Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 115
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Blood ; 2024 05 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38768337

RESUMEN

Estimating progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) superiority during clinical trials of multiple myeloma (MM) has become increasingly challenging as novel therapeutics have improved patient outcomes. Thus, it is imperative to identify earlier endpoint surrogates that are predictive of long-term clinical benefit to expedite development of more effective therapies. Minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity is a common intermediate endpoint that has shown prognostic value for clinical benefit in trials of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). This meta-analysis was based on the FDA guidance for considerations for a meta-analysis of MRD as a clinical endpoint and evaluates MRD-negativity as an early endpoint reasonably likely to predict long-term clinical benefit. Eligible studies were phase 2 or 3 randomized controlled clinical trials measuring MRD negativity as an endpoint in patients with MM, with follow-up of ≥6 months following an a priori defined time point of 12±3 months post-randomization. Eight newly diagnosed MM-(NDMM)-studies evaluating 4,907 patients were included. Trial-level associations between MRD-negativity and PFS were R2WLSiv (95% CI) 0.67 (0.43-0.91) and R2copula 0.84 (0.64->0.99) at the 12-month timepoint. The individual-level association between 12-month MRD negativity and PFS resulted in a global odds ratio of 4.02 (95% CI: 2.57-5.46). For relapse/refractory MM-(RRMM), there were four studies included, and the individual-level association between 12-month MRD negativity and PFS resulted in a global odds ratio of 7.67 (4.24-11.10). A clinical trial demonstrating a treatment effect on MRD is reasonably likely to eventually demonstrate a treatment effect on PFS, suggesting that MRD may be an early clinical endpoint reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit in MM, that may be used to support accelerated approval and thereby expedite the availability of new drugs to patients with MM.

3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37740288

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The possibility of combining real and virtual environments is driving the increased use of augmented reality (AR) in education, including medical training. The aim of this multicentre study was to evaluate the students' perspective on the AR-based Rheumality GO!® app as a new teaching concept, presenting six real anonymised patient cases with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: The study encompassed 347 undergraduate medical students (232 women and 115 men) from four medical universities in Germany (Jena, Bad Nauheim/Gießen, Nuremberg, Erlangen). The course was divided into a theoretical refresher lecture followed by six AR-based cases in each of the three indications presented in the Rheumality GO!® app. All participants evaluated the course after completion, assessing the benefit of the app from a student´s perspective using a questionnaire with 16 questions covering six subject areas. RESULTS: The use of the AR-based app Rheumality GO!® improved the understanding of pathologies in RA, PsA, and axSpA for 99% of the participants. For 98% of respondents, the concept of AR with real patient data has made a positive impact on the teaching environment. On the other hand, 82% were in favour of the use of virtual tools (e.g. AR) in addition to this conventional approach. CONCLUSION: The results of our survey showed that from medical students' perspective, an AR-based concept like the Rheumality GO!® app can complement rheumatology teaching in medical school as an effective and attractive tool though not replace bedside teaching.

4.
BMC Cancer ; 22(1): 1032, 2022 Oct 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36192719

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the third most common hematologic malignancy with increasing importance due to improving treatment strategies and long-term outcomes in an aging population. This study aims to analyse influencing factors on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), such as treatment strategies, participation in a clinical trial and patient characteristics like anxiety, depression, gender, and age. A better understanding of the individual factors in context with HRQoL could provide a helpful instrument for clinical decisions. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, the HRQoL of MM patients with different therapies (first-line and relapse) was quantified by standardized questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and -MY20) in the context of sociodemographic data, individual anxiety and depressiveness (PHQ-4), and a selected number of clinical parameters and symptoms at defined time-points before, during, and after therapy. RESULTS: In total, 70 patients were included in the study. The median age of the study cohort was 62 years. 44% were female and 56% were male patients. More than half of the patients were fully active with an ECOG 0. Global health status was significantly higher in patients with first-line treatment and even increased after start of therapy, while the pain level decreased. In contrast, patients with relapsed MM reported a decreasing global health status and increasing pain. Additionally, there was a higher global health status in less anxious/depressive patients. HRQoL decreased significantly after start of chemotherapy in the parameters body image, side effects of treatment, and cognitive functioning. Tandem stem-cell transplantation was not found to be a risk factor for higher impairment of HRQoL. Participation in a clinical study led to an improvement of most aspects of HRQoL. Among others, increased anxiety and depression, female gender, older age, impaired performance status, and recurrent disease can be early indicators for a reduced HRQoL. CONCLUSION: This study showed the importance of regular longitudinal assessments of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in routine clinical care. For the first time, to our knowledge, we were able to demonstrate a potential impact between participation in clinical trials and HRQoL. However, due to frequently restrictive inclusion criteria for clinical trials, these MM patients might not be directly comparable with patients treated within standard therapy concepts. Further studies are needed to clarify the relevance of this preliminary data in order to develop an individualized, patient-centred, therapy concept.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Depresión/etiología , Depresión/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/psicología , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Dolor , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
5.
Lancet ; 395(10218): 132-141, 2020 01 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31836199

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Standard-of-care treatment for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma includes combination therapies for patients who are not eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. At the primary analysis for progression-free survival of the phase 3 ALCYONE trial, progression-free survival was significantly longer with daratumumab in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (D-VMP) versus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) alone in patients with transplant-ineligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Here we report updated efficacy and safety results from a prespecified, interim, overall survival analysis of ALCYONE with more than 36 months of follow-up. METHODS: ALCYONE was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, active-controlled, phase 3 trial that enrolled patients between Feb 9, 2015, and July 14, 2016, at 162 sites in 25 countries across North America, South America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and were ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation, because of their age (≥65 years) or because of substantial comorbidities. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio and by permuted block randomisation to receive D-VMP or VMP. An interactive web-based randomisation system was used. Randomisation was stratified by International Staging System disease stage, geographical region, and age. There was no masking to treatment assignments. All patients received up to nine 6-week cycles of subcutaneous bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 of body surface area on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, and 32 of cycle one and on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 of cycles two through nine), oral melphalan (9 mg/m2 once daily on days 1 through 4 of each cycle), and oral prednisone (60 mg/m2 once daily on days 1 through 4 of each cycle). Patients in the D-VMP group also received intravenous daratumumab (16 mg/kg of bodyweight, once weekly during cycle one, once every 3 weeks in cycles two through nine, and once every 4 weeks thereafter as maintenance therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, which has been reported previously. Results presented are from a prespecified interim analysis for overall survival. The primary analysis population (including for overall survival) was the intention-to-treat population of all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment. The safety population included patients who received any dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02195479. FINDINGS: 706 patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups (350 to the D-VMP group, 356 to the VMP group). At a median follow-up of 40·1 months (IQR 37·4-43·1), a significant benefit in overall survival was observed for the D-VMP group. The hazard ratio (HR) for death in the D-VMP group compared with the VMP group was 0·60 (95% CI 0·46-0·80; p=0·0003). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the 36-month rate of overall survival was 78·0% (95% CI 73·2-82·0) in the D-VMP group and 67·9% (62·6-72·6) in the VMP group. Progression-free survival, the primary endpoint, remained significantly improved for the D-VMP group (HR 0·42 [0·34-0·51]; p<0·0001). The most frequent adverse events during maintenance daratumumab monotherapy in patients in the D-VMP group were respiratory infections (54 [19%] of 278 patients had upper respiratory tract infections; 42 [15%] had bronchitis, 34 [12%] had viral upper respiratory tract infections), cough (34 [12%]), and diarrhoea (28 [10%]). INTERPRETATION: D-VMP prolonged overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation. With more than 3 years of follow-up, the D-VMP group continued to show significant improvement in progression-free survival, with no new safety concerns. FUNDING: Janssen Research & Development.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Asia , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Masculino , Melfalán/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , América del Norte , Prednisona/efectos adversos , América del Sur , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
N Engl J Med ; 378(6): 518-528, 2018 02 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29231133

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The combination of bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone is a standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. Daratumumab has shown efficacy in combination with standard-of-care regimens in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 706 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation to receive nine cycles of bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone either alone (control group) or with daratumumab (daratumumab group) until disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 16.5 months in a prespecified interim analysis, the 18-month progression-free survival rate was 71.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.5 to 76.8) in the daratumumab group and 50.2% (95% CI, 43.2 to 56.7) in the control group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.65; P<0.001). The overall response rate was 90.9% in the daratumumab group, as compared with 73.9% in the control group (P<0.001), and the rate of complete response or better (including stringent complete response) was 42.6%, versus 24.4% (P<0.001). In the daratumumab group, 22.3% of the patients were negative for minimal residual disease (at a threshold of 1 tumor cell per 105 white cells), as compared with 6.2% of those in the control group (P<0.001). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were hematologic: neutropenia (in 39.9% of the patients in the daratumumab group and in 38.7% of those in the control group), thrombocytopenia (in 34.4% and 37.6%, respectively), and anemia (in 15.9% and 19.8%, respectively). The rate of grade 3 or 4 infections was 23.1% in the daratumumab group and 14.7% in the control group; the rate of treatment discontinuation due to infections was 0.9% and 1.4%, respectively. Daratumumab-associated infusion-related reactions occurred in 27.7% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation, daratumumab combined with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone resulted in a lower risk of disease progression or death than the same regimen without daratumumab. The daratumumab-containing regimen was associated with more grade 3 or 4 infections. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; ALCYONE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02195479 .).


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Infecciones/inducido químicamente , Infecciones/mortalidad , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Tasa de Supervivencia
7.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 659, 2021 Jun 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34078314

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the phase III ALCYONE trial, daratumumab plus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (D-VMP) significantly improved overall response rate and progression-free status compared with VMP alone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Here, we present patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from ALCYONE. METHODS: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30-item (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EuroQol 5-dimensional descriptive system (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire were administered at baseline, every 3 months (year 1) and every 6 months (until progression). Treatment effects were assessed using a repeated-measures, mixed-effects model. RESULTS: Compliance with PRO assessments was comparable at baseline (> 90%) and throughout study (> 76%) for both treatment groups. Improvements from baseline were observed in both groups for EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status (GHS), most functional scales, symptom scales and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (VAS). Between-group differences were significant for GHS (p = 0.0240) and VAS (p = 0.0160) at month 3. Improvements in pain were clinically meaningful in both groups at all assessment time points. Cognitive function declined in both groups, but the magnitude of the decline was not clinically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with transplant-ineligible NDMM demonstrated early and continuous improvements in health-related quality of life, including improvements in functioning and symptoms, following treatment with D-VMP or VMP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02195479 , registered September 21, 2014.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Melfalán/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/psicología , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Eur J Haematol ; 107(5): 529-542, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34270825

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A post hoc subgroup analysis of two phase III trials (NCT00416273, NCT00416208) was carried out to investigate the influence of 100/140 and 200 mg/m² melphalan as well as single/double autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) on progression-free survival (PFS). Additionally, the effect of bortezomib consolidation on PFS was analyzed. METHODS: Following induction therapy and high-dose melphalan with subsequent ASCT, patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) were randomized 1:1 to either four 35-day cycles of bortezomib consolidation (1.6 mg/m² IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22) or observation. RESULTS: Of the 340 patients included in this analysis, 13.5% received 1 × MEL100/140, 22.9% 2 × MEL100/140, 31.2% 1 × MEL200, and 32.4% 2 × MEL200. With higher cumulative melphalan dose, PFS improved (P = .0085). PFS curves of patients treated with 2 × MEL100/140 and 1 × MEL200 were very similar. The superior dose effect of MEL200 over MEL100/140 was non-existent in the bortezomib consolidation arm but pronounced in the observation arm (P = .0015). Similarly, double ASCT was only beneficial in patients without bortezomib consolidation (P = .0569). CONCLUSIONS: Full dose melphalan and double transplantation seem advantageous only as long as patients are not receiving bortezomib consolidation afterwards.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia de Consolidación/métodos , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante Autólogo
9.
Ann Hematol ; 99(8): 1709-1725, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32296915

RESUMEN

Lenalidomide is an integral, yet evolving, part of current treatment pathways for both transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). It is approved in combination with dexamethasone as first-line therapy for transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM, and as maintenance treatment following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Although strong clinical trial evidence has supported the integration of lenalidomide into current treatment paradigms for NDMM, applying those paradigms to individual patients and determining which patients are most likely to benefit from lenalidomide treatment are more complex. In this paper, we utilize the available clinical trial evidence to provide recommendations for patient selection and lenalidomide dosing in both the first-line setting in patients ineligible for ASCT and the maintenance setting in patients who have undergone ASCT. In addition, we provide guidance on management of those adverse events that are most commonly associated with lenalidomide treatment, and consider the optimal selection and sequencing of next-line agents following long-term frontline or maintenance treatment with lenalidomide.


Asunto(s)
Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple , Trasplante de Células Madre , Autoinjertos , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Selección de Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo
10.
Br J Cancer ; 121(9): 751-757, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31558804

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ixazomib-revlimid-dexamethason showed significant activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we evaluate ixazomib in combination with thalidomide and dexamethasone for induction treatment followed by ixazomib maintenance therapy in RRMM patients. METHODS: Ninety patients have been included. Ixazomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (4 mg, day 1, 8, 15; 100 mg daily; and 40 mg weekly) was scheduled for eight cycles followed by maintenance with ixazomib for one year. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 51.1%, 23.3% achieved CR or VGPR and 10% MR resulting in a clinical benefit rate of 61.1%. In patients completing ≥2 cycles, the rates were 60.5%, 27.6% and 68.4%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.5 months in all, and 9.4 months in those completing ≥2 cycles. Response rates, PFS and overall survival (OS) were similar in patients with and without t(4;14) and/or del(17p), but PFS and OS was significantly shorter in patients with gain of 1q21. Multivariate regression analysis revealed gain of 1q21 as the most important factor associated with OS. Ixazomib maintenance resulted in an upgrade in the depth of response in 12.4% of patients. Grade 3/4 toxicities were relatively rare. CONCLUSIONS: Ixazomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone followed by ixazomib maintenance therapy is active and well tolerated in patients with RRMM. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02410694.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Boro/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Boro/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Femenino , Glicina/administración & dosificación , Glicina/efectos adversos , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Tasa de Supervivencia , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/efectos adversos
11.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 46(7): 1407-1416, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30798427

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is a rare cause of heart failure with frequently delayed diagnosis, because specific early signs or symptoms are missing. Recently, direct amyloid imaging using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has emerged. The aim of this study was to examine the performance of 18F-florbetaben-PET/CT in detection of CA, and compare it to echocardiography (echo), cardiac MRI (CMR) and scintigraphy. Additionally, the use of 18F-florbetaben-PET/CT for quantification of amyloid burden and monitoring of treatment response was assessed. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with proven (n = 5) or clinical suspicion (n = 17) of CA underwent 18F-florbetaben-PET/CT for diagnostic work-up. Qualitative and quantitative assessment including calculation of myocardial tracer retention (MTR) was performed, and compared to echo (n = 20), CMR (n = 16), scintigraphy (n = 16) and serologic biomarkers (NT-proBNP, cTnT, free light chains). In four patients, follow-up PET/CT was available (after treatment initiation, n = 3; surveillance, n = 1). RESULTS: PET demonstrated myocardial 18F-florbetaben retention consistent with CA in 14/22 patients. Suspicion of CA was subsequently dropped in all eight PET-negative patients. Amyloid subtypes showed characteristic retention patterns (AL > AA > ATTR; all p < 0.005). MTR correlated with morphologic and functional parameters, as measured by CMR and echo (all r| > 0.47|, all p < 0.05), but not with cardiac biomarkers. Changes in MTR from baseline to follow-up corresponded well to treatment response, as assessed by cardiac biomarkers and performance status. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) with 18F-florbetaben-PET/CT is feasible and might be useful in differentiating CA subtypes.


Asunto(s)
Amiloidosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía , Corazón/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Cintigrafía , Adulto , Anciano , Amiloidosis/sangre , Compuestos de Anilina , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/sangre , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estilbenos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
12.
Eur J Haematol ; 103(3): 255-267, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31231828

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A post hoc analysis of two phase III trials was carried out to explore the influence of age and treatment factors on the effect of bortezomib consolidation on progression-free survival (PFS) post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were assigned to one of two trials (ClinicalTrials.gov IDs: NCT00416273, NCT00416208), which were conducted in parallel, based on age (18-60 or 61-75 years, respectively). Following induction and ASCT, patients were randomized 1:1 to four 35-day cycles of bortezomib consolidation (1.6 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22) or observation only. RESULTS: Median PFS with bortezomib consolidation vs observation was 33.6 vs 29.0 months (P = 0.3599) in patients aged 18-60 years (n = 202), and 33.4 vs 26.4 months (P = 0.0073) in patients aged 61-75 years (n = 155), respectively. Bortezomib consolidation post-ASCT appeared to equalize outcomes between older and younger patients who received prior treatment of differing intensity. This suggests that the effect of consolidation may be relative and may depend on the composition and intensity of induction and high-dose therapy. CONCLUSION: Older patients receiving less intensive prior treatment could experience a larger PFS benefit from bortezomib consolidation.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Quimioterapia de Consolidación , Femenino , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
13.
Radiology ; 286(1): 205-213, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28799843

RESUMEN

Purpose To determine the diagnostic performance of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) for detection of bone marrow (BM) infiltration in patients with multiple myeloma by using a virtual noncalcium (VNCa) technique. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, 34 consecutive patients with multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance sequentially underwent dual-energy CT and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the axial skeleton. Two independent readers visually evaluated standard CT and color-coded VNCa images for the presence of BM involvement. MR imaging served as the reference standard. Analysis on the basis of the region of interest (ROI) of VNCa CT numbers of infiltrated (n = 75) and normal (n = 170) BM was performed and CT numbers were subjected to receiver operating characteristic analysis to calculate cutoff values. Results In the visual analysis, VNCa images had an overall sensitivity of 91.3% (21 of 23), specificity of 90.9% (10 of 11), accuracy of 91.2% (31 of 34), positive predictive value of 95.5% (21 of 22), and a negative predictive value of 83.3% (10 of 12). ROI-based analysis of VNCa CT numbers showed a significant difference between infiltrated and normal BM (P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.978. A cutoff of -44.9 HU provided a sensitivity of 93.3% (70 of 75), specificity of 92.4% (157 of 170), accuracy of 92.7% (227 of 245), positive predictive value of 84.3% (70 of 83), and negative predictive value of 96.9% (157 of 162) for the detection of BM infiltration. Conclusion Visual and ROI-based analyses of dual-energy VNCa images had excellent diagnostic performance for assessing BM infiltration in patients with multiple myeloma with precision comparable to that of MR imaging. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Asunto(s)
Médula Ósea/diagnóstico por imagen , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico por imagen , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Pelvis/diagnóstico por imagen , Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Anciano , Médula Ósea/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pelvis/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Columna Vertebral/patología
14.
Blood ; 128(4): 497-503, 2016 07 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27226434

RESUMEN

Patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have poor prognosis. The STRATUS study assessed safety and efficacy of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in the largest cohort to date of patients with RRMM. Patients who failed treatment with bortezomib and lenalidomide and had adequate prior alkylator therapy were eligible. Pomalidomide 4 mg was given on days 1-21 of 28-day cycles with low-dose dexamethasone 40 mg (20 mg for patients aged >75 years) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Safety was the primary end point; secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Among 682 patients enrolled, median age was 66 years, and median time since diagnosis was 5.3 years. Median number of prior regimens was 5. Most patients were refractory to both lenalidomide and bortezomib (80.2%). Median follow-up was 16.8 months; median duration of treatment was 4.9 months. Most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were hematologic (neutropenia [49.7%], anemia [33.0%], and thrombocytopenia [24.1%]). Most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were pneumonia (10.9%) and fatigue (5.9%). Grade 3/4 venous thromboembolism and peripheral neuropathy were rare (1.6% each). The ORR was 32.6%, and the median DOR was 7.4 months. Median PFS and OS were 4.6 months and 11.9 months, respectively. We present the largest trial to date evaluating pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in patients with RRMM, further confirming that this regimen offers clinically meaningful benefit and is generally well tolerated. www.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01712789.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Talidomida/análogos & derivados
16.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 45(10): 1694-1704, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29610955

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Despite improved treatment options, multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using 18F-2'-deoxy-2'-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) in MM patients shortly before and ~100 days after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated [18F]FDG-PET/CT-scans of 45 heavily pre-treated MM patients before and 27 patients after scheduled allo-HCT. All scans were qualitatively and semi-quantitatively assessed for the presence of active disease. Serological response was recorded according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were correlated with different PET/CT-derived parameters, such as presence, number and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of focal myeloma lesions. The impact of extramedullary disease on patient outcome was also assessed. RESULTS: PET/CT negativity -prior to or following allo-HCT- was a favorable prognostic factor for progression-free and overall survival (both, PFS and OS: pre-HSCT p < 0.001, post-HCT p < 0.005). High FDG-uptake (SUVmax > 6.5) revealed a significantly shortened survival compared to patients with a lower SUVmax (<6.5) (OS, 5.0 ± 1.1 m vs. not reached - longest 122.0 m; p < 0.001). Moreover, our data prove that a higher number (>3) of focal lesions (pre-HCT: both PFS and OS: p < 0.001; post-HCT PFS: p < 0.001, OS: p = 0.139) as well as the presence of extramedullary disease serve as adverse prognostic factors prior to and after allo-HCT. At response assessment after allo-HCT, [18F]FDG-PET/CT had a complementary value in prognostication in addition to IMWG criteria alone. CONCLUSION: [18F]FDG-PET/CT before and shortly after allogeneic HCT is a powerful predictor for progression-free and overall survival in MM patients.


Asunto(s)
Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico por imagen , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis Citogenético , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante Homólogo
17.
Eur Radiol ; 28(12): 5083-5090, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29882069

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Bone marrow imaging patterns in patients with multiple myeloma possess prognostic and potential therapeutic relevance. We aim to evaluate whether different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) patterns also result in different bone marrow dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) virtual non-calcium (VNCa) attenuation values. METHODS: The institutional review board approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. 53 patients with plasma cell disorders (24 with normal imaging pattern, 24 with focal infiltration, 5 with diffuse infiltration) and 21 control subjects sequentially underwent DECT and MRI of the axial skeleton. MRI served as reference standard for imaging pattern assessment. Bone marrow VNCa attenuation numbers were obtained according to pattern allocation. Generalised estimating equations and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed. RESULTS: Mean VNCa attenuation numbers in patients with normal, focal and diffuse imaging patterns were - 65.8 HU, 3.3 HU and - 13.3 HU, respectively. We found significant differences between diffuse vs. normal (p < 0.001), diffuse vs. focal (p = 0.002) and normal vs. focal (p < 0.001) patterns. A cut-off of - 35.7 HU showed a sensitivity of 100% (24/24) and specificity of 97% (116/120) for the identification of a diffuse pattern vs. normal pattern, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.997. CONCLUSIONS: Bone marrow VNCa attenuation numbers of various imaging patterns in patients with plasma cell disorders differ significantly and a diffuse imaging pattern can be determined confidently using DECT, when ROIs are carefully selected on the basis of MRI findings. KEY POINTS: • DECT allows for imaging pattern allocation similar to MRI. • Bone marrow VNCa attenuation numbers differ significantly depending on the imaging pattern. • A diffuse imaging pattern can be determined confidently using DECT.


Asunto(s)
Médula Ósea/diagnóstico por imagen , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
18.
Future Oncol ; 14(30): 3123-3134, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30058374

RESUMEN

Despite improvement of prognosis since approval of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs, myeloma remains largely incurable. The outcome of first-line treatment is known to be crucial for survival and, therefore, implementation of novel strategies remains one of the key aims of clinical myeloma research. Since approval of carfilzomib for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, a new therapeutic option with a favorable safety profile regarding neuropathy is available. Regarding its superior response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) when combined with other agents in heavily pretreated patients, the compound rapidly became a matter of great interest in search for first-line treatment. With an ORR up to 98% and promising PFS data, it might become an important partner in treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Oligopéptidos/uso terapéutico , Animales , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Ensayos Clínicos Fase I como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Oligopéptidos/farmacocinética , Complejo de la Endopetidasa Proteasomal/metabolismo , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Br J Haematol ; 179(4): 586-597, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28961309

RESUMEN

We assessed the safety and efficacy of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) induction therapy in previously untreated multiple myeloma patients. A total of 414 patients received three 21-day cycles of VCD prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). Most common grade ≥3 adverse events were leucopenia (31·4%) and thrombocytopenia (6·8%). The overall response rate (ORR) by investigator-based assessment was 85·4%. Most patients (74%) underwent successful central laboratory-based molecular cytogenetic analysis. No clinically relevant differences in ORR post-induction were seen between patients with or without high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (86·2% vs. 84·3%). Further follow-up data are available for 113 patients receiving ASCT who were included in a prospective consolidation trial (median follow-up, 55·5 months); median progression-free survival (PFS) was 35·3 months and median overall survival (OS) was not reached. In patients with high-risk versus standard-risk cytogenetics, median PFS was 19·9 vs. 43·6 months (P < 0·0001), and median OS was 54·7 months versus not reached (P = 0·0022). VCD is an effective and tolerable induction regimen; results suggest that VCD induces high response rates independently of cytogenetic risk status, but after long-term follow-up, cytogenetic high risk is associated with markedly reduced PFS and OS post-ASCT.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia de Inducción/métodos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia de Consolidación , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Citogenética , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre , Análisis de Supervivencia , Trasplante Autólogo , Adulto Joven
20.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 22(11): 1988-1996, 2016 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27590108

RESUMEN

Although generally not applied as first-line treatment of multiple myeloma, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-SCT) can still be chosen as ultimate escalation approach in high-risk patients, preferentially within the framework of clinical trials. In this study, we investigated whether decreasing donor chimerism (DC) is predictive for relapse. In addition, we comprehensively determined the impact of several other disease- and treatment-related factors on outcome. One hundred fifty-five multiple myeloma patients whose DC status was followed serially by the short tandem repeat-based techniques at a single lab were included in this retrospective study. Outcome variables were studied in univariate and multivariable analyses. Available were 2.324 DC samples (median, 12 per patient). Loss of full DC was associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.6) but did not impact overall survival. Two-thirds of patients with International Myeloma Working Group-defined relapses still displayed a full DC in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Extramedullary manifestations were observed in 33% of patients, accounting for the discrepancy between DC analysis and the actual disease status. In multivariable analysis, the 2 most relevant variables for an unfavorable PFS were progressive disease before allo-SCT (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.5 to 5.9) and allo-SCT at least the second relapse (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.5 to 4.9), whereas for overall survival progressive disease or partial response before allo-SCT had the strongest negative effects (HR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.9 to 9, and HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.8, respectively). Adverse cytogenetics such as del17p, t(4,14) or amp(1q21) were not associated with shorter survival after allo-SCT. Extensive DC sampling beyond robust engraftment does not appear to provide additional information helpful for disease management in most patients and is challenged by a significant incidence of extramedullary disease. In our series, allo-SCT overcame unfavorable cytogenetics.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Adulto , Quimerismo , Citogenética , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Repeticiones de Microsatélite/genética , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Trasplante Homólogo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA