Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pan Afr Med J ; 42: 231, 2022.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36845226

RESUMEN

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common neuropathy affecting the upper limb. Several therapeutic approaches are used to treat this syndrome, including conservative treatment, often used as the first line treatment. We here report the case of a 61-year-old female patient, presenting to the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology of the Specialty Hospital, Rabat, with moderate and bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome with sensory loss confirmed by electroneuromyography (ENMG). Manual therapy, including bilateral median nerve neurodynamic mobilization, was performed. Patient´s outcome was marked by disappearance of nocturnal numbness and follow up ENMG showed a marked improvement in nerve conduction parameters. Based on this positive result, neurodynamic mobilization of the median nerve may be considered as a possible approach for the conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano , Manipulaciones Musculoesqueléticas , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nervio Mediano , Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/terapia , Dimensión del Dolor , Tratamiento Conservador
2.
Pan Afr Med J ; 42: 61, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35949472

RESUMEN

Introduction: the validity of the upper limb neurodynamic tests and especially the upper limb neurodynamic test 1 for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome has been the subject of several previous studies. However, the upper limb neurodynamic test 2A, which is also a test designated to assess the mechanosensitivity of the median nerve, has not been sufficiently studied, particularly for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: we used the upper limb neurodynamic test 2A as the index test and nerve conduction studies as the reference standard. We considered the upper limb neurodynamic test 2A positive according to Nee et al. criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood, and negative likelihood were calculated. In addition, a receiver operating characteristics analysis was carried out. Results: ninety-four women (188 hands) suspected of carpal tunnel syndrome with a mean age of 48.87 years and SD of 12.09 participated in the study. The sensitivity of the upper limb neurodynamic test 2A was estimated at 73.4%, the specificity at 47%, the positive likelihood ratio was 1.38, the negative likelihood ratio was 0.57, and the Kappa agreement was 20.3%, and the area under the curve 60.1%. Conclusion: the upper limb neurodynamic test 2A does not seem to have value in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome when compared to nerve conduction studies. It could be alternatively used to detect an increased mechanosensitivity of the median nerve when the upper limb neurodynamic test 1 cannot be performed in case of a range of motion limitation of the shoulder abduction.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano , Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Nervio Mediano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Conducción Nerviosa/fisiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Extremidad Superior
3.
S Afr J Physiother ; 78(1): 1823, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36483131

RESUMEN

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most prevalent upper limb compression neuropathy. Surgical or nonsurgical treatment is recommended. Both mild and moderate CTS can be managed conservatively. Neurodynamic mobilisation techniques (NMTs) of the median nerve have not been widely studied, and conflicting findings exist. Methods/design: Sixty-two female patients with mild or moderate bilateral CTS were assigned one wrist to the treatment group (TG) and the other to the control group (CG). Both groups underwent carpal bone mobilisation. The TG underwent NMTs while the CG received a placebo elbow mobilisation not targeting the median nerve. The Numerical Rating Pain Scale, JAMAR Plus Digital Hand dynamometer and Functional Status Scale (FSS) were used to assess pain, grip strength and functional status. Discussion: Comparison of groups showed that NMTs at 5 weeks decreased pain intensity by 1.15 (p = 0.001) and by 2 (p ˂ 0.001) at 10 weeks. Difference in functional status was 0.45 at 5 weeks (p = 0.003) and 0.84 at 10 weeks (p = 0.003). The CG's grip strength improved by 0.59 (p = 0.05) after 5 weeks and 0.61 (p = 0.028) at 10 weeks. Both groups improved in all parameters over time. Conclusion: When combined with carpal bone mobilisation, both NMTs and placebo elbow mobilisation seem to reduce pain intensity and improve grip strength and functional status. However, NMTs had better results in pain intensity and FSS. Clinical implications: Women with mild or moderate bilateral CTS may benefit from NMTs as a conservative treatment option. Trial registration: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, PACTR202201807752672, https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=19340.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA