RESUMEN
Atherectomy, whether rotational or orbital, is an essential and established method for treatment of calcified coronary lesions. By modifying the plaque, atherectomy lessens the risk of plaque shift and facilities stent delivery and stent expansion. Atherectomy technique is meticulous and challenging especially in tortuous and angulated coronary arteries. Herein, we describe the rare case of occurrence and the management of fracture of the tip of the crown of CSI Diamondback orbital atherectomy device during treatment of severely angulated and calcified ostial left circumflex lesion.
Asunto(s)
Aterectomía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Calcificación Vascular , Aterectomía , Aterectomía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of insulin resistance (IR) is increasing worldwide because of increasing age, obesity, and physical inactivity. Emerging evidence supports a direct proatherogenic effect of IR on the coronary vasculature, but the relation between IR and angiographic atherosclerosis in a real-world clinical setting is uncertain. In this work, we assessed whether IR is independently associated with clinically significant angiographic atherosclerosis in nondiabetic individuals. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We examined the association between IR and the extent of coronary atherosclerosis determined by angiography in 1073 nondiabetic patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. Patients were divided into quartiles on the basis of the homeostasis model assessment grading of IR, and associations between IR and multivessel coronary artery disease, defined as ≥ 2 arteries with ≥ 70% stenosis (or ≥ 50% left main stenosis), were analyzed in bivariate and multivariable modeling. Overall, the cohort had a median age of 56 years; 28.9% women and 21.8% nonwhite. The crude prevalence of multivessel coronary artery disease was 37.8%, 42.3%, 47.2%, and 48.0% for homeostasis model assessment grading of IR quartiles 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively (P(trend) = 0.009). In multivariable modeling, compared with quartile 1, both quartile 3 (relative risk [95% confidence interval], 1.31 [1.07-1.60]) and quartile 4 (1.29 [1.03-1.60]) were independently associated with multivessel coronary artery disease. Covariates in the model included patient demographic and clinical characteristics and metabolic factors (low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, triglyceride, glycosylated hemoglobin, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate an independent association between IR and multivessel coronary artery disease in nondiabetic postmyocardial infarction patients. Our findings strengthen the experimental evidence for a direct atherogenic effect of IR independent of glucose control and other components of the metabolic syndrome.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Estenosis Coronaria/epidemiología , Resistencia a la Insulina , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Glucemia/análisis , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/sangre , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Coronaria/sangre , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Mediadores de Inflamación/sangre , Insulina/sangre , Lípidos/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Infarto del Miocardio/sangre , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Oportunidad Relativa , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Multiple recent epidemiologic studies have highlighted the importance of diastolic heart failure (DHF) as a public health problem. Approximately half of patients presenting with symptomatic heart failure (HF) have DHF and they suffer from morbidity and mortality comparable to those with systolic HF. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of DHF has evolved rapidly over the last decade, and the associated echo-Doppler findings that assist with its diagnosis are greatly refined. Recently, there has been increased recognition of the role of diastolic dysfunction and DHF in the care of critically ill patients, including those admitted to noncardiac units. The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date summary of the concepts of the pathophysiology of DHF. In addition, we provide an overview of the diagnostic approaches, prognostic identifiers, and associated comorbidities that make DHF more resistant to manage with a focus of the patients admitted to the intensive care unit. The current approach to managing patients with DHF is also reviewed.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca Diastólica/fisiopatología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Diástole , Insuficiencia Cardíaca Diastólica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca Diastólica/mortalidad , Humanos , Función Ventricular/fisiologíaRESUMEN
The interest in coronary collateral circulation (CCC) as "natural bypasses" is growing, especially in patients in whom the extent of coronary atherosclerosis is too severe to allow for conventional revascularization. The anatomic foundation of CCC has been recognized for long time. Recently, reliable methods have become available for the assessment of the adequacy of collateral flow. However, the debate regarding the importance of CCC in the different clinical settings continues. In this article, we present the recent progress in the understanding of anatomy and physiology of the CCC and focus on the studies addressing their functional significance in acute, subacute, and chronic coronary artery disease. In addition, we provide a focused update on the essential role of collateral circulation in the management of coronary chronic total occlusions.
Asunto(s)
Circulación Colateral , Circulación Coronaria , Oclusión Coronaria/fisiopatología , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Animales , Enfermedad Crónica , Angiografía Coronaria , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico , Oclusión Coronaria/terapia , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , PronósticoRESUMEN
Background: The management of intermediate-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is controversial with increasing interest in more aggressive treatment approaches than anticoagulation alone. Case summary: We describe the case series of four consecutive patients who presented to emergency room for acute shortness of breath. They were diagnosed with intermediate-high-risk acute PE based on the computed tomography pulmonary angiography and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) findings and the elevated simplified PE score index. They received bolus of 5â mg thrombolytics recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) administered through peripheral intravenous (i.v.) line followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 2â mg/h along with unfractionated heparin (UFH) at a rate of 500â mg/h for additional ≤10â h. There after the dose of UFH was increased to reach a therapeutic level. Rapid clinical improvement and also improvement in TTE parameters were noted at discharge. Patients were discharged home on oral anticoagulation. Discussion: Intermediate-high-risk acute PE carries increased risk of mortality and morbidities. Catheter-directed thrombolysis uses a low rtPA dose for local thrombolysis and is associated with low bleeding risk; however it is expensive and requires expertise and human resources. Low-dose rtPA through a peripheral i.v. line might be safe and effective in the treatment of patient with intermediate-high-risk acute PE. This therapeutic approach is readily available at most medical centres, can be started in the emergency room (ER), and can be alternative to catheter-directed thrombolysis nowadays during the COVID-19 era and in hospitals at the periphery and with limited resources.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to examine rates of radial artery access in post-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients undergoing diagnostic catherization and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), whether operators with higher procedural volumes and higher percentage radial use were more likely to perform diagnostic catherization and/or PCI via the radial approach in post-CABG patients, and clinical and procedural outcomes in post-CABG patients who undergo diagnostic catherization and/or PCI via the radial or femoral approach. BACKGROUND: There are limited data comparing outcomes of patients with prior CABG undergoing transradial or transfemoral diagnostic catheterization and/or PCI. METHODS: Using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry, all diagnostic catheterizations and PCIs performed in patients with prior CABG from July 1, 2009, to March 31, 2018 (n = 1,279,058, 1,173 sites) were evaluated. Temporal trends in transradial access were examined, and mortality, bleeding, vascular complications, and procedural metrics were compared between transradial and transfemoral access. RESULTS: The rate of transradial access increased from 1.4% to 18.7% over the study period. Transradial access was associated with decreased mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75 to 0.91), decreased bleeding (OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.63), decreased vascular complications (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.47), increased PCI procedural success (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.16; p < 0.0001), and significantly decreased contrast volume across all procedure types. Transradial access was associated with shorter fluoroscopy time for PCI-only procedures but longer fluoroscopy time for diagnostic procedures plus ad hoc PCI and diagnostic procedures only. Operators with a higher rate of transradial access in non-CABG patients were more likely to perform transradial access in patients with prior CABG. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of transradial artery access in patients with prior CABG undergoing diagnostic catheterization and/or PCI has increased over the past decade in the United States, and it was more often performed by operators using a transradial approach in non-CABG patients. Compared with transfemoral access, transradial access was associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with prior CABG.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Arteria Radial/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Transcutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a widely accepted minimally invasive approach for treatment of severe aortic stenosis. Self-expandable prostheses are commonly the device of choice, with excellent procedural success and durability. However, there have been several recent case reports of infolding of the self-expandable prosthesis during development with subsequent malfunction and need for further intervention. We present a case of self-expandable valve prosthesis infolding managed by balloon postdilation, and summarize the cases reported in the literature to date in an attempt to increase awareness of this serious technical problem and the factors associated with it.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine if there is a variation in the ischemic burden post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI), as assessed by myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), between different populations in different geographic locations and to see if this variation is associated with different clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We characterized the MPI findings in 104 stable patients who were hospitalized with AMI at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), a tertiary referral hospital in an East Mediterranean country and we compared them to 126 patients who were enrolled according to a similar protocol in a previous study done at Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), Houston, Texas. There were no differences between the two populations with respect to prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, smoking, the use of thrombolysis, percentage of anterior MIs, Q-wave MIs, and multivessel disease on coronary angiography. However, the quantified ischemic defect size in the BCM population was double that in the AUBMC population (12 +/- 12% vs 6 +/- 8%, P < .01). This was associated with almost doubling of the 1 year event rate of death/myocardial infarction (18.3% vs 10.6%, P = .02) in the BCM population. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the ischemic burden post-AMI, as assessed by MPI, might vary between different populations in different geographic locations. This variation carries important prognostic implications and is associated with different patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Aturdimiento Miocárdico/diagnóstico por imagen , Aturdimiento Miocárdico/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Internacionalidad , Líbano/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Cintigrafía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadAsunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Developing countries contribute a major share to the global burden of cardiovascular disease. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in particular remains one of the leading causes of death in the developing world as well as in the developed world. While the risk factors, management and outcome of AMI have been extensively studied in the developed world, limited data is available on this subject from developing countries. The current review looks at the prevalence of the classical coronary artery disease risk factors in developing countries and their association with myocardial infarction, as well as the management and outcome of AMI patients in these countries.
Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Distribución por Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/complicaciones , Hiperlipidemias/epidemiología , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) complicating percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. To date, no studies have evaluated the association of blood transfusion with AKI in patients undergoing PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used a retrospective cohort study of all patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI from CathPCI Registry (n=1 756 864). The primary outcome was AKI defined as the rise in serum creatinine post procedure ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥25% above baseline values. AKI developed in 9.0% of study sample. Patients with AKI were older, more often women, and had high prevalence of comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and advanced stages of chronic kidney disease at baseline. Blood transfusion was utilized in 2.2% of patients. In the overall sample, AKI developed in 35.1% of patients who received transfusion versus 8.4% of patients without transfusion (adjusted odds ratio, 4.87 [4.71-5.04]). In the subgroup of patients who sustained bleeding event and received transfusion, the rate of AKI was significantly increased across all preprocedure hemoglobin levels versus no blood transfusion. Similar findings were seen in the subgroup of patients with no bleeding event. CONCLUSIONS: Blood transfusion is strongly associated with AKI in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI. Further investigation is needed to determine whether a restrictive blood transfusion strategy might improve PCI outcomes by reducing the risk of AKI.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Transfusión Sanguínea , Hemorragia/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Reacción a la Transfusión/etiología , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesión Renal Aguda/sangre , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anemia/sangre , Anemia/etiología , Biomarcadores/sangre , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Creatinina/sangre , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Hemorragia/sangre , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Puntaje de Propensión , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Reacción a la Transfusión/sangre , Reacción a la Transfusión/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Regulación hacia ArribaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the temporal trends in demographics, clinical characteristics, management strategies, and in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS-AMI) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from the Cath-PCI Registry (2005 to 2013). BACKGROUND: The authors examined contemporary use and outcomes of PCI in patients with CS-AMI. METHODS: The authors used the Cath-PCI Registry to evaluate 56,497 patients (January 2005 to December 2013) undergoing PCI for CS-AMI. Temporal trends in clinical variables and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Compared with cases performed from 2005 to 2006, CS-AMI patients receiving PCI from 2011 to 2013 were more likely to have diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, previous PCI, dialysis, but less likely to have chronic lung disease, peripheral vascular disease, or heart failure within 2 weeks (p < 0.01). Between 2005 and 2006 to 2011 and 2013, intra-aortic balloon pump use decreased (49.5% to 44.9%; p < 0.01), drug-eluting stent use declined (65% to 46%; p < 0.01), and the use of bivalirudin increased (12.6% to 45.6%). Adjusted in-hospital mortality; increased (27.6% in 2005 to 2006 vs. 30.6% in 2011 to 2013, adjusted odds ratio: 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 1.005 to .173; p = 0.04) for patients who were managed with an early invasive strategy (<24 h from symptoms). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that despite the evolution of medical technology and use of contemporary therapeutic measures, in-hospital mortality in CS-AMI patients who are managed invasively continues to rise. Additional research and targeted efforts are indicated to improve outcomes in this high-risk cohort.
Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/tendencias , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Comorbilidad , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/tendencias , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Oportunidad Relativa , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Choque Cardiogénico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogénico/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Acute management of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients on chronic vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy is uncertain. This study aims to estimate in-hospital major bleeding risk among STEMI patients on chronic VKA treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); and determine the relationship between bleeding and acute treatments stratified by international normalised ratio (INR) values. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 120,270 STEMI patients treated with primary PCI at 586 national registry hospitals (2007-2012). RESULTS: Overall, 3101 patients (2.6%) were on VKA which was associated with increased in-hospital major bleeding risk when compared with patients not on VKA (17.0%, vs 10.1%; adjusted OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.40). In patients on VKA, admission INR ≥2.0 was not associated with an increase in bleeding risk compared to INR <2.0. Patients on VKA were more likely to receive clopidogrel or bivalirudin within 24â h of presentation (acute), but less likely to receive prasugrel, heparin, or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI). In those patients, acute GPI was associated with increased bleeding risk (adjusted OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.54 to 2.40) while bivalirudin was associated with decreased risk (adjusted OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.86); bleeding risk associated with heparin, bivalirudin, ADP-receptor blockers, or GPI was similar between INR ≥2.0 and <2.0. CONCLUSIONS: In STEMI patients treated with primary PCI, chronic VKA therapy was associated with a significant increase in in-hospital major bleeding risk compared to no VKA therapy, irrespective of whether admission INR was ≥2.0 or not. In patients on VKA, GPI was associated with increased bleeding risk while bivalirudin was associated with decreased risk.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Hemorragia/sangre , Hospitalización , Humanos , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Infarto del Miocardio/sangre , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Oportunidad Relativa , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) can be treated by restenting using the same DES as previously placed (same stent strategy), versus switching to a stent that elutes a different drug (different stent strategy). To compare the efficacy of these strategies, a meta-analysis of controlled trials and observational studies evaluating patients with DES ISR was performed. The primary outcome was target lesion revascularization or target vessel revascularization, and secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events, death, and myocardial infarction. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with the generic inverse variance method using a random-effects model. The chi-square test was used to evaluate heterogeneity. Ten studies (1,680 patients) were included. There was no significant heterogeneity among the studies for any end point. The different stent strategy was found to reduce the odds of target lesion revascularization or target vessel revascularization (OR 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55 to 0.96) and major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.96). There was no difference between the 2 strategies in rates of death (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.16) or myocardial infarction (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.41). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that treatment of DES ISR by restenting with a different DES than previously placed may lead to improved outcomes compared with the use of the same DES. Further large-scale trials are needed to confirm this effect.
Asunto(s)
Reestenosis Coronaria/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Causas de Muerte , Humanos , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A 600-mg loading dose (LD) of clopidogrel has been shown to be superior to a 300-mg LD in inhibiting platelet function. However, data for clinical superiority are limited, and there is a paucity of adequately powered randomized trials investigating this issue. This meta-analysis was performed to determine the optimal LD of clopidogrel in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: A meta-analysis of controlled trials and observational studies was performed comparing 600-mg with 300-mg LDs of clopidogrel. The primary efficacy end point was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE), and the primary safety end point was major bleeding. Data were extracted on an intention to treat basis. The X2 test was used to evaluate heterogeneity. A random effects model was used, and odds ratios (OR) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Nine studies involving 18 623 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. Mean duration of follow-up was 8 months. Four studies were eligible for the safety analysis. The MACE risk was lower with a 600-mg LD (7.0% [650/9231]) than with a 300-mg LD (9.2% [867/9392]; OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.91). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the major bleeding events between the 2 groups (2.5% [89/3551] with 600 mg vs 2.3% [63/2796] with 300 mg; OR, 0.84; 95% CI, (0.60-1.16). CONCLUSIONS: In ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, administration of a 600-mg LD of clopidogrel is associated with a lower risk of MACE than is administration of a 300-mg LD, without increasing the risk of major bleeding.
Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Clopidogrel , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Ticlopidina/administración & dosificación , Ticlopidina/efectos adversos , Ticlopidina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a meta-analysis to assess outcomes for a single-stent (SS) strategy versus a double-stent (DS) strategy in treatment of distal unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) lesions in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era. BACKGROUND: Routine use of DES implantation has contributed to improved outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for disease involving the ULMCA. However, PCI for ULMCA bifurcation lesions continues to be technically demanding and is an independent predictor of poor outcomes. While a number of stenting techniques have been described, the optimal strategy remains unknown. METHODS: SS treatment was defined as stenting of the main branch alone and DS treatment as stenting of both the main and side branches. Our co-primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and its individual components. RESULTS: We identified 7 observational studies involving 2328 patients. Mean duration of follow-up was 32 months. We adopted the random effect model when computing the combined odds ratio (OR). There was decreased risk of MACE with SS strategy (20.4%) versus DS strategy (32.8%) (OR, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.73). There was also decreased target vessel/target lesion revascularization (TLR/TVR) with SS strategy (10.1%) versus DS strategy (24.3%) (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.25-0.49). CONCLUSION: Compared to the DS strategy of percutaneous ULMCA bifurcation intervention, an SS approach may be associated with better outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Anciano , Determinación de Punto Final , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Intensive statin therapy is a central component of secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), particularly among high-risk patients, such as those with diabetes mellitus (DM). However, the frequency and predictors of intensive statin therapy use after AMI among patients with DM have not been described. We examined patterns of intensive statin therapy use (defined as a statin with expected low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering of >50%) at discharge among patients with AMI with known DM enrolled in a 24-site US registry. Predictors of intensive statin therapy use were evaluated using multivariable hierarchical Poisson regression models. Among 1,300 patients with DM after AMI, 22% were prescribed intensive statin therapy at hospital discharge. In multivariable models, ST-elevation AMI (risk ratio [RR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29 to 1.70), insurance for medications (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.63), and higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (RR 1.05 per 1 mg/dl, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.07) were independent predictors of intensive statin therapy, whereas higher Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events scores were associated with lower rates of intensive statin therapy (RR 0.94 per 10 points, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.98). In conclusion, only 1 in 5 patients with DM was prescribed intensive statin therapy at discharge after an AMI. Predictors of intensive statin therapy use suggest important opportunities to improve quality of care in this patient population.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Noruega/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Prevención Secundaria , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the safety and efficacy of radial access compared with femoral access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: Numerous randomized controlled trials, including several new studies, have compared outcomes of these approaches in the context of primary PCI for STEMI patients with inconclusive results. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing radial versus femoral access for primary PCI. Primary outcomes were death and major bleeding evaluated at the longest available follow-up. Secondary outcomes included access site bleeding, stroke, and procedure time. Twelve studies (N = 5,055) were included. All trials were conducted in centers experienced with both approaches. RESULTS: Compared with femoral approach, radial approach was associated with decreased risk of mortality (2.7% vs. 4.7%; odds ratio [OR]: 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40 to 0.76; p < 0.001) and decreased risk of major bleeding (1.4% vs. 2.9%; OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.85; p = 0.01). Radial access was also associated with reduction in relative risk of access site bleeding (2.1% vs. 5.6%; OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.50; p < 0.001). Stroke risk was similar between both approaches (0.5% vs. 0.5%; OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.45 to 2.54; p = 0.87). The procedure time was slightly longer in the radial group than in the femoral group (mean difference: 1.52 min; 95% CI: 0.33 to 2.70, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, the radial approach is associated with favorable outcomes and should be the preferred approach for experienced radial operators.