Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for patients with severe bicuspid aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis (BAV) were excluded from all the trileaflet aortic valve stenosis (TAV) pivotal trials, and therefore, their outcomes are not clearly defined. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with BAV and compared them with those of TAV. METHODS: We evaluated the outcomes following TAVR of patients with BAV at our institution between April 2011 and November 2016 and compared them with the outcomes of patients with TAV treated with TAVR. The χ2 and the Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the groups, and a Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate long-term survival. RESULTS: TAVR was performed in a total of 567 patients, from which 50 (8.8%) had BAV and 517 (91.2%) had TAV. Patients with BAV were younger and had higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lower prevalence of coronary artery disease, higher body mass index, and lower Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (STS PROM). Patients with BAV had a slightly higher mean aortic valve gradient postoperatively (median 12 mm Hg [10-15] vs 10 [7-13], P < .001), but paravalvular aortic regurgitation was not different between the groups (> mild 4.0% vs 3.5%, P = .541). Clinical outcomes were not different between the groups, including stroke (2.0% vs 1.5, P = .567) and the 30-day all-cause mortality (6.0% vs 1.5, P = .064). The 2-year survival (82.0% vs 83.4, P = .476) was similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This initial experience suggests that TAVR can be safely performed in patients with BAV, achieving similar short-term procedural and clinical outcomes when compared with patients with TAV.

Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis-When to Intervene: a Review of the Literature, Current Trials, and Guidelines.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The optimal treatment for asymptomatic patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) is not clearly known. Here, we review the available data on the management of such patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Half of patients with severe AS are asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis, and are at risk for adverse events, including sudden cardiac death. A significant proportion of these patients develop AS-related symptoms within 1 or 2 years. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics are predictors of poor outcomes and can guide treatment decisions. Several non-randomized studies and meta-analyses have suggested benefit from early AVR for asymptomatic severe AS, including improved all-cause, cardiovascular, and valve-related mortality. Based on the available information, current guidelines suggest aortic valve replacement in the presence of specific characteristic, including left ventricular dysfunction and very severe AS with significantly elevated gradients. Although the available data suggests early AVR improves the clinical outcomes of these patients, most patients in current practice are managed conservatively. Six randomized trials are ongoing to better elucidate the ideal management of asymptomatic severe AS patients.

Association of Renin-Angiotensin Inhibitor Treatment With Mortality and Heart Failure Readmission in Patients With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Importance: Data are lacking on the effect of a renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor prescribed after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Treatment with a RAS inhibitor may reverse left ventricular remodeling and improve function. Objective: To investigate the association of prescription of a RAS inhibitor and outcomes after TAVR. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of TAVR procedures performed in the United States (using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapies Registry) between July 2014 and January 2016 that were linked to Medicare claims data (final date of follow-up: March 31, 2017). To account for differences in demographics, echocardiographic findings, and in-hospital complications, 1:1 propensity matching was performed. Exposures: Initial hospital discharge prescription of a RAS inhibitor after TAVR. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were all-cause death and readmission due to heart failure at 1 year after discharge, which were considered separately. The secondary outcome was health status assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ; score range: 0-100, with a higher score indicating less symptom burden and better quality of life; a small effect size was defined as 5 points) at 1 year. Results: Among 21 312 patients who underwent TAVR at 417 US sites, 8468 patients (39.7%) were prescribed a RAS inhibitor at hospital discharge. After propensity matching, 15 896 patients were included (mean [SD] age, 82.4 [6.8] years; 48.1% were women; mean [SD] left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], 51.9% [11.5%]). Patients with a prescription for a RAS inhibitor vs those with no prescription had lower mortality rates at 1 year (12.5% vs 14.9%, respectively; absolute risk difference [ARD], -2.4% [95% CI, -3.5% to -1.4%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.76 to 0.90]) and lower heart failure readmission rates at 1 year (12.0% vs 13.8%; ARD, -1.8% [95% CI, -2.8% to -0.7%]; HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.79 to 0.95]). When stratified by LVEF, having a prescription for a RAS inhibitor vs no prescription was associated with lower 1-year mortality among patients with preserved LVEF (11.1% vs 13.9%, respectively; ARD, -2.81% [95% CI, -3.95% to -1.67%]; HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.71 to 0.86]), but not among those with reduced LVEF (18.8% vs 19.5%; ARD, -0.68% [95% CI, -3.52% to 2.20%]; HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.12]) (P = .04 for interaction). Of 15 896 matched patients, 4837 (30.4%) were included in the KCCQ score analysis and improvements at 1 year were greater in patients with a prescription for a RAS inhibitor vs those with no prescription (median, 33.3 [interquartile range, 14.2 to 51.0] vs 31.3 [interquartile range, 13.5 to 51.1], respectively; difference in improvement, 2.10 [95% CI, 0.10 to 4.06]; P < .001), but the effect size was not clinically meaningful. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients who underwent TAVR, receiving a prescription for a RAS inhibitor at hospital discharge compared with no prescription was significantly associated with a lower risk of mortality and heart failure readmission. However, due to potential selection bias, this finding requires further investigation in randomized trials.

