Protein architecture of the human kinetochore microtubule attachment site.

Chromosome segregation requires assembly of kinetochores on centromeric chromatin to mediate interactions with spindle microtubules and control cell-cycle progression. To elucidate the protein architecture of human kinetochores, we developed a two-color fluorescence light microscopy method that measures average label separation, Delta, at <5 nm accuracy. Delta analysis of 16 proteins representing core structural complexes spanning the centromeric chromatin-microtubule interface, when correlated with mechanical states of spindle-attached kinetochores, provided a nanometer-scale map of protein position and mechanical properties of protein linkages. Treatment with taxol, which suppresses microtubule dynamics and activates the spindle checkpoint, revealed a specific switch in kinetochore architecture. Cumulatively, Delta analysis revealed that compliant linkages are restricted to the proximity of chromatin, suggested a model for how the KMN (KNL1/Mis12 complex/Ndc80 complex) network provides microtubule attachment and generates pulling forces from depolymerization, and identified an intrakinetochore molecular switch that may function in controlling checkpoint activity.

Chromosome congression by Kinesin-5 motor-mediated disassembly of longer kinetochore microtubules.

During mitosis, sister chromatids congress to the spindle equator and are subsequently segregated via attachment to dynamic kinetochore microtubule (kMT) plus ends. A major question is how kMT plus-end assembly is spatially regulated to achieve chromosome congression. Here we find in budding yeast that the widely conserved kinesin-5 sliding motor proteins, Cin8p and Kip1p, mediate chromosome congression by suppressing kMT plus-end assembly of longer kMTs. Of the two, Cin8p is the major effector and its activity requires a functional motor domain. In contrast, the depolymerizing kinesin-8 motor Kip3p plays a minor role in spatial regulation of yeast kMT assembly. Our analysis identified a model where kinesin-5 motors bind to kMTs, move to kMT plus ends, and upon arrival at a growing plus end promote net kMT plus-end disassembly. In conclusion, we find that length-dependent control of net kMT assembly by kinesin-5 motors yields a simple and stable self-organizing mechanism for chromosome congression.

Adaptor autoregulation promotes coordinated binding within clathrin coats.

Membrane traffic is an essential process that allows protein and lipid exchange between the endocytic, lysosomal, and secretory compartments. Clathrin-mediated traffic between the trans-Golgi network and endosomes mediates responses to the environment through the sorting of biosynthetic and endocytic protein cargo. Traffic through this pathway is initiated by the controlled assembly of a clathrin-adaptor protein coat on the cytosolic surface of the originating organelle. In this process, clathrin is recruited by different adaptor proteins that act as a bridge between clathrin and the transmembrane cargo proteins to be transported. Interactions between adaptors and clathrin and between different types of adaptors lead to the formation of a densely packed protein network within the coat. A key unresolved issue is how the highly complex adaptor-clathrin interaction and adaptor-adaptor interaction landscape lead to the correct spatiotemporal assembly of the clathrin coat. Here we report the discovery of a new autoregulatory motif within the clathrin adaptor Gga2 that drives synergistic binding of Gga2 to clathrin and the adaptor Ent5. This autoregulation influences the temporal and/or spatial location of the Gga2-Ent5 interaction. We propose that this synergistic binding provides built-in regulation to ensure the correct assembly of clathrin coats.

Molecular architecture of a kinetochore-microtubule attachment site.

Kinetochore attachment to spindle microtubule plus-ends is necessary for accurate chromosome segregation during cell division in all eukaryotes. The centromeric DNA of each chromosome is linked to microtubule plus-ends by eight structural-protein complexes. Knowing the copy number of each of these complexes at one kinetochore-microtubule attachment site is necessary to understand the molecular architecture of the complex, and to elucidate the mechanisms underlying kinetochore function. We have counted, with molecular accuracy, the number of structural protein complexes in a single kinetochore-microtubule attachment using quantitative fluorescence microscopy of GFP-tagged kinetochore proteins in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find that relative to the two Cse4p molecules in the centromeric histone, the copy number ranges from one or two for inner kinetochore proteins such as Mif2p, to 16 for the DAM-DASH complex at the kinetochore-microtubule interface. These counts allow us to visualize the overall arrangement of a kinetochore-microtubule attachment. As most of the budding yeast kinetochore proteins have homologues in higher eukaryotes, including humans, this molecular arrangement is likely to be replicated in more complex kinetochores that have multiple microtubule attachments.

Signaling protein abundance modulates the strength of the spindle assembly checkpoint.

During mitosis, unattached kinetochores in a dividing cell signal to the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) to delay anaphase onset and prevent chromosome missegregation.1,2,3,4 The signaling activity of these kinetochores and the likelihood of chromosome missegregation depend on the amount of SAC signaling proteins each kinetochore recruits.5,6,7,8 Therefore, factors that control SAC protein recruitment must be thoroughly understood. Phosphoregulation of kinetochore and SAC signaling proteins due to the concerted action of many kinases and phosphatases is a significant determinant of the SAC protein recruitment to signaling kinetochores.9 Whether the abundance of SAC proteins also influences the recruitment and signaling activity of human kinetochores has not been studied.8,10 Here, we reveal that the low cellular abundance of the SAC signaling protein Bub1 limits its own recruitment and that of BubR1 and restricts the SAC signaling activity of the kinetochore. Conversely, Bub1 overexpression results in higher recruitment of SAC proteins, producing longer delays in anaphase onset. We also find that the number of SAC proteins recruited by a signaling kinetochore is inversely correlated with the total number of signaling kinetochores in the cell. This correlation likely arises from the competition among the signaling kinetochores to recruit from a limited pool of signaling proteins, including Bub1. The inverse correlation may allow the dividing cell to prevent a large number of signaling kinetochores in early prophase from generating an overly large signal while enabling the last unaligned kinetochore in late prometaphase to signal at the maximum strength.

The structural flexibility of MAD1 facilitates the assembly of the Mitotic Checkpoint Complex.

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) safeguards the genome during cell division by generating an effector molecule known as the Mitotic Checkpoint Complex (MCC). The MCC comprises two subcomplexes: BUBR1:BUB3 and CDC20:MAD2, and the formation of CDC20:MAD2 is the rate-limiting step during MCC assembly. Recent studies show that the rate of CDC20:MAD2 formation is significantly accelerated by the cooperative binding of CDC20 to the SAC proteins MAD1 and BUB1. However, the molecular basis for this acceleration is not fully understood. Here, we demonstrate that the structural flexibility of MAD1 at a conserved hinge near the C-terminus is essential for catalytic MCC assembly. This MAD1 hinge enables the MAD1:MAD2 complex to assume a folded conformation in vivo. Importantly, truncating the hinge reduces the rate of MCC assembly in vitro and SAC signaling in vivo. Conversely, mutations that preserve hinge flexibility retain SAC signaling, indicating that the structural flexibility of the hinge, rather than a specific amino acid sequence, is important for SAC signaling. We summarize these observations as the 'knitting model' that explains how the folded conformation of MAD1:MAD2 promotes CDC20:MAD2 assembly.

Kre28-Spc105 interaction is essential for Spc105 loading at the kinetochore.

Kinetochore (KTs) are macromolecular protein assemblies that attach sister chromatids to spindle microtubules (MTs) and mediate accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis. The outer KT consists of the KMN network, a protein super-complex comprising Knl1 (yeast Spc105), Mis12 (yeast Mtw1), and Ndc80 (yeast Ndc80), which harbours sites for MT binding. Within the KMN network, Spc105 acts as an interaction hub of components involved in spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) signalling. It is known that Spc105 forms a complex with KT component Kre28. However, where Kre28 physically localizes in the budding yeast KT is not clear. The exact function of Kre28 at the KT is also unknown. Here, we investigate how Spc105 and Kre28 interact and how they are organized within bioriented yeast KTs using genetics and cell biological experiments. Our microscopy data show that Spc105 and Kre28 localize at the KT with a 1 : 1 stoichiometry. We also show that the Kre28-Spc105 interaction is important for Spc105 protein turn-over and essential for their mutual recruitment at the KTs. We created several truncation mutants of kre28 that affect Spc105 loading at the KTs. When over-expressed, these mutants sustain the cell viability, but SAC signalling and KT biorientation are impaired. Therefore, we conclude that Kre28 contributes to chromosome biorientation and high-fidelity segregation at least indirectly by regulating Spc105 localization at the KTs.

BubR1 recruitment to the kinetochore via Bub1 enhances spindle assembly checkpoint signaling.

During mitosis, unattached kinetochores in a dividing cell activate the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) and delay anaphase onset by generating the anaphase-inhibitory mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC). These kinetochores generate the MCC by recruiting its constituent proteins, including BubR1. In principle, BubR1 recruitment to signaling kinetochores should increase its local concentration and promote MCC formation. However, in human cells BubR1 is mainly thought to sensitize the SAC to silencing. Whether BubR1 localization to signaling kinetochores by itself enhances SAC signaling remains unknown. Therefore, we used ectopic SAC activation (eSAC) systems to isolate two molecules that recruit BubR1 to the kinetochore, the checkpoint protein Bub1 and the KI and MELT motifs in the kinetochore protein KNL1, and observed their contribution to eSAC signaling. Our quantitative analyses and mathematical modeling show that Bub1-mediated BubR1 recruitment to the human kinetochore promotes SAC signaling and highlight BubR1's dual role of strengthening the SAC directly and silencing it indirectly.

Aurora B phosphorylates Bub1 to promote spindle assembly checkpoint signaling.

Accurate chromosome segregation during cell division requires amphitelic chromosome attachment to the spindle apparatus. It is ensured by the combined activity of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC),1 a signaling mechanism that delays anaphase onset in response to unattached chromosomes, and an error correction mechanism that eliminates syntelic attachments.2 The SAC becomes active when Mps1 kinase sequentially phosphorylates the kinetochore protein Spc105/KNL1 and the signaling proteins that Spc105/KNL1 recruits to facilitate the production of the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC).3-8 The error correction mechanism is regulated by the Aurora B kinase, but Aurora B also promotes SAC signaling via indirect mechanisms.9-12 Here we present evidence that Aurora B kinase activity directly promotes MCC production by working downstream of Mps1 in budding yeast and human cells. Using the ectopic SAC activation (eSAC) system, we find that the conditional dimerization of Aurora B in budding yeast and an Aurora B recruitment domain in HeLa cells with either Bub1 or Mad1, but not the phosphodomain of Spc105/KNL1, leads to ectopic MCC production and mitotic arrest.13-16 Importantly, Bub1 must recruit both Mad1 and Cdc20 for this ectopic signaling activity. These and other data show that Aurora B cooperates with Bub1 to promote MCC production, but only after Mps1 licenses Bub1 recruitment to the kinetochore. This direct involvement of Aurora B in SAC signaling may maintain SAC signaling even after Mps1 activity in the kinetochore is lowered.

Microtubule Attachment and Centromeric Tension Shape the Protein Architecture of the Human Kinetochore.

The nanoscale protein architecture of the kinetochore plays an integral role in specifying the mechanisms underlying its functions in chromosome segregation. However, defining this architecture in human cells remains challenging because of the large size and compositional complexity of the kinetochore. Here, we use Förster resonance energy transfer to reveal the architecture of individual kinetochore-microtubule attachments in human cells. We find that the microtubule-binding domains of the Ndc80 complex cluster at the microtubule plus end. This clustering occurs only after microtubule attachment, and it increases proportionally with centromeric tension. Surprisingly, Ndc80 complex clustering is independent of the organization and number of its centromeric receptors. Moreover, this clustering is similar in yeast and human kinetochores despite significant differences in their centromeric organizations. These and other data suggest that the microtubule-binding interface of the human kinetochore behaves like a flexible "lawn" despite being nucleated by repeating biochemical subunits.

The copy-number and varied strengths of MELT motifs in Spc105 balance the strength and responsiveness of the spindle assembly checkpoint.

During mitosis, the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC) maintains genome stability while also ensuring timely anaphase onset. To maintain genome stability, the SAC must be strong to delay anaphase even if just one chromosome is unattached, but for timely anaphase onset, it must promptly respond to silencing mechanisms. How the SAC meets these potentially antagonistic requirements is unclear. Here we show that the balance between SAC strength and responsiveness is determined by the number of 'MELT' motifs in the kinetochore protein Spc105/KNL1 and their Bub3-Bub1 binding affinities. Many strong MELT motifs per Spc105/KNL1 minimize chromosome missegregation, but too many delay anaphase onset. We demonstrate this by constructing a Spc105 variant that trades SAC responsiveness for much more accurate chromosome segregation. We propose that the necessity of balancing SAC strength and responsiveness drives the dual evolutionary trend of the amplification of MELT motif number, but degeneration of their functionally optimal amino acid sequence.

Delineating the contribution of Spc105-bound PP1 to spindle checkpoint silencing and kinetochore microtubule attachment regulation.

Accurate chromosome segregation during cell division requires the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which detects unattached kinetochores, and an error correction mechanism that destabilizes incorrect kinetochore-microtubule attachments. While the SAC and error correction are both regulated by protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), which silences the SAC and stabilizes kinetochore-microtubule attachments, how these distinct PP1 functions are coordinated remains unclear. Here, we investigate the contribution of PP1, docked on its conserved kinetochore receptor Spc105/Knl1, to SAC silencing and attachment regulation. We find that Spc105-bound PP1 is critical for SAC silencing but dispensable for error correction; in fact, reduced PP1 docking on Spc105 improved chromosome segregation and viability of mutant/stressed states. We additionally show that artificially recruiting PP1 to Spc105/Knl1 before, but not after, chromosome biorientation interfered with error correction. These observations lead us to propose that recruitment of PP1 to Spc105/Knl1 is carefully regulated to ensure that chromosome biorientation precedes SAC silencing, thereby ensuring accurate chromosome segregation.

Ectopic Activation of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Signaling Cascade Reveals Its Biochemical Design.

Switch-like activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is critical for accurate chromosome segregation and for cell division in a timely manner. To determine the mechanisms that achieve this, we engineered an ectopic, kinetochore-independent SAC activator: the "eSAC." The eSAC stimulates SAC signaling by artificially dimerizing Mps1 kinase domain and a cytosolic KNL1 phosphodomain, the kinetochore signaling scaffold. By exploiting variable eSAC expression in a cell population, we defined the dependence of the eSAC-induced mitotic delay on eSAC concentration in a cell to reveal the dose-response behavior of the core signaling cascade of the SAC. These quantitative analyses and subsequent mathematical modeling of the dose-response data uncover two crucial properties of the core SAC signaling cascade: (1) a cellular limit on the maximum anaphase-inhibitory signal that the cascade can generate due to the limited supply of SAC proteins and (2) the ability of the KNL1 phosphodomain to produce the anaphase-inhibitory signal synergistically, when it recruits multiple SAC proteins simultaneously. We propose that these properties together achieve inverse, non-linear scaling between the signal output per kinetochore and the number of signaling kinetochores. When the number of kinetochores is low, synergistic signaling by KNL1 enables each kinetochore to produce a disproportionately strong signal output. However, when many kinetochores signal concurrently, they compete for a limited supply of SAC proteins. This frustrates synergistic signaling and lowers their signal output. Thus, the signaling activity of unattached kinetochores will adapt to the changing number of signaling kinetochores to enable the SAC to approximate switch-like behavior.

Stu2 acts as a microtubule destabilizer in metaphase budding yeast spindles.

The microtubule-associated protein Stu2 (XMAP215) has the remarkable ability to act either as a polymerase or as a destabilizer of the microtubule plus end. In budding yeast, it is required for the dynamicity of spindle microtubules and also for kinetochore force generation. To understand how Stu2 contributes to these distinct activities, we analyzed the contributions of its functional domains to its localization and function. We find that Stu2 colocalizes with kinetochores using its TOG domains, which bind GTP-tubulin, a coiled-coil homodimerization domain, and a domain that interacts with plus-end interacting proteins. Stu2 localization is also promoted by phosphorylation at a putative CDK1 phosphorylation site located within its microtubule-binding basic patch. Surprisingly, however, we find that kinetochore force generation is uncorrelated with the amount of kinetochore-colocalized Stu2. These and other data imply that Stu2 colocalizes with kinetochores by recognizing growing microtubule plus ends within yeast kinetochores. We propose that Stu2 destabilizes these plus ends to indirectly contribute to the "catch-bond" activity of the kinetochores.

How Kinetochore Architecture Shapes the Mechanisms of Its Function.

The eukaryotic kinetochore is a sophisticated multi-protein machine that segregates chromosomes during cell division. To ensure accurate chromosome segregation, it performs three major functions using disparate molecular mechanisms. It operates a mechanosensitive signaling cascade known as the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) to detect and signal the lack of attachment to spindle microtubules, and delay anaphase onset in response. In addition, after attaching to spindle microtubules, the kinetochore generates the force necessary to move chromosomes. Finally, if the two sister kinetochores on a chromosome are both attached to microtubules emanating from the same spindle pole, they activate another mechanosensitive mechanism to correct the monopolar attachments. All three of these functions maintain genome stability during cell division. The outlines of the biochemical activities responsible for these functions are now available. How the kinetochore integrates the underlying molecular mechanisms is still being elucidated. In this Review, we discuss how the nanoscale protein organization in the kinetochore, which we refer to as kinetochore 'architecture', organizes its biochemical activities to facilitate the realization and integration of emergent mechanisms underlying its three major functions. For this discussion, we will use the relatively simple budding yeast kinetochore as a model, and extrapolate insights gained from this model to elucidate functional roles of the architecture of the much more complex human kinetochore.

A Cell Biological Perspective on Past, Present and Future Investigations of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint.

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is a quality control mechanism that ensures accurate chromosome segregation during cell division. It consists of a mechanochemical signal transduction mechanism that senses the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle, and a signaling cascade that inhibits cell division if one or more chromosomes are not attached. Extensive investigations of both these component systems of the SAC have synthesized a comprehensive understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms. This review recounts the milestone results that elucidated the SAC, compiles a simple model of the complex molecular machinery underlying the SAC, and highlights poorly understood facets of the biochemical design and cell biological operation of the SAC that will drive research forward in the near future.

Dual mechanisms regulate the recruitment of spindle assembly checkpoint proteins to the budding yeast kinetochore.

Recruitment of spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) proteins by an unattached kinetochore leads to SAC activation. This recruitment is licensed by the Mps1 kinase, which phosphorylates the kinetochore protein Spc105 at one or more of its six MELT repeats. Spc105 then recruits the Bub3-Bub1 and Mad1-Mad2 complexes, which produce the inhibitory signal that arrests cell division. The strength of this signal depends, in part, on the number of Bub3-Bub1 and Mad1-Mad2 molecules that Spc105 recruits. Therefore regulation of this recruitment will influence SAC signaling. To understand this regulation, we established the physiological binding curves that describe the binding of Bub3-Bub1 and Mad1-Mad2 to the budding yeast kinetochore. We find that the binding of both follows the mass action law. Mps1 likely phosphorylates all six MELT repeats of Spc105. However, two mechanisms prevent Spc105 from recruiting six Bub3-Bub1 molecules: low Bub1 abundance and hindrance in the binding of more than one Bub3-Bub1 molecule to the same Spc105. Surprisingly, the kinetochore recruits two Mad1-Mad2 heterotetramers for every Bub3-Bub1 molecule. Finally, at least three MELT repeats per Spc105 are needed for accurate chromosome segregation. These data reveal that kinetochore-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms influence the physiological operation of SAC signaling, potentially to maximize chromosome segregation accuracy.

The kinetochore encodes a mechanical switch to disrupt spindle assembly checkpoint signalling.

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is a unique signalling mechanism that responds to the state of attachment of the kinetochore to spindle microtubules. SAC signalling is activated by unattached kinetochores, and it is silenced after these kinetochores form end-on microtubule attachments. Although the biochemical cascade of SAC signalling is well understood, how kinetochore-microtubule attachment disrupts it remained unknown. Here we show that, in budding yeast, end-on microtubule attachment to the kinetochore physically separates the Mps1 kinase, which probably binds to the calponin homology domain of Ndc80, from the kinetochore substrate of Mps1, Spc105 (KNL1 orthologue). This attachment-mediated separation disrupts the phosphorylation of Spc105, and enables SAC silencing. Additionally, the Dam1 complex may act as a barrier that shields Spc105 from Mps1. Together these data suggest that the protein architecture of the kinetochore encodes a mechanical switch. End-on microtubule attachment to the kinetochore turns this switch off to silence the SAC.

Using Protein Dimers to Maximize the Protein Hybridization Efficiency with Multisite DNA Origami Scaffolds.

DNA origami provides a versatile platform for conducting 'architecture-function' analysis to determine how the nanoscale organization of multiple copies of a protein component within a multi-protein machine affects its overall function. Such analysis requires that the copy number of protein molecules bound to the origami scaffold exactly matches the desired number, and that it is uniform over an entire scaffold population. This requirement is challenging to satisfy for origami scaffolds with many protein hybridization sites, because it requires the successful completion of multiple, independent hybridization reactions. Here, we show that a cleavable dimerization domain on the hybridizing protein can be used to multiplex hybridization reactions on an origami scaffold. This strategy yields nearly 100% hybridization efficiency on a 6-site scaffold even when using low protein concentration and short incubation time. It can also be developed further to enable reliable patterning of a large number of molecules on DNA origami for architecture-function analysis.

Assembling the protein architecture of the budding yeast kinetochore-microtubule attachment using FRET.

BACKGROUND: The kinetochore is a multiprotein machine that couples chromosome movement to microtubule (MT) polymerization and depolymerization. It uses numerous copies of at least three MT-binding proteins to generate bidirectional movement. The nanoscale organization of these proteins within the kinetochore plays an important role in shaping the mechanisms that drive persistent, bidirectional movement of the kinetochore. RESULTS: We used fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between genetically encoded fluorescent proteins fused to kinetochore subunits to reconstruct the nanoscale organization of the budding yeast kinetochore. We performed >60 FRET and high-resolution colocalization measurements involving the essential MT-binding kinetochore components: Ndc80, Dam1, Spc105, and Stu2. These measurements reveal that neighboring Ndc80 complexes within the kinetochore are narrowly distributed along the length of the MT. Dam1 complex molecules are concentrated near the MT-binding domains of Ndc80. Stu2 localizes in high abundance within a narrowly defined territory within the kinetochore centered ∼20 nm on the centromeric side of the Dam1 complex. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the MT attachment site of the budding yeast kinetochore is well organized. Ndc80, Dam1, and Stu2 are all narrowly distributed about their average positions along the kinetochore-MT axis. The relative organization of these components, their narrow distributions, and their known MT-binding properties together elucidate how their combined actions generate persistent, bidirectional kinetochore movement coupled to MT polymerization and depolymerization.