Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 41(4): 177-85, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25977202

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A study was conducted to investigate (1) the extent to which best-practice central line maintenance practices were employed in the homes of pediatric oncology patients and by whom, (2) caregiver beliefs about central line care and central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) risk, (3) barriers to optimal central line care by families, and (4) educational experiences and preferences regarding central line care. METHODS: Researchers administered a survey to patients and families in a tertiary care pediatric oncology clinic that engaged in rigorous ambulatory and inpatient CLABSI prevention efforts. RESULTS: Of 110 invited patients and caregivers, 105 participated (95% response rate) in the survey (March-May 2012). Of the 50 respondents reporting that they or another caregiver change central line dressings, 48% changed a dressing whenever it was soiled as per protocol (many who did not change dressings per protocol also never personally changed dressings); 67% reported the oncology clinic primarily cares for their child's central line, while 29% reported that an adult caregiver or the patient primarily cares for the central line. Eight patients performed their own line care "always" or "most of the time." Some 13% of respondents believed that it was "slightly likely" or "not at all likely" that their child will get an infection if caregivers do not perform line care practices perfectly every time. Dressing change practices were the most difficult to comply with at home. Some 18% of respondents wished they learned more about line care, and 12% received contradictory training. Respondents cited a variety of preferences regarding line care teaching, although the majority looked to clinic nurses for modeling line care. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions aimed at reducing ambulatory CLABSIs should target appropriate educational experiences for adult caregivers and patients and identify ways to improve compliance with best-practice care.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/enfermería , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/enfermería , Cateterismo Venoso Central/normas , Servicio de Oncología en Hospital/normas , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Pediatría/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Niño , Demografía , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Pediatrics ; 130(4): e996-e1004, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22945408

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a multidisciplinary, best-practice central line maintenance care bundle reduces central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) rates in hospitalized pediatric oncology patients and to further delineate the epidemiology of CLABSIs in this population. METHODS: We performed a prospective, interrupted time series study of a best-practice bundle addressing all areas of central line care: reduction of entries, aseptic entries, and aseptic procedures when changing components. Based on a continuous quality improvement model, targeted interventions were instituted to improve compliance with each of the bundle elements. CLABSI rates and epidemiological data were collected for 10 months before and 24 months after implementation of the bundle and compared in a Poisson regression model. RESULTS: CLABSI rates decreased from 2.25 CLABSIs per 1000 central line days at baseline to 1.79 CLABSIs per 1000 central line days during the intervention period (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.80, P = .58). Secondary analyses indicated CLABSI rates were reduced to 0.81 CLABSIs per 1000 central line days in the second 12 months of the intervention (IRR: 0.36, P = .091). Fifty-nine percent of infections resulted from Gram-positive pathogens, 37% of patients with a CLABSI required central line removal, and patients with Hickman catheters were more likely to have a CLABSI than patients with Infusaports (IRR: 4.62, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: A best-practice central line maintenance care bundle can be implemented in hospitalized pediatric oncology patients, although long ramp-up times may be necessary to reap maximal benefits. Further research is needed to determine if this CLABSI rate reduction can be sustained and spread.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/normas , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Hospitales Pediátricos/normas , Control de Infecciones/normas , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Servicio de Oncología en Hospital/normas , Adolescente , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/complicaciones , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Niño , Preescolar , Infección Hospitalaria/complicaciones , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Masculino , Neoplasias/terapia , Distribución de Poisson , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Análisis de Regresión
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA