Chemoradiotherapy for untreated Masaoka-Koga stage IVB thymic carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare type of a malignant tumor. The optimal treatment for Masaoka-Koga stage IVB TC patients is controversial due to the rarity of the disease. Chemotherapy is still the preferred option, but the outcomes are unsatisfactory. Whether radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy could improve prognosis remains unclear. METHODS: Untreated stage IVB TC patients who have received first-line chemotherapy were included in the present study. The patients who have undergone surgery were excluded. The primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were included in the study. A total of 31 patients received chemoradiotherapy (ChemoRT cohort), and the remaining 36 patients only received chemotherapy (Chemo cohort). The median follow-up period was 40.3 months. The ORR for the ChemoRT and Chemo cohorts was 61.3 and 27.8%, respectively (P = 0.006). Furthermore, PFS (P = 0.003) and OS (P = 0.046) were significantly superior in the ChemoRT cohort. Radiotherapy maintained a significant favorable effect on PFS in multivariate analysis (P = 0.014), but the effect on OS was insignificant (P = 0.249). There was no advantage in PFS (P = 0.302) in the ChemoRT cohort in patients who received < 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In contrast, radiotherapy significantly improved PFS (P = 0.005) in patients who received ≥ 4 cycles of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Chemoradiotherapy used as the first-line treatment improved ORR and PFS in Masaoka-Koga stage IVB TC patients. Patients receiving more cycles of chemotherapy may have a better chance to benefit from chemoradiotherapy.

Correction to: Timing of thoracic radiotherapy is more important than dose intensification in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a parallel comparison of two prospective studies.

Correction to: Strahlenther Onkol 2019 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-019-01539-1 The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The correct version of the funding information are given ….

Timing of thoracic radiotherapy is more important than dose intensification in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a parallel comparison of two prospective studies.

PURPOSE: The optimal radiotherapy dose/fraction for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is undefined. Our objectives were to compare efficacy between hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (TRT; 1.5 Gy 2 times per day [bid] in 30 fractions) and hypofractionated TRT (2.5 Gy once per day [qd] in 22 fractions), and to explore prognostic factors influencing the prognosis, such as the timing of TRT. METHODS: Patients enrolled in two independent prospective studies were combined and analyzed. The primary endpoint was local/regional control (LRC). The prognosis was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Ninety-two and 96 patients were treated with hyperfractionated TRT and hypofractionated TRT, respectively. The 1­ and 2­year LRC rates of the two arms were 82.1 and 60.7%, and 84.9 and 68.8% (P = 0.27), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) times (months) were 28.3 (95% confidence interval, CI 16.4-40.1) and 22.0 (95% CI 16.4-27.5), while the 1­year, 3­year, and 5­year OS rates were 85.2, 40.8, and 27.1%, and 76.9, 34.3, and 26.8% (P = 0.37), respectively. Using a multivariate Cox regression study, time (days) from the initiation of chemotherapy to TRT (TCT) ≤43 was associated with improved LRC (hazard radio, HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.76; P = 0.005). Time (days) from the start of chemotherapy to the end of TRT (SER) ≤63 (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.80; P = 0.003) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.29-0.63; P = 0.000) were favorably related to OS. Grade 2/3 acute radiation esophagitis was observed in 37.0 and 17.7% of patients in the hyperfractionated and hypofractionated arms, respectively (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Both hyperfractionated and hypofractionated TRT schedules achieved good LRC and OS for patients with limited-stage SCLC in this study. Keeping TCT ≤43 and SER ≤63 resulted in a better prognosis. The incidence of acute esophagitis was significantly higher in the hyperfractionated arm.

Derived Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and C-Reactive Protein as Prognostic Factors for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Objectives: To explore the relationship between peripheral blood inflammation parameters and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Patients and methods: In this study, eligible patients treated with SBRT from 2013 to 2018, and both serum complete blood count and blood biochemical results were available prior to (within 60 days) radiotherapy were included. Results: A review of hospital registries identified 148 patients, and the 5-year OS and PFS of the entire cohort were 69.8% and 65.6%, respectively, with the median follow-up time was 52.8 months. Multivariable analysis showed that derived neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) ≥1.4 and C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥2.9 were statistically and independently associated with worse OS (HR = 4.62, 95% CI 1.89-11.27, p = 0.001; HR = 2.92, 95% CI 1.49-5.70, p = 0.002, respectively). The 5-year OS for patients with dNLR below and equal to or above the 1.4 were 85.3% and 62.9% (p = 0.002), respectively, and 76.7% for the low CRP group versus 58.5% for the high CRP group (p = 0.030). Higher serum level of post-treatment CRP also independent parameters for inferior PFS (HR = 4.83, 95% CI 1.28-18.25, p = 0.020). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that dNLR and CRP are associated with the outcomes of early-stage NSCLC patients treated with SBRT, which may assist in selecting optimal nursing care and therapeutic scheme for every individual.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy versus surgery for multiple primary lung cancers after prior radical resection: A multicenter retrospective study.

Background: Patients who previously underwent surgical resection of initial primary lung cancer are at a high risk of developing multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs). The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and surgery for MPLCs patients after prior radical resection for the first lung cancers. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, eligible MPLC patients with tumor diameter of 5.0 cm or less at N0M0 who underwent SBRT or reoperation between January 2013 and August 2020 were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the 3-year locoregional recurrence and treatment-related toxicity. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates. The χ2 test was adapted to assess the difference of categorical variables between the two subgroup patients. Results: A total of 203 (73 in the SBRT group and 130 in the surgery group) patients from three academic cancer centers were evaluated with a median follow-up of 38.3 months. The cumulative 1-, 2-, and 3-year incidences of locoregional recurrence were 5.6 %, 7.0 % and 13.1 % in the SBRT group versus 3.2 %, 4.8 % and 7.4 % in the surgery group, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 1.97; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.74-5.24; P = 0.14]. The cancer-specific survival rates were 95.9 %, 94.5 % and 88.1 % versus 96.9 %, 94.6 % and 93.8 % in the SBRT and surgery groups respectively (HR, 1.72; 95 % CI, 0.67-4.44; P = 0.23). In the SBRT group, two patients (2.7 %) suffered from grade 3 radiation pneumonitis, while in the surgery group, grade 3 complications occurred in four (3.1 %) patients, and four cases were expired due to pneumonia or pulmonary heart disease within 90 days after surgery. Conclusions: SBRT is an effective therapeutic option with limited toxicity compared to surgery for patients with MPLCs after prior radical surgical resection, and it could be considered as an alternative treatment for those patients.

Definitive local therapy for extracranial single-organ oligorecurrent non-small-cell lung cancer: A single institutional retrospective study.

Oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is potentially curable. Oligo-recurrence occurs with oligometastatic disease characterized by well-controlled primary lesion. The purpose of the present study was to explore the value of definitive local therapy (DLT) for extracranial single-organ oligorecurrent NSCLC. A total of 81 patients with NSCLC who had extracranial single-organ oligorecurrence after receiving radical treatment at the Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences from January 2010 to December 2017 were analyzed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The median follow-up time of the 81 patients was 65.8 months. A total of 39 patients received DLT. A large proportion of patients who did not accept DLTs received specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The results of multivariate analysis showed that DLT and specific TKI therapy were favorable prognostic factors significantly related to PFS. Further analysis showed that for patients without specific TKI therapy, DLT significantly improved PFS and the 5-year PFS rate. The 5-year OS rate also improved, but the improvement was not significant. For extracranial single-organ oligorecurrent NSCLC, PFS was significantly superior in patients receiving DLT. Among them, for the subgroup of patients who did not receive specific TKI therapy, DLT is expected to improve long-term prognostic outcomes.