Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mil Med ; 2022 Mar 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35260903

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a significant source of disability for active duty service members in both deployed and training settings as well as those who have left active service. Service members with ocular trauma are at risk for a TBI and should be screened appropriately. Early detection results in treatment to minimize long-term sequelae which can often be debilitating. This study is the first to evaluate different combat-related ocular injuries and their associations with TBI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A secondary analysis of existing data was conducted from a prospective study of patients who sustained combat ocular trauma (COT) during Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) between 2006 and 2020. Clinical data of a total of 88 participants were gathered and each case reviewed, including patient demographics, injury-related factors, history of TBI, and treatments rendered. All cases were then categorized to compare COT (n = 13) versus COT-T (Combat Ocular Trauma associated with TBI; n = 75). The Fisher's exact test was completed for each category to assess for predictive factors of TBI within the ophthalmic trauma cohort. Odds ratios were calculated with their 95% CI. RESULTS: When compared to COT, COT-T was significantly associated with closed globe injuries (56%; OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.08-16.67), blast injuries (89.3%; OR 3.72, 95% CI 0.93-14.9), multiple surgeries (89%; OR 2.51, 95% CI 0.57-11.08), anterior segment injuries (69.3%; OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.42-4.79), optic nerve injuries (24%; OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.26-4.25), orbital fractures (48%; OR 2.08, 95% CI 0.59-7.34), enucleation (17.3%; OR 2.52, 95% CI 0.300-21.08), the use of eye protection (68.6%; OR 2.18, 95% CI 0.57-8.32), and the need to undergo plastic surgery (78.7%; OR 2.30, 95% CI 0.66-8.02). Significant factors associated with COT included penetrating injury (30.8%; OR 0.027, 95% CI 0.07-1.08), posterior segment injuries (92%; OR 0.264, 95% CI 0.032-2.17), bilateral injuries (76.9%; OR 0.678, 95% CI 0.17-2.69), and bilateral blindness (7.7%; OR 0.857, 95% CI 0.092-7.99). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have sustained combat-related ocular injuries, specifically blast injury, anterior segment injury, or an orbital fracture, were noted to be more likely to have also sustained a TBI. However, of the evaluated variables in predicting the co-occurrence of TBI, only closed globe injury was identified as statistically significant. Service members with injuries requiring multiple surgical procedures, reconstructive plastic surgery, or enucleation of an eye were also more likely to be diagnosed with a TBI, but these variables were not found to be predictive of TBI among ocular trauma patients. The presence of eye protection was not protective against TBI. Further studies are needed to find significant predictors of TBI in combat ocular trauma patients to assist in the early and accurate detection of TBI.

2.
Mil Med ; 187(1-2): 209-215, 2022 01 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34117765

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess visual and health-related quality of life (QOL) among U.S. military service members who sustained combat ocular trauma (COT) with or without associated traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective observational study of U.S. service members (n = 88) with COT who were treated at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. Participants completed the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) at enrollment and at follow-up (>1 year) and supplemental surveys: Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory, the Medical Outcomes 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory. RESULTS: Initial and follow-up VFQ-25 showed a statistically significant increase in median scores for near activities (initial: 75.0, follow-up 83.3; P = .004) and peripheral vision (initial: 50.0, follow-up: 75.0; P = .009) and in composite scores (initial: 79.5, follow-up: 79.8; P = .022). Comparing those who did (n = 78) and did not (n = 8) have a TBI history, there were no significant differences in median change in VFQ-25 composite scores (with TBI: 2.3 vs. no TBI: 10.7; P = .179). Participants with a TBI history had a significantly lower median SF-36 General Health score (with TBI: 67.5 vs. no TBI: 92.5; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Vision-related QOL of COT patients is generally good in the long term. However, those with both COT and a history of TBI conditions showed significantly worse functioning in several domains than those without TBI. As TBI is a common finding in COT, this association is an important factor impacting this population's overall clinical presentation and daily functions.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Lesiones Oculares , Personal Militar , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Agudeza Visual
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA