Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Preprint en Inglés | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-22277165

RESUMEN

Analytical methods for the differential determination between natural infection with SARS- CoV-2 vs. immunity elicited by vaccination or infection after immunization (breakthrough cases) represent attractive new research venues in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Herein, we set out to compare humoral responses against several SARS-CoV-2 structural and non-structural proteins in infected unvaccinated (convalescent), vaccinated, as well as vaccinated and infected (breakthrough) individuals. Our results indicate that immunization with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) induces significantly higher levels of IgG antibodies against the membrane (M) protein of SARS-CoV-2 as compared to convalescent subjects both, after the primary vaccination schedule and after a booster dose. Moreover, we found that CoronaVac-immunized individuals, after receiving a third vaccine shot, display equivalent levels of N-specific IgG antibodies as convalescents subjects. Regarding non-structural viral proteins, for the two viral proteins ORF3a and NSP8, IgG antibodies were produced in more than 50% of the convalescent subjects. Finally, a logistic regression model and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis show that combined detection of M and N proteins may be useful as a biomarker to differentiate breakthrough cases from vaccinated and convalescent individuals that did not receive prior vaccination. Taken together, these results suggest that multiple SARS-CoV-2 antigens may be used as differential biomarkers for distinguishing natural infection from vaccination.

2.
Preprint en Inglés | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-22270253

RESUMEN

Production of affordable coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in low- and middle-income countries is needed. NDV-HXP-S is an inactivated egg-based Newcastle disease virus (NDV) vaccine expressing the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Wuhan-Hu-1. The spike protein was stabilized and incorporated into NDV virions by removing the polybasic furin cleavage site, introducing the transmembrane domain and cytoplasmic tail of the fusion protein of NDV, and introducing six prolines for stabilization in the prefusion state. Vaccine production and clinical development was initiated in Vietnam, Thailand, and Brazil. Here the interim results from the first stage of the randomized, dose-escalation, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial conducted at the Hanoi Medical University (Vietnam) are presented. Healthy adults aged 18-59 years, non-pregnant, and with self-reported negative history for SARS-CoV-2 infection were eligible. Participants were randomized to receive one of five treatments by intramuscular injection twice, 28 days apart: 1 g +/-CpG1018 (a toll-like receptor 9 agonist), 3 g alone, 10 g alone, or placebo. Participants and personnel assessing outcomes were masked to treatment. The primary outcomes were solicited adverse events (AEs) during 7 days and subject-reported AEs during 28 days after each vaccination. Investigators further reviewed subject-reported AEs. Secondary outcomes were immunogenicity measures (anti-spike immunoglobulin G [IgG] and pseudotyped virus neutralization). This interim analysis assessed safety 56 days after first vaccination (day 57) in treatment-exposed individuals and immunogenicity through 14 days after second vaccination (day 43) per protocol. Between March 15 and April 23, 2021, 224 individuals were screened and 120 were enrolled (25 per group for active vaccination and 20 for placebo). All subjects received two doses. The most common solicited AEs among those receiving active vaccine or placebo were all predominantly mild and included injection site pain or tenderness (<58%), fatigue or malaise (<22%), headache (<21%), and myalgia (<14%). No higher proportion of the solicited AEs were observed for any group of active vaccine. The proportion reporting vaccine-related AEs during the 28 days after either vaccination ranged from 4% to 8% among vaccine groups and was 5% in controls. No vaccine-related serious adverse event occurred. The immune response in the 10 g formulation group was highest, followed by 1 g +CpG1018, 3 g, and 1 g formulations. Fourteen days after the second vaccination, the geometric mean concentrations (GMC) of 50% neutralizing antibody against the homologous Wuhan-Hu-1 pseudovirus ranged from 56.07 IU/mL (1 g, 95% CI 37.01, 84.94) to 246.19 IU/mL (10 g, 95% CI 151.97, 398.82), with 84% to 96% of vaccine groups attaining a [≥] 4-fold increase over baseline. This was compared to a panel of human convalescent sera (N=29, 72.93 95% CI 33.00-161.14). Live virus neutralization to the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of concern was reduced but in line with observations for vaccines currently in use. Since the adjuvant has shown modest benefit, GMC ratio of 2.56 (95% CI, 1.4 - 4.6) for 1 g +/-CpG1018, a decision was made not to continue studying it with this vaccine. NDV-HXP-S had an acceptable safety profile and potent immunogenicity. The 3 g dose was advanced to phase 2 along with a 6 g dose. The 10 g dose was not selected for evaluation in phase 2 due to potential impact on manufacturing capacity. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04830800.

3.
Preprint en Inglés | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-21263758

RESUMEN

BackgroundProduction of affordable coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in low- and middle-income countries is needed. NDV-HXP-S is an inactivated egg-based Newcastle disease virus vaccine expressing the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Its being developed in Thailand, Vietnam, and Brazil; herein are initial results from Thailand. MethodsThis phase 1 stage of a randomised, dose-escalation, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial was conducted at the Vaccine Trial Centre, Mahidol University (Bangkok). Healthy adults aged 18-59 years, non-pregnant and negative for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were eligible. Participants were block randomised to receive one of six treatments by intramuscular injection twice, 28 days apart: 1 {micro}g{+/-}CpG1018 (a toll-like receptor 9 agonist), 3 {micro}g{+/-}CpG1018, 10 {micro}g, or placebo. Participants and personnel assessing outcomes were masked to treatment. The primary outcomes were solicited and spontaneously reported adverse events (AEs) during 7 and 28 days after each vaccination, respectively. Secondary outcomes were immunogenicity measures (anti-S IgG and pseudotyped virus neutralisation). An interim analysis assessed safety at day 57 in treatment-exposed individuals and immunogenicity through day 43 per protocol. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04764422). FindingsBetween March 20 and April 23, 2021, 377 individuals were screened and 210 were enrolled (35 per group); all received dose one; five missed dose two. The most common solicited AEs among vaccinees, all predominantly mild, were injection site pain (<63%), fatigue (<35%), headache (<32%), and myalgia (<32%). The proportion reporting a vaccine-related AE ranged from 5{middle dot}7% to 17{middle dot}1% among vaccine groups and was 2{middle dot}9% in controls; there was no vaccine-related serious adverse event. The 10 {micro}g formulations immunogenicity ranked best, followed by 3 {micro}g+CpG1018, 3 {micro}g, 1 {micro}g+CpG1018, and 1 {micro}g formulations. On day 43, the geometric mean concentrations of 50% neutralising antibody ranged from 122{middle dot}23 IU/mL (1 {micro}g, 95% CI 86{middle dot}40-172{middle dot}91) to 474{middle dot}35 IU/mL (10 {micro}g, 95% CI 320{middle dot}90-701{middle dot}19), with 93{middle dot}9% to 100% of vaccine groups attaining a [≥]4-fold increase over baseline. InterpretationNDV-HXP-S had an acceptable safety profile and potent immunogenicity. The 3 {micro}g and 3 {micro}g+CpG1018 formulations advanced to phase 2. FundingNational Vaccine Institute (Thailand), National Research Council (Thailand), Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, National Institutes of Health (USA)

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA