Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
PLoS Pathog ; 18(9): e1010876, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36178969

RESUMEN

The SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant of Concern is highly transmissible and contains mutations that confer partial immune escape. The emergence of Delta in North America caused the first surge in COVID-19 cases after SARS-CoV-2 vaccines became widely available. To determine whether individuals infected despite vaccination might be capable of transmitting SARS-CoV-2, we compared RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) data from 20,431 test-positive anterior nasal swab specimens from fully vaccinated (n = 9,347) or unvaccinated (n = 11,084) individuals tested at a single commercial laboratory during the interval 28 June- 1 December 2021 when Delta variants were predominant. We observed no significant effect of vaccine status alone on Ct value, nor when controlling for vaccine product or sex. Testing a subset of low-Ct (<25) samples, we detected infectious virus at similar rates, and at similar titers, in specimens from vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. These data indicate that vaccinated individuals infected with Delta variants are capable of shedding infectious SARS-CoV-2 and could play a role in spreading COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas Virales , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(5152): 1610-1615, 2022 Dec 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36580416

RESUMEN

As of November 14, 2022, monkeypox (mpox) cases had been reported from more than 110 countries, including 29,133 cases in the United States.* Among U.S. cases to date, 95% have occurred among males (1). After the first confirmed U.S. mpox case on May 17, 2022, limited supplies of JYNNEOS vaccine (Modified Vaccinia Ankara vaccine, Bavarian Nordic) were made available to jurisdictions for persons exposed to mpox. JYNNEOS vaccine was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019 as a 2-dose series (0.5 mL per dose, administered subcutaneously) to prevent smallpox and mpox disease.† On August 9, 2022, FDA issued an emergency use authorization to allow administration of JYNNEOS vaccine by intradermal injection (0.1 mL per dose) (2). A previous report on U.S. mpox cases during July 31-September 3, 2022, suggested that 1 dose of vaccine offers some protection against mpox (3). This report describes demographic and clinical characteristics of cases occurring ≥14 days after receipt of 1 dose of JYNNEOS vaccine and compares them with characteristics of cases among unvaccinated persons with mpox and with the vaccine-eligible vaccinated population in participating jurisdictions. During May 22-September 3, 2022, among 14,504 mpox cases reported from 29 participating U.S. jurisdictions,§ 6,605 (45.5%) had available vaccination information and were included in the analysis. Among included cases, 276 (4.2%) were among persons who had received 1 dose of vaccine ≥14 days before illness onset. Mpox cases that occurred in these vaccinated persons were associated with lower percentage of hospitalization (2.1% versus 7.5%), fever, headache, malaise, myalgia, and chills, compared with cases in unvaccinated persons. Although 1 dose of JYNNEOS vaccine offers some protection from disease, mpox infection can occur after receipt of 1 dose, and the duration of protection conferred by 1 dose is unknown. Providers and public health officials should therefore encourage persons at risk for acquiring mpox to complete the 2-dose vaccination series and provide guidance and education regarding nonvaccine-related prevention strategies (4).


Asunto(s)
Mpox , Vacuna contra Viruela , Humanos , Masculino , Demografía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Mpox/epidemiología , Mpox/prevención & control
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(4): 132-138, 2022 Jan 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35085223

RESUMEN

Previous reports of COVID-19 case, hospitalization, and death rates by vaccination status† indicate that vaccine protection against infection, as well as serious COVID-19 illness for some groups, declined with the emergence of the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, and waning of vaccine-induced immunity (1-4). During August-November 2021, CDC recommended§ additional primary COVID-19 vaccine doses among immunocompromised persons and booster doses among persons aged ≥18 years (5). The SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant emerged in the United States during December 2021 (6) and by December 25 accounted for 72% of sequenced lineages (7). To assess the impact of full vaccination with additional and booster doses (booster doses),¶ case and death rates and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated among unvaccinated and fully vaccinated adults by receipt of booster doses during pre-Delta (April-May 2021), Delta emergence (June 2021), Delta predominance (July-November 2021), and Omicron emergence (December 2021) periods in the United States. During 2021, averaged weekly, age-standardized case IRRs among unvaccinated persons compared with fully vaccinated persons decreased from 13.9 pre-Delta to 8.7 as Delta emerged, and to 5.1 during the period of Delta predominance. During October-November, unvaccinated persons had 13.9 and 53.2 times the risks for infection and COVID-19-associated death, respectively, compared with fully vaccinated persons who received booster doses, and 4.0 and 12.7 times the risks compared with fully vaccinated persons without booster doses. When the Omicron variant emerged during December 2021, case IRRs decreased to 4.9 for fully vaccinated persons with booster doses and 2.8 for those without booster doses, relative to October-November 2021. The highest impact of booster doses against infection and death compared with full vaccination without booster doses was recorded among persons aged 50-64 and ≥65 years. Eligible persons should stay up to date with COVID-19 vaccinations.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/prevención & control , Inmunización Secundaria , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(4): 114-117, 2021 Jan 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33507887

RESUMEN

During September 3-November 16, 2020, daily confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) reported to the Wisconsin Department of Health Services (WDHS) increased at a rate of 24% per week, from a 7-day average of 674 (August 28-September 3) to 6,426 (November 10-16) (1). The growth rate during this interval was the highest to date in Wisconsin and among the highest in the United States during that time (1). To characterize potential sources of this increase, the investigation examined reported outbreaks in Wisconsin that occurred during March 4-November 16, 2020, with respect to their setting and number of associated COVID-19 cases.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Laboratorios , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Prisiones/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Universidades/estadística & datos numéricos , Wisconsin/epidemiología
5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(8): 207-211, 2020 Feb 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32106217

RESUMEN

In January 2018, the Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Division of Public Health (DPH), received a report of a culture-confirmed case of Legionnaires' disease. The patient, who was immunocompromised, had died at a local hospital 10 days after being admitted. DPH and an infection preventionist from the hospital investigated to determine the source of the infection and prevent additional cases. Because the case was suspected to be nosocomial, health care facility water samples were tested for Legionella. When these samples were negative, water sources in the patient's home were tested. These tested positive for Legionella pneumophila, and the bacteria remained after an attempt to remediate. The patient and home isolates were identified as L. pneumophila serogroup 3, sequence type 93, by whole-genome multilocus sequence typing. A second resident of the home did not become ill. This case highlights the potential for immunocompromised persons and others at risk for Legionnaires' disease to be exposed to Legionella through home water systems containing the bacteria and demonstrates the difficulty of home remediation. This case also illustrates the role of lower respiratory tract specimens in the identification of less common Legionella infections (e.g., L. pneumophila serogroup 3) and confirmation of the infection source.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Vivienda , Legionella pneumophila/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/diagnóstico , Anciano , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Legionella pneumophila/clasificación , Serotipificación , Wisconsin
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(4): 485-492, 2018 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29617957

RESUMEN

Background: During the 2014-2015 influenza season in the United States, 256 cases of influenza-associated parotitis were reported from 27 states. We conducted a case-control study and laboratory investigation to further describe this rare clinical manifestation of influenza. Methods: During February 2015-April 2015, we interviewed 50 cases (with parotitis) and 124 ill controls (without parotitis) with laboratory-confirmed influenza; participants resided in 11 states and were matched by age, state, hospital admission status, and specimen collection date. Influenza viruses were characterized using real-time polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing. We compared cases and controls using conditional logistic regression. Specimens from additional reported cases were also analyzed. Results: Cases, 73% of whom were aged <20 years, experienced painful (86%), unilateral (68%) parotitis a median of 4 (range, 0-16) days after onset of systemic or respiratory symptoms. Cases were more likely than controls to be male (76% vs 51%; P = .005). We detected influenza A(H3N2) viruses, genetic group 3C.2a, in 100% (32/32) of case and 92% (105/108) of control specimens sequenced (P = .22). Influenza B and A(H3N2) 3C.3 and 3C.3b genetic group virus infections were detected in specimens from additional cases. Conclusions: Influenza-associated parotitis, as reported here and in prior sporadic case reports, seems to occur primarily with influenza A(H3N2) virus infection. Because of the different clinical and infection control considerations for mumps and influenza virus infections, we recommend clinicians consider influenza in the differential diagnoses among patients with acute parotitis during the influenza season.


Asunto(s)
Gripe Humana/complicaciones , Parotiditis/virología , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A/genética , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Parotiditis/diagnóstico , Parotiditis/epidemiología , Estaciones del Año , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(4): 493-501, 2018 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29617951

RESUMEN

Background: During the 2014-2015 US influenza season, 320 cases of non-mumps parotitis (NMP) among residents of 21 states were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). We conducted an epidemiologic and laboratory investigation to determine viral etiologies and clinical features of NMP during this unusually large occurrence. Methods: NMP was defined as acute parotitis or other salivary gland swelling of >2 days duration in a person with a mumps- negative laboratory result. Using a standardized questionnaire, we collected demographic and clinical information. Buccal samples were tested at the CDC for selected viruses, including mumps, influenza, human parainfluenza viruses (HPIVs) 1-4, adenoviruses, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), herpes simplex viruses (HSVs) 1 and 2, and human herpes viruses (HHVs) 6A and 6B. Results: Among the 320 patients, 65% were male, median age was 14.5 years (range, 0-90), and 67% reported unilateral parotitis. Commonly reported symptoms included sore throat (55%) and fever (48%). Viruses were detected in 210 (71%) of 294 NMP patients with adequate samples for testing, ≥2 viruses were detected in 37 samples, and 248 total virus detections were made among all samples. These included 156 influenza A(H3N2), 42 HHV6B, 32 EBV, 8 HPIV2, 2 HPIV3, 3 adenovirus, 4 HSV-1, and 1 HSV-2. Influenza A(H3N2), HHV6B, and EBV were the most frequently codetected viruses. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that, in addition to mumps, clinicians should consider respiratory viral (influenza) and herpes viral etiologies for parotitis, particularly among patients without epidemiologic links to mumps cases or outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
Gripe Humana/complicaciones , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Parotiditis/virología , Virus/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paperas , Parotiditis/epidemiología , Faringitis/virología , Estaciones del Año , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
8.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 24(8): 1444-1452, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30014837

RESUMEN

Although coccidioidomycosis in Arizona and California has been well-characterized, much remains unknown about its epidemiology in states where it is not highly endemic. We conducted enhanced surveillance in 14 such states in 2016 by identifying cases according to the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists case definition and interviewing patients about their demographic characteristics, clinical features, and exposures. Among 186 patients, median time from seeking healthcare to diagnosis was 38 days (range 1-1,654 days); 70% had another condition diagnosed before coccidioidomycosis testing occurred (of whom 83% were prescribed antibacterial medications); 43% were hospitalized; and 29% had culture-positive coccidioidomycosis. Most (83%) patients from nonendemic states had traveled to a coccidioidomycosis-endemic area. Coccidioidomycosis can cause severe disease in residents of non-highly endemic states, a finding consistent with previous studies in Arizona, and less severe cases likely go undiagnosed or unreported. Improved coccidioidomycosis awareness in non-highly endemic areas is needed.


Asunto(s)
Coccidioidomicosis/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Niño , Coccidioidomicosis/etnología , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/epidemiología , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Viaje , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
11.
WMJ ; 115(2): 74-9; quiz 80, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27197340

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the completeness of identification of pregnant women testing positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and birth dose hepatitis B vaccine administration, and the extent of appropriate prophylaxis of infants born to women with and without maternal HBsAg status documented in the infant medical record. METHODS: We conducted medical record reviews of 3058 maternal and infant pairs at 58 Wisconsin maternity hospitals that cumulatively delivered 90% of Wisconsin's 2010 birth cohort. RESULTS: A documented HBsAg test result for the current pregnancy was included in 2928 (95.7%) of maternal records, and in 2676 (87.5%) infant records. Four infants (15%) were born to HBsAg-positive women; all 4 infants received appropriate prophylaxis: hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and a dose of hepatitis B vaccine within 12 hours of birth. However, among 382 infants without a documented maternal HBsAg test result in the infant medical record, only 135 (35%) received appropriate prophylaxis: a dose of hepatitis B vaccine within 12 hours of birth or a dose of hepatitis B vaccine and HBIG within 12 hours of birth for infants weighing < 2000 g. Among all infants, 81.6% received hepatitis B vaccine prior to hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals must ensure that infants without a documented maternal HBsAg test result receive appropriate prophylaxis to prevent hepatitis B vaccine infection. All infants, regardless of maternal HBsAg test result, should receive a dose of hepatitis B vaccine before hospital discharge to serve as a "safety net" to prevent infection among infants born to HBsAg-positive women who are not identified prenatally. A written hospital policy for universal hepatitis B vaccine birth dose administration should be developed to reinforce admission orders.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/administración & dosificación , Hepatitis B/prevención & control , Hepatitis B/transmisión , Maternidades , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Femenino , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B/análisis , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Wisconsin/epidemiología
12.
Public Health Rep ; 138(2): 333-340, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36482712

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, several outbreaks were linked with facilities employing essential workers, such as long-term care facilities and meat and poultry processing facilities. However, timely national data on which workplace settings were experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks were unavailable through routine surveillance systems. We estimated the number of US workplace outbreaks of COVID-19 and identified the types of workplace settings in which they occurred during August-October 2021. METHODS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention collected data from health departments on workplace COVID-19 outbreaks from August through October 2021: the number of workplace outbreaks, by workplace setting, and the total number of cases among workers linked to these outbreaks. Health departments also reported the number of workplaces they assisted for outbreak response, COVID-19 testing, vaccine distribution, or consultation on mitigation strategies. RESULTS: Twenty-three health departments reported a total of 12 660 workplace COVID-19 outbreaks. Among the 12 470 workplace types that were documented, 35.9% (n = 4474) of outbreaks occurred in health care settings, 33.4% (n = 4170) in educational settings, and 30.7% (n = 3826) in other work settings, including non-food manufacturing, correctional facilities, social services, retail trade, and food and beverage stores. Eleven health departments that reported 3859 workplace outbreaks provided information about workplace assistance: 3090 (80.1%) instances of assistance involved consultation on COVID-19 mitigation strategies, 1912 (49.5%) involved outbreak response, 436 (11.3%) involved COVID-19 testing, and 185 (4.8%) involved COVID-19 vaccine distribution. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the continued impact of COVID-19 among workers, the potential for work-related transmission, and the need to apply layered prevention strategies recommended by public health officials.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias/prevención & control , Prueba de COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Lugar de Trabajo , Brotes de Enfermedades
13.
PLoS One ; 18(9): e0291678, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37729332

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants have the potential to impact vaccine effectiveness and duration of vaccine-derived immunity. We analyzed U.S. multi-jurisdictional COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough surveillance data to examine potential waning of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection for the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b) primary vaccination series by age. METHODS: Weekly numbers of SARS-CoV-2 infections during January 16, 2022-May 28, 2022 were analyzed by age group from 22 U.S. jurisdictions that routinely linked COVID-19 case surveillance and immunization data. A life table approach incorporating line-listed and aggregated COVID-19 case datasets with vaccine administration and U.S. Census data was used to estimate hazard rates of SARS-CoV-2 infections, hazard rate ratios (HRR) and percent reductions in hazard rate comparing unvaccinated people to people vaccinated with a Pfizer-BioNTech primary series only, by age group and time since vaccination. RESULTS: The percent reduction in hazard rates for persons 2 weeks after vaccination with a Pfizer-BioNTech primary series compared with unvaccinated persons was lowest among children aged 5-11 years at 35.5% (95% CI: 33.3%, 37.6%) compared to the older age groups, which ranged from 68.7%-89.6%. By 19 weeks after vaccination, all age groups showed decreases in the percent reduction in the hazard rates compared with unvaccinated people; with the largest declines observed among those aged 5-11 and 12-17 years and more modest declines observed among those 18 years and older. CONCLUSIONS: The decline in vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection observed in this study is consistent with other studies and demonstrates that national case surveillance data were useful for assessing early signals in age-specific waning of vaccine protection during the initial period of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant predominance. The potential for waning immunity during the Omicron period emphasizes the importance of continued monitoring and consideration of optimal timing and provision of booster doses in the future.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Niño , Humanos , Anciano , Vacuna BNT162 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Tablas de Vida , SARS-CoV-2
14.
NEJM Evid ; 1(3)2022 Jan 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37207114

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With the emergence of the delta variant, the United States experienced a rapid increase in Covid-19 cases in 2021. We estimated the risk of breakthrough infection and death by month of vaccination as a proxy for waning immunity during a period of delta variant predominance. METHODS: Covid-19 case and death data from 15 U.S. jurisdictions during January 3 to September 4, 2021 were used to estimate weekly hazard rates among fully vaccinated persons, stratified by age group and vaccine product. Case and death rates during August 1 to September 4, 2021 were presented across four cohorts defined by month of vaccination. Poisson models were used to estimate adjusted rate ratios comparing the earlier cohorts to July rates. RESULTS: During August 1 to September 4, 2021, case rates per 100,000 person-weeks among all vaccine recipients for the January to February, March to April, May to June, and July cohorts were 168.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 167.5 to 170.1), 123.5 (95% CI, 122.8 to 124.1), 83.6 (95% CI, 82.9 to 84.3), and 63.1 (95% CI, 61.6 to 64.6), respectively. Similar trends were observed by age group for BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine recipients. Rates for the Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen-Johnson & Johnson) vaccine were higher; however, trends were inconsistent. BNT162b2 vaccine recipients 65 years of age or older had higher death rates among those vaccinated earlier in the year. Protection against death was sustained for the mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients. Across age groups and vaccine types, people who were vaccinated 6 months ago or longer (January-February) were 3.44 (3.36 to 3.53) times more likely to be infected and 1.70 (1.29 to 2.23) times more likely to die from COVID-19 than people vaccinated recently in July 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection among all ages or death among older adults waned with increasing time since vaccination during a period of delta predominance. These results add to the evidence base that supports U.S. booster recommendations, especially for older adults vaccinated with BNT162b2 and recipients of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.).

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA