Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Transplant ; 32(7): e13309, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29952035

RESUMEN

In 2013, the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act was passed to permit the conduct of research on the transplantation of organs from donors infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) into recipients who are HIV-positive. The HOPE Act workshop had many objectives including the discussion of the ethical issues involved in HIV-positive to HIV-positive transplantation, the informed consent process, and the role of independent advocates in the context of HIV to HIV transplantation. As of 2018, 22 transplant hospitals are approved, or undergoing approval, to perform HIV-positive to HIV-positive transplant surgeries, and this number is expected to grow. This study aims to: (i) briefly review the history and research of HIV+ transplantation prior to the HOPE Act, (ii) describe the ethical principles supporting the HOPE Act, (iii) characterize the informed consent process, and (iv) provide guidance regarding the role of independent advocates in the context of HIV-positive to HIV-positive transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/cirugía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trasplante de Órganos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Defensa del Paciente , Donantes de Tejidos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/legislación & jurisprudencia , VIH/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por VIH/virología , Seropositividad para VIH , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado , Pronóstico
2.
Clin Transplant ; 27(2): 178-84, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23566069

RESUMEN

The practice recommendations discussed here are based on the findings of the national survey as well as the opinions of the authors. The recommendations that are proposed here are not exhaustive and are aspirational in intent and are likely to evolve with time. Practice guidelines are recommended for legal and regulatory issues (e.g., state or federal laws), consumer or public benefit (e.g., improving service delivery, avoiding harm to the patient, decreasing disparities in underserved or vulnerable populations), and for professional guidance (e.g., new role, professional risk management issues, advances in practice). Without such practice guidelines, donors, and indirectly the candidates, may be at increased risk for possible bias or undue harm.


Asunto(s)
Donadores Vivos , Defensa del Paciente/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado/ética , Donadores Vivos/ética , Defensa del Paciente/economía , Defensa del Paciente/educación , Defensa del Paciente/ética , Participación del Paciente , Rol Profesional , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA