Low correlation between serum thyroglobulin and 131I radioiodine whole body scintigraphy: implication for postoperative disease surveillance in differentiated thyroid cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate postoperative serum thyroglobulin (Tg) as a reliable tumor marker in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). METHODS: Two hundred and three patients met the selection criteria of >18 years old; who had undergone total or near total thyroidectomy; had a postoperative Tg, and had undergone 131I pre ablation whole body scan (PA-WBS). The primary endpoint was the correlation between Tg level and functional remnant thyroid tissues. Outcomes were categorized as concordant and discordant. Concordant results were positive Tg (>1 ng/ml) with positive PA-WBS or negative Tg (<1 ng/ml) with negative PA-WBS. Discordant results were negative Tg with a positive PA-WBS or positive Tg with a negative PA-WBS. To increase the sensitivity of Tg detection, we evaluated Tg in patients with high thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) with serum level >30 mU/l on thyroxine withdrawal protocol. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients (54.1%) had discordant results (p < 0.05) with positive PA-WBS and Tg <1 ng/ml, while 93 patients (45.9%) had concordant results. For concordant results, 88 patients had positive PA-WBS and Tg >1 ng/ml, and 5 patients had negative PA-WBS and Tg <1 ng/ml. There was no patient with Tg >1 ng/ml and negative PA-WBS. There were 74 patients with high TSH (>30 mU/l) on abstention (thyroxine withdrawal protocol). Twenty-four (32.5%) had discordant results (p < 0.001) and 50 (67.5%) had concordant results. CONCLUSION: There is low correlation between postoperative Tg and PA-WBS. The sole use of Tg as a serum biomarker for postoperative disease status may not be reliable.

Adding value to imaging services: a survey of patient and referring physician preferences for direct radiologic reporting of results.

PURPOSE: To identify preferences of patients and referring physicians for direct patient communication and notification of radiologic study results. METHODS: An anonymous survey was conducted of patients undergoing outpatient radiologic imaging studies and their referring physicians. The voluntary surveys elicited responses regarding preferences on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree and strongly agree), as well as indicated by responding yes or no to specific questions. RESULTS: 368 patients completed the survey. 81.5% of patient responders preferred all results communicated from the radiologist within the same day. 65.9% of patients preferred same day results if normal vs 65.8% if abnormal. 34.5% preferred to wait and review normal results with the referring physician. 41.5% preferred to wait and review abnormal results with the referring physician. It was found that patients were more likely to strongly agree with waiting to review results with the referring physician if the results were abnormal, as opposed to normal (18.5% vs 11.9%, respectively; P < 0.014). 64% of physicians did not want results reviewed with their patients; 87.6% did not want a report sent to the patient by the radiologist, even after report was sent to their office. 66.4% of patients surveyed indicated that waiting for imaging results gives them anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: 58-82% of patients preferred same day radiologist communication of their results while 55-87.6% of physicians did not prefer same day radiologist communication of results directly with their patients. 66.4% of patients surveyed indicated that waiting for imaging results gives them anxiety.