Echocardiographic Changes in Patients Implanted With a Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device (Heartmate 3).

BACKGROUND: The Heartmate 3 (HM3) is a Conformiteé Européenne mark-approved left ventricular (LV) assist device (LVAD) with fully magnetically levitated rotor and features consisting of a wide range operational speeds, wide flow paths, and artificial pulse. We performed a hemodynamic-echocardiographic speed optimization evaluation in HM3-implanted patients to achieve optimal LV- and right ventricular (RV) shape. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixteen HM3 patients underwent pump speed ramp tests with right heart catheterization. Three-dimensional echocardiographic (3DE) LV and RV datasets (Philips) were acquired, and volumetric (Tomtec) and shape (custom software) analyses were performed (LV: sphericity, conicity; RV: septal and free-wall curvatures). Data were recorded at up to 13 speed settings. Speed changes were in 100-rpm steps, starting at 4600 rpm and ramping up to 6200 rpm. 3DE was feasible in 50% of the patients. Mean original speed was 5306 ± 148 rpm. LV end-diastolic (ED) diameter (-0.15 ± 0.09 cm/100 rpm) and volumes (ED: 269 ± 109 mL to 175 ± 90 mL; end-systolic [ES]: 234 ± 111 mL to 146 ± 81 mL) progressively decreased as the shape became less spherical and more conical; RV volumes initially remained stable, but at higher speeds increased (ED: from 148 ± 64 mL to 181 ± 92 mL; ES: 113 ± 63 mL to 130 ± 69 mL). On average, the RV septum became less convex (bulging toward the LV) at the highest speeds. CONCLUSIONS: LV and RV shape changes were noted in HM3-supported patients. Although a LV volumetric decrease and shape improvement was consistently noted, RV volumes grew in response to increase in speed above a certain point. A next concern would be whether understanding of morphologic and function changes in LV and RV during LVAD speed change assessed with the use of 3DE helps to optimize LVAD speed settings and improve clinical outcomes.

Echocardiographic Predictors of Hemodynamics in Patients Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of hemodynamics in patients supported with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is often challenging. Physical examination maneuvers correlate poorly with true hemodynamics. We assessed the value of novel transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)-derived variables to reliably predict hemodynamics in patients supported with LVAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 102 Doppler-TTE images of the LVAD outflow cannula were obtained during simultaneous invasive right heart catheterization (RHC) in 30 patients supported with continuous-flow LVADs (22 HMII, 8 HVAD) either during routine RHC or during invasive ramp testing. Properties of the Doppler signal though the outflow cannula were measured at each ramp stage (RS), including the systolic slope (SS), diastolic slope (DS), and velocity time integral (VTI). Hemodynamic variables were concurrently recorded, including Doppler opening pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), right atrial pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), Fick cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to explore the dependence of PCWP, CO, and SVR on DS, SS, VTI, MAP, HR, and RS. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed significant contributions of DS on PCWP (PCWPpred = 0.164DS + 4.959; R = 0.68). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that PCWPpred could predict an elevated PCWP ≥18 mm Hg with a sensitivity (Sn) of 94% and specificity (Sp) of 85% (area under the ROC curve 0.88). CO could be predicted by RS, VTI, and HR (COpred = 0.017VTI + 0.016HR + 0.12RS + 2.042; R = 0.61). COpred could predict CO ≤4.5 L/min with Sn 73% and Sp 79% (AUC 0.81). SVR could be predicted by MAP, VTI, and HR (SVRpred = 15.44MAP - 5.453VTI - 6.349HR + 856.15; R = 0.84) with Sn 84% and Sp 79% (AUC 0.91) to predict SVR ≥1200 dyn-s/cm5. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler-TTE variables derived from the LVAD outflow cannula can reliably predict PCWP, CO, and SVR in patients supported with LVADs and may mitigate the need for invasive testing.

Residual native left ventricular function optimization using quantitative 3D echocardiographic assessment of rotational mechanics in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

Preservation of native left ventricular (LV) function in patients supported with LV assist device (LVAD) may be beneficial to attain optimal hemodynamics and enhance potential recovery. Currently, LVAD speed optimization is based on hemodynamic parameters, without considering residual native LV function. We hypothesized that alternatively, LV rotational mechanics can be quantified by 3D echocardiography (3DE), and may help preserve native LV function while optimizing LVAD speed. The goal of this study was to test the feasibility of quantifying the effects of LVAD implantation on LV rotational mechanics and to determine whether conventional speed optimization maximally preserves native LV function. We studied 55 patients with LVADs, who underwent 3DE imaging and quantitative analysis of LV twist. Thirty patients were studied before and after LVAD implantation. The remaining 25 patients were studied during hemodynamic ramp studies. The pump speed at which LV twist was maximal was compared with the hemodynamics-based optimal speed. LV twist decreased following LVAD implantation from 4.2 ± 2.7 to 2.3 ± 1.9° (P < 0.01), reflecting the constricting effects on native function. With lower pump speeds, no significant changes were noted in LV twist, which peaked at a higher speed. In 11/25 (44%) patients, the conventional hemodynamic/2DE methodology and 3DE assessment of maximal residual function did not indicate the same optimal conditions, suggesting that a higher pump speed would have better preserved native function. In conclusion, quantitative 3DE analysis of LV rotational mechanics provides information, which together with hemodynamics may help select optimal pump speed, while maximally preserving native LV function.

The Hemodynamic Effects of Aortic Insufficiency in Patients Supported With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: The impact of aortic insufficiency (AI) on the morbidity and mortality of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients remains controversial. This study's aim was to assess the hemodynamics of LVAD patients with at least mild AI, at baseline and in response to device speed changes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Asymptomatic LVAD patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent a hemodynamic and echocardiographic ramp study. Hemodynamics at rest and in response to device speed changes were compared between patients with at least mild AI at their baseline speed and patients without AI. Fift-five patients were enrolled in the study, and 42% had AI. The AI group had higher baseline central venous pressure (11 ± 5 vs 8 ± 5 mm Hg; P = .03), higher pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (16 ± 6 vs 12 ± 6 mm Hg; P = .02) and lower pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPI) (2.3 ± 1.3 vs 3.6 ± 2.4; P = .01). Cardiac index (CI) increased and PCWP decreased in both groups by similar degrees during the ramp study. AI worsened in 78% of patients during the ramp study. CONCLUSIONS: LVAD patients with at least mild AI have increased filling pressures and reduced PAPI. Normalization of filling pressures can be achieved by increasing LVAD speed; however, this concomitantly worsens AI severity. The long-term hemodynamic consequences of this approach are unknown.

3D echocardiographic analysis of aortic annulus for transcatheter aortic valve replacement using novel aortic valve quantification software: Comparison with computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: With the increasing use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), computed tomography (CT) remains the standard for annulus sizing. However, 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been an alternative in patients with contraindications to CT. We sought to (1) test the feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of prototype 3DTEE analysis software (Philips) for aortic annular measurements and (2) compare the new approach to the existing echocardiographic techniques. METHODS: We prospectively studied 52 patients who underwent gated contrast CT, procedural 3DTEE, and TAVR. 3DTEE images were analyzed using novel semi-automated software designed for 3D measurements of the aortic root, which uses multiplanar reconstruction, similar to CT analysis. Aortic annulus measurements included area, perimeter, and diameter calculations from these measurements. The results were compared to CT-derived values. Additionally, 3D echocardiographic measurements (3D planimetry and mitral valve analysis software adapted for the aortic valve) were also compared to the CT reference values. RESULTS: 3DTEE image quality was sufficient in 90% of patients for aortic annulus measurements using the new software, which were in good agreement with CT (r-values: .89-.91) and small (<4%) inter-modality nonsignificant biases. Repeated measurements showed <10% measurements variability. The new 3D analysis was the more accurate and reproducible of the existing echocardiographic techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Novel semi-automated 3DTEE analysis software can accurately measure aortic annulus in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR, in better agreement with CT than the existing methodology. Accordingly, intra-procedural TEE could potentially replace CT in patients where CT carries significant risk.

Screening for Outflow Cannula Malfunction of Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) With the Use of Doppler Echocardiography: New LVAD-Specific Reference Values for Contemporary Devices.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is used as a screening tool to evaluate the integrity and mechanics of the pump and circuit. We aimed to 1) establish the normal range and upper reference limit of peak velocity of the outflow cannula for the modern era of LVADs and 2) assess the clinical performance of the currently cited and newly proposed reference limits in patients with continuous-flow LVADs as a screening tool for cannula malfunction. METHODS: LVAD outflow peak CW velocities were measured with the use of Doppler transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in 57 patients with LVADs (44 with Heartmate II (HM2), 13 with Heartware (HW)). The average velocity and the upper and lower normal reference limits (defined as ±2 standard deviations from the mean) for each LVAD type was calculated. The upper reference limit was then used as a screening threshold for cannula malfunction. RESULTS: The average outflow cannula peak velocity for the normal HM2 cohort was 1.86 ± 0.44 m/s with upper and lower reference limits of 2.73 m/s and 0.98 m/s, respectively. The average outflow cannula peak velocity for the normal HW cohort was 2.36 ± 0.53 m/s with upper and lower reference limits of 3.42 m/s and 1.3 m/s, respectively, which was significantly higher than the HM2 cohort (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: In both HM2 and HW LVADs, the average peak outflow velocity and reference limit for the normal population, as measured by Doppler TTE, was markedly higher than the currently used LVAD reference limits of 2 m/s and are significantly different between devices. Patients with peak outflow velocities above our upper reference limits should be evaluated for LVAD outflow cannula malfunction.

Guidelines for the Evaluation of Prosthetic Valve Function With Cardiovascular Imaging: A Report From the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration With the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

In patients with significant cardiac valvular disease, intervention with either valve repair or valve replacement may be inevitable. Although valve repair is frequently performed, especially for mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, valve replacement remains common, particularly in adults. Diagnostic methods are often needed to assess the function of the prosthesis. Echocardiography is the first-line method for noninvasive evaluation of prosthetic valve function. The transthoracic approach is complemented with two-dimensional and three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for further refinement of valve morphology and function when needed. More recently, advances in computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance have enhanced their roles in evaluating valvular heart disease. This document offers a review of the echocardiographic techniques used and provides recommendations and general guidelines for evaluation of prosthetic valve function on the basis of the scientific literature and consensus of a panel of experts. This guideline discusses the role of advanced imaging with transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance in evaluating prosthetic valve structure, function, and regurgitation. It replaces the 2009 American Society of Echocardiography guideline on prosthetic valves and complements the 2019 guideline on the evaluation of valvular regurgitation after percutaneous valve repair or replacement.

Utility of transillumination and transparency renderings in 3D transthoracic imaging.

Transillumination (TI) is a new 3D rendering tool that uses a freely movable virtual light source to enhance depth, contours, and image detail. The TI model was recently modified to allow the operator adjust the degree of transparency of both cardiac and extra-cardiac structures. While the addition of transparency was shown to significantly improve quality in 3D transesophageal imaging, this has not yet been shown for transthoracic (TTE) imaging. We prospectively studied 35 patients who underwent clinically indicated TTE with standard 3D acquisition, as well as TI with and without transparency. Six experienced echocardiographers were shown images of all three display types in random order. Each image was scored independently using a Likert Scale while assessing each of the following aspects: ability to identify anatomy or pathology, depth perception, degree of anatomic detail, and border delineation. All experts perceived an incremental value of the transparency mode, compared to TI without transparency and standard 3D rendering, in terms of ability to identify anatomy or pathology (4.15 ± 0.97 vs. 3.88 ± 0.99 vs. 2.52 ± 1.41, p < 0.01), depth perception (4.33 ± 0.78 vs. 3.88 ± 0.82 vs. 2.29 ± 1.07, p < 0.01), degree of anatomic detail (4.08 ± 1.0 vs. 3.89 ± 0.79 vs. 2.31 ± 1.08, p < 0.01), and border delineation (4.44 ± 0.80 vs. 3.90 ± 0.78 vs. 2.42 ± 1.13, p < 0.01). Compared to standard 3D and TI renderings of TTE images, the addition of transparency significantly improves both image quality and diagnostic confidence.

Biventricular Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients Supported With LVAD.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the effects of right ventricular (RV) pacing versus biventricular (BiV) pacing on quality of life, functional status, and arrhythmias in LVAD patients. BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) independently improve outcomes in heart failure patients, but the effects of combining these therapies remains unknown. We present the first prospective randomized study evaluating the effects of RV versus BiV pacing on quality of life, functional status, and arrhythmias in LVAD patients. METHODS: In this prospective randomized crossover study, LVAD patients with prior CRT devices were alternated on RV and BiV pacing for planned 7-14-day periods. Ambulatory step count, 6-minute walk test distance, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores, arrhythmia burden, CRT lead function, and echocardiographic data were collected with each pacing mode. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled, with a median age of 65 years, 67% male, and mean duration of LVAD support of 309 days. Compared with BiV pacing, RV-only pacing resulted in 29% higher mean daily step count, 11% higher 6-minute walk test distance, and 7% improved KCCQ-12 score (all p < 0.03). LV end-diastolic volume was significantly lower with RV pacing (220 vs. 250 mL; p = 0.03). Fewer patients had ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes during RV pacing (p = 0.03). RV lead impedance was lower with RV pacing (p = 0.047), but no significant differences were observed in impedance across other CRT leads. CONCLUSIONS: In the first prospective randomized study comparing variable pacing in LVAD patients, RV pacing was associated with significantly improved functional status, quality of life, fewer ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and stable lead impedance compared with BiV pacing. This study supports turning off LV lead pacing in LVAD patients with CRT.

Short-Term Ventricular Structural Changes Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Reverse remodeling of the left ventricle has been reported following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. However, left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volumetric and shape changes have not been described. Consecutive candidates for LVAD were prospectively enrolled. Comprehensive 2- and 3-dimensional echocardiographic (2DE, 3DE) images were acquired before and 1 to 2 months following LVAD implantation. 3D endocardial surfaces were analyzed to derive shape indices, including LV sphericity and conicity and RV septal and free-wall curvatures. Sixty patients were enrolled with a mean age 56 ± 13 years, 77% male, and 83% destination therapy. 3DE showed that LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) improved from 461 ± 182 to 287 ± 144 ml (p < 0.001) and RV EDV showed no change (p = 0.08). RV longitudinal strain (LS) worsened from -9.1 ± 3.1 to -5.9 ± 2.6% (p < 0.01). LV sphericity and conicity improved (p < 0.001 for both), whereas the curvature of the interventricular septum and RV free wall did not change (p = 0.79 and 0.26, respectively). At 1 month following LVAD implantation, LV volumes decrease dramatically, and there is a favorable LV shape improvement, indicating reverse remodeling. RV shape did not change, whereas RV LS worsened, indicating an absence of RV reverse remodeling.

Long-Term Postpartum Cardiac Function and Its Association With Preeclampsia.

Background Preeclampsia is a prominent risk factor for long-term development of cardiovascular disease. Although existing studies report a strong correlation between preeclampsia and heart failure, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. One possibility is the glycoprotein growth factor activin A. During pregnancy, elevated activin A levels are associated with impaired cardiac global longitudinal strain at 1 year, but whether these changes persist beyond 1 year is not known. We hypothesized that activin A levels would remain increased more than 1 year after a preeclamptic pregnancy and correlate with impaired cardiac function. Methods and Results To test our hypothesis, we performed echocardiograms and measured activin A levels in women approximately 10 years after an uncomplicated pregnancy (n=25) or a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia (n=21). Compared with women with a previously normal pregnancy, women with preeclampsia had worse global longitudinal strain (-18.3% versus -21.3%, P=0.001), left ventricular posterior wall thickness (0.91 mm versus 0.80 mm, P=0.003), and interventricular septal thickness (0.96 mm versus 0.81 mm, P=0.0002). Women with preeclampsia also had higher levels of activin A (0.52 versus 0.37 ng/mL, P=0.02) and activin/follistatin-like 3 ratio (0.03 versus 0.02, P=0.04). In a multivariable model, the relationship between activin A levels and worsening global longitudinal strain persisted after adjusting for age at enrollment, mean arterial pressure, race, and body mass index (P=0.003). Conclusions Our findings suggest that both activin A levels and global longitudinal strain are elevated 10 years after a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia. Future studies are needed to better understand the relationship between preeclampsia, activin A, and long-term cardiac function.

Contrast-enhanced echocardiographic measurement of longitudinal strain: accuracy and its relationship with image quality.

The importance of left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) is increasingly recognized in multiple clinical scenarios. However, in patients with poor image quality, strain is difficult or impossible to measure without contrast enhancement. The feasibility of contrast-enhanced GLS measurement was recently demonstrated. We sought to determine: (1) whether contrast enhancement improves the accuracy of GLS measurements against cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) reference, (2) their reproducibility compared to non-enhanced GLS, and (3) the dependence of accuracy and reproducibility on image quality. We prospectively enrolled 25 patients undergoing clinically indicated CMR imaging who subsequently underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with and without low-dose contrast injection (1-2 mL Optison/3-5 mL saline IV, GE Healthcare). GLS was measured from both non-contrast and contrast-enhanced images using speckle tracking (EchoInsight, Epsilon Imaging). These measurements were compared to each other and to CMR reference values obtained using feature tracking (SuiteHEART, NeoSoft). Inter-technique comparisons included linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses. A random subgroup of 15 patients was used to assess inter- and intra-observer variability using intra-class correlation (ICC). Contrast-enhanced GLS was in close agreement with non-enhanced GLS (r = 0.95; bias: - 0.2 ± 1.5%). Both inter-observer (ICC = 0.88 vs. 0.82) and intra-observer variability (ICC = 0.91 vs. 0.88) were improved by contrast enhancement. The agreement with CMR was better for contrast-enhanced GLS (r = 0.87; bias: 1.1 ± 2.2%) than for non-enhanced GLS (r = 0.80; bias: 1.3 ± 2.7%). In 12/25 patients with suboptimal TTE images that rendered GLS difficult to measure, contrast-enhanced GLS showed better agreement with CMR than non-enhanced GLS (r = 0.88 vs. 0.83) and also improved inter-observer (ICC = 0.83 vs. 0.76) and intra-observer variability (ICC = 0.88 vs. 0.82). In conclusion, contrast enhancement of TTE images improves the accuracy and reproducibility of GLS measurements, resulting in better agreement with CMR, even in patients with suboptimal acoustic windows. This approach may aid in the assessment of LV function in this patient population.

Improved Delineation of Cardiac Pathology Using a Novel Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Tissue Transparency Tool.

BACKGROUND: Accurate visualization of cardiac valves and lesions by three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography is integral for optimal guidance of structural procedures and appropriate selection of closure devices. A new 3D rendering tool known as transillumination (TI), which integrates a virtual light source into the data set, was recently reported to effectively enhance depth perception and orifice definition. We hypothesized that adding the ability to adjust transparency to this tool would result in improved visualization and delineation of anatomy and pathology and improved localization of regurgitant jets compared with TI without transparency and standard 3D rendering. METHODS: We prospectively studied 30 patients with a spectrum of structural heart disease who underwent 3D transesophageal imaging (EPIQ system, Philips) with standard acquisition and TI with and without the transparency feature. Six experienced cardiologists and sonographers were shown randomized images of all three display types in a blinded fashion. Each image was scored independently by all experts using a Likert scale from 1 to 5, while assessing each of the following aspects: (1) ability to recognize anatomy, (2) ability to identify pathology, including regurgitant jet origin, (3) depth perception, and (4) quality of border delineation. RESULTS: TI images with transparency were successfully obtained in all cases. All experts perceived an incremental value of the transparency mode, compared with TI without transparency and standard 3D rendering, in terms of ability to recognize anatomy (respective scores: 4.5 ± 1.1 vs 4.1 ± 1.1 vs 3.6 ± 1.1, P < .05), ability to identify pathology (4.1 ± 1.1 vs 3.9 ± 1.2 vs 3.3 ± 1, P < .05), depth perception (4.6 ± 0.7 vs 4.1 ± 0.8 vs 3.2 ± 1.0, P < .05), and border delineation (4.6 ± 0.8 vs 4.1 ± 1.0 vs 3.1 ± 1.1, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of the transparency mode to TI rendering significantly improves the diagnostic and clinical utility of 3D echocardiography and has the potential to markedly enhance echocardiographic guidance of cardiac structural interventions.

Asymmetric Calcification in Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis and Implications for Balloon Valvuloplasty.

A 50 year-old male with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis was deemed too high risk for surgery and referred for percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty. The valvuloplasty was successful in reducing the trans-mitral gradient and improving the patient's symptoms, however was complicated by a tear in the posteromedial commissure and moderate mitral regurgitation.

Outflow Cannula Systolic Slope in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Novel Marker of Myocardial Contractility.

Left ventricular (LV) unloading with a LV assist device (LVAD) reverse remodels the heart and may lead to favorable changes in cellular architecture and LV geometry promoting myocardial recovery. Currently, there are no standardized methods for evaluating myocardial recovery. This study assesses the systolic slope of the LVAD outflow cannula as a marker for myocardial contractility. Doppler echocardiography (transthoracic echocardiogram [TTE]) of the LVAD outflow cannula and TTE of the LV cavity were prospectively collected in 57 patients with LVADs. Systolic acceleration of the LVAD outflow cannula was measured in each patient as the peak change of velocity over time (dv/dt) during systole from continuous-wave Doppler signal acquired from the LVAD outflow cannula. Ventricular volumes were concurrently measured by TTE. In a subset of 10 patients, the systolic slope was measured during each stage of a ramp study to study the properties of this parameter across a variety of loading conditions. The systolic slope of the LVAD outflow cannula was successfully measured in 53 of 57 patients (93%). Systolic slope strongly correlated with ejection fraction (EF) (R = 0.92). Analysis of systolic slope stratified by EF (EF >30%, EF 20-30%, EF 10-20%, and EF <10%) revealed systolic slopes that were significantly different between the groups (1,371 cm/s ± 324; 983 cm/s ± 122; 578 cm/s ± 139; and 495 cm/s ± 107, respectively; p < 0.001). Systolic slope did not change significantly across variable preload and afterload conditions during a ramp study. Systolic slope of the LVAD outflow cannula strongly correlates with EF and can be used to assess underlying myocardial contractility across a variety of LVAD loading conditions.

Comparison Between Four-Chamber and Right Ventricular-Focused Views for the Quantitative Evaluation of Right Ventricular Size and Function.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) function plays a pivotal prognostic role in multiple cardiac diseases. Echocardiography guidelines recommend that RV quantification be performed in the RV-focused view, which is theoretically more reproducible than the four-chamber (4Ch) view. However, differences between views in RV size and function measurements have never been systematically studied. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to compare (1) RV size and function parameters obtained from the RV-focused and 4Ch views and (2) test-retest variability between these two views. METHODS: Fifty patients (26 men; mean age, 63 ± 18 years) undergoing clinically indicated transthoracic echocardiography were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent three repeated acquisitions of the 4Ch and RV-focused views by two sonographers. The first operator performed two acquisitions at the beginning and the end of the clinical transthoracic echocardiographic study, and the second operator performed the third acquisition afterward. RV size and function measurements were obtained from the two views and compared using paired t-test analysis and Bland-Altman analysis. Intra- and interoperator test-retest and intra- and interreader variability for both views were assessed using intraclass correlations and coefficients of variation. RESULTS: All RV size parameters were significantly larger when measured in the RV-focused view compared with the 4Ch view. Also, all RV function parameters, including RV free wall and global longitudinal strain, were larger in magnitude when measured in the RV-focused view. Measurements variability was consistently better for the RV-focused view. CONCLUSIONS: RV size and function measurements obtained from the RV-focused and 4Ch views are not interchangeable. RV size and function parameters measured from the RV-focused view are more reproducible than from 4Ch acquisitions. Therefore, only the RV-focused view should be used for quantitative assessment of the right ventricle.

Peak left atrial strain as a single measure for the non-invasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressures.

Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular (LV) filling pressures is performed using a multi-parametric algorithm. Left atrial (LA) strain was recently found to accurately classify the degree of diastolic dysfunction. We hypothesized that LA strain could be used as a stand-alone marker and sought to identify and test a cutoff, which would accurately detect elevated LV pressures. We studied 76 patients with a spectrum of LV function who underwent same-day echocardiogram and invasive left-heart catheterization. Speckle tracking was used to measure peak LA strain. The protocol involved a retrospective derivation group (N = 26) and an independent prospective validation cohort (N = 50) to derive and then test a peak LA strain cutoff which would identify pre-A-wave LV diastolic pressure > 15 mmHg. The guidelines-based assessment of filling pressures and peak LA strain were compared side-by-side against invasive hemodynamic data. In the derivation cohort, receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed area under curve of 0.76 and a peak LA strain cutoff < 20% was identified as optimal to detect elevated filling pressure. In the validation cohort, peak LA strain demonstrated better agreement with the invasive reference (81%) than the guidelines algorithm (72%). The improvement in classification using LA strain compared to the guidelines was more pronounced in subjects with normal LV function (91% versus 81%). In summary, the use of a peak LA strain to estimate elevated LV filling pressures is more accurate than the current guidelines. Incorporation of LA strain into the non-invasive assessment of LV diastolic function may improve the detection of elevated filling pressures.

Feasibility of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain Measurements from Contrast-Enhanced Echocardiographic Images.

BACKGROUND: Although left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) is an index of systolic function recommended by the guidelines, poor image quality may hamper strain measurements. While contrast agents are commonly used to improve endocardial visualization, no commercial speckle-tracking software is able to measure strain in contrast-enhanced images. This study aimed to test the accuracy of speckle-tracking software when applied to contrast-enhanced images in patients with suboptimal image quality. METHODS: We studied patients with a wide range of GLS values who underwent transthoracic echocardiography. Protocol 1 included 44 patients whose images justified use of contrast but still allowed noncontrast speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE), which was judged as accurate and used as a reference. Protocol 2 included 20 patients with poor image quality that precluded noncontrast STE; cardiac magnetic resonance- (CMR-) derived strain was used as the reference instead. Half the manufacturer recommended dose of a commercial contrast agent (Definity/Optison/Lumason) was used to provide partial contrast enhancement. Higher than normal mechanical indices (0.6-0.7) and lowest frequency range for maximal penetration settings were used for imaging. GLS was measured (Epsilon) with and without contrast-enhanced images and by CMR-derived feature tracking (TomTec). Comparisons included linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: The contrast STE analysis failed in 4/64 patients (6%). Manual corrections were needed to optimize tracking with contrast in all patients. GLS measurements were in good agreement between contrast and noncontrast images (r = 0.85; mean GLS in the contrast images, -12.9% ± 4.7%; bias, 0.34% ± 2.4%). Good agreement was also noted between contrast STE- and CMR-derived strain (r = 0.83; mean, GLS -13.5% ± 4.0%; bias, 0.72% ± 2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: We found that GLS measurements from contrast-enhanced images are feasible and accurate in most patients, even in those with poor image quality that precludes strain measurements without contrast enhancement.

Invasive Validation of the Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures Using the 2016 Diastolic Guidelines: Head-to-Head Comparison with the 2009 Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Recent American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) guidelines for echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function provide a practical, simplified diagnostic algorithm for estimating LV filling pressure. The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of this algorithm against invasively measured pressures and compare it with the accuracy of the previous 2009 guidelines in the same patient cohort. METHODS: Ninety patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography immediately before left heart catheterization. Mitral inflow E/A ratio, E/e', tricuspid regurgitation velocity, and left atrial volume index were used to estimate LV filling pressure as normal or elevated using the ASE/EACVI algorithm. Invasive LV pre-A pressure was used as a reference, with >12 mm Hg defined as elevated. RESULTS: Invasive LV pre-A pressure was elevated in 40 (44%) and normal in 50 (56%) patients. The 2016 algorithm resulted in classification of 9 of 90 patients (10%) as indeterminate but estimated LV filling pressures in agreement with the invasive reference in 61 of 81 patients (75%), with sensitivity of 0.69 and specificity of 0.81. The 2009 algorithm could not definitively classify 4 of 90 patients (4.4%), but estimated LV filling pressures in agreement with the invasive reference in 64 of 86 patients (74%), with sensitivity of 0.79 and specificity of 0.70. CONCLUSIONS: The 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines for estimation of filling pressures are more user friendly and efficient than the 2009 guidelines and provide accurate estimates of LV filling pressure in the majority of patients when compared with invasive measurements. The simplicity of the new algorithm did not compromise its accuracy and is likely to encourage its incorporation into clinical decision making.