with 6539 deaths. This study attempts to quantify the impact of remdesivir on healthcare costs in Saudi Arabia, in terms of intensive care unit admissions, mechanical ventilation, and death prevention. METHODS: A forecasting model was designed to estimate the impact of remdesivir on the capacity of intensive care units and healthcare costs with patients requiring low flow oxygen therapy. The forecasting model was applied in the Saudi context with a 20-week projection between 1 February and 14 June, 2021. Model inputs were collected from published global and Saudi literature, available forecasting resources, and expert opinions. Three scenarios were assumed: the effective pandemic infection rate (Rt) remains at 1, the Rt increases up to 1.2, and the Rt declines from 1 to 0.8 over the study period. RESULTS: The model estimated that the use of remdesivir in hospitalized patients, in the optimistic and pessimistic scenarios, could prevent between 1520 and 3549 patient transfers to intensive care units and mechanical ventilation, prevent between 815 and 1582 deaths, and make potential cost savings between $US154 million and $US377 million owing to the reduction in intensive care unit capacity, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment with remdesivir may improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden on healthcare resources during this pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitales , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Arabia Saudita/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Aims: This mass spectrometry study investigated the diffusion of hydroxyl and calcium ions from a calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament (Pulpdent®) when used alone or mixed in equal parts with a steroid-antibiotic paste (Ledermix®). Materials and Methods: The pH (using pH meter) and calcium ion concentration (using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry) of the diffused medicaments were assessed using endodontically prepared human extracted teeth with either a sealed or a patent apex, at time intervals of 1, 3, 8, 24, and 168 h. Statistical Analysis: A one-way ANOVA was used to explore differences between and within groups, with Tukey-Kramer/Games-Howell posttests. Results: In both situations tested, Pulpdent® showed greater release of both calcium and hydroxyl ions than when mixed in equal parts with Ledermix®. Greater initial release of both ions occurred in roots with a patent apex, but by 1 week there was no significant difference between the two. If a 50:50 combination of Pulpdent® paste and Ledermix® paste is used, there is a lower release of calcium ions and hydroxyl ions than using Pulpdent® paste alone. Conclusion: With both Pulpdent® paste alone and Pulpdent® paste mixed equally with Ledermix® paste, the major pathway for movement of hydroxyl ions and calcium ions is diffusion through the dentine of the root, with the apex playing only a minor role.
RESUMEN
Managed access agreements provide a crucial mechanism whereby real-world data can be collected systematically to reduce uncertainty around available clinical and economic data, whilst providing the opportunity to identify patient sub-populations who are most likely to benefit from a new treatment. This manuscript aims to share learnings from the first managed access agreement, which was initiated following positive conditional approval in 2015 from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for elosulfase alfa, an enzyme replacement therapy for the treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis type IVA (MPS IVA). This managed access agreement enabled the collection of comprehensive real-world data for patients with MPS IVA, with results demonstrating that patients starting elosulfase alfa treatment showed gains similar to those seen in the pivotal trial for outcomes including endurance, respiratory and cardiac function, pain, quality of life measures and urinary keratan sulfate levels. In addition, former trial patients continued to see benefits in both clinical assessments and quality of life/activities of daily living nine years after beginning treatment. Key strengths of the process included recruitment of a high proportion of MPS IVA patients treated in England (72/89 known eligible patients) with a wide range of ages (2-58 years). Participation of a patient organisation (the MPS society) ensured that the patient voice was present throughout the process, whilst a contract research organisation (Rare Disease Research Partners) ensured that patients were represented when interpreting agreement criteria and during patient assessment meetings. Longer-term follow-up will be required for several MPS IVA outcomes (e.g. skeletal measures) to further reduce uncertainty, and continued follow-up of patients who had stopped treatment was found to be challenging. The burden associated with this managed access agreement was found to be high for patients, physicians, patient organisations, NHS England and the manufacturer, therefore costs and benefits of future agreements should be considered carefully before initiation. Through evaluation of the strengths and limitations of this process, it is hoped that learnings from this managed access agreement can be used to inform future agreements.
Asunto(s)
Condroitinsulfatasas , Mucopolisacaridosis IV , Actividades Cotidianas , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Terapia de Reemplazo Enzimático , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mucopolisacaridosis IV/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of remdesivir compared to other existing therapies (SoC) in Turkey to treat COVID-19 patients hospitalized with < 94% saturation and low-flow oxygen therapy (LFOT) requirement. METHODS: We compared remdesivir as the treatment for COVID-19 with the treatments in the Turkish treatment guidelines. Analyses were performed using data from 78 hospitalized COVID-19 patients with SpO2 < 94% who received LFOT in a tertiary healthcare facility. COVID-19 episode costs were calculated for 78 patients considering the cost of modeled remdesivir treatment in the same group from the payer's perspective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was calculated for remdesivir versus the SoC for the population identified. For Turkey, a reimbursement threshold value between USD 8599 (1 × per capita gross domestic product-GDP) and USD 25.797 (3 × GDP) per QALY was used. RESULTS: In the remdesivir arm, the length of hospital stay (LOS) was 3 days shorter than the SOC. The low ventilator requirement in the remdesivir arm was one factor that decreased the QALY disutility value. In patients who were transferred to intensive care unit (ICU) from the ward, the mean LOS was 17.3 days (SD 13.6), and the mean cost of stay was USD 155.3/day (SD 168.0), while in patients who were admitted to ICU at baseline, the mean LOS was 13.1 days (SD 13.7), and the mean cost of stay was USD 207.9/day (SD 133.6). The mean cost of episode per patient was USD 3461.1 (SD 2259.8) in the remdesivir arm and USD 3538.9 (SD 3296.0) in the SOC arm. Incremental QALYs were estimated at 0.174. Remdesivir treatment was determined to be cost saving vs. SoC. CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir, which results in shorter LOS and lower rates of intubation requirements in ICU patients than existing therapies, is associated with higher QALYs and lower costs, dominating SoC in patients with SpO2 < 94% who require oxygen support.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Oxígeno , SARS-CoV-2 , TurquíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We present baseline characteristics and follow-up data of a Managed Access Agreement (MAA), including patients with mucopolysaccharidosis IVA (MPS IVA) receiving elosulfase alfa enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in England on a conditional basis. Patients enrolled in the MAA programme are reviewed on an annual basis. Therapy can be continued if patients are compliant, able to tolerate infusions, and meet four out of five pre-defined clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) criteria. Baseline and follow-up clinical and PRO data are presented for all participants who completed ≥ 1 year of assessments in the MAA. RESULTS: The analysis included data from 55 patients, including 26 patients previously enrolled in clinical trials and 29 who started ERT after enrolling in the MAA. In patients with both baseline and follow-up data, mean 6-min walk test distance increased from 217 m at baseline to 244 m after a mean follow-up of 4.9 years. Improvement or stabilisation was seen regardless of age at treatment initiation or duration of treatment. Mean forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s were 0.87 L and 0.78 L, respectively at baseline and 1.05 L and 0.88 L after a mean follow-up of 5.5 years. PRO data showed overall improvements over time in Mobility, Self-care, and Caregiver assistance scores of the MPS-Health Assessment Questionnaire, relatively stable quality of life, and some improvements in pain scores. CONCLUSIONS: The MAA data confirm the effects of elosulfase alfa on clinical and PRO results observed in the clinical trials and provide real-world evidence for long-term stabilisation in these measures, suggesting a positive impact on the natural history of MPS IVA.
Asunto(s)
Mucopolisacaridosis IV , Condroitinsulfatasas , Inglaterra , Terapia de Reemplazo Enzimático , Humanos , Mucopolisacaridosis IV/tratamiento farmacológico , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Therapies may be more efficacious when targeting a patient subpopulation with specific attributes, thereby enhancing the cost-effectiveness of treatment. In the CRYSTAL study, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were treated with cetuximab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFIRI alone until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects or withdrawal of consent. OBJECTIVE: To determine if stratified use of cetuximab based on genetic biomarker detection improves cost-effectiveness. METHODS: We used individual patient data from CRYSTAL to compare the cost-effectiveness, cost per life-year (LY) and cost per quality-adjusted LY (QALY) gained of cetuximab plus FOLFIRI versus FOLFIRI alone in three cohorts of patients with mCRC: all randomised patients (intent-to-treat; ITT), tumours with no detectable mutations in codons 12 and 13 of exon 2 of the KRAS protein ('KRAS wt') and no detectable mutations in exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and exons 2, 3 and 4 of NRAS ('RAS wt'). Survival analysis was conducted using RStudio, and a cost-utility model was modified to allow comparison of the three cohorts. RESULTS: The deterministic base-case ICER (cost per QALY gained) was £130,929 in the ITT, £72,053 in the KRAS wt and £44,185 in the RAS wt cohorts for cetuximab plus FOLFIRI compared with FOLFIRI alone. At a £50,000 willingness-to-pay threshold, cetuximab plus FOLFIRI has a 2.8, 20 and 63% probability of being cost-effective for the ITT, KRAS wt and RAS wt cohorts, respectively, versus FOLFIRI alone. CONCLUSION: Screening for mutations in both KRAS and NRAS may provide the most cost-effective approach to patient selection.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Cetuximab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas Genéticas/economía , Medicina de Precisión/economía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/economía , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Cetuximab/administración & dosificación , Cetuximab/economía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/economía , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Marcadores Genéticos/genética , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Leucovorina/economía , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS: The purpose of the present study was to develop techniques to evaluate and quantify the primary components of dental medicament paste mixtures for root canal treatment, and to evaluate if degradation of the primary components occurred during storage. METHODS: The first part of the study developed a mass spectrometry (MS) method for determination of best recovery process. For this process, analytical grades of triamcinolone acetonide, clindamycin HCl, and doxycycline hyclate were sourced and analyzed. This was followed by solid-phase extraction (SPE) and an analysis of active components in dental pastes. RESULTS: By utilizing the targeted analytical properties of multiple reaction monitoring MS methods, coupled with SPE technique, the active components of endodontic dental pastes could be quantified and compared. The developed methods showed consistency over multiple runs, with a high level of reproducibility. None of the active components of the tested pastes degraded over the periods of product life tested. CONCLUSION: The inactivation or destruction of any of the primary components of endodontic medicaments in storage, or when mixed with other pastes, could affect treatment outcomes. The present study provides a reliable technique for the analysis of the active components of root canal medicaments.
Asunto(s)
Almacenaje de Medicamentos , Irrigantes del Conducto Radicular/química , Clindamicina/química , Doxiciclina/química , Combinación de Medicamentos , Espectrometría de Masas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Extracción en Fase Sólida , Triamcinolona Acetonida/químicaRESUMEN
The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the current scientific and economic thinking on the use of genetic technologies for cystic fibrosis (CF) screening. The paper takes a public health genetics viewpoint and gives an overview of the genetics behind CF, then describes current practices in screening for the disease. We then discuss the current literature on the economic evaluations of screening for CF. As the "wet" science improves, there are direct implications for health service. Therefore, it is important to keep examining both clinical practice and economics behind the technologies.
Asunto(s)
Fibrosis Quística/diagnóstico , Pruebas Genéticas/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Fibrosis Quística/genética , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, neurodegenerative autoimmune disorder affecting the central nervous system. Relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) is the most common clinical form of MS and affects â¼85% of cases at onset. Highly active (HA) and rapidly evolving severe (RES) RRMS are 2 forms of RRMS amenable to disease-modifying therapies (DMT). This study explored the efficacy of fingolimod relative to other DMTs for the treatment of HA and RES RRMS. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to identify published randomised controlled trials in HA and RES RRMS. Identified evidence was vetted, and a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to evaluate the relative efficacy of fingolimod versus dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in HA RRMS and versus natalizumab in RES RRMS. RESULTS: For HA RRMS, the SLR identified 2 studies with relevant patient subgroup data: 1 comparing fingolimod with placebo and the other comparing DMF with placebo. 3 studies were found for RES RRMS: 1 comparing fingolimod with placebo and 2 studies comparing natalizumab with placebo. NMA results in the HA population showed a favourable numerical trend of fingolimod versus DMF assessed for annualised relapse rate (ARR) and 3-month confirmed disability progression. For the RES population, the results identified an increase of ARR and 3-month confirmed disability progression for fingolimod versus natalizumab (not statistically significant). Sparse study data and the consequently high uncertainty around the estimates restricted our ability to demonstrate statistical significance in the studied subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Data limitations are apparent when conducting an informative indirect comparison for the HA and RES RRMS subgroups as the subgroups analyses were retrospective analyses of studies powered to indicate differences across entire study populations. Comparisons across treatments in HA or RES RRMS will be associated with high levels of uncertainty until new data are collected for these subgroups.
Asunto(s)
Dimetilfumarato/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Fingolimod/uso terapéutico , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Natalizumab/uso terapéutico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
The aim of the review is to establish whether, on the basis of previous published evidence, current accepted guidance for health economic evaluation needs to be adapted to evaluate healthcare based on use of genetic information. Online literature search strategies were designed (using PubMed and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database [NHS EED], among others) to gather papers carrying out or discussing economic evaluation and genetics. Papers meeting the inclusion criteria were obtained and reviewed. The papers purporting to be economic analyses were classified using the criteria of the NHS EED and the British Medical Journal (BMJ) working party on peer review of health economic literature. Of 120 English-language papers that met the criteria for review, only 37 were economic evaluations according to the criteria set out by the NHS EED and BMJ working party on economic evaluations. Of these 37, only 33 papers discussed economic evaluation methodologies in the genetics context. The economic evaluation papers did not seem to tackle any of the problems discussed in the methodological papers. Economic evaluation methods offer a structured approach for evaluation of changes but may need to change in order to assess the new technologies. We have found that such studies have not been widely reported, and that those that have been reported do not depart from current economic methods. We have identified a need for better skills and guidance in health economics within this growing area of research.