RESUMEN
AIM: The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate. STRUCTURE: Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Cardiología , Tromboembolia , Humanos , American Heart Association , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes of sterile lead management strategies of lead abandonment (LA) or transvenous lead extraction (TLE) remain unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of a population residing in southeastern Minnesota with follow-up at the Mayo Clinic and its health systems. Patients who underwent LA or TLE of sterile leads from January 1, 2000, to January 1, 2011, and had follow-up for at least 10 years or until their death were included. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were included in the study with 153 patients who underwent LA and 19 who underwent TLE for sterile leads. Indications for subsequent lead extraction arose in 9.1% (n = 14) of patients with initial LA and 5.3% (n = 1) in patients with initial TLE, after an average of 7 years. Moreover, 28.6% of patients in the LA cohort who required subsequent extraction did not proceed with the extraction, and among those who proceeded, 60% had clinical success and 40% had a clinical failure. Subsequent device upgrades or revisions were performed in 18.3% of patients in the LA group and 31.6% in the TLE group, with no significant differences in procedural challenges (5.2% vs. 5.3%). There was no difference in 10-year survival probability among the LA group and the TLE group (p = .64). CONCLUSION: An initial lead abandonment strategy was associated with more complicated subsequent extraction procedures compared to patients with an initial transvenous lead extraction strategy. However, there was no difference in 10-year survival probability between both lead management approaches.
Asunto(s)
Remoción de Dispositivos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Minnesota/epidemiología , Desfibriladores Implantables , Marcapaso Artificial , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Electrodos ImplantadosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) is common among patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. AF has been shown to occur more commonly among patients with postcapillary PH, although AF also occurs among patients with precapillary PH. The goal of this study was to evaluate the independent impact of PH hemodynamic phenotype on incident AF among patients with PH. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 262 consecutive patients, without a prior diagnosis of atrial arrhythmias, seen at the PH clinic at Mayo Clinic, Florida, between 1997 and 2017, who had right heart catheterization and echocardiography performed, with follow-up for outcomes through 2021. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox-proportional hazards regression modeling were used to evaluate the independent effect of PH hemodynamic phenotype on incident AF. RESULTS: Our study population was classified into two broad PH hemodynamic groups: precapillary (64.9%) and postcapillary (35.1%). The median age was 59.5 years (Q1: 48.4, Q3: 68.4), and 72% were female. In crude models, postcapillary PH was significantly associated with incident AF (HR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.26-3.74, p = 0.005). This association was lost following multivariable adjustment, whereas left atrial volume index remained independently associated with incident AF (aHR 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09-1.54, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: We found PH hemodynamic phenotype was not significantly associated with incident AF in our patient sample; however, echocardiographic evidence of left atrial remodeling appeared to have a greater impact on AF development. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and identify potential modifiable risk factors for AF in this population.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Aleteo Atrial , Hipertensión Pulmonar , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Hipertensión Pulmonar/epidemiología , Hipertensión Pulmonar/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Atrios Cardíacos , Factores de Riesgo , Aleteo Atrial/complicaciones , HemodinámicaRESUMEN
AIMS: To develop quality indicators (QIs) that may be used to evaluate the quality of care and outcomes for adults with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We followed the ESC methodology for QI development. This methodology involved (i) the identification of the domains of AF care for the diagnosis and management of AF (by a group of experts including members of the ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines Task Force for AF); (ii) the construction of candidate QIs (including a systematic review of the literature); and (iii) the selection of the final set of QIs (using a modified Delphi method). Six domains of care for the diagnosis and management of AF were identified: (i) Patient assessment (baseline and follow-up), (ii) Anticoagulation therapy, (iii) Rate control strategy, (iv) Rhythm control strategy, (v) Risk factor management, and (vi) Outcomes measures, including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). In total, 17 main and 17 secondary QIs, which covered all six domains of care for the diagnosis and management of AF, were selected. The outcome domain included measures on the consequences and treatment of AF, as well as PROMs. CONCLUSION: This document defines six domains of AF care (patient assessment, anticoagulation, rate control, rhythm control, risk factor management, and outcomes), and provides 17 main and 17 secondary QIs for the diagnosis and management of AF. It is anticipated that implementation of these QIs will improve the quality of AF care.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Adulto , Comités Consultivos , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Humanos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Revisiones Sistemáticas como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many advanced heart failure patients have both a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). This study examines incidence, clinical impact, and management of LVAD-related EMI. METHODS: We performed a three-center retrospective analysis of transvenous ICD implanted patients with LVAD implanted between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was EMI after LVAD implantation, categorized as LVAD-related noise or telemetry interference. RESULTS: The rate of LVAD-related EMI among the 737 patients (mean age 58.6 ± 12.8 years) studied was 5.0%. Telemetry interference (1.5%) compromised ICD interrogation in all patients. This was resolved successfully with use of a metal shield, encased wand, radiofrequency tower, different ICD programmer or by increasing distance between ICD programmer and LVAD (n = 6). ICD replacement was required to reestablish successful communication in three patients. LVAD-related noise (3.5%) led to oversensing (n = 4), inappropriate mode switches (n = 4), noise reversion (n = 3), inhibition of pacing (n = 2), inappropriate detection as atrial fibrillation (AF) (n = 2) and inappropriate detection as ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/or ventricular fibrillation (VF) (n = 2). This noise interference persisted (n = 3), resolved spontaneously (n = 16), resolved with programming change (n = 6) or required lead revision (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: EMI from LVAD impacts ICD function, although, the incidence rate is low. Physicians implanting both, LVAD in patients with ICD (more common) or ICD in patients with LVAD, should be aware of possible interferences. Telemetry failure not resolved by metal shielding was overcome by ICD generator replacement to a different manufacturer. In most cases, LVAD-related noise resolves spontaneously.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Fenómenos Electromagnéticos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has a larger generator and its implantation involves more dissection and tunneling compared to traditional transvenous defibrillator system. Liposomal bupivacaine, an extended-release bupivacaine with 72 h of duration has been used for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing S-ICD implantation. Our aim was to compare postoperative pain and opioid prescription patterns among patients undergoing S-ICD implantation who received intraprocedural liposomal bupivacaine and those who did not. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent subcutaneous ICD implantation from January 1, 2013 to March 30, 2018 at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Patients were categorized into those who received liposomal bupivacaine and those who did not. Data on inpatient pain score, outpatient opioid prescription rates at discharge, and doses based on oral morphine equivalents (OME) were collected. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients underwent S-ICD implantation. Intraprocedural liposomal bupivacaine was used in 69% of patients. Patients who received intraprocedural liposomal bupivacaine had similar mean inpatient pain scores (2.9 vs. 2.9, p = .786). There was also no difference in the rate of inpatient opioid administration (79.2% vs. 87.5%, p = .4139), outpatient opioid prescription (23.6% vs. 12.5%, p = .29), or mean OME (41.7-mg vs. 16.6-mg, p = .188) when comparing patients those who received intraprocedural liposomal bupivacaine and those who did not. CONCLUSION: Intraprocedural liposomal bupivacaine administration was not associated with any significant impact on postoperative pain scores, inpatient opioid administration, and outpatient opioid prescription rates or OME amounts at discharge.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Bupivacaína/uso terapéutico , Desfibriladores Implantables , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Adulto , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Femenino , Humanos , Liposomas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although large randomized clinical trials have found that primary prevention use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) improves survival in patients with cardiomyopathy and heart failure symptoms, patients who receive ICDs in practice are often older and have more comorbidities than patients who were enrolled in the clinical trials. In addition, there is a debate among clinicians on the usefulness of electrophysiological study for risk stratification of asymptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome. AIM: Our analysis has 2 objectives. First, to evaluate whether ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) induced with programmed electrostimulation in asymptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome identify a higher risk group that may require additional testing or therapies. Second, to evaluate whether implantation of an ICD is associated with a clinical benefit in older patients and patients with comorbidities who would otherwise benefit on the basis of left ventricular ejection fraction and heart failure symptoms. METHODS: Traditional statistical approaches were used to address 1) whether programmed ventricular stimulation identifies a higher-risk group in asymptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome and 2) whether ICD implantation for primary prevention is associated with improved outcomes in older patients (>75 years of age) and patients with significant comorbidities who would otherwise meet criteria for ICD implantation on the basis of symptoms or left ventricular function. RESULTS: Evidence from 6 studies of 1138 asymptomatic patients were identified. Brugada syndrome with inducible VA on electrophysiological study was identified in 390 (34.3%) patients. To minimize patient overlap, the primary analysis used 5 of the 6 studies and found an odds ratio of 2.3 (95% CI: 0.63-8.66; P=0.2) for major arrhythmic events (sustained VAs, sudden cardiac death, or appropriate ICD therapy) in asymptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome and inducible VA on electrophysiological study versus those without inducible VA. Ten studies were reviewed that evaluated ICD use in older patients and 4 studies that evaluated unique patient populations were identified. In our analysis, ICD implantation was associated with improved survival (overall hazard ratio: 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.83; P<0.001). Ten studies were identified that evaluated ICD use in patients with various comorbidities including renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, heart disease, and others. A random effects model demonstrated that ICD use was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (overall hazard ratio: 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.79; P<0.0001), and a second "minimal overlap" analysis also found that ICD use was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (overall hazard ratio: 0.71; 95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.82; P<0.0001). In 5 studies that included data on renal dysfunction, ICD implantation was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (overall hazard ratio: 0.71; 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.85; P<0.001).
Asunto(s)
Cardiología/normas , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia , Complejos Prematuros Ventriculares/terapia , American Heart Association , Consenso , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Taquicardia Ventricular/complicaciones , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Ventricular/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Fibrilación Ventricular/complicaciones , Fibrilación Ventricular/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Ventricular/mortalidad , Complejos Prematuros Ventriculares/complicaciones , Complejos Prematuros Ventriculares/diagnóstico , Complejos Prematuros Ventriculares/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recognition of rates and causes of hard, patient-centered outcomes of death and cerebrovascular events (CVEs) after heart rhythm disorder management (HRDM) procedures is an essential step for the development of quality improvement programs in electrophysiology laboratories. Our primary aim was to assess and characterize death and CVEs (stroke or transient ischemic attack) after HRDM procedures over a 17-year period. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing HRDM procedures between January 2000 and November 2016 at the Mayo Clinic. Patients from all 3 tertiary academic centers (Rochester, Phoenix, and Jacksonville) were included in the study. All in-hospital deaths and CVEs after HRDM procedures were identified and were further characterized as directly or indirectly related to the HRDM procedure. Subgroup analysis of death and CVE rates was performed for ablation, device implantation, electrophysiology study, lead extraction, and defibrillation threshold testing procedures. RESULTS: A total of 48 913 patients (age, 65.7±6.6 years; 64% male) who underwent a total of 62 065 HRDM procedures were included in the study. The overall mortality and CVE rates in the cohort were 0.36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.42) and 0.12% (95% CI, 0.09-0.16), respectively. Patients undergoing lead extraction had the highest overall mortality rate at 1.9% (95% CI, 1.34-2.61) and CVE rate at 0.62% (95% CI, 0.32-1.07). Among patients undergoing HRDM procedures, 48% of deaths directly related to the HDRM procedure were among patients undergoing device implantation procedures. Overall, cardiac tamponade was the most frequent direct cause of death (40%), and infection was the most common indirect cause of death (29%). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 0.76%, with the highest being in lead extraction procedures (3.08%), followed by device implantation procedures (0.94%). CONCLUSIONS: Half of the deaths directly related to an HRDM procedure were among the patients undergoing device implantation procedures, with cardiac tamponade being the most common cause of death. This highlights the importance of the development of protocols for the quick identification and management of cardiac tamponade even in procedures typically believed to be lower risk such as device implantation.
Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Técnicas de Ablación/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/mortalidad , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/tendencias , Taponamiento Cardíaco/mortalidad , Causas de Muerte , Desfibriladores Implantables , Remoción de Dispositivos/mortalidad , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Marcapaso Artificial , Implantación de Prótesis/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Leadless cardiac pacing (LCP) has emerged as a new modality for permanent pacing. We sought to describe comparative outcomes between LCP and transvenous pacemakers. METHODS: Patients receiving LCP (Micra [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA] and Nanostim [St. Jude Medical/Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL, USA]) between 2014 and 2017 at the Mayo Clinic Heart Rhythm Enterprise practice (Rochester, MN, USA; Jacksonville, FL, USA; and Scottsdale, AZ, USA) were identified. We identified 1:1 age- and sex-matched controls receiving single-chamber transvenous ventricular pacemakers (TVP). Statistical analyses were performed with JMP 13.0.0 (SAS, Institute Cary, NC, USA). RESULTS: Ninety patients underwent LCP implantation (73 Micra and 17 Nanostim) with a median follow-up duration of 62 (interquartile range 28-169) days. Both groups had 100% successful device implant rates. There were no differences in procedure-related major (0% vs 1%) or minor complications (8% vs 3%) in the LCP versus TVP groups (P > 0.05). Excluding Nanostim patients, there was a lower rate of device-related revision or extraction in the Micra versus TVP groups (0% vs 5%, P = 0.028). Device endocarditis was more common in the TVP group (0% vs 3%, P = 0.04). Estimated longevity was greater for the LCP group (median 12.0 vs 10.0 years, P < 0.0001). An increase in severity of tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) by ≥2 grades occurred in none of the LCP patients, and in 19% of the TVP patients (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: There are no significant differences in procedural complications among patients receiving LCP versus TVP. The Micra group had lower rates of device-related revision/extraction compared to the TVP group. Patients with leadless pacemaker were less likely to develop endocarditis or worsening TR.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Diseño de Equipo , Marcapaso Artificial , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The utilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) has increased significantly, since its initial approval for use in selected patients with heart failure. Limited data exist as for current trends in implant-related in-hospital complications and cost utilization. The aim of our study was to examine in-hospital complication rates associated with CRT-D and their trends over the last decade. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we estimated 378 248 CRT-D procedures from 2003 to 2012. We investigated common complications, including mechanical, cardiovascular, pericardial complications (hemopericardium, cardiac tamponade, or pericardiocentesis), pneumothorax, stroke, vascular complications (consisting of hemorrhage/hematoma, incidents requiring surgical repair, and accidental arterial puncture), and in-hospital deaths described with CRT-D, defining them by the validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code. Mechanical complications (5.9%) were the commonest, followed by cardiovascular (3.6%), respiratory failure (2.4%), and pneumothorax (1.5%). Age (≥65 years), female gender (OR, 95% CI; P value) (1.08, 1.03-1.13; 0.001), and the Charlson score ≥3 (1.52, 1.45-1.60; <0.001) were significantly associated with increased mortality/complications. CONCLUSIONS: The overall complication rate in patients undergoing CRT-D has been increasing in the last decade. Age (≥65), female sex, and the Charlson score ≥3 were associated with higher complications. In patients who underwent CRT-D implantation, postoperative complications were associated with significant increases in cost.
Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/economía , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/economía , Desfibriladores Implantables/economía , Cardioversión Eléctrica/economía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/economía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Costos de Hospital , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/efectos adversos , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/mortalidad , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/tendencias , Dispositivos de Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/tendencias , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Desfibriladores Implantables/tendencias , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/mortalidad , Cardioversión Eléctrica/tendencias , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Our study assesses the utility of telemetry in identifying decompensation in patients with documented cardiopulmonary arrest. METHODS: A retrospective review of inpatients who experienced a cardiopulmonary arrest from May 1, 2008, until June 30, 2014, was performed. Telemetry records 24 hours prior to and immediately preceding cardiopulmonary arrest were reviewed. Patient subanalyses based on clinical demographics were made as well as analyses of survival comparing patients with identifiable rhythm changes in telemetry to those without. RESULTS: Of 242 patients included in the study, 75 (31.0%) and 110 (45.5%) experienced telemetry changes at the 24-hour and immediately preceding time periods, respectively. Of the telemetry changes, the majority were classified as nonmalignant (n = 50, 66.7% and n = 66, 55.5% at 24 hours prior and immediately preceding, respectively). There was no difference in telemetry changes between intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients and among patients stratified according to the American Heart Association telemetry indications. There was no difference in survival when comparing patients with telemetry changes immediately preceding and at 24 hours prior to an event (n = 30, 27.3% and n = 15, 20.0%) to those without telemetry changes during the same periods (n = 27, 20.5% and n = 42, 25.2%; P = .22 and .39). CONCLUSION: Telemetry has limited utility in predicting clinical decompensation in the inpatient setting.
Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Sistema de Registros , Telemetría/métodos , Anciano , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Telemetría/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device therapy (CIED) has revolutionized treatment for advanced heart failure. Most patients considered for orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) are treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy, or both. These CIEDs are surgically extracted at the time of transplant. Occasionally, CIEDs are incompletely removed. Little is known about the outcomes of post-OHT patients with retained CIED fragments. METHODS: We identified 200 consecutive patients that underwent OHT at our institution between April 2006 and December 2014 and performed a retrospective analysis of available radiographic images and clinical records. Chest radiographs prior to and following OHT were reviewed for the presence of CIED or retained CIED fragments. The outcomes of patients with retained CIED fragments that had subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies performed were further investigated. RESULTS: One hundred eighty of 200 patients were identified as having CIED prior to OHT, of which 29 had retained CIED fragments after OHT. Most retained CIED fragments originated from superior vena cava defibrillator coils. There were no adverse events in the retained CIED fragment cohort, and survival was unaffected. Ten patients with retained CIED fragments safely underwent a total of 28 MRIs after OHT, all of diagnostic quality. CONCLUSION: Retained CIED fragments are not associated with adverse events or increased mortality after OHT. Diagnostic MRI has been safely performed in patients with retained CIED fragments after incomplete device extraction. Retrieval of these fragments prior to MRI does not appear warranted given the demonstrated safety and preserved image quality in this population.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Trasplante de Corazón , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Florida/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
Syncope is common representing approximately 3% of ED visits and up to 6% of hospital admissions, with a cost close to 2 billion dollars per year. Diagnostic testing is often poorly sensitive and evaluations commonly lack a standardized approach. A mindful and systematic approach can increase sensitivity and improve diagnostic accuracy. A thorough history and physical exam is paramount, as conclusions drawn from the history and exam will guide further assessment. Developing a strategy for the first and, if necessary, subsequent tests will improve the accuracy of identifying the etiology of syncope and reduce cost. Although syncope has a favorable prognosis, identification of patients with structural heart disease is critical, as these patients are at greatest risk for mortality. Several risk scoring systems have been developed to help separate high risk from low risk patients.
Asunto(s)
Síncope/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Ecocardiografía , Electrocardiografía , Humanos , Examen Físico , Pronóstico , Medición de RiesgoAsunto(s)
Bradicardia/diagnóstico , Trastorno del Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Algoritmos , Bradicardia/genética , Bradicardia/terapia , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Trastorno del Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/genética , Trastorno del Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/terapia , Cardiotónicos/uso terapéutico , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , HumanosAsunto(s)
Bradicardia/diagnóstico , Trastorno del Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiología , Bradicardia/complicaciones , Bradicardia/epidemiología , Bradicardia/terapia , Trastorno del Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/complicaciones , Trastorno del Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/epidemiología , Trastorno del Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/terapia , Electrocardiografía , Fenómenos Electrofisiológicos , Epilepsia/complicaciones , Cardiopatías/complicaciones , Cardiopatías/congénito , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
AIMS: Dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) may improve specificity and reduce the risk of inappropriate shocks, and enhance atrial arrhythmia (AT/AF) detection to permit stroke prevention compared with single-chamber ICDs, but at additional expense and risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n = 100) receiving primary prevention ICDs at two USA and two Israeli centres were randomized to dual-chamber or single-chamber devices between December 2008 and December 2010 and were followed for 1 year. Programming in both groups included: delayed detection to avoid therapy for non-sustained episodes; high detection cut-off rates to avoid treating slower, better tolerated arrhythmias; minimized right ventricular pacing; and routine use of supraventricular-ventricular tahcycardia discriminators and antitachycardia pacing. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with inappropriate shocks. One patient in each group (2%) received inappropriate shocks (P = 1.00). Death occurred in two patients in the single-chamber arm, and in none of the patients in the dual-chamber arm (P = 0.15). New AT/AF was detected in 12 patients (24%) in the dual-chamber group, vs. no patients in the single-chamber group (P < 0.001). Among US participants, the mean cost of dual- vs. single-chamber ICD implantation was $16 579 vs. $14 249, respectively (P < 0.001); there was no difference in the quality of life (EQ-5D index difference 0.013, P = 0.769; EQ VAS difference 3.3, P = 0.49). CONCLUSION: When optimal programming is utilized, inappropriate shocks are rare in primary prevention patients with both single- and dual-chamber ICDs. The routine use of dual-chamber ICDs increases the expense without reducing inappropriate shocks or improving the quality of life at 1 year. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00787800.
Asunto(s)
Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Algoritmos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevención Primaria , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Patients with atrial fibrillation not associated with other cardiac conditions require different individualized treatment strategies. However, in all patients it is critical to address modifiable risk factors, assess stroke risk, minimize atrial fibrillation burden, and identify the patient's individual goals of care.