Conversational Agents for Body Weight Management: Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a public health issue worldwide. Conversational agents (CAs), also frequently called chatbots, are computer programs that simulate dialogue between people. Owing to better accessibility, cost-effectiveness, personalization, and compassionate patient-centered treatments, CAs are expected to have the potential to provide sustainable lifestyle counseling for weight management. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to critically summarize and evaluate clinical studies on the effectiveness and feasibility of CAs with unconstrained natural language input for weight management. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, and ACM Digital Library were searched up to December 2022. Studies were included if CAs were used for weight management and had a capability for unconstrained natural language input. No restrictions were imposed on study design, language, or publication type. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool or the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. The extracted data from the included studies were tabulated and narratively summarized as substantial heterogeneity was expected. RESULTS: In total, 8 studies met the eligibility criteria: 3 (38%) randomized controlled trials and 5 (62%) uncontrolled before-and-after studies. The CAs in the included studies were aimed at behavior changes through education, advice on food choices, or counseling via psychological approaches. Of the included studies, only 38% (3/8) reported a substantial weight loss outcome (1.3-2.4 kg decrease at 12-15 weeks of CA use). The overall quality of the included studies was judged as low. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this systematic review suggest that CAs with unconstrained natural language input can be used as a feasible interpersonal weight management intervention by promoting engagement in psychiatric intervention-based conversations simulating treatments by health care professionals, but currently there is a paucity of evidence. Well-designed rigorous randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes, longer treatment duration, and follow-up focusing on CAs' acceptability, efficacy, and safety are warranted.

Comparison of ticagrelor with clopidogrel on quality of life in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor has a Class I recommendation for use following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, ticagrelor needs to be taken twice a day, as compared to clopidogrel. Its adverse effects, such as dyspnea or bleeding, are known to be more common than with clopidogrel. Dyspnea may tend to be uncomfortable and limit activity. Major bleeding often leads to hospitalization or transfusions, and frequent minor bleeding, which might not result in patients seeking medical care, can make ACS patients feel unhealthy. Thus, these characteristics may affect the health-related quality of life (HQOL). METHODS: In the PLEIO (comParison of ticagreLor and clopidogrEl on mIcrocirculation in patients with acute cOronary syndrome) trial, we randomized 120 participants to receive ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 75 mg once daily for at least 12 months. We carried out an HQOL assessment with the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire on the day of discharge following PCI, as well as six months later. RESULTS: At discharge, the HQOL measures were similar in the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups, both having a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS) score. A six-month HQOL follow-up assessment showed that there were no differences between the two study groups in either the PCS or the MCS scores. In both groups, the PCS scores significantly increased over six months of treatment (both p < 0.01). However, the MCS score did not differ significantly. A baseline MCS score is an independent predictor of better physical and mental health status at six months. CONCLUSIONS: Ticagrelor, as compared to clopidogrel, did not significantly reduce the HQOL during the six months following PCI in patients with ACS. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02618733.

Dynamics of serum anion gaps with in-hospital mortality: Analysis of the multi-open databases.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the relationship between the anion gap, including the corrected anion gap, and patient mortality in intensive care units (ICUs) without restricting the analysis to specific diseases or medical specialties. Our primary objective was to investigate the association between the anion gap and ICU mortality using multiple open-access databases. METHODS: We identified 4229 subjects from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database, whose entries were from between 2008 and 2019. For each patient, the anion gap and corrected anion gap were calculated, and the study sample was divided into tertile groups (T) according to these levels. The association between the anion gap and in-hospital mortality was assessed using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) derived from a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. Besides MIMIC-IV, we also incorporated study samples from two other databases (MIMIC-III and electronic ICU) to calculate summary HRs using a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Within MIMIC-IV, 1015 patients (24%) died during an average follow-up period of 15.5 days. The fully adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for T2 and T3, relative to T1, were 1.31 (95% CI 1.08-1.58) and 1.54 (95% CI 1.24-1.90), respectively. When grouped by corrected anion gap, the results remained statistically significant. In the meta-analysis, the summary HRs and 95% CIs for T2 and T3 were 1.24 (95% CI 1.08-1.43) and 1.55 (95% CI 1.33-1.82), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both the anion gap and corrected anion gap were associated with in-hospital mortality regardless of specific diseases or medical specialties.

Design and rationale for a comparison study of Olmesartan and Valsartan On myocardial metabolism In patients with Dilated cardiomyopathy (OVOID) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMP) is characterized by ventricular chamber enlargement and systolic dysfunction which may cause heart failure. Patients with DCMP have overactivation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systems, which can also adversely affect myocardial metabolism in heart failure. The impairment of myocardial metabolism can contribute to the progression of left ventricular remodeling and contractile dysfunction in heart failure. Although angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been used to treat patients with DCMP, there has been no direct comparison of the efficacy of these agents. The objective of this study is to compare the effects of olmesartan and valsartan on myocardial metabolism in patients with DCMP. METHODS/DESIGN: The OVOID study (a comparison study of Olmesartan and Valsartan On myocardial metabolism In patients with Dilated cardiomyopathy) is designed as a non-blinded, open-label, parallel-group, prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial. A total of 40 DCMP patients aged between 20 and 85 years will be randomly allocated into the olmesartan or the valsartan group. 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) will be performed at baseline and six months after receiving the study agent. The primary endpoint is myocardial glucose consumption per square meter, measured using 18F-FDG PET 6 months after receiving the study agent. DISCUSSION: The purpose of this trial is to compare the efficacy between olmesartan and valsartan in improving myocardial metabolism in DCMP patients. This will be the first randomized comparative study investigating the differential effects of ARBs on heart failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04174456 . Registered on 18 November 2019.

Severe multivessel coronary artery spasm detected by computed tomography: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac arrest caused by multivessel coronary artery spasm (CAS) is rare. Although coronary angiography (CAG) with provocation testing is the diagnostic gold standard in current vasospastic angina guidelines, it can cause severe procedure-related complications. Here, we report a novel technique involving dual-acquisition coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to detect multivessel CAS in a patient who survived out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). CASE SUMMARY: A 58-year-old healthy Korean male survived OHCA caused by ventricular fibrillation (VF), experiencing seven episodes of defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and was referred to the Emergency Room. Vital signs were stable and physical examination, electrocardiogram, chest, and brain CT did not show any abnormal findings, except elevated hs-Troponin I levels (0.1146 ng/mL). Echocardiogram revealed a regional wall motion abnormality in the inferior wall, with a low normal left ventricular ejection fraction (50%). A multivessel CAS (both left and right) was detected using a dual-acquisition CCTA technique (presence and absence of intravenous nitrate). During CAG with the 2nd injection of ergonovine, a prolonged and refractory total occlusion in the proximal-ostial right coronary artery was completely relieved after a seven-cycle intracoronary injection regimen of nitroglycerine. The patient was discharged with the recommendation of smoking and alcohol cessation. Nitrate and calcium channel blockers were also prescribed. The patient had no further events at 3 months of follow-up after discharge. DISCUSSION: Dual-acquisition CCTA is a promising tool to detect multivessel CAS.