Impact of the timing of first appropriate shock on outcomes in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Early versus late.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks are associated with an increased risk of mortality and heart failure (HF) events. The first appropriate shock may occur late after implantation. However, whether the timing of the first appropriate shock influences prognosis is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of the timing of the first appropriate shock in patients with ICD. METHODS: This retrospective and observational study enrolled 565 consecutive ICD patients. Patients who received an appropriate shock were divided into the early group (first appropriate shock <1 year after ICD implantation) and late group (first appropriate shock ≥1 year after ICD implantation). All-cause mortality was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 5.6 years, 112 (19.8%) patients received an appropriate shock, including 32 patients (28.6%) in the early group and 80 patients (71.4%) in the late group. Comparisons of baseline characteristics at ICD implantation revealed that the late group was more likely to receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (66.3% vs. 31.3%, p < 0.001), ICD for primary prevention (60.0% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.001), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker treatment (88.8% vs. 71.9%, p = 0.028). Survival after shock was significantly worse in the late group than in the early group (p = 0.027). In multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, the late group had an increased risk of all-cause mortality compared with the early group (HR: 2.22; 95% CI 1.01-4.53; p = 0.029). In both groups, the most common cause of death was HF. CONCLUSIONS: Late occurrence of the first appropriate ICD shock was associated with a worse prognosis compared with early occurrence of the first appropriate shock. Cardiac death was the most common cause of death in patients who experienced late occurrence of the first appropriate ICD shock, resulting from HF in most cases.

Left Ventricular End-Systolic Diameter May Predict Persistent Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Patients with persistent heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have a poorer prognosis than those with HF with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF). However, data on the predictive value of echocardiographic parameters for persistent HFrEF are lacking. We retrospectively studied 443 patients who were diagnosed with HFrEF (EF ≤ 40%) during hospitalization and underwent echocardiography at the 1-year follow-up. We divided them into the 2 groups: HFimpEF (EF > 40%) and persistent HFrEF group at 1-year follow-up, and assessed the predictive value of echocardiographic parameters at discharge for persistent HFrEF. In total, 301/443 patients (68%) were diagnosed with persistent HFrEF and 142/443 (32%) with HFimpEF at the 1-year follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the persistent HFrEF group had a poorer prognosis than the HFimpEF group (log-rank, P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.75; cutoff value: 55 mm) among various echocardiographic parameters. LVESD was an independent predictor of persistent HFrEF at the 1-year follow-up (odds ratio: 1.07, 95%CI: 1.02-1.12) upon multivariable logistic regression analysis. The incidence of persistent HFrEF was higher in patients with an LVESD ≥ 55 mm than in those with an LVESD < 55 mm (81% versus 55%, Fisher's exact test, P < 0.001). In conclusion, an LVESD (≥ 55 mm) was associated with persistent HFrEF. Focusing on LVESD in daily practice may help clinicians with risk stratification for decision-making regarding management in patients with advanced HF refractory to guideline-directed medical therapy.

Prognostic impact of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure on regular hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) and ß-blocker provide prognostic benefits as guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, there is limited data for the favorable effects in such patients receiving regular hemodialysis. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of RASi and ß-blocker in patients with HFrEF who receive regular hemodialysis. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center, observational study, from 2110 consecutive patients hospitalized for HF and who survived to discharge, 97 with HFrEF who received regular hemodialysis were included for analysis. They were classified into three groups according to prescribed medication at discharge following index hospitalization: both RASi and ß-blocker (Dual-GDMT group: n = 55), either RASi or ß-blocker (Mono-GDMT group: n = 34), and neither RASi nor ß-blocker (No-GDMT group: n = 8). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and rehospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: The mean age was 66 years and 79% of the patients were men. During the median follow-up of 501 days, the primary endpoint occurred in 43 patients (44%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the Dual-GDMT group had the lowest rates of the primary endpoint (log-rank test for trend: p < 0.001). Even after adjustment for diverse covariates (multivariate Cox regression), the Dual-GDMT (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.005-0.32) and Mono-GDMT (HR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01-0.50) groups had better prognoses than the No-GDMT group. CONCLUSIONS: The prescription of RASi and/or ß-blocker was associated with a lower adverse-event rate after discharge in patients with HFrEF who were on regular hemodialysis.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitor exerts prognostic effects in HFpEF patients with low baseline chloride level.

BACKGROUND: Few interventions have shown improved prognosis in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Serum chloride levels, which are affected by serum renin secretion, are associated with the prognosis of HFpEF patients. However, the relationship between serum chloride levels and the effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in HFpEF patients remains unclear. We investigated whether the prognostic benefit of RASi depends on baseline serum chloride levels in HFpEF patients. METHODS: This observational study included 506 hospitalized patients with HFpEF (ejection fraction ≥50%) who were discharged. They were divided into two categories based on serum chloride levels at admission (cutoff level: 101 mEq/L) according to previous reports. In each chloride category, all-cause mortality, the primary endpoint, was compared between patients who received RASi and those who did not. RESULTS: Patients who received RASi had a significantly lower mortality rate after discharge than those who did not, but only in the lower chloride category (log-rank, P = 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed the effect of risk reduction by RASi on all-cause mortality in the lower chloride category (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.31, 95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.84). The prognostic advantages of RASi were evident in the lower chloride category, but not in the higher chloride category, at admission (P for interaction = 0.027). CONCLUSION: RASi administration was associated with an improved prognosis only in HFpEF patients with a low baseline serum chloride level. Clinicians should consider RASi administration if patients' serum chloride levels are low, to improve the long-term prognosis of HFpEF patients.

Prognosis and diastolic dysfunction predictors in patients with heart failure and recovered ejection fraction.

There is limited data on whether diastolic dysfunction in patients with heart failure (HF) and recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) is associated with worse prognosis. We retrospectively assessed 96 patients diagnosed with HFrecEF and created ROC curve of their diastolic function at the 1-year follow-up for the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF readmission after the follow-up. Eligible patients were divided into two groups according to the cutoff value of E/e' ratio (12.1) with the highest AUC (0.70). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that HFrecEF with high E/e' group had a significantly poorer prognosis than the low E/e' group (log-rank, p = 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the high E/e' group was significantly related to the composite endpoint (hazard ratio 5.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-24.1). The independent predictors at discharge for high E/e' ratio at the 1-year follow-up were older age and female sex after adjustment for covariates (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.13 and OR 4.70, 95% CI 1.08-20.5). In conclusion, HFrecEF with high E/e' ratio might be associated with a poor prognosis. Older age and female sex were independent predictors for a sustained high E/e' ratio in patients with HFrecEF.

Nutritional status during hospitalization is associated with the long-term prognosis of patients with heart failure.

AIMS: The CONtrolling NUTritional status (CONUT) score represents the nutritional status of patients with heart failure (HF). Although high CONUT scores on admission are associated with increased risks of cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with HF, the impact of CONUT changes during hospitalization on their long-term prognosis is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of CONUT score changes on the clinical outcomes of patients with HF after discharge. METHODS AND RESULTS: This observational study included 1705 patients hospitalized with HF who were discharged alive. The patients were categorized depending on their CONUT scores at admission and discharge into persistently high, high at admission and normal at discharge, normal at admission and high at discharge, and persistently normal CONUT groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of CV death and readmission for HF after discharge. The primary endpoint occurred in 652 patients (38%) during the median 525 day follow-up period. Patients with persistently high CONUT scores had the highest composite endpoint rate (log-rank trend test: P < 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, the hazard ratio for the composite outcome was significantly lower for the patients with high CONUT scores at admission and normal CONUT scores at discharge than that for those with persistently high CONUT scores (hazard ratio: 0.69; 95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional status changes in patients with HF that occurred during hospitalization were associated with CV events after discharge. Improving the nutritional status of patients may improve their clinical outcomes.