Recurrent pregnancy loss: couples' perspectives on their need for treatment, support and follow up.

STUDY QUESTION: What do couples referred to or attending a recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) clinic believe they need in terms of treatment, support and follow up? SUMMARY ANSWER: Men and women wish for more information, earlier access to treatment, support and follow up that is sensitive to their history of pregnancy loss (PL), includes both members of the couple, and acknowledges the psychological impact of RPL. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Previous research has highlighted women's dissatisfaction with medical care provided post-PL and their desire for medical professionals to have increased awareness about PL and recognition of the psychological impact of PL. Less is known about the needs of the male partner, the needs of those experiencing RPL and whether the needs differ during different reproductive stages. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Over a 2-month period in 2017-2018, 13 couples who were referred to the national RPL program in Copenhagen, Denmark were qualitatively interviewed. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Inclusion criteria were heterosexual couples with at least three consecutive PLs before 12 weeks' gestation with no children or one child prior to the PLs, not currently pregnant, and willing to be interviewed in English. Couples were interviewed together in a semi-structured format. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Invitations (n = 30) were sent to couples recently referred to the RPL program who indicated an interest in participating and 17 couples contacted the interviewer to schedule an interview. Due to cancellations, 15 interviews were held. Data from 13 interviews that met the study criteria were used for the current analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The participants had experienced a median of three PLs (range 3-6). Both men and women described the cumulative effect of RPL with an increase in pressure and exhaustion by the third and subsequent losses. Inclusion of the male partner in consultations and treatment was seen as important. Men felt pressured to remain positive and support their partners despite their own feelings of loss. The findings showed that couples desired reliable and accurate information about RPL. They wished for recognition from the medical community that RPL has a significant psychological impact, and stressed that effective treatment should include both members of the couple, with attention to both physical and psychological aspects of the RPL and should be tailored to their current reproductive stage, in order to help them cope with the negative impact of RPL and the anxiety associated with conception and another pregnancy. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Participants were self-selected thus findings cannot be generalized to all couples with RPL. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This is the first study addressing the needs of the female and male partners in couples suffering from RPL. The findings highlight a disconnect between couples' perceived needs and their experience of medical care after RPL. This may be partly due to a discrepancy in couples' and medical professionals' perceptions of the PLs. The findings highlight that medical professionals need to take a holistic and couple-focused approach in their treatment of RPL and include attention to the psychological impact and cumulative effect of the multiple PLs on the couple. The results underscore the need for informational resources and psychological support for couples experiencing RPL, tailored to their reproductive stage. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): EK was funded by a Travel/Training Fellowship from ReproUnion, co-financed by the European Union, Interreg V ÖKS. No other competing interests were declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

An experimental evaluation of the benefits and costs of providing fertility information to adolescents and emerging adults.

STUDY QUESTION: Does the provision of fertility (compared to control) information affect fertility-related knowledge, perceived threat of infertility, anxiety, physical stress and fertility plans in adolescents and emerging adults? SUMMARY ANSWER: The provision of fertility information was associated with increased fertility knowledge (emerging adults) and greater infertility threat (adolescents and emerging adults). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: According to fertility education research, adolescents and emerging adults know less than they should know about fertility topics. Fertility knowledge can be improved through the provision of information in older adults. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Experimental design. Secondary and university students completed pre-information questionnaires, were randomly assigned via computer to an experimental group, read either fertility (FertiEduc group) or healthy pregnancy information (Control group), and completed post-information questionnaires. Data were collected in group sessions via an online portal. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Eligible participants were aged 16-18 (adolescents) or 21-24 years (emerging adults), childless, not currently pregnant (for men, partner not pregnant) or trying to conceive, presumed fertile and intending to have a child in the future. Of the 255 invited, 208 (n = 93 adolescents, n = 115 emerging adults) participated. The FertiEduc group received 'A Guide to Fertility', four online pages of information about fertility topics (e.g. 'When are men and women most fertile?') and the Control group received four online pages from the National Health Service (NHS) pregnancy booklet 'Baby Bump and Beyond'. Participants completed a questionnaire (fertility knowledge, perceived threat of infertility, anxiety, physical stress and fertility plans, moderators) prior to and after the provision of information. Mixed factorial analysis of variance was used to examine the effects of information provision and hierarchical multiple regression to assess potential moderators of knowledge. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The FertiEduc and Control groups were equivalent on age, gender, disability, relationship status and orientation at baseline. Results showed that fertility information significantly increased fertility knowledge for emerging adults only (P < 0.001) and threat of infertility for emerging adults and adolescents (P = 0.05). The moderators were not significant. Participation in the study was associated with an increase in feelings of anxiety but a decrease in physical stress reactions. Adolescents had more optimal fertility plans compared to emerging adults due to being younger. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This was an experimental study on a self-selected sample of men and women from selected educational institutions and only short term effects of information were studied. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Provision of fertility information can have benefits (increased fertility knowledge) but also costs (increase potential threat of infertility). Adolescents find fertility information positive but do not learn from it. Fertility education should be tailored according to age groups and created to minimise negative effects. Longitudinal examination of the effects of fertility information in multi-centre studies is warranted and should include measures of perceived threat of infertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Cardiff University funded this research. All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Childless women's beliefs and knowledge about oocyte freezing for social and medical reasons.

STUDY QUESTION: What factors inform a woman's decision-making about oocyte freezing to preserve fertility for social and medical reasons? SUMMARY ANSWER: Women lacked knowledge about the costs and viability of oocyte freezing as a fertility preservation option for social and medical reasons, and identified health consequences, costs, and viability as being particularly influential in their decision-making. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Having only recently become a viable fertility preservation option, relatively little is known about childless women's beliefs or knowledge about oocyte freezing for social or medical reasons. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A cross sectional study of 500 childless women was conducted in August, 2015. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 500 childless, presumed fertile, women from 18 to 38 years of age completed an online, self-report questionnaire assessing beliefs and knowledge about oocyte freezing to preserve fertility for social or medical reasons. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Financial costs (85.6%), health risks to themselves (86.4%) or their offspring (87.8%), and success rates (82%) were the primary factors that women felt would influence their decision to freeze their oocytes. Partner's feelings (88.6%), prognosis for a full recovery (85.4%), and concerns about the health effects of the hormones or oocyte retrieval procedure (85.4%) were identified as being particularly important when considering oocyte freezing for medical reasons. Consistent with their perceptions of having little or no knowledge about oocyte freezing, there was an overall correct response rate of 33% to the 12 knowledge questions. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The online format and use of a survey company to recruit participants may have increased the risk of self-selection bias and limit the generalizability of these findings. The findings may also be limited by the fact that the participants were not facing cancer treatments, and the younger participants were not nearing the end of their reproductive lifespan, and therefore would not have had reason to learn about, or consider, fertility preservation for medical or social reasons. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Given the worldwide trend towards delaying childbearing and the increasing availability of oocyte freezing as an option to preserve women's fertility, it is likely these results could be extended to wider North American, European, and Australasian populations of English speaking childless women. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No specific funding. No competing interests.

Fertility awareness online: the efficacy of a fertility education website in increasing knowledge and changing fertility beliefs.

STUDY QUESTION: How effective is online education in increasing knowledge of fertility and assisted reproductive technologies (ART), and changing beliefs about the timing of parenthood? SUMMARY ANSWER: Exposure to an online educational intervention resulted in immediate changes in participants' beliefs about the ideal timing of parenthood, and a significant increase in their knowledge of fertility and ART treatments and options; most of these changes were not sustained over time, particularly for men. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Research has identified significant gaps in men's and women's knowledge of fertility and ART, contributing to the trend to delay childbearing. Effective educational programs need to be developed, to support informed fertility and child-timing decisions. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Pre-post intervention study of 199 currently childless men and women, and a 6-month follow-up of 110 of these participants. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: One hundred and ninety-nine childless participants between the ages of 18 and 35 were asked to complete 4 beliefs and 22 knowledge questions prior to, and immediately after, reading 10 online posts related to: fertility testing and preservation, fertility history and lifespan, the effects of health and fitness on fertility, and assisted reproduction. Six months later, 110 of the original sample repeated the 26-item survey. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Participants' fertility and ART knowledge scores increased significantly immediately after the intervention, as did their confidence in their fertility and ART knowledge. Participants' beliefs about the ideal and latest age a woman or man should consider producing a child decreased. However, 6 months later, participants' beliefs and knowledge levels largely returned to their pre-intervention levels, particularly for the men in the study. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The sample size and the recruitment methods may limit the generalizability of these findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Previous studies have demonstrated the short-term efficacy of online educational approaches to increase fertility knowledge and support informed family planning decisions. Web-based approaches have the benefit of being easily and conveniently accessed by individuals worldwide. However, the findings of the current study call into question the long-term efficacy of online fertility education, and suggest that variables such as gender and relevance need to be considered in assessing the efficacy of online fertility education strategies.

'You're never pregnant in the same way again': prior early pregnancy loss influences need for health care and support in subsequent pregnancy.

STUDY QUESTION: What are couples' needs for health care and support in a subsequent pregnancy after prior early pregnancy loss (PL) and how do needs change across the pregnancy? SUMMARY ANSWER: Couples described unmet needs for pregnancy care in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy and were more satisfied with the care provided during the remainder of the pregnancy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Despite early PL being common (∼25% of pregnancies), there is a paucity of research to guide practice to optimize treatment and support future pregnancies. There has been low priority for the issue in research and a pervasive acceptance that couples should 'just try again' after experiencing PL. Women with prior PL report increased anxiety during the first trimester of pregnancy compared to those without previous PL. No longitudinal studies explore what couples' needs are throughout the pregnancy and how these needs shift across time. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This was a qualitative longitudinal dyadic (joint) interview study. In total, 15 couples who were pregnant after a prior PL were interviewed four times over their pregnancy. Couples were recruited from the Copenhagen Pregnancy Loss Cohort Research Programme. Interviews were held in person at the hospital or university, or online. Interviews ranged from 20 to 91 min (mean = 54 min). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: Inclusion criteria included couples with one to two prior early PL(s) who self-reported a new pregnancy and were willing to be interviewed together and in English. Couples were interviewed four times: after a positive pregnancy test and once in each trimester. Interviews were transcribed and data were analysed using thematic analysis to compare and contrast needs of the couples at each of the four time periods in the pregnancy and across the entire pregnancy. One same-sex couple and 14 heterosexual couples participated. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Couples' needs were categorized into two main longitudinal themes across the pregnancy, divided by the 20-week scan. Within each longitudinal theme, there were two themes to represent each time period. In the longitudinal theme 'The first 20 weeks: a 'scary' gap in care' there were two themes: Positive pregnancy test: 'Tell them it's not the same pregnancy' and First trimester: 'We craved that someone was taking care of us'. The standard pregnancy care offered in the public healthcare system in Denmark includes a scan at 12 and 20 weeks. While all couples wished for additional access to scans and monitoring of the foetus in early pregnancy to provide reassurance and detect problems early, they described considerable variation in the referrals and care they were offered. Both partners expressed a high degree of worry and anxiety about the pregnancy, with pregnant women in particular describing 'surviv[ing] from scan to scan' in the early weeks. Couples took scans wherever offered or paid for comfort scans, but this resulted in fragmented care. Instead, they wished for continuity in care, and acknowledgement and sensitivity that a pregnancy after PL is not the same as a first pregnancy. In the longitudinal theme 'The second 20 weeks: Safety in the care system' there were two themes: Second trimester: 'I think we are in good hands' and Third trimester: 'It's more of a 'nice to know' everything is OK than a 'need to know'. Couples reported their distress was lower and overall needs for care were met during this time. They expressed general satisfaction with regular or extended antenatal support although, as in the first 20 weeks, additional acknowledgement and sensitivity regarding their history of PL was desired. Couples said they felt more secure given that they had access to a 24-hour telephone support by midwife/nurse if they had any concerns or questions. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Participants were self-selected from an ongoing cohort study of patients presenting at hospital with PL. Single women were not included in the study. This study was limited to data collection in Denmark; however, other countries with public healthcare systems may have similar offerings with regard to their provision of antenatal care, care provided in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) clinics and the availability of private scans. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The findings underscore that an early PL creates an increased need for monitoring and care in a subsequent pregnancy. This study highlights a gap in pregnancy care for those with a history of PL given that their need for monitoring and support is high in the early weeks of a new pregnancy before they have access to antenatal care, and before they have had multiple PLs and can be referred to the RPL unit. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 101028172 for E.K. The Copenhagen Pregnancy Loss Cohort is funded by a grant from the BioInnovation Institute Foundation. H.S.N. has received scientific grants from Freya Biosciences, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, BioInnovation Institute, Ministry of Education, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Augustinus Fonden, Oda og Hans Svenningsens Fond, Demant Fonden, Ole Kirks Fond, and Independent Research Fund Denmark. H.S.N. received personal payment or honoraria for lectures and presentations from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Astra Zeneca, Cook Medical, Gedeon Richter, and Ibsa Nordic. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Childless Canadian men's and women's childbearing intentions, attitudes towards and willingness to use assisted human reproduction.

STUDY QUESTION: What are the childbearing intentions of currently childless men and women? What is their attitude towards, and willingness to use, assisted human reproduction (AHR) treatments and family-building options should they be faced with fertility challenges in the future? SUMMARY ANSWER: Men and women expect to become parents significantly later in life than they believe is ideal. If faced with future fertility challenges, respondents were open to using IVF, but were not positively predisposed to third-party family-building options. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Delayed childbearing is an increasing worldwide phenomenon that has considerable health and fertility-related implications. Research to date has focused primarily on women, and indicates a lack of knowledge about the fertility life span and the limitations of AHR in fully compensating for age-related fertility declines. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Cross-sectional study of 2000 childless women and 599 childless men, conducted between April 2010 and May 2011. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 2599 childless, presumed fertile individuals between the ages of 20 and 50 years. An online questionnaire assessed fertility beliefs and intentions and willingness to use AHR. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The findings indicate that men and women expect to become parents significantly later in life than they believe is ideal. If faced with fertility challenges in the future, both men and women were open to using IVF. Men were significantly more willing to consider using donated eggs and embryos, gestational surrogacy and fertility preservation. Women were significantly more willing to consider using home fertility testing, IVF, ICSI and donor sperm. Overall, the childless respondents were not positively predisposed to third party-family-building options. LIMITATIONS: The geographic specificity of the sample, the online format and recruitment methods may limit the generalizability of these findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Given the worldwide trend towards delayed childbearing, and the widespread availability of AHR, it is likely that these findings could extend to the wider North American, European and Australasia populations of English- and French-speaking childless men and women. However, it should be noted that international differences exist, especially concerning regulations governing the funding of AHR and payment for gametes and surrogacy. It is significant that women and men in this study indicated a lack of willingness to consider the use of third third-party treatments--the very options they may need to use in building their families, if the increasing trend towards delayed childbearing continues. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This research was funded by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Assisted Human Reproduction Canada #PAH-103594, 2009/10. No competing interests.

Determining the need for fertility care and the acceptability and feasibility of administering a fertility awareness tool from the user's perspective in a sample of Sudanese infertility patients.

Fertility experts have advocated addressing preventable causes of infertility and early intervention. However, awareness of risk factors is low, especially in low- and middle-income countries where the prevalence of infertility is high. To address this lack of awareness, the Fertility Awareness Tool (FertiSTAT) was adapted for use in Sudan and other low-resource countries. The aims of this study were to ascertain the need for fertility education in Sudan (Aim 1), and to gauge the acceptability and feasibility of implementing the FertiSTAT in Sudan (Aim 2), both from the patients' perspective. Convenience sampling was used to recruit participants for semi-structured-in-depth interviews from a fertility clinic in Sudan. We collected sociodemographic information, medical and reproductive history, asked about fertility knowledge, administered the FertiSTAT and asked about the acceptability of the FertiSTAT. Thematic analysis was conducted for qualitative data. Twenty participants were included; of these, 17 were female, 13 were educated beyond secondary school, the mean age was 32.8 years, and the mean duration of infertility was 4.1 years. Ten themes emerged: of these, three themes addressed Aim 1: 'desire for fertility information', 'state of fertility knowledge' and 'benefits of fertility education'; and seven themes addressed Aim 2: 'specific suggestions for the tool', 'factors influencing the acceptability and feasibility of implementing the tool', 'challenges and barriers to implementation', 'self-disclosure', 'understanding of being at risk', 'compatibility with worldview' and 'cultural tailoring'. Fertility education was viewed as necessary and beneficial; however, participants thought that lack of acceptability of sensitive topics would hinder the implementation of the FertiSTAT. Acceptability and feasibility would be enhanced if challenges were addressed in a culturally sensitive manner using cultural tailoring of materials to increase compatibility with individual worldviews.

How do young men want to receive information about fertility? Young men's attitudes towards a fertility campaign targeting men in Copenhagen, Denmark.

STUDY QUESTION: What are young men's attitudes towards the Danish fertility campaign 'How's your sperm?' and how do they want to receive fertility information in the future? SUMMARY ANSWER: The young men found that the campaign had limited impact because it was not relevant to their current life situation and they believed general fertility awareness should be a mandatory part of education, while more targeted information would be helpful through web-based venues when it was more relevant to their lives (e.g. when ready to have children). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: It is estimated that 16-26% of the Danish population who want children will experience infertility at some point in their lives. In Denmark, 25% of young healthy men have decreased sperm quality, and 20% of 50-year-old men are childless. Men play an important role in the fertility decision-making of couples, thus, it is important to target men and ensure that they have sufficient fertility knowledge. However, fertility awareness is limited among men and there have been few fertility awareness initiatives targeting men. In October 2018, the Municipality of Copenhagen launched the campaign 'How's your sperm?' as a tool to increase fertility knowledge among men. To identify potential barriers for the effect of fertility campaigns targeting men, evaluations of such campaigns are needed. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This study was a cross-sectional, qualitative study of six focus groups including a total of 27 currently childless young men from the Capital Region of Copenhagen, Denmark. Data collection took place between April and October 2019. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: The interviewed young men were currently childless and were all residents in the Capital Region of Copenhagen. They were between 23 and 32 years old with an average age of 26 years, and almost all were university students or had a university degree. The focus group discussions were audiotaped, anonymized and transcribed in full. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Overall, the campaign had limited influence on the young men because they believed the campaign was not relevant to their current life situation. Furthermore, the young men were confused about the aim and message of the campaign, as they thought it encouraged them to have their sperm quality tested. The young men also criticized the campaign for making a link between sperm quality and masculinity. They recognized the importance of knowledge about reproductive health but they wanted access to accurate information about fertility and risk factors for infertility. According to the young men, future initiatives should prioritize clear communication of accurate, reliable and understandable fertility information in web-based venues. In addition, the young men suggested that general fertility information should be a mandatory part of the (sexual) education curriculum in primary and secondary schools. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTIONS: Participants were young and highly educated; thus the findings cannot be generalized to all men of a similar age group or to men at older ages. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Different strategies that are relevant to the lifespan are needed to increase fertility awareness in the male population. The young men's responses underscored that any fertility awareness strategy or campaign must convey respect for the individual's autonomy. The findings highlight that how information is communicated and the quality or type of information that is disseminated are both important in acceptability by target users. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No funding was received for this study. No conflicts were declared for all authors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Women's perceptions of fertility assessment and counselling 6 years after attending a Fertility Assessment and Counselling clinic in Denmark.

STUDY QUESTION: What are women's perceptions and experience of fertility assessment and counselling 6 years after attending a Fertility Assessment and Counselling (FAC) clinic in Denmark? SUMMARY ANSWER: Women viewed the personalized fertility knowledge and advice they received as important aids to decision-making and they felt the benefits outweighed the risks of receiving personalized fertility information. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Many young people wish to become parents in the future. However, research demonstrates there is a gap in women's and men's knowledge of fertility and suggests they may be making fertility decisions based on inaccurate information. Experts have called for the development of interventions to increase fertility awareness so that men and women can make informed fertility decisions and achieve their family-building goals. Since 2011, the FAC clinic in Copenhagen, Denmark has provided personalized fertility assessment and guidance based on clinical examination and evaluation of individual risk factors. Available qualitative research showed that attending the FAC clinic increased fertility awareness and knowledge and was experienced as a catalyst for change (e.g. starting to conceive, pursuing fertility treatment, ending a relationship) in women 1-year post-consultation. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: The study was a 6-year follow-up qualitative study of 24 women who attended the FAC clinic between January and June 2012. All women were interviewed during a 2-month period from February to March 2018 at Rigshospitalet, their home or office, in Copenhagen, Denmark. Interviews were held in English and ranged between 60 and 94 min (mean 73 min). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: Invitations to participate in an interview-based follow-up study were sent to 141 women who attended the FAC clinic in 2012. In total, 95 women read the invitation, 35 confirmed interest in participating and 16 declined to participate. Twenty-five interviews were booked and 24 interviews held. Interviews followed a semi-structured format regarding reasons for attending the FAC clinic, if/how their needs were met, and perceptions of fertility assessment and counselling. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: At the follow-up interview, women were on average 39.5 years old. Ten were currently single or dating and 14 were married/cohabiting. All were childless when they attended the FAC clinic. At the follow-up interview, 21 women were parents (14 women with one child; 6 with two children; 1 with three children) and the remaining three women intended to have children in the future. The most common reason for originally attending the FAC clinic was to determine how long they could delay childbearing. Most of the women now believed their needs for attending had been met. Those who were dissatisfied cited a desire for more exact ('concrete') information as to their remaining years of fertility, although acknowledged that this was likely not realistic. Women stated that they had felt reassured as to their fertility status after attending the FAC clinic whilst receiving the message that they could not delay childbearing 'too long'. Women viewed personalized fertility knowledge as an important aid to decision-making but cautioned about developing a false sense of security about their fertility and chance of conceiving in the future based on the results. Although women were generally satisfied with their experience, they wished for more time to discuss options and to receive additional guidance after their initial meeting at the FAC clinic. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Participants were from a group of Danish women attending the FAC clinic and interviews were conducted in English, which means they are not representative of all reproductive-aged women. Nevertheless, the study group included a broad spectrum of women who achieved parenthood through different means (heterosexual/lesbian relationship, single parent with donor, co-parent) with various family sizes, and women who were currently childless. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our study provides support for an individualized approach to fertility education, assessment and counselling provided at a time when the information is relevant to the individual and their current fertility decision-making. The findings suggest that although satisfied with their visit to the FAC clinic, the women wished for more information and guidance after this visit, suggesting that the current intervention may need to be expanded or new interventions developed to meet these additional needs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: E.K. was funded by an ESHRE Travel/Training grant by ReproUnion, co-financed by the European Union, Interreg V OKS. J.B. reports that the risk evaluation form used at the Fertility Assessment Clinic was inspired by the Fertility Status Awareness Tool FertiSTAT that was developed at Cardiff University for self-assessment of reproductive risk. J.B. also reports personal fees from Merck KGaA, Merck AB, Theramex, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S and a research grant from Merck Serono Ltd outside the submitted work. A.N.A. has received personal fees from both Merck Pharmaceuticals and Ferring and grants from Roche Diagnostics outside the submitted work. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Depression among men in ART treatment: a register-based national cohort study.

STUDY QUESTION: Are male factor infertility or remaining childless risk factors for unipolar depression among men in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment? SUMMARY ANSWER: Male factor infertility was not associated with a significantly increased risk of unipolar depression and men remaining childless did not have a significantly increased risk of developing unipolar depression compared to men in ART treatment who became fathers. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Men in medically assisted reproduction due to male factor infertility are more distressed and have more negative emotions such as feelings of loss, stigma and low self-esteem compared to men in fertility treatment due to other infertility diagnosis. Stress is in general a risk factor for depression. However, previous studies show conflicting results whether male factor infertility is a risk factor for depression. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This national, register-based cohort study consisted of 37 913 cohabitant male partners of women in ART treatment recorded in the Danish IVF register (1994-2009). Via a national register, the men's personal identification number data were linked to the Danish Psychiatric Central Research Register (PCRR) (1969-2009) which records psychiatric diagnoses including unipolar depression, based on the ICD-8 and ICD-10 classification system. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: The full cohort of male partners (n = 37 913) was included in the initial analysis on prevalence of unipolar depression before or after ART treatment initiation. The association between male factor infertility and unipolar depression diagnosis after initiating ART treatment was analysed with Cox regression analysis in a sub-study population of men with the exclusion of men having a depression prior to ART treatment or not having full data on educational level and infertility diagnosis (n = 34 817). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Overall, 1.2% (n = 446) of the men were diagnosed with unipolar depression either before initiating ART treatment (n = 146) or during follow-up (n = 300). In all, 76.0% of men with depression prior to or after ART treatment achieved fatherhood compared to 82.3% of men without depression (P < 0.001). In the sub-study population (n = 34 817, which included 266 men with a unipolar depression diagnosis), male factor infertility was not associated a significantly increased risk of depression (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.79-1.36, P = 0.804), and ART-treated men who remained childless did not have a significantly increased risk of developing depression compared to ART treated men who became fathers (aHR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.87-1.48, P = 0.355). LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTIONS: Only severe cases of depression are recorded and included in this national register-based study given that only men with clinically diagnosed unipolar depression recorded in a psychiatric hospital (in-patient and out-patient) are included in the Danish PCRR. It is difficult to completely rule out an association between the exposures and depression as this outcome is so rare, and therefore the results are still statistically uncertain despite a large cohort. Furthermore, only men in ART treatment were included in this study, and caution should be taken in generalising findings to the total population of men in all areas of medically assisted reproduction or infertile men who have not sought treatment. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OT THE FINDINGS: This large national cohort study suggests that despite evidence showing that male factor infertility is a potential severe stressor for men, which can increase psychological distress and negative emotions, infertile men in ART treatment and men remaining childless after ART are not at a significantly increased risk of developing clinically diagnosed unipolar depression. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: C.S.S. was funded by unrestricted research grants received by Lone Schmidt from The Danish Health Insurance Foundation (J.nr. 2008B105) and Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD). The sponsors had no influence on how data were retrieved and analysed or on the conclusions of the study. C.S.S. and L.S. have declared conflicts of interests; the remaining co-authors have no conflicts of interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Attitudes towards family formation among men attending fertility counselling.

Men and women are increasingly postponing childbearing until an age where fertility has decreased, meaning that they might have difficulties in achieving their desired family size. This study explored childless men's attitudes towards family formation. Data were collected through semi-structured qualitative interviews with 21 men attending the Fertility Assessment and Counselling Clinic in Copenhagen or Horsens, Denmark. Data were analysed using content analysis. The men envisioned a nuclear family with their own biological children, but they experienced doubts and ambivalence about parenthood and feeling 'ready'. Their lack of readiness was linked to their awareness of the sacrifices and costs involved with parenthood, and their belief that they could safely delay parenthood. The men did not consider that they may be unable to have their own biological children. This study highlights the importance of considering men's attitudes and preferences towards family formation when understanding couples' decision-making. Contrary to common understanding, the findings show that men are as concerned with the planning and timing of parenthood as women, but their knowledge of the age-related decline in fertility is poor. Men need to gain more awareness of the limitations of fertility and the impact of female and male age on the ability to achieve parenthood aspirations.