RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To obtain a comprehensive overview of comparative biomechanical cadaveric studies investigating the effect of both the iliotibial band (ITB) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) on anterolateral rotatory instability (ALRI) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knees, and the effect of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) versus ALL reconstruction (ALLR) in ACL-reconstructed knees. METHODS: An electronic search was performed in the Embase and MEDLINE databases for the period between January 1, 2010, and October 1, 2022. All sectioning studies comparing the role of both the ITB and ALL on ALRI and all studies comparing the effect of both LET and ALLR were included. Articles were assessed for methodological quality according to the Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies scale. RESULTS: Data of 15 studies were included, representing the mean values of biomechanical data collected from 203 cadaveric specimens, with sample sizes ranging from 10 to 20 specimens. All 6 sectioning studies reported that the ITB acts as a secondary stabilizer to the ACL and helps resist internal knee rotation, whereas in only 2 of 6 sectioning studies the ALL contributed significantly to tibial internal rotation (IR). Most reconstruction studies reported that both a modified Lemaire tenodesis and an ALLR could significantly reduce the residual ALRI in isolated ACL-reconstructed knees and were able to restore IR stability/IR stability during the pivot shift. CONCLUSIONS: The ITB acts as the main secondary stabilizer to the ACL in resisting IR/IR during pivot shift and an anterolateral corner (ALC) reconstruction with either a modified Lemaire tenodesis and ALLR can improve residual knee rotatory laxity in ACL reconstructed knees. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This systematic review provides insight in the biomechanical function of the ITB and ALL and emphasizes the importance of adding an ALC reconstruction to ACL reconstruction.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Inestabilidad de la Articulación , Tenodesis , Humanos , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Cadáver , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugíaRESUMEN
Returning to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can be a challenging and complex process for the athlete, with the rate of return to the pre-injury level of sport observed to be less than athlete expectations. Of the athletes that do return to sport (RTS), knee re-injury rates remain high, and multiple studies have observed impaired athletic performance upon RTS after ACLR as well as reduced playing time, productivity, and career lengths. To mitigate re-injury and improve RTS outcomes, multiple RTS after ACLR consensus statements/clinical practice guidelines have recommended objective RTS testing criteria to be met prior to medical clearance for unrestricted sports participation. While the achievement of RTS testing criteria can improve RTS rates after ACLR, current criteria do not appear valid for predicting safe RTS. Therefore, there is a need to review the various factors related to the successful return to the pre-injury level of sport after ACLR, clarify the utility of objective performance testing and RTS criteria, further discuss safe RTS decision-making as well as present strategies to reduce the risk of ACL injury/re-injury upon RTS. This article provides a practical review of the current RTS after ACLR literature, as well as makes medical recommendations for rehabilitation and RTS decision-making after ACLR.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Volver al Deporte , Humanos , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Lesiones de Repetición , Traumatismos en Atletas/cirugía , Rendimiento Atlético/fisiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to perform a survey administered to members of the Meniscus International Network (MenIN) Study Group, seeking to delineate the most contentious aspects of meniscal extrusion classification and provide a foundation for new, more comprehensive definitions and treatments for these pathologies. METHODS: MenIN Study Group is a group of international experts treating and performing research on meniscus pathology and treatment. All MenIN Study Group members were asked to complete a survey aimed at establishing criteria for the optimal classification system for meniscal extrusion. Data obtained from the completed questionnaires were transferred into a spreadsheet and then analysed. All responses are presented as counts, percentages or means. RESULTS: Forty-seven (85.5%) MenIN Study Group members completed the survey and were included in this analysis. Key aspects recommended for inclusion in a comprehensive classification system for meniscal extrusion included laterality (93.6%), anatomical location (76.6%), patient age (76.6%), body mass index (BMI) (68.1%) and aetiology (68.1%). For classifying meniscal extrusion, 53.2% considered the distance in millimetres from the tibial plateau's outer margin as the most reliable measurement technique on imaging. Preferences for imaging modalities varied, with 44.7% favouring weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 36.2% opting for weight-bearing ultrasound due to its greater availability. Respondents advocated for a classification system addressing stability or progression of meniscal extrusion (66%), reducibility (53.2%), potential progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA) (83%), influencing treatment approaches (83%), a gradation system (83%), consideration of dynamic factors (66%), association with clinical outcomes and prognosis (76.6%) and investigation around centralization procedures (57.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the findings of this survey shed light on the global perspectives regarding meniscal extrusion classification. It was generally felt that a new classification of extrusion measured on MRI scans at the mid-tibial plateau should be developed, which considers factors such as laterality, anatomical location, age, BMI and aetiology. Additionally, the results support the integration of dynamic factors and clinical outcomes in MRI-based classifications to inform treatment approaches. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Meniscos Tibiales , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Meniscos Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Femenino , MasculinoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform a scoping review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) concerning the use of functional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) braces and to clarify the nomenclature for bracing relevant to ACL injury treatment in order to support prescribing clinicians. METHODS: A PubMed search for CPGs for the use of braces following ACL injury or reconstruction was performed. CPGs on the treatment of ACL injuries with sufficient attention to postoperative braces were included in this scoping review. The references used for supporting the specific CPG recommendations were reviewed. Specific indications for brace use including brace type, period of use following surgery and activities requiring brace use were collected. RESULTS: Six CPGs were identified and included this this review. Three randomised trials provided the evidence for recommendations on functional brace use following ACL reconstruction in the six CPGs. Functional ACL braces were the primary focus of the three randomised trials, although extension braces (postoperative knee immobilisers) were also discussed. A novel dynamic ACL brace category has been described, although included CPGs did not provide guidance on this brace type. CONCLUSIONS: Guidance on the use of functional ACL braces following ACL reconstruction is provided in six CPGs supported by three randomised trials. However, the brace protocols and patient compliance in the randomised trials render these CPGs inadequate for providing guidance on the use of functional ACL braces in the general and high-risk patient populations when returning to sport after ACL reconstruction. Functional ACL braces are commonly utilised during the course of ACL injury treatment although there is presently limited evidence supporting or refuting the routine use of these braces. Future studies are, therefore, necessary in order to provide guidance on the use of functional and dynamic ACL braces in high-risk patient populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Tirantes , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Humanos , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The reliable data on the incidence of hypermobile lateral meniscus (HLM) and its clinical manifestations, diagnostic methods and therapeutic approaches are limited. This systematic study aimed to review available treatment options for HLM and the outcomes of each approach. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science) to identify studies in which arthroscopically confirmed cases of HLM were treated surgically or nonsurgically, and the required data comprising study characteristics, patient data, treatment approaches and outcome measures were extracted from eligible studies. RESULTS: Twenty studies with a total of 212 patients (138 males and 74 females) and 219 knees were included. The most frequently reported symptoms were locking sensations, knee pain, giving way and snapping. Treatments used by the studies were: radiofrequency energy in two studies; arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in one study; open surgery in two studies; and arthroscopic meniscal repair in 17 studies. Eleven studies used an all-inside repair method and an inside-out meniscal repair was reported in eight studies. Three studies reported the usage of posterior arthroscopy for therapeutic or diagnostic approaches. Evaluation of symptom resolution was the main outcome measurement for which almost all of the studies stated relief of symptoms after intervention. CONCLUSION: Despite the lack of definite consensus about the most appropriate intervention for HLM, therapeutic preference was directed towards arthroscopic all-inside and inside-out repair techniques. Although the surgeon's decision remains the key factor in choosing the most suitable treatment option for each individual, posterior arthroscopic meniscal repair may be considered as a better option for HLM treatment according to the findings of this review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Asunto(s)
Artroscopía , Inestabilidad de la Articulación , Meniscos Tibiales , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/diagnóstico , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/terapia , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugía , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/terapia , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico , MeniscectomíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: External snapping hip syndrome (ESHS) was historically attributed to isolated iliotibial band (ITB) contracture. However, the gluteus maximus complex (GMC) may also be involved. This study aimed to intraoperatively identify the ESHS origin and assess the outcomes of endoscopic treatment based on the identified aetiological type. METHODS: From 2008-2014, 30 consecutive patients (34 hips) with symptomatic ESHS cases refractory to conservative treatment underwent endoscopic stepwise "fan-like" release, gradually addressing all known reasons of ESHS: from the isolated ITB, through the fascial part of the GMC until a partial release of gluteus maximus femoral attachment occurred. Snapping was assessed intra-operatively after each surgical step and prospectively recorded. Functional outcomes were assessed via the MAHORN Hip Outcome Tool (MHOT-14). RESULTS: Twenty seven patients (31 hips) were available to follow-up at 24-56 months. In all cases, complete snapping resolution was achieved intra-operatively: in seven cases (22.6%) after isolated ITB release, in 22 cases (70.9%), after release of ITB + fascial part of the GMC, and in two cases (6.5%) after ITB + fascial GMC release + partial release of GM femoral insertion. At follow-up, there were no snapping recurrences and MHOT-14 score significantly increased from a pre-operative average of 46 to 93(p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative identification and gradual addressing of all known causes of ESHS allows for maximum preservation of surrounding tissue during surgery while precisely targeting the directly involved structures. Endoscopic stepwise "fan-like" release of the ITB and GMC is an effective, tailor-made treatment option for ESHS regardless of the snapping origin in the patients with possibility to manually reproduce the snapping.
Asunto(s)
Contractura , Artropatías , Humanos , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Artropatías/cirugía , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Músculo Esquelético/cirugía , Contractura/cirugía , SíndromeRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To map the current literature evaluating the diagnosis and treatment of multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs). DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews and Arksey and O'Malley frameworks were followed. A three-step search strategy identified relevant published literature comprising studies reporting on at least one aspect in the diagnosis or treatment of MLKI in adults. Data were synthesised to form a descriptive analysis and thematic summary. RESULTS: Overall, 417 studies were included. There was a substantial chronological increase in the number of studies published per year, with 70% published in the last 12 years. Of included studies, 128 (31%) were narrative reviews, editorials or technical notes with no original data. The majority of studies (n=239, 57%) originated from the USA; only 4 studies (1%) were of level I evidence. Consistent themes of contention included clinical assessment, imaging, operative strategy, timing of surgery and rehabilitation. There was a lack of gender and ethnic diversity reported within patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: There remains insufficient high-level evidence to support definitive management strategies for MLKI. There is considerable heterogeneity in outcome reporting in current MLKI literature, precluding robust comparison, interpretation and pooling of data. Further research priorities include the development of expert consensus relating to the investigation, surgical management and rehabilitation of MLKI. There is a need for minimum reporting standards for clinical studies evaluating MLKI.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de la Rodilla , Articulación de la Rodilla , Adulto , Humanos , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/diagnóstico , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/cirugíaRESUMEN
With the improved recognition of meniscal root tears over the past decade, it has become clear that root repairs are necessary in most patients indicated for a repair to prevent the further progression of osteoarthritis. Root repairs are cost beneficial to and prevent the early need for a total knee arthroplasty. As further postoperative follow-up occurs for root repairs, we have found that most patients have significantly improved patient-reported outcomes, while it is still clear that further clinical outcome study as well as further refinement of surgical technique is necessary. The next thing that we have to investigate is how to prevent recurrent meniscal extrusion after a root repair. Nonanatomic repair significantly alters tibiofemoral biomechanics and results in notably increased meniscal extrusion. In contrast, biomechanical studies show anatomic repair of the meniscus attachment within 1 cm of the meniscus attachment site restores joint loading close to normal.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Enfermedades de los Cartílagos , Traumatismos de la Rodilla , Menisco , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugía , Menisco/cirugía , Enfermedades de los Cartílagos/cirugía , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of perioperative gabapentin or pregabalin treatment on postoperative pain and opioid requirement reduction in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: A systematic review of randomized control trials was conducted evaluating the effect of gabapentin or pregabalin on postoperative pain and opioid requirement for patients undergoing ACLR. The primary outcomes assessed were postoperative pain scores and opioid requirements. Secondary outcomes were complications, side effects, dosage, and timing of intervention. RESULTS: The initial search query identified 151 studies and 6 studies were included after full-text articles were reviewed. Three studies investigated the use of gabapentin and three studies investigated pregabalin. All three gabapentin studies reported significantly decreased or equivalent pain scores while also significantly reducing or removing total opioid consumption compared to control groups. Pregabalin demonstrated inconsistent efficacy for pain control and opioid consumption parameters across three studies. One study (pregabalin, n = 1) reported significantly increased incidence of dizziness with pregabalin compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: There is moderate evidence demonstrating that preoperative gabapentin may be safe and effective in reducing postoperative pain and opioid consumption after ACLR. Gabapentin may be considered when employed as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen; however, the optimal protocol has yet to be determined. Currently, there is limited evidence demonstrating the efficacy of pregabalin on pain and opioid consumption in the setting of ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, systematic review of Level I Studies.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Humanos , Gabapentina/uso terapéutico , Pregabalina/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Analgésicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The primary objective was to systematically review the literature evaluating patient-reported outcomes and return to sport after re-revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) procedures. The secondary objectives were 2-fold: to identify the risk factors that lead to revision ACLR failure and to assess the secondary knee structure injuries after the initial revision ACLR. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane databases. The inclusion criteria were outcomes of re-revision ACLR, minimum of 2 years' follow-up, human studies, and English language. Basic science articles, epidemiologic studies, editorials, surgical technique articles, surveys, cadaveric studies, and animal studies were excluded. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were considered for review. There were 6 Level III and 9 Level IV studies that included 399 patients undergoing re-revision ACLR. The rate of concomitant meniscal lesions at the time of re-revision ranged from 35% to 90%. The prevalence of concomitant cartilaginous lesions at the time of re-revision ranged from 13.6% to 90%. Compared with preoperative scores, patient-reported outcomes overall improved after re-revision ACLR, with mean preoperative Lysholm scores ranging from 38.4 to 73.15 that improved to postoperative scores ranging from 68 to 87.8. However, return to sport at preinjury levels was inconsistent, with rates ranging from 12.5% to 80%. CONCLUSIONS: Re-revision ACLR was found to restore knee stability and improve functional outcomes. Despite this improvement, there was a low rate of return to sport at the preinjury level. Functional outcomes were also inferior when compared with primary ACLR. In addition, concomitant knee pathologies were found to rise in prevalence compared with revision and primary ACLR cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of ramp lesions and posteromedial tibial plateau (PMTP) bone bruising on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) and an intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients surgically treated for MLKIs at 2 level I trauma centers between January 2001 and March 2021 was performed. Only MLKIs with an intact ACL that received MRI scans within 90 days of the injury were included. All MLKIs were diagnosed on MRI and confirmed with operative reports. Two musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively rereviewed preoperative MRIs for evidence of medial meniscus ramp lesions (MMRLs) and PMTP bone bruises using previously established classification systems. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to calculate the reliability between the radiologists. The incidence of MMRLs and PMTP bone bruises was quantified using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 221 MLKIs were identified, of which 32 (14.5%) had an intact ACL (87.5% male; mean age of 29.9 ± 8.6 years) and were included. The most common MLKI pattern was combined injury to the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner (n = 27, 84.4%). PMTP bone bruises were observed in 12 of 32 (37.5%) patients. Similarly, MMRLs were diagnosed in 12 of 32 (37.5%) patients. A total of 8 of 12 (66.7%) patients with MMRLs demonstrated evidence PMTP bone bruising. CONCLUSIONS: Over one-third of MLKI patients with an intact ACL were diagnosed with MMRLs on MRI in this series. PMTP bone bruising was observed in 66.7% of patients with MMRLs, suggesting that increased vigilance for identifying MMRLs at the time of ligament reconstruction should be practiced in patients with this bone bruising pattern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Contusiones , Traumatismos de la Rodilla , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Femenino , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico por imagen , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/complicaciones , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/epidemiología , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/cirugía , Contusiones/diagnóstico por imagen , Contusiones/epidemiología , Contusiones/etiología , Imagen por Resonancia MagnéticaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the quadriceps femoris system for the presence of additional layers. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-eight lower limbs fixed in 10% formalin were examined. RESULTS: Five types of quadriceps tendon layering were found based on the accessory heads of the quadriceps muscle. Type I (55%)-represented by four heads and four layers, and it was something new because standard orthopaedic textbooks described quadriceps tendon as a structure composed of only three layers. Type II (27.4%)-the first four layers were the same as in Type 1, but the accessory tendon of the fifth head of the quadriceps femoris muscle had the deepest attachments. Type III (10.9%)-this type included 6 heads of quadriceps femoris. It consisted of five layers. Type IV (3.1%)-this type included 7 quadriceps femoris heads. This type consisted of only four layers. Type V (3.1%)-this type included 8 heads of the quadriceps femoris heads. This type consist of 5 layers. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study provide a detailed anatomy of the quadriceps tendon including the accessory tendons of the accessory heads of the quadriceps tendon. The accessory heads of the quadriceps femoris muscle contribute to the layering of the quadriceps tendon. The second conclusion of this study is the development of safe distances depending on the types. Not all types are perfect for harvesting-Type IV seems to be the safest type, in turn Type V the most dangerous.
Asunto(s)
Músculo Cuádriceps , Tendones , Humanos , Músculo Cuádriceps/cirugía , Músculo Cuádriceps/anatomía & histología , Tendones/anatomía & histología , Extremidad InferiorRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Stress radiographs are an easily accessible, cost-effective tool in the evaluation of acute and chronic ligament knee injuries. Stress radiographs provide an objective, quantifiable, and functional assessment of the injured ligament and can be a useful adjunct when planning surgical management and to objectively assess postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to review the literature reporting on stress radiographic techniques in evaluating knee ligament injury and instability and propose thresholds for interpreting stress radiography techniques. METHODS: The following three databases, OVID MEDLINE, the EMBASE library, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, were systematically searched on January 23, 2023, for studies published from January 1970 to January 2023. The search extended to the reference lists of all relevant studies and orthopedic journals. Included studies were those that described a stress technique for the diagnosis of knee ligament injury; studies that reported a description or comparison of the accuracy and/or reliability of one or several stress radiography techniques, or studies that reported a comparison with alternative diagnostic modalities. RESULTS: Sixteen stress radiography techniques were reported for assessing the ACL with stress applied in the anterior plane, 10 techniques for assessing the PCL with stress applied in the posterior plane, 3 techniques for valgus stress, and 4 techniques for varus stress. The Telos device was the most commonly used stress device in the ACL and PCL studies. There was no consensus on the accuracy and reliability of stress radiography techniques for the diagnosis of any knee ligament injury. Stress radiography techniques were compared with alternative diagnostic techniques including instrumented arthrometry, MRI, and physical examination in 18 studies, with variability in the advantages and disadvantages of stress radiography techniques and alternatives. Analysis of results pooled from different studies demonstrated average delta gapping in knees with a completely injured ligament compared to the normal contralateral knee as per the following: for the ACL 4.9 ± 1.4 mm; PCL 8.1 ± 2.5 mm; MCL 2.3 ± 0.05 mm; and the FCL 3.4 ± 0.2 mm. CONCLUSION: Despite heterogeneity in the available literature with regard to stress examination techniques and device utilization, the data support that stress radiography techniques were accurate and reliable when compared to numerous alternatives in the diagnosis of acute and chronic knee ligament injuries. The present study also provides average increased ipsilateral compartment gapping/translation for specific knee ligament injuries based on the best available data. These values provide a reference standard for the interpretation of stress radiography techniques, help to guide surgical decision-making, and provide benchmark values for future investigations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Inestabilidad de la Articulación , Traumatismos de la Rodilla , Ligamento Cruzado Posterior , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Radiografía , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Ligamento Cruzado Posterior/cirugía , Ligamentos/lesiones , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess if incomplete meniscal healing during second-look arthroscopy at six to eight weeks after all-inside suture hook meniscus repair results in longer-term failure of repair in patients with restored knee stability. METHODS: From 2008 to 2013, 41 patients with post-traumatic, longitudinal, vertical, complete meniscal tears with concomitant ACL injury were treated via a two-stage surgical procedure and prospectively evaluated. In the first stage, all-inside meniscus repair was performed using suture hook passers and non-absorbable sutures. In total, there were 26 medial and 16 lateral meniscus tears. A second-stage ACL reconstruction, performed six to eight weeks later, served as an early second-look arthroscopic evaluation of meniscal healing. Clinical follow-up was performed at a minimum of 24 months. RESULTS: Second-look arthroscopy revealed 31 cases (75.6%) of complete and ten cases (24.4%) of incomplete meniscal healing. Two patients were lost prior to follow-up, and three were excluded due to recurrent instability. Therefore, 36 patients were assessed at the final follow-up. All patients with complete meniscal healing during second-look arthroscopy achieved clinical success at follow-up. Six out of nine (66.7%) of patients with incomplete meniscal healing during second-look arthroscopy achieved clinical success at follow-up (p = 0.012). One saphenous neuropathy occurred (2.4%). CONCLUSION: Incomplete meniscal healing during early second-look arthroscopy after all-inside meniscal repair using suture hook passers and non-absorbable sutures did not necessarily result in longer-term failure in patients with restored knee stability. The described method of meniscal repair was associated with a low rate of symptomatic re-tears and complications.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Artroscopía/efectos adversos , Artroscopía/métodos , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugía , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Arthroscopy in popliteal cyst surgery enables addressing all components of its pathomechanism: the cyst wall, valvular mechanism, and concomitant intra-articular pathologies. Techniques differ as to the management of the cyst wall and the valvular mechanism. This study aimed to assess the recurrence rate and functional outcomes of a cyst wall and valve excising arthroscopic technique with concurrent intra-articular pathology management. The secondary purpose was to assess cyst and valve morphology and concomitant intra-articular findings. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2012, 118 patients with symptomatic popliteal cysts refractory to at least three months of guided physiotherapy were operated on by a single surgeon using a cyst wall and valve excising arthroscopic technique with intra-articular pathology management. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at a mean follow-up of 39 months (range 12-71) by ultrasound, Rauschning and Lindgren, Lysholm, and VAS of perceived satisfaction scales. RESULTS: Ninety-seven out of 118 cases were available for follow-up. Recurrence was observed on ultrasound in 12/97 cases (12.4%); however, it was symptomatic only in 2/97 cases (2.1%). Mean scores improved: Rauschning and Lindgren from 2.2 to 0.4, Lysholm from 54 to 86, and VAS of perceived satisfaction from 5.0 to 9.0. No persistent complications occurred. Arthroscopy revealed simple cyst morphology in 72/97 (74.2%) and presence of a valvular mechanism in all cases. The most prevalent intra-articular pathologies were medial meniscus (48.5%) and chondral lesions (33.0%). There were significantly more recurrences in grade III-IV chondral lesions (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic popliteal cyst treatment had a low recurrence rate and good functional outcomes. Severe chondral lesions increase the risk of cyst recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Quiste Poplíteo , Cirujanos , Humanos , Quiste Poplíteo/cirugía , Cistectomía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Artroscopía/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In irreducible bucket-handle medial meniscal tears (BHMMTs), the displaced central fragment is rotated 180° or more, meaning reduction is impossible without derotation of the tear. In chronic cases, the rotated meniscus is deformed and degenerated; thus, the issue of reproducibility and repairability arises. This study presents the clinical outcomes of chronic irreducible and unstable