Prescribing Practices of Recommended Treatment for Trichomonas vaginalis and Chlamydia trachomatis after 2021 STI Treatment Guideline Update.

ABSTRACT: We evaluated the proportion of patients with trichomoniasis and chlamydial infections who received recommended versus non-recommended antibiotic therapy after the updated 2021 Sexually Transmitted Infections Guideline. Of 712 patients, 473 (66%) received recommended therapy. Receipt of emergency department care was independently associated with recommended therapy (adjOR, 2.1; 95% CI 1.5-2.9).

Leveraging stewardship to promote ceftriaxone use in severe infections with low- and no-risk AmpC Enterobacterales.

AmpC ß-lactamases are associated with development of ceftriaxone resistance despite initial in vitro susceptibility, but the risk of AmpC derepression is not equal among Enterobacterales. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of an AmpC stewardship intervention on the definitive treatment of low- and no-risk Enterobacterales. This was an IRB-approved, single pre-test, post-test quasi-experiment at a 5-hospital system. An AmpC stewardship intervention was implemented in July 2022 and included prescriber education, the removal of microbiology comments indicating potential for ceftriaxone resistance on therapy, and the modification of a blood PCR comment for Serratia marcescens to recommend ceftriaxone. Adults ≥18 years pre-intervention (July 2021 to December 2021) and post-intervention (July 2022 to December 2022) who received ≥72 hours of inpatient definitive therapy and had non-urine cultures growing low- and no-risk organisms (S. marcescens, Providencia spp., Citrobacter koseri, Citrobacter amalonaticus, or Morganella morganii) were included. The primary endpoint was definitive treatment with ceftriaxone. A total of 224 patients were included; 115 (51%) in pre-intervention and 109 (49%) in post-intervention. Definitive ceftriaxone therapy was prescribed more frequently after intervention [6 (5%) vs 72 (66%), P < 0.001]. After adjustment for critical illness, patients in the post-group were more likely to receive definitive ceftriaxone (adjOR, 34.7; 95% CI, 13.9-86.6). The proportion of patients requiring retreatment was 18 (15%) and 11 (10%) for pre- and post-intervention patients (P = 0.22), and ceftriaxone resistance within 30 days occurred in 5 (4%) and 2 (2%) patients in the pre- and post-group (P = 0.45). An antimicrobial stewardship intervention was associated with increased ceftriaxone prescribing and similar patient outcomes for low- and no-risk AmpC Enterobacterales.

Implementation of indication-based antibiotic order sentences improves antibiotic use in emergency departments.

INTRODUCTION: Prior data have suggested that suboptimal antibiotic prescribing in the emergency department (ED) is common for uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI), urinary tract infections (UTI), and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). The objective of this study was to measure the effect of indication-based antibiotic order sentences (AOS) on optimal antibiotic prescribing in the ED. METHODS: This was an IRB-approved quasi-experiment of adults prescribed antibiotics in EDs for uncomplicated LRTI, UTI, or ABSSSI from January to June 2019 (pre-implementation) and September to December 2021 (post-implementation). AOS implementation occurred in July 2021. AOS are lean process, electronic discharge prescriptions retrievable by name or indication within the discharge order field. The primary outcome was optimal prescribing, defined as correct antibiotic selection, dose, and duration per local and national guidelines. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were performed; multivariable logistic regression was used to determine variables associated with optimal prescribing. RESULTS: A total of 294 patients were included: 147 pre-group and 147 post-group. Overall optimal prescribing improved from 12 (8%) to 34 (23%) (P < 0.001). Individual components of optimal prescribing were optimal selection at 90 (61%) vs 117 (80%) (P < 0.001), optimal dose at 99 (67%) vs 115 (78%) (P = 0.036), and optimal duration at 38 (26%) vs 50 (34%) (P = 0.13) for pre- and post-group, respectively. AOS was independently associated with optimal prescribing after multivariable logistic regression analysis (adjOR, 3.6; 95%CI,1.7-7.2). A post-hoc analysis showed low uptake of AOS by ED prescribers. CONCLUSIONS: AOS are an efficient and promising strategy to enhance antimicrobial stewardship in the ED.

Impact of a Standardized, Pharmacist-Initiated "Test-Claim" Workflow for Anticipating Barriers to Accessing Discharge Antimicrobials.

Background: Inability to access and afford discharge oral antimicrobials may delay discharges or result in therapeutic failure. "Test-claims" have the potential to identify such barriers. Objective: This study evaluated discharge antimicrobial access and patient outcomes after implementation of a standardized, inpatient pharmacist-initiated antimicrobial discharge medication cost inquiry (aDMCI) process. Methods: This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, pilot retrospective cohort study that included adults admitted for ≥72 hours from November 1, 2018, to February 28, 2019, and discharged on oral antimicrobials. Patients with a cost inquiry (aDMCI group) were compared with those without (standard-of-care, SOC, group). Primary endpoint was discharge delay. Secondary endpoints included percentage of patients discharged on suboptimal antimicrobials and medication errors from aDMCI. Results: 84 patients were included: 43 in SOC and 41 in aDMCI. Seventy-five antimicrobial cost inquiries were evaluated among 41 patients. There were no discharge delays or medication errors associated with the standardized "test-claim" (aDMCI) workflow. Patients in the SOC group had a greater Charlson Comorbidity Index (4 [2-6] vs 2 [1-4], P =0.004), were more likely to be immunosuppressed (24, 56% vs 12, 29%; P =0.014), and had longer hospitalization (8 [5-15] vs 6 [5-9] days, P =0.026). Primary access barriers were prior-authorization (8, 11%) and associated with linezolid and moxifloxacin cost inquiries. Most aDMCIs results were available in <24 hours (66, 88%). Conclusions: The aDMCI process is safe and offers an actionable transition of care tool that can identify barriers to accessing discharge medications while insulating patients from surprise out-of-pocket cost.

COVID-19: disease pathways and gene expression changes predict methylprednisolone can improve outcome in severe cases.

MOTIVATION: COVID-19 has several distinct clinical phases: a viral replication phase, an inflammatory phase and in some patients, a hyper-inflammatory phase. High mortality is associated with patients developing cytokine storm syndrome. Treatment of hyper-inflammation in these patients using existing approved therapies with proven safety profiles could address the immediate need to reduce mortality. RESULTS: We analyzed the changes in the gene expression, pathways and putative mechanisms induced by SARS-CoV2 in NHBE, and A549 cells, as well as COVID-19 lung versus their respective controls. We used these changes to identify FDA approved drugs that could be repurposed to help COVID-19 patients with severe symptoms related to hyper-inflammation. We identified methylprednisolone (MP) as a potential leading therapy. The results were then confirmed in five independent validation datasets including Vero E6 cells, lung and intestinal organoids, as well as additional patient lung sample versus their respective controls. Finally, the efficacy of MP was validated in an independent clinical study. Thirty-day all-cause mortality occurred at a significantly lower rate in the MP-treated group compared to control group (29.6% versus 16.6%, P = 0.027). Clinical results confirmed the in silico prediction that MP could improve outcomes in severe cases of COVID-19. A low number needed to treat (NNT = 5) suggests MP may be more efficacious than dexamethasone or hydrocortisone. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: iPathwayGuide is available at https://advaitabio.com/ipathwayguide/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Bridging the gap: An approach to reporting antimicrobial stewardship metrics specific to solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: This study seeks to describe inpatient antimicrobial use (AU) utilizing the National Healthcare Safety Network-AU (NHSN-AU) framework among solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) within 12 months after transplant. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included SOTr ≥ 18 years of age who underwent transplantation from January 2015 to December 2016 at a Midwestern US transplant center. Inpatient AU was followed for 12 months post-transplant. Hospital days present up to 12 months post-transplant, AU variables, and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) occurrences were analyzed. RESULTS: The cohort of 530 SOTr included 225 kidney (42.5%), 171 liver (32.3%), 45 lung (8.5%), 40 heart (7.5%), 39 multivisceral (7.4%), seven small bowel (1.3%), and three pancreas (0.6%) transplants. Total days of therapy (DOT) were 22 782 among the cohort, with a median of 5 days [interquartile range [IQR], 1-12]. Lung and liver transplants had the most total DOT (6571 vs. 5569 days), while lungs and small bowels had the highest median DOT (13 [IQR, 2-56] vs. 12 [IQR, 2-31]). The facility-wide DOT/1000 days were lowest in pancreas and highest in lung transplants (5.3 vs. 428.1). Small bowel transplants received the most resistant-Gram-positive infection and hospital-onset infection agents for facility-wide DOT/1000 days present. Pancreas and kidney transplants accounted for the most high-risk CDI agents. CDI occurred in 34 patients, with kidney and liver transplants experiencing 13 each. CONCLUSION: This study represents one of the first reports of AU in SOTr utilizing the NHSN-AU framework. More studies are needed for further peer-to-peer comparison of AU in this complex patient population.

Sex differences in the time course and mechanisms of vascular and cardiac aging in mice: role of the smooth muscle cell mineralocorticoid receptor.

Aging is associated with heart and vascular dysfunction that contributes to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Clinical data support a sexual dimorphism in the time course of aging-associated CVD. However, the mechanisms driving sex differences in cardiovascular aging and whether they can be modeled in mice have not been explored. Mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs) regulate blood pressure, and we previously demonstrated in male mice that MR expression increases in aging mouse vessels and smooth muscle cell-specific MR deletion (SMC-MR-KO) protects from cardiovascular aging. This study characterizes sex differences in murine cardiovascular aging and the associated sex-specific role of SMC-MR. Aortic stiffness, measured by pulse wave velocity, increased from 3 to 12 mo of age in males but not until 18 mo in females. The timing of the rise in aortic stiffening correlated with the timing of increased aortic MR expression, and aortic stiffness did not increase with age in SMC-MR-KO mice of both sexes. Vascular fibrosis increased at 12 mo in males and later at 18 mo in females; however, fibrosis was attenuated by SMC-MR-KO in males only. In resistance vessels, angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R)-mediated vasoconstriction also increased at 12 mo in males and 18 mo in females. ANG II-induced vasoconstriction was decreased in SMC-MR-KO specifically in males in association with decreased AT1R expression. Cardiac systolic function declined in males and females by 18 mo of age, which was prevented by SMC-MR-KO specifically in females. Cardiac perivascular fibrosis increased with age in both sexes accompanied by sex-specific changes in the expression levels of MR-regulated profibrotic genes.NEW & NOTEWORTHY These data demonstrate that the delayed and steeper decline in cardiovascular function observed in aging females can be modeled in aging mice. Moreover, the mechanisms driving vascular and cardiac aging phenotypes are distinct between males and females. Mineralocorticoid receptors in smooth muscle cells play a significant role in cardiovascular aging in both sexes; however, they do so by distinct mechanisms. Overall, these findings suggest that sex-specific therapies may be necessary to retard the aging process and improve cardiovascular disease outcomes in the aging population.

High-Dose Daptomycin Is Well Tolerated via 2-Minute IV Push Administration.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of administering high-dose daptomycin (HDD; > 6 mg/kg actual body weight) as a 2-minute intravenous (IV) push (IVP) compared to traditional 30-minute IV piggyback (IVPB) infusion. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study comparing patients receiving HDD as an IVP or IVPB infusion. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a documented infusion-related reaction (IRR) to daptomycin. RESULTS: Three hundred patients were included in the final analysis, 200 patients received IVP, and 100 patients received IVPB representing a total of 1697 administrations. Median (IQR) daptomycin dose was IVP 700 mg (550-900) and IVPB 700 mg (600-900), with mg/kg doses of 8.2 (7.9-10) and 8.3 (8-10), respectively. After adjudication, IRR occurred in 1% of subjects in each treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides data in more than 1100 administrations of HDD administered via IVP. Infusion-related reactions were documented in 1% of patients regardless of infusion method, suggesting comparable safety to traditional infusion methods. This practice may be useful during fluid shortage and in the outpatient setting.

Discharge Delays and Costs Associated With Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy for High-Priced Antibiotics.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is a widely used, safe, and cost-effective treatment. Most public and private insurance providers require prior authorization (PA) for OPAT, yet the impact of the inpatient PA process is not known. Our aim was to characterize discharge barriers and PA delays associated with high-priced OPAT antibiotics. METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved study of adult patients discharged with daptomycin, ceftaroline, ertapenem, and novel beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations from January 2017 to December 2017. Patients with an OPAT PA delay were compared with patients without a delay. The primary endpoint was total direct hospital costs from the start of treatment. RESULTS: Two-hundred patients were included: 141 (71%) no OPAT delay vs 59 (30%) OPAT delay. More patients with a PA delay were discharged to a subacute care facility compared with an outpatient setting: 37 (63%) vs 52 (37%), P = .001. Discharge delays and median total direct hospital costs were higher for patients with OPAT delays: 31 (53%) vs 21 (15%), P < .001 and $19 576 (interquartile range [IQR], 10 056-37 038) vs $7770 (IQR, 3031-13 974), P < .001. In multiple variable regression, discharge to a subacute care facility was associated with an increased odds of discharge delay, age >64 years was associated with a decreased odds of discharge delay. CONCLUSIONS: OPAT with high-priced antibiotics requires significant care coordination. PA delays are common and contribute to discharge delays. OPAT transitions of care represent an opportunity to improve patient care and address access barriers.

Early Short-Course Corticosteroids in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: There is no proven antiviral or immunomodulatory therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The disease progression associated with the proinflammatory host response prompted us to examine the role of early corticosteroid therapy in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a single pretest, single posttest quasi-experiment in a multicenter health system in Michigan from 12 March to 27 March 2020. Adult patients with confirmed moderate to severe COVID were included. A protocol was implemented on 20 March 2020 using early, short-course, methylprednisolone 0.5 to 1 mg/kg/day divided in 2 intravenous doses for 3 days. Outcomes of standard of care (SOC) and early corticosteroid groups were evaluated, with a primary composite endpoint of escalation of care from ward to intensive care unit (ICU), new requirement for mechanical ventilation, and mortality. All patients had at least 14 days of follow-up. RESULTS: We analyzed 213 eligible subjects, 81 (38%) and 132 (62%) in SOC and early corticosteroid groups, respectively. The composite endpoint occurred at a significantly lower rate in the early corticosteroid group (34.9% vs 54.3%, P = .005). This treatment effect was observed within each individual component of the composite endpoint. Significant reduction in median hospital length of stay was also observed in the early corticosteroid group (5 vs 8 days, P < .001). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated an independent reduction in the composite endpoint at 14-days controlling for other factors (adjusted odds ratio: 0.41; 95% confidence interval, .22 - .77). CONCLUSIONS: An early short course of methylprednisolone in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 reduced escalation of care and improved clinical outcomes. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04374071.

Treatment and outcomes of Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections in solid organ transplant recipients.

Optimal antimicrobial therapy for Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infection (EFBSI) in the solid organ transplant (SOT) population is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to describe the pharmacotherapy and outcomes of EFBSI in SOT patients. This was a single-center retrospective cohort of SOT patients with EFBSI from 2013 to 2019. Susceptibility testing was performed with Vitek® 2 or Etest. Estimates of optimal DAP pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic exposures (dose <10 mg/kg, fAUC/MIC >27.4) were made from previously established literature and equations. Fifty-one unique cases were included in the analysis. The median age was 61 years and liver (64%), intestinal (19%), and kidney (12%) were the most common organs transplanted. Most patients had indwelling central lines (75%) at the time of bacteremia; intra-abdominal abscesses/fluid collections were present in 44% of patients and 8% had endocarditis. Nineteen (37%) patients had polymicrobial infections. The most common definitive antimicrobial regimens were as follows: DAP plus beta-lactam (46%), DAP monotherapy (18%), and LZD (25%). Of the 33 patients that received DAP, 21% of E faecium isolates developed DAP resistance. 30-day mortality was 25% overall but higher in patients who received an initial DAP dose <10 mg/kg (43% vs 13%). Vancomycin-resistance, severity of illness, neutropenia, and source control were also associated with mortality. Inadequate DAP dosing for EFBSI may be associated with mortality in the SOT population. Larger, controlled analyses are necessary to determine the impact of optimized pharmacodynamics in this population.

Stewardship opportunities in viral pneumonia: Why not the immunocompromised?

Antimicrobial management of viral pneumonia has proven to be a challenge in hospitalized immunocompromised patients. A host of factors contribute to the dilemma, such as diagnostic uncertainty, lack of organism identification, and clinical status of the patient. Respiratory virus panel (RVP) use was compared between 131 immunocompromised patients who received send-out (n = 56) vs in-house (n = 75) testing. Antimicrobial optimization interventions consisted of antiviral addition/discontinuation, antibiotic discontinuation/de-escalation, or modification of immunosuppressive regimen. After implementation of an in-house test with audit and feedback, turnaround time of the RVP was reduced from 46.7 to 5.5 hours (P < .001) and time to intervention was reduced from 52.1 to 13.9 hours (P < .001), yet the frequency of antimicrobial optimization interventions was unchanged (30.7% vs 35.7%). Differences were not observed in duration of empiric antibiotic therapy or length of stay. The overall discontinuation rate for patients tested with a RVP was low (4.6%), and those with positive RVP (n = 43) had antibiotics stopped in 14% of cases. Bacterial pneumonia coinfection was confirmed in 2 patients. Further systematic efforts should be taken to reduce antibiotic use in viral pneumonia and identify the major barriers in the immunocompromised population.

Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine the Efficacy of Early Switch From Vancomycin to Vancomycin Alternatives as a Strategy to Prevent Nephrotoxicity in Patients With Multiple Risk Factors for Adverse Renal Outcomes (STOP-NT).

BACKGROUND: Use of alternative antimicrobials to vancomycin is a potential strategy to reduce acute kidney injury (AKI) in high-risk patients, but current data do not support widespread adoption of this practice. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of early switch to a nonnephrotoxic alternative for prevention of AKI in high-risk patients who receive vancomycin. METHODS: This was an IRB-approved, prospective randomized controlled trial in a single, tertiary care academic medical center. Patients initially prescribed vancomycin between October 2011 to April 2013 with at least 2 risk factors for AKI were included. Treatment randomization was stratified by indication for therapy. Patients were randomized to continuation of dose-optimized vancomycin or early switch to an alternative antimicrobial agent. The primary end point was nephrotoxicity by consensus guideline definition adjudicated by blinded review; the secondary end point was AKI network-defined AKI. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were randomized; 100 were included in the modified intent-to-treat population, 51 in the vancomycin group and 49 in the alternative group. The incidence of nephrotoxicity was 6.1% in the alternative therapy arm and 9.8% in the vancomycin group ( P = 0.72). The incidence of AKI was 32.7% in the alternative therapy group and 31.4% in the vancomycin group ( P = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in nephrotoxicity or AKI was detected among patients treated with alternative antimicrobials compared with vancomycin. The use of alternative antimicrobial therapy instead of vancomycin solely for the purpose of preventing AKI in high-risk patients does not appear to be warranted.

Outpatient use of ceftaroline fosamil versus vancomycin for osteoarticular infection: a matched cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: There are few convenient intravenous options for long-term outpatient treatment of osteoarticular infection (OAI) and limited effectiveness and safety data exist for this off-label use of ceftaroline. The objective of this study was to describe the long-term effectiveness and safety of ceftaroline for the treatment of OAI. METHODS: This was a matched retrospective cohort study of patients receiving ceftaroline- or vancomycin-based therapy for OAI in the outpatient setting. Patients were matched according to infection subtype, anatomical site and microbiology. The primary endpoint was 180 day infection-related readmission (IRR). Secondary endpoints included all-cause readmission, time-to-IRR and adverse event incidence. RESULTS: The final matched cohort consisted of 50 ceftaroline-treated patients and 50 vancomycin-treated patients. The IRR incidence was 22% for ceftaroline patients and 30% for vancomycin patients; OR = 0.66 (95% CI = 0.27-1.62; P = 0.362). There was no significant difference between groups in all-cause readmission or time-to-IRR. Attributable adverse event incidences were 24% and 18% for ceftaroline and vancomycin, respectively. Rash (10%) and nausea (6%) were the most common ceftaroline adverse events, while acute kidney injury (6%) and rash (4%) were the most common vancomycin adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Attributable readmission and adverse events were common among patients treated with outpatient intravenous antimicrobials for OAI. This study found no appreciable difference in effectiveness or tolerability between ceftaroline- or vancomycin-treated patients. Although further research will be important to delineate the role of ceftaroline in the management of OAI, data derived from this study may aid clinicians in determining therapy when limited options exist.