Coronary Artery Anomalies: When You Need to Worry.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is a broad spectrum of coronary artery anomalies that cardiologists may encounter either incidentally or during evaluation for cardiac symptoms. These anomalies include anomalous coronary arteries arising from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS), coronary fistulae, and coronary artery aneurysms. This manuscript outlines the unique features, diagnostic characteristics, and treatment considerations for these lesions. RECENT FINDINGS: Intravenous ultrasound (IVUS), computed tomographic angiography (CTA), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are becoming more sophisticated and will be increasingly used to facilitate the optimal treatment approach for coronary anomalies. There are a wide variety of coronary artery anomalies and their clinical ramifications range from benign to potentially fatal. Coronary anomalies often have complex anatomy and require advanced imaging modalities for comprehensive characterization. Due to the heterogeneity in lesion characteristics and outcomes, physicians should consider clinical and imaging features to create individualized management plans, along with referral to adult congenital heart disease centers.

Challenges in Aortic Valve Stenosis: Low-Flow States Diagnosis, Management, and a Review of the Current Literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We will describe and define the current diagnosis, management, and potential therapy for low-flow aortic stenosis (AS) states, as well as summarize the available evidence underlying these recommendations. RECENT FINDINGS: Low-flow aortic stenosis syndromes have worse prognoses than traditionally defined normal flow severe aortic stenosis. In this setting, aortic valve replacement is the only therapy that improves outcomes. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has an ever-expanding role in the treatment of aortic stenosis, and there is growing evidence that TAVR may be a preferred therapy for low-flow AS states. Aortic stenosis remains one of the most common valvular diseases requiring therapy. Low-flow AS represents up to 40% of all patients with AS and is associated with significant mortality. This condition requires further testing for appropriate diagnosis and treatment. Low-flow AS states have poor prognoses, thus AVR and especially TAVR have a growing role in treatment of this challenging subset of AS patients.

Assessment of single-bolus contrast administration technique using hybrid dual-source ECG-gated thoracic and dual-source non-ECG-gated high-pitch abdominopelvic CT acquisitions for procedural planning before transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess vascular contrast opacification and homogeneity using single-bolus contrast administration with hybrid thoracic and abdominopelvic computed tomographic angiography in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Combination electrocardiogram-gated thoracic and dual-source, high-pitch abdominopelvic computed tomographic angiography examinations of 50 patients with severe aortic stenosis between December 2013 and March 2014 were reviewed. Contrast administration was individualized to patient-specific physiology. Image analysis of vascular opacification was obtained and interdependencies of vascular contrast and homogeneity of contrast distribution were assessed. RESULTS: The mean volume of contrast administered was 106 ± 11.7 mL. Mean attenuation was 371 ± 90.7 Hounsfield units (HU) in the thoracic aorta and 388 ± 95.9 HU in the abdominal aorta. Homogeneous opacification was obtained throughout with coefficient of variation of 11%. CONCLUSIONS: Procedural planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement can be achieved using a single-injection bolus contrast protocol in combination with a 2-part multidetector computed tomographic image acquisition technique with optimal opacification of major arterial structures.

Thrombolytic therapy for thrombosis of continuous flow ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: Despite chronic systemic anticoagulation, advanced heart failure patients treated with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) remain at risk for pump thrombosis. Pump thrombosis may initially be suspected in the setting of clinical and biochemical evidence for intravascular hemolysis, putatively related to shear stress on red blood cells propelled through a partially occluded pump. Limited data exist to guide management in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We present a series of 8 LVAD patients who presented with intravascular hemolysis secondary to pump thrombosis who were treated with intraventricular thrombolytic therapy. In 3 patients, thrombolytic therapy led to complete and lasting resolution of hemolysis, suggesting successful dissolution of pump thrombus. In the remaining 5 patients, thrombolytic therapy ultimately failed to halt or reverse pump thrombosis and hemolysis: 1 patient required emergent pump exchange, 2 patients progressed to cardiogenic shock and died, 1 patient suffered a debilitating stroke after which care was withdrawn, and 1 patient underwent cardiac transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of LVAD thrombosis, thrombolytic therapy is an alternate treatment strategy in a subset of patients. Candidacy for this alternate procedure must carefully weigh the risks of complications, including hemorrhage and thromboembolism.

Treatment of mechanical aortic valve thrombosis with heparin and eptifibatide.

A 75-year old woman with a history of coronary disease status post 3-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) 8 years ago and a repeat one-vessel CABG 2 years ago in the setting of aortic valve replacement with a #19 mm St. Jude bileaflet mechanical valve for severe aortic stenosis presented with two to three weeks of progressive dyspnea and increasing substernal chest discomfort. Echocardiography revealed a gradient to 31 mmHg across her aortic valve, increased from a baseline of 13 mmHg five months previously. Fluoroscopy revealed thrombosis of her mechanical aortic valve. She was not a candidate for surgery given her multiple comorbidities, and fibrinolysis was contraindicated given a recent subdural hematoma 1 year prior to presentation. She was treated with heparin and eptifibatide and subsequently demonstrated resolution of her aortic valve thrombosis. We report the first described successful use of eptifibatide in addition to unfractionated heparin for the management of subacute valve thrombosis in a patient at high risk for repeat surgery or fibrinolysis.

Invasive hemodynamic evaluation in patients with mechanical aortic valves.

Invasive hemodynamic evaluation in the patient with a mechanical aortic valve has in the past required transseptal or apical left ventricular puncture in order to obtain left ventricular pressure measurements. Over the last few years, several case reports have described the feasibility of using a coronary pressure-sensing guidewire to cross mechanical prosthetic aortic valves. In the current manuscript, we report four cases in which the use of a pressure-sensing guidewire was utilized for invasive hemodynamic diagnostic evaluation in patients with mechanical aortic valves. Furthermore, we present a detailed description of the technical approach to this technique and the limitations of this approach.

Radiation-associated valvular heart disease.

Therapeutic ionizing radiation, such as that used in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma, can cause cardiac valvular damage that may take several years to manifest as radiation-associated valvular heart disease. Treatment can be complicated by comorbid radiation injury to other cardiac and mediastinal structures that lead to traditional surgical valve replacement or repair becoming high-risk. A representative case is presented that demonstrates the complexity of radiation-associated valvular heart disease and its successful treatment with percutaneous transcatheter valve replacement. The prevalence and pathophysiologic mechanism of radiation-associated valvular injury are reviewed. Anthracycline adjuvant therapy appears to increase the risk of valvular fibrosis. Left-sided heart valves are more commonly affected than right-sided heart valves. A particular pattern of calcification has been noted in some patients, and experimental data suggest that radiation induction of an osteogenic phenotype may be responsible. A renewed appreciation of the cardiac valvular effects of therapeutic ionizing radiation for mediastinal malignancies is important, and the treatment of such patients may be assisted by the development of novel, less-invasive approaches.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an update.

Aortic stenosis affects many people worldwide with a significant impact on morbidity and mortality with uncorrected, symptomatic aortic valve stenosis carrying mortality of 50% at one year. Degenerative calcific pathology, the most common cause of aortic stenosis, increases in prevalence with age; estimated prevalence of 5% in individuals over 75 years of age. Despite the malignant prognosis without valve replacement, many patients are not offered surgery due to advanced age and co-existing medical conditions; reported to be a third of symptomatic patients. In the last several years, transcatheter aortic valve replacement has emerged as an alternative treatment in patients with high or prohibitive open surgical risk. The PARTNER cohort B data, employing the Sapien valve, demonstrated a 20% absolute mortality benefit at one year compared with medical therapy. In this review, we provide an update of this technology and discuss patient selection, procedural planning, complications, and look toward the future of transcatheter heart valves in the treatment of aortic stenosis.

Infective endocarditis: a comprehensive overview.

Infective endocarditis (IE) is an infection of a heart valve or other cardiac structure at a site of endothelial damage. The definition has been also expanded to include infected cardiac devices. A variety of organ systems may be adversely affected in patients with IE. Although advances have improved the diagnostic accuracy for IE, morbidity and mortality remain remarkably high. This article reviews the pathophysiology, complications, diagnosis, and management of IE with recent updates to the literature and the major cardiovascular society guidelines. The increasingly prevalent clinical problem of intracardiac device-related IE is addressed, along with the recent changes to the IE prophylaxis guidelines.

Association between valvular surgery and mortality among patients with infective endocarditis complicated by heart failure.

CONTEXT: Heart failure (HF) is the most common complication of infective endocarditis. However, clinical characteristics of HF in patients with infective endocarditis, use of surgical therapy, and their associations with patient outcome are not well described. OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical, echocardiographic, and microbiological variables associated with HF in patients with definite infective endocarditis and to examine variables independently associated with in-hospital and 1-year mortality for patients with infective endocarditis and HF, including the use and association of surgery with outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study, a prospective, multicenter study enrolling 4166 patients with definite native- or prosthetic-valve infective endocarditis from 61 centers in 28 countries between June 2000 and December 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Of 4075 patients with infective endocarditis and known HF status enrolled, 1359 (33.4% [95% CI, 31.9%-34.8%]) had HF, and 906 (66.7% [95% CI, 64.2%-69.2%]) were classified as having New York Heart Association class III or IV symptom status. Within the subset with HF, 839 (61.7% [95% CI, 59.2%-64.3%]) underwent valvular surgery during the index hospitalization. In-hospital mortality was 29.7% (95% CI, 27.2%-32.1%) for the entire HF cohort, with lower mortality observed in patients undergoing valvular surgery compared with medical therapy alone (20.6% [95% CI, 17.9%-23.4%] vs 44.8% [95% CI, 40.4%-49.0%], respectively; P < .001). One-year mortality was 29.1% (95% CI, 26.0%-32.2%) in patients undergoing valvular surgery vs 58.4% (95% CI, 54.1%-62.6%) in those not undergoing surgery (P < .001). Cox proportional hazards modeling with propensity score adjustment for surgery showed that advanced age, diabetes mellitus, health care-associated infection, causative microorganism (Staphylococcus aureus or fungi), severe HF (New York Heart Association class III or IV), stroke, and paravalvular complications were independently associated with 1-year mortality, whereas valvular surgery during the initial hospitalization was associated with lower mortality. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients with infective endocarditis complicated by HF, severity of HF was strongly associated with surgical therapy and subsequent mortality, whereas valvular surgery was associated with lower in-hospital and 1-year mortality.

Management of patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.

OPINION STATEMENT: Our approach to the management of the patient with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) takes several factors into consideration. First, is the dysfunction of the valve due to aortic stenosis (AS), aortic regurgitation (AR), or a combination of stenosis and regurgitation, and what is the severity? Next, is there aortic dilation in any of the regions (sinuses of Valsalva, sinotubular junction, tubular ascending aorta, or transverse arch) discussed in this article. In general, we follow patients with a BAV and moderate valve dysfunction (AS or AR) with yearly surveillance transthoracic echocardiography for left ventricular function, jet velocity, gradient, and valve area with AS, whereas left ventricular (LV) function and LV dimensions are monitored for patients with AR. In addition, yearly clinical evaluation for change in symptom status or functional capacity is critical. More recently, we have utilized NT-pro BNP levels to help assess patients, particularly those in whom the anatomic severity does not match the clinical symptoms (ie, the valve severity appears mild but the patient is complaining of symptoms or the valve severity seems significant but no symptoms are noted). All patients with a bicuspid valve should have evaluation of the aorta with a MRI or CT angiography at some point, as 50% of BAV patients have aortic root involvement. At our institution, cardiac MRI is preferred unless there is a contraindication, particularly in younger patients, given the cumulative radiation exposure from surveillance CT scans. Cardiac MRI also provides the added benefit of information regarding LV function, LV dimensions, and assessment of valve stenosis/regurgitation severity, thus obviating the need for echocardiographic data in those being followed with serial cardiac MRI. For those with no aortic dilatation, we tend to use only echocardiography for follow-up. For patients with mild aortic dilation, surveillance aortic imaging is usually performed every 3-5 years. However, for those with greater degrees of aortic dilation (aortic diameters >4.0 cm) or notable interval change in dimensions, then aortic imaging every year is conducted. For young adult patients with isolated aortic stenosis, balloon aortic valvuloplasty is often an effective and temporizing treatment option. In older patients with aortic stenosis or those with AR, aortic valve replacement, with or without a surgery on the aorta depending on whether concomitant dilation (aortic diameter >4.5 cm) of the aorta is present, is the preferred management strategy. In a few patients, surgery on the aortic alone may be indicated if the maximal diameter exceeds 5.0 cm.

Review of alternative access in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has surpassed surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) as the most common treatment strategy for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis over the past decade. As TAVR technology has continued to advance, it has been expanded from being an option only for extreme risk patients to now being the preferred option for the majority of patients with severe aortic stenosis. Recent trials have shown that TAVR is superior or non-inferior to SAVR even in patients at low surgical risk. One limitation of TAVR is the need for large bore vascular access. This has improved over time with smaller sheath sizes and improved delivery systems, but is still a significant issue in a patient population that often has many comorbidities including peripheral arterial disease. Early in the TAVR experience the only option for alternative access was transapical access, which has consistently been linked to increased procedural complications and worsened clinical outcomes. However, in recent years several centers have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of several alternative access strategies including transaxillary, transcarotid, transcaval, and direct aortic. There are no randomized data comparing these strategies, so access site approach is chosen by the multidisciplinary heart team based on patient anatomy and site expertise. We will review the current data in alternative access that in our view supports prioritizing a transaxillary or transcarotid strategy. In addition, we will describe our center's pre-procedural planning, peri-procedural approach, and propose an algorithm for alternative access.

Valve-in-Ring Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement After Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.

Aortic regurgitation after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a well-described problem that decreases the clinical effectiveness of LVAD therapy and may eventually prompt consideration of aortic valve replacement once the regurgitation becomes severe. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is an attractive, less invasive option compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in these patients. We report a valve-in-ring transcatheter aortic valve replacement for a patient with severe aortic regurgitation associated with LVAD destination therapy. Our case demonstrates that this approach is feasible in humans and can yield excellent clinical results.

Impact of dual energy cardiac CT for metal artefact reduction post aortic valve replacement.

PURPOSE: Assess image quality of dual-energy (DE) and single-energy (SE) cardiac multi-detector computed tomographic (MDCT) post aortic valve replacement (AVR) on a dual source MDCT scanner. METHODS: Eighty patients with cardiac MDCT acquisitions (ECG gated, dual-source) post-surgical and transcatheter AVR were retrospectively identified. Forty DE (cohort 1) and 40 SE acquisitions (cohort 2; 100 or 120 kVp) were reviewed. Metal artefact at valve coaptation (VC) and valve insertion site (VIS), and contrast enhancement were assessed. Valve leaflet edge definition was graded on a 4-point scale by three radiologists. RESULTS: The mean percentage valve area obscured by metal artifact differed between the cohorts; cohort 1 DE blended, high keV and low keV: 14.8 %, 11.1 % and 17.8 % at VC and 16.4 %, 13 %, 20.4 % at VIS respectively. Cohort 2: 25.8 % and 33.6 % (VC and VIS); each DE reconstruction vs SE: P < 0.0001. Average contrast opacification and coefficient of variance for cohort 1: 562.9 ± 144.7, 281.1 ± 60.3 and 1132.7 ± 300.8 Hounsfield Units (HU) and 9.6 %, 10 % and 8.9 %. For cohort 2: 437.2 ± 119.2 HU and 10.8 % (P < 0.01). Average leaflet edge definition cohort 1: 2.3 ± 0.4, 2.7 ± 0.2 and 2.3 ± 0.2, and cohort 2: 2.9 ± 0.2. CONCLUSION: DE high keV renderings can result in up to 17.2 % less metal artefact compared to standard SE acquisition for cardiac CT. Contrast opacification and homogeneity is higher for DE blended and low keV renderings compared to SE acquisition with leaflet visibility preferred for low keV and blended DE renderings.