Psychometric evaluation of a Canadian version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-CAN).

BACKGROUND: The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) is a widely-used patient-reported outcomes measure in patients with heart disease. This study assesses the validity and reliability of the SAQ in a Canadian cohort of individuals with stable angina. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data are from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) registry, a population-based registry of patients who received cardiac catheterization in Alberta, Canada. The cohort consists of 4052 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for stable angina and completed the SAQ within 2 weeks. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to assess the factorial structure of the SAQ. Internal and test-retest reliabilities of a new measure (i.e., SAQ-CAN) was measured using Cronbach α and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. CFA model fit was assessed using the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and comparative fit index (CFI). Construct validity of the SAQ-CAN was assessed in relation to Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS), Euro Quality of life 5 dimension (EQ5D), and original SAQ. Of the 4052 patients included in this analysis, 3281 (80.97%) were younger than 75 years old, while 3239 (79.94%) were male. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a four-factorial structure consisting of 16 items that provided a better fit to the data (RMSEA = 0.049 [90% CI = (0.047, 0.052)]; CFI = 0.975). The 16-item SAQ demonstrated good to excellent internal reliability (Cronbach's α range from 0.77 to 0.90), moderate to strong correlation with the Original SAQ and EQ5D but negligible correlations with HADS. CONCLUSION: The SAQ-CAN has acceptable psychometric properties that are comparable to the original SAQ. We recommend its use for assessing coronary health outcomes in Canadian patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Trajectories of Health-Related Quality of Life in Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment is an important health outcome for measuring the efficacy of treatments and interventions for coronary artery disease (CAD). HRQOL is known to improve over the first year after interventions for CAD, but there is limited knowledge of the changes in HRQOL beyond 1 year. We investigated heterogeneity in long-term trajectories of HRQOL in patients with CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were obtained from 6226 patients identified from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease with at least 1-vessel CAD who underwent their first catheterization between 2006 and 2009. HRQOL was assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, a 19-item disease-specific measure of HRQOL for patients with CAD. Group-based trajectory analysis was used to identify various subgroups of Seattle Angina Questionnaire trajectories over time while adjusting for missing data through a longitudinal multiple imputation model. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of differences among the identified subgroups. Our analysis revealed significant improvements in HRQOL across all the 5 domains of Seattle Angina Questionnaire overtime for the whole data. Multitrajectory analyses revealed 4 HRQOL trajectory subgroups including high (25.1%), largely increased (32.3%), largely decreased (25.0%), and low (17.6%) trajectories. Age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, previous history of myocardial infarction, smoking, depression, anxiety, type of treatment received, and perceived social support were significant predictors of differences among these trajectory subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights variations in longitudinal trajectories of HRQOL in patients with CAD. Despite overall improvements in HRQOL, about a quarter of our cohort experienced a significant decline in their HRQOL over the 5-year period. Understanding these HRQOL trajectories may help personalize prognostic information, identify patients and HRQOL domains on which clinical interventions are most beneficial, and support treatment decisions for patients with CAD.

Incidence and Prognostic Implications of Late Bleeding After Myocardial Infarction or Unstable Angina According to Treatment Strategy.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding complications accompanying coronary revascularization are associated with increased mortality; however, few data are available on subsequent bleeding risk. We used administrative data to assess the incidence of late bleeding events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) according to treatment allocation. METHODS: The cohort and bleeding events were identified through the Canadian Institute for Health Information discharge abstract database. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for index and postindex admission bleeding up to 1 year after discharge. RESULTS: Of 31,941 patients hospitalized with ACS, 7681 (32.4%) patients were treated with medication alone, 3728 (15.2%) underwent angiography without intervention, and 13,075 (53.4%) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The overall incidence of readmission with bleeding based on administrative codes was low (3.8% for medically treated patients, 2.8% for patients who underwent angiography alone, 2.6% for patients who underwent CABG, and 1.8% for patients who underwent PCI; P < 0.0001). Bleeding codes were mainly gastrointestinal bleeding (52%), but 7.8% were intracranial episodes of bleeding. Patients who received PCI had significantly lower odds of late bleeding compared with medically treated patients (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.94). Late bleeding during the first year after ACS was associated with mortality (OR, 4.96; 95% CI, 2.47-9.93). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent revascularization procedures had a relatively low risk for late bleeding events after a hospitalization for ACS. Late bleeding events were associated with an increased risk of death.

Area Median Income and Metropolitan Versus Nonmetropolitan Location of Care for Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Complex Interaction of Social Determinants.

BACKGROUND: Metropolitan versus nonmetropolitan status and area median income may independently affect care for and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes. We sought to determine whether location of care modifies the association among area income, receipt of cardiac catheterization, and mortality following an acute coronary syndrome in a universal health care system. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied a cohort of 14 012 acute coronary syndrome patients admitted to cardiology services between April 18, 2004, and December 31, 2011, in southern Alberta, Canada. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine the odds of cardiac catheterization within 1 day and 7 days of admission and the odds of 30-day and 1-year mortality according to area median household income quintile for patients presenting at metropolitan and nonmetropolitan hospitals. In models adjusting for area income, patients who presented at nonmetropolitan facilities had lower adjusted odds of receiving cardiac catheterization within 1 day of admission (odds ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.11-0.46, P<0.001). Among nonmetropolitan patients, when examined by socioeconomic status, each incremental decrease in income quintile was associated with 10% lower adjusted odds of receiving cardiac catheterization within 7 days (P<0.001) and 24% higher adjusted odds of 30-day mortality (P=0.008) but no significant difference for 1-year mortality (P=0.12). There were no differences in adjusted mortality among metropolitan patients. CONCLUSION: Within a universal health care system, the association among area income and receipt of cardiac catheterization and 30-day mortality differed depending on the location of initial medical care for acute coronary syndromes. Care protocols are required to improve access to care and outcomes in patients from low-income nonmetropolitan communities.

In-hospital outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in Canada: 1992/93 to 2000/01.

BACKGROUND: Despite existing research on outcomes of cardiac care in Canada, little is known about Canada-wide trends and interprovincial differences in outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVES: To examine Canadian trends in rates of in-hospital mortality and same-admission coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after PCI and to compare provincial risk-adjusted in-hospital death and same-admission CABG rates. METHODS: Hospital discharge abstract data were obtained from the Canadian Institute for Health Information and were used to identify cohorts of patients who underwent PCI in eight provinces in fiscal years 1992/93 through 2000/01. Crude data from Quebec hospitals were available for calendar years 1998 and 1999. Logistic regression modelling was used to calculate risk-adjusted in-hospital death and same-admission CABG rates by year and province. RESULTS: A total of 127,103 PCI cases performed in 23 hospitals across eight provinces were examined, with an overall unadjusted death rate of 1.4% and an overall unadjusted CABG rate of 1.6%. A national trend of stable in-hospital mortality rates was observed with a risk-adjusted death rate of 1.4% in 1992/93 versus 1.4% in 2000/01. An overall decline was seen in rates of same-admission CABG with a risk-adjusted rate of 2.7% in 1992/93 versus 0.9% in 2000/01 (relative decrease 67%, P<0.01). New Brunswick, Manitoba and British Columbia achieved overall declines in risk-adjusted death rates over the study period, while the other provinces experienced a slight increase (Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan). All provinces displayed a similar decline in risk-adjusted same-admission CABG rates post-PCI. INTERPRETATION: Risk-adjusted rates of in-hospital death after PCI in Canada have remained stable over nine years, while risk-adjusted rates of same-admission CABG have decreased. The presence of interprovincial differences in risk-adjusted outcomes raises the possibility of variable quality of care for patients undergoing PCI across the Canadian provinces.

Sex, socioeconomic status, access to cardiac catheterization, and outcomes for acute coronary syndromes in the context of universal healthcare coverage.

BACKGROUND: Sex and neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) may independently affect the care and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome, partly through barriers in timely access to cardiac catheterization. We sought to determine whether sex modifies the association between nSES and the receipt of cardiac catheterization and mortality after an acute coronary syndrome in a universal healthcare system. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 14 012 patients with acute coronary syndrome admitted to cardiology services between April 18, 2004, and December 31, 2011, in Southern Alberta, Canada. We used multivariable logistic regression to compare the odds of cardiac catheterization within 2 and 30 days of admission and the odds of 30-day and 1-year mortality for men and women by quintile of neighborhood median household income. Significant relationships between nSES and the receipt of cardiac catheterization and mortality after acute coronary syndrome were detected for women but not men. When examined by nSES, each incremental decrease in neighborhood income quintile for women was associated with a 6% lower odds of receiving cardiac catheterization within 30 days (P=0.01) and a 14% higher odds of 30-day mortality (P=0.03). For men, each decrease in neighborhood income quintile was associated with a 2% lower odds of receiving catheterization within 30 days (P=0.10) and a 5% higher odds of 30-day mortality (P=0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Associations between nSES and receipt of cardiac catheterization and 30-day mortality were noted for women but not men in a universal healthcare system. Care protocols designed to improve equity of access to care and outcomes are required, especially for low-income women.

The prognostic importance of nonsignificant left main coronary artery disease in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to study the association between nonsignificant (<50%) left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) and short- and long-term survival in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The prognostic importance of nonsignificant LMCAD is unknown; however, the co-existence of nonsignificant LMCAD may influence revascularization decisions. METHODS: We analyzed mortality and repeat catheterization rates of 11,855 patients in a prospective cardiac registry database who underwent single-vessel or multivessel PCI from January 1996 through December 2001. Of this cohort, 11.7% (n = 1,385) had nonsignificant (<50%) LMCAD. Outcomes were compared with those without LMCAD. A secondary analysis was performed on a larger cohort of 34,586 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, irrespective of mode of revascularization therapy. RESULTS: Patients with nonsignificant LMCAD had more co-morbidities, and a significantly higher crude mortality rate at 1 year compared with those without LMCAD (4.4% vs. 3.4%; p = 0.05). The 7-year crude mortality hazard ratio (HR) of PCI patients with <50% LMCAD versus those with no LMCAD was 1.18 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94 to 1.46). After risk adjustment for differences in baseline clinical profile, however, the HR decreased to 0.98 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.23). Repeat catheterization rates at 1 year did not differ between groups. The secondary analysis in all patients with nonsignificant LMCAD showed an adjusted HR of 1.03 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.14). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing single-vessel or multivessel PCI who have <50% LMCAD have a nonsignificantly increased 18% relative risk for mortality compared with those without detectable LMCAD that appears to be related to these patients' higher incidence of co-morbidities rather than the left main stenosis itself.