Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 34(4): 966-73, 1999 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10520777

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare recombinant hirudin and heparin as adjuncts to streptokinase thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Experimental studies and previous small clinical trials suggest that specific thrombin inhibition improves early patency rates and clinical outcome in patients treated with streptokinase. METHODS: In a randomized double-blind, multicenter trial, 1,208 patients with AMI < or =6 h were treated with aspirin and streptokinase and randomized to receive recombinant hirudin (lepirudin, i.v. bolus of 0.2 mg/kg, followed by subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of 0.5 mg/kg b.i.d. for 5 to 7 days) or heparin (i.v. placebo bolus, followed by s.c. injections of 12,500 IU b.i.d. for 5 to 7 days). A total of 447 patients were included in the angiographic substudy in which the primary end point, 90-min Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 of the infarct-related artery, was evaluated, while the other two-thirds served as "safety group" in which only clinical end points were evaluated. As an additional efficacy parameter the ST-segment resolution at 90 and 180 min was measured in all patients. RESULTS: TIMI flow grade 3 was observed in 40.7% in the lepirudin and in 33.5% in the heparin group (p = 0.16), respectively. In the entire study population the proportion of patients with complete ST resolution at 90 min (28% vs. 22%, p = 0.05) and at 180 min (52% vs. 48%, p = 0.18) after start of therapy tended to be higher in the lepirudin group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hemorrhagic stroke (0.2% vs. 0.3%) or total stroke (1.2% vs. 1.5%), reinfarction rate (4.6% vs. 5.1%) and total mortality rate (6.8% vs. 6.4%) at 30 days, as well as the combined end point of death, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal reinfarction, rescue-percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and refractory angina (22.7 vs. 24.3%) were not statistically different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lepirudin as adjunct to thrombolysis with streptokinase did not significantly improve restoration of blood flow in the infarct vessel as assessed by angiography, but was associated with an accelerated ST resolution. There was no increase in the risk of major bleedings with lepirudin compared to heparin.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Hirudinas/análogos & derivados , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Estreptoquinasa/uso terapéutico , Terapia Trombolítica , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Electrocardiografía/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Heparina/efectos adversos , Heparina/uso terapéutico , Terapia con Hirudina , Hirudinas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteínas Recombinantes/efectos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia , Estreptoquinasa/efectos adversos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA