Loss-of-function variants of the filaggrin gene are associated with clinical reactivity to foods.

The aim of this study was to assess the genetic association of Filaggrin loss-of-function (FLG LOF) genetic variants with food allergy, and to investigate the added value of this test in diagnosing food allergy. Clinical reactivity to foods was diagnosed by the gold standard, the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. Of 155 children, 33 (21.3%) children had at least one FLG LOF variant, and of these, 29 (87.9%) were clinically reactive to at least one food, compared to 73 of 122 children (59.8%) carrying wild-type alleles. The odds ratio for having at least one FLG LOF variant and clinical reactivity to at least one food was 4.9 (CI = 1.6-14.7, P = 0.005), corresponding to a relative risk of 1.5, compared to carriers of wild-type alleles. Prediction of food allergy improved when FLG LOF variants were included in the model. Therefore, genetic markers may be useful as an addition to clinical assessment in the diagnosis of food allergy.

No matrix effect in double-blind, placebo-controlled egg challenges in egg allergic children.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic and accidental food allergic reactions may be modified by the matrix containing the allergenic food. Previous studies of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs) with peanut found an effect of the fat content of the challenge matrix on the severity of the challenge reactions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine whether the fat content of the food matrix is related to eliciting dose and reaction severity in DBPCFCs with heated hen's egg. METHODS: Sensitized egg allergic children (n = 59) undergoing DBPCFCs with egg as a routine diagnostic procedure in our tertiary care centre were evaluated retrospectively. Three different recipes were used for the food matrix: vanilla pudding, pancake and minced meat, containing 22.8%, 31.9% and 52.7% fat (weighted average), respectively. The eliciting dose (i.e. the highest cumulative dose to which the child reacted) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier log-rank statistic and by Cox regression. Reaction severity was quantified by using an index (range 1-12) and was analysed by multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The overall influence of type of recipe on eliciting dose was not significant (P = 0.12). The rate of response to minced meat (with the highest fat content) was not significantly different from pudding [HR = 0.61 (0.26-1.45, P = 0.26) or pancake (HR = 1.41 (0.50-3.99), P = 0.52] after adjustment for confounders. The type of recipe did not influence the severity of the challenge reaction. The severity of the challenge reaction for minced meat compared to pudding and pancake was 1.06 (0.52-2.16), P = 0.87 and 0.81 (0.32-2.01), P = 0.64, respectively, after correction for confounders. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In contrast to similar research with peanut, no significant influence of the fat content of the matrix was found on the eliciting dose or severity of the reaction in 59 DBPCFCs with hen's egg. Matrix fat content differences comparable to those reported here may not be an important co-determinant of reaction severity for all allergenic foods.

Validation of novel recipes for double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in children and adults.

BACKGROUND: In double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs), the use of challenge materials in which blinding is validated is a prerequisite for obtaining true blinded conditions during the test procedure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to enlarge the available range of validated recipes for DBPCFCs to facilitate oral challenge tests in all age groups, including young children, while maximizing the top dose in an acceptable volume. METHODS: Recipes were developed and subsequently validated by a panel recruited by a matching sensory test. The best 30% of candidates were selected to participate in sensory testing using the paired comparison test. RESULTS: For young children, three recipes with cow's milk and one recipe with peanut could be validated which may be utilized in DBPCFCs. For children older than 4 years and adults, one recipe with egg, two with peanut, one with hazelnut, and one with cashew nut were validated for use in DBPCFCs. CONCLUSIONS: All recipes contained larger amounts of allergenic foods than previously validated. These recipes increase the range of validated recipes for use in DBPCFCs in adults and children.

Should children with a history of anaphylaxis to foods undergo challenge testing?

BACKGROUND: Data on the frequency of resolution of anaphylaxis to foods are not available, but such resolution is generally assumed to be rare. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the frequency of negative challenge tests in children with a history of anaphylaxis to foods is frequent enough to warrant challenge testing to re-evaluate the diagnosis of anaphylaxis, and to document the safety of this procedure. METHODS: All children (n=441) who underwent a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) between January 2003 and March 2007 were screened for symptoms of anaphylaxis to food by history. Anaphylaxis was defined as symptoms and signs of cardiovascular instability, occurring within 2 h after ingestion of the suspected food. RESULTS: Twenty-one children were enrolled (median age 6.1 years, range 0.8-14.4). The median time interval between the most recent anaphylactic reaction and the DBPCFC was 4.25 years, range 0.3-12.8. Twenty-one DBPCFCs were performed in 21 children. Eighteen of 21 children were sensitized to the food in question. Six DBPCFCs were negative (29%): three for cows milk, one for egg, one for peanut, and one for wheat. In the positive DBPCFCs, no severe reactions occurred, and epinephrine administration was not required. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study using DBPCFCs in a consecutive series of children with a history of anaphylaxis to foods, and no indications in dietary history that the food allergy had been resolved. Our study shows that in such children having specific IgE levels below established cut-off levels reported in other studies predicting positive challenge outcomes, re-evaluation of clinical reactivity to food by DBPCFC should be considered, even when there are no indications in history that anaphylaxis has resolved. DBPCFCs can be performed safely in these children, although there is a potential risk for severe reactions.

Ready-to-use introduction schedules for first exposure to allergenic foods in children at home.

BACKGROUND: The vast majority of children will undergo their first exposure to common allergenic foods at home. However, the first exposure may lead to clinical reactions. It has been proposed to introduce allergenic foods gradually into the diets of children at risk for food allergy, but no practical dietary advice has been devised. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to devise safe introduction schedules for common allergenic foods for use at home, based on the challenge doses as administered in double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFCs) in children who were never exposed previously to these foods. METHODS: Seventy-two DBPCFCs were performed in 63 children as a first known exposure. The incrementing challenge doses were converted into equivalent portions of these foods in their usual household form and incorporated in introduction schedules. The feasibility of the introduction scales was tested in parents of the children attending our clinic. RESULTS: Based on the results of the positive challenges (37) in which severe reactions did not occur, detailed introduction schedules and a reference photograph of the required increasing amounts of food were devised for use at home. Feasibility testing showed that, when using these introduction schedules, parents portioned the initial doses significantly lower than without detailed instructions. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction schedules and reference photograph provide information for parents to introduce the required amounts of allergenic foods in initial low doses at home. This is expected to improve the safety of this procedure.

Dietary assessment in children adhering to a food allergen avoidance diet for allergy prevention.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to verify if avoidance of allergenic foods in children adhering to a food allergen avoidance diet from birth was complete and feasible, and whether dietary assessment can be used as a tool in predicting the outcome of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs). DESIGN: Children adhering to an allergen avoidance diet from birth underwent DBPCFCs. The investigator-dietician verified whether the elimination was complete, using food frequency questionnaires for common allergenic foods. SETTING: University Medical Centre Groningen, the Netherlands. SUBJECTS: Thiry-eight children aged 1-13 years, who were consecutively referred to the University Medical Centre Groningen for DBPCFC between January 2002 and February 2004. RESULTS: Among the 38 children undergoing DBPCFCs, there were 15 challenges with egg, 15 with peanut, five with hazelnut and three with soy. Fifteen food challenges (39%) were positive. Small quantities of allergenic foods were inadvertently present in the diets of 13 patients (34%), were possibly present in the diets of 14 patients (37%) and could not be identified in the diets of 11 patients (29%). Seven patients (54%) who had inadvertently ingested small quantities of allergenic foods without sequelae had a positive DBPCFC. CONCLUSION: Dietary avoidance was incomplete and not feasible in most cases. Tolerance of small amounts of allergenic foods does not preclude positive challenge reactions. Dietary assessment does not seem a useful tool in predicting the outcome of DBPCFC in children adhering to an elimination diet. SPONSORSHIP: The Stichting Astma Bestrijding (Foundation for the Prevention of Asthma), The Netherlands.

Placebo reactions in double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in children.

BACKGROUND: A cardinal feature of the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) is that placebo administration is included as a control. To date, the occurrence and diagnostic significance of placebo events have not extensively been documented. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the occurrence and features of placebo events in DBPCFCs and to assess their contribution to the diagnostic accuracy of the DBPCFC in children. METHODS: The study population consisted of 132 challenges in 105 sensitized children (age range 0.7-16.6 years, median 5.3 years), who underwent DBPCFCs with cow's milk, egg, peanut, hazelnut and soy. Placebo and active food challenges were performed on different days. RESULTS: A total number of 17 (12.9%) positive placebo events occurred, which could be classified as immediate (9/17), late-onset (8/17), objective (11/17) or subjective (6/17). Four of 74 (5.4%) positive active food challenges were revealed to be false positive by administration of a placebo challenge. This is 3% (4/132) of all challenges. When computed by a statistical model, the false positive rate was 0.129 (12.9% of all challenges). CONCLUSION: Placebo events with diverse clinical characteristics occur in DBPCFCs in a significant number of children. The diagnostic significance of the administration of a placebo challenge is first, to identify false positive diagnoses in DBPCFCs by refuting false positive tests in individual patients. Secondly, to allow for blinding of the active food challenge. Thirdly, applying a statistical model demonstrates that some positive challenges may be false positive and that the test may need to be repeated in selected cases.

Dosage and time effects of inhaled budesonide on bronchial hyperreactivity.

In a double-blind study of 2 parallel groups of 15 allergic asthmatic patients each, we investigated whether treatment with inhaled budesonide has a dose- and time-dependent effect on the degree of bronchial hyperreactivity. The patients were randomly allocated to treatment with either 200 or 800 micrograms budesonide per day for a period of 8 wk. The active treatment period was preceded by a selection period of 3 wk, and a single-blind placebo period of 2 wk. During these initial 5 wk the maintenance treatment of the patients, including cromolyn sodium and inhaled corticosteroids, was withheld. Spirometry and inhalation provocation tests with methacholine were carried out, and the symptom score was recorded every 2 wk. The methacholine provocation concentrations (geometric mean) causing a decrease in FEV1 of 20% (PC20) in the 200 and 800 micrograms/day treatment groups just before the active treatment period were 0.90 and 0.91 mg/ml, respectively. These values increased significantly to 1.21 and 1.84 mg/ml after 2 wk of treatment (p less than 0.05 and p less than 0.001, respectively) and to 1.55 and 2.74 mg/ml after 8 wk of treatment (p less than 0.01 and p less than 0.001). During the whole study period budesonide in a dosage of 800 micrograms/day induced a significantly larger change in PC20 than in a dosage of 200 micrograms/day. The FEV1 before treatment was 91 +/- 3% (SEM) and 84 +/- 2% of the predicted value in the 200 and 800 micrograms/day treatment groups, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)