Outcomes of Aminopenicillin Therapy for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Urinary Tract Infections.

Vancomycin-resistant urinary tract infections are often challenging to treat. This retrospective cohort study compared outcomes between patients treated for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal urinary tract infection with an aminopenicillin and those treated with a non-ß-lactam antibiotic. Inpatients treated with an enterococcus-active agent for their first symptomatic vancomycin-resistant enterococcal urinary tract infection between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2013 were considered for inclusion. Patients with colonization, on hospice, or receiving comfort care only were excluded. The primary endpoint of clinical cure was defined as resolution of clinical symptoms, or symptom improvement to the extent that no additional antibacterial drug therapy was necessary, and lack of microbiologic persistence. Secondary endpoints of 30-day readmission or retreatment and 30-day all-cause mortality were also compared. A total of 316 urinary isolates were screened, and 61 patients with symptomatic urinary tract infection were included. Twenty (35%) of the 57 isolates tested were ampicillin susceptible. Thirty-one patients received an aminopenicillin, and 30 received a non-ß-lactam. Rates of clinical cure for aminopenicillin versus non-ß-lactam treatment were 26/31 (83.9%) and 22/30 (73.3%) (P = 0.315), respectively. Rates of 30-day readmission (6/31, or 19.4%, versus 9/30, or 30%, respectively; P = 0.334), 30-day retreatment (4/31, or 12.9%, versus 4/30, 13.3%, respectively; P = 0.960), and 30-day all-cause mortality (2/31, or 6.5%, versus 1/30, or 3.3%, respectively; P = 0.573) were also not significantly different between groups. Aminopenicillins may be a viable option for treating vancomycin-resistant urinary tract infection regardless of the organism's ampicillin susceptibility. Prospective validation with larger cohorts of patients should be considered.

Evaluating the Impact of Substance Use Disorder Resources on Outcomes of Persons Who Inject Drugs with Infections.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of inpatient substance use disorder (SUD) resources on outcomes of persons who inject stimulants and/or opioids (PWIDs) with infections. METHODS: This retrospective cohort evaluated PWIDs hospitalized from July 1, 2020, to May 31, 2021, and prescribed an antimicrobial course. The patients were compared based on inpatient implementation of SUD resources, including consultation of addiction medicine/behavioral health, implementation of an opioid withdrawal treatment protocol, or continuation/initiation of medications for opioid use disorder. The primary outcome was a composite of antibiotic completion, no unplanned discharge, and no 30-day readmission. Notable secondary outcomes included length of stay and presence of stigmatizing language in the electronic medical record. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients were analyzed-74 (62.2%) received SUD resources. The primary outcome was met by 43 patients with SUD resources implemented (58.1%) and 19 patients without resources (42.2%, P = 0.093). After adjustment for infection type, implementation of SUD resources (adjusted odds ratio, 2.593; 95% confidence interval, 1.162-5.789) was independently associated with primary outcome success. The patients who received SUD resources had a median length of stay of 7 days (4-13.3) compared with 4 days (2-6.5) in those without resources ( P < 0.001). Stigmatizing language was present in 98% of patient electronic medical records. CONCLUSIONS: Patient care provided to PWIDs with infections is optimized when SUD resources are implemented. This study further supports the necessity of improving SUD management when PWIDs are admitted to healthcare facilities.

Respiratory culture nudge improves antibiotic prescribing for Moraxella catarrhalis and Haemophilus influenzae lower respiratory tract infections.

We compared optimal antibiotic prescribing before and after implementing an interpretive ß-lactamase microbiology comment for Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis in lower respiratory-tract infections. The postintervention group was associated with 5-fold increased odds of optimal de-escalation (adjusted odds ratio, 5.03; 95% confidence interval, 2.57-9.87).

Cancer is chronic but antimicrobial stewardship is iconic: A retrospective cohort of optimal antibiotic use in ambulatory oncology clinics.

Objective: To evaluate antibiotic prescribing in ambulatory oncology clinics and to identify opportunities to improve antibiotic use. Methods: Retrospective cohort of adult patients who received care at 4 ambulatory oncology clinics from May 2021 to December 2021. Patients were included if they actively followed with a hematologist-oncologist for a cancer diagnosis and received an antibiotic prescription for uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), urinary tract infection (UTI), or acute bacterial skin-skin structure infection (ABSSSI) at an oncology clinic. The primary outcome was receipt of optimal antibiotic therapy, defined as a composite of drug, dose, and duration according to local and national guidelines. Patient characteristics were described and compared; predictors of optimal antibiotic use were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Results: In total, 200 patients were included in this study: 72 (36%) received optimal antibiotics and 128 (64%) received suboptimal antibiotics. The proportions of patients receiving optimal therapy by indication were ABSSSI (52%), UTI (35%), URTI (27%), and LRTI (15%). The most common suboptimal prescribing components were dose (54%), selection (53%) and duration (23%). After adjusting for female sex and LRTI, ABSSSI (adjusted odds ratio, 2.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-4.37) was associated with optimal antibiotic therapy. Antibiotic-associated adverse drug events occurred in 7 patients; 6 occurred patients who received prolonged durations and 1 occurred in a patient who received an optimal duration (P = .057). Conclusions: Suboptimal antibiotic prescribing in ambulatory oncology clinics is common and mostly driven by antibiotic selection and dosing. Duration of therapy may also be an area for improvement as national oncology guidelines have not adopted short-course therapy.

Aminopenicillins vs non-aminopenicillins for treatment of enterococcal lower urinary tract infections.

Aminopenicillins (APs) achieve urinary concentrations that exceed typical minimum inhibitory concentrations for enterococcal lower urinary tract infection (UTI). The local clinical microbiology laboratory discontinued routine susceptibilities on enterococcal urine isolates, and reports that 'APs are predictably reliable for uncomplicated enterococcal UTI'. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of APs with non-APs (NAPs) for enterococcal lower UTIs. This was an institutional-review-board-approved, retrospective cohort of adults hospitalized with symptomatic enterococcal lower UTIs from 2013 to 2021. The primary endpoint was composite clinical success at 14 days, defined as resolution of symptoms without new symptoms and no repeat culture growth of the index organism. A non-inferiority analysis was utilized with a 15% margin, and logistic regression evaluated characteristics associated with 14-day failure. In total, 178 subjects were included: 89 AP patients and 89 NAP patients. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were identified in 73 (82%) AP patients and 76 (85%) NAP patients (P=0.54); in total, 34 (38.2%) AP patients and 66 (74.2%) NAP patients had confirmed Enterococcus faecium (P<0.001). Amoxicillin (n=36, 40.5%) and ampicillin (n=36, 40.5%) were the most commonly used APs, and linezolid (n=41, 46%) and fosfomycin (n=30, 34%) were the most commonly used NAPs. Fourteen-day clinical success rates for APs and NAPs were 83.1% and 82.0%, respectively [1.1% difference, 97.5% confidence interval (CI) -0.117 to 0.139]. Among the E. faecium subgroup, 14-day clinical success was observed in 27/34 (79.4%) AP patients and 53/66 (80.3%) NAP patients (P=0.916). On logistic regression, APs were not associated with 14-day clinical failure (adjusted odds ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.38-1.86). APs were non-inferior to NAPs for treating enterococcal lower UTIs, and may be considered irrespective of susceptibility results.