RESUMEN
As the number of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions has increased significantly, surgical techniques have also made a lot of progress, and clinical outcomes are improving accordingly. However, the authors still have different opinions on ACL anatomy, femoral tunnel position, how to make a femoral tunnel, and graft selection, and many parts are controversial. Major factors contributing to the failure of ACL reconstruction, such as technical errors and biological healing failures. To reduce technical errors, a comprehensive understanding of ACL anatomy and the ability to create a well-positioned femoral tunnel are crucial. This involves recognizing the advantages and disadvantages of three surgical techniques: modified transtibial, transanteromedial portal, and outside-in. To improve biological healing, the four principles of tissue engineering (cells, growth factors, scaffolds, and mechanical stimuli) have been increasingly explored in various methods of bioaugmentation. Residual rotational instability of the knee joint remains a significant concern. Since the rediscovery of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) in the knee joint, the role of anterolateral complex, including the ALL and the deep iliotibial band, as secondary stabilizers of anterolateral rotatory instability, has gained attention. In the quest to reinforce the anterolateral complex, there are two approaches: ALL reconstruction as anatomical reconstruction concept and lateral extraarticular tenodesis as a nonanatomical reinforcement concept.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To date, a variety of surgical approaches have been used to reconstruct the medial orbital wall fracture. Still however, there is still a controversy as to their applicability because of postoperative scars, injury of anatomical structures and limited visual fields. The purpose of this study was to introduce a useful additional medial subbrow approach for better reduction and securement more accurate implant pocket of medial orbital wall fracture with the subciliary technique. METHODS: We had performed our technique for a total of 14 patients with medial orbital wall fracture at our medical institution between January 2016 and July 2017. All fractures were operated through subciliary technique combined with the additional medial subbrow approach. They underwent subciliary approach accompanied by medial wall dissection using a Louisville elevator through the slit incision of the medial subbrow procedure. This facilitated visualization of the medial wall fracture site and helped to ensure a more accurate pocket for implant insertion. RESULTS: Postoperative outcomes showed sufficient coverage without displacement. Twelve cases of preoperative diplopia improved to two cases of postoperative diplopia. More than 2 mm enophthalmos was 14 cases preoperatively, improving to 0 case postoperatively. Without damage such as major vessels or extraocular muscles, enophthalmos was corrected and there was no restriction of eyeball motion. CONCLUSION: Our ancillary procedure was useful in dissecting the medial wall, and it was a safe method as to cause no significant complications in our clinical series. Also, there is an only nonvisible postoperative scar. Therefore, it is a recommendable surgical modality for medial orbital wall fracture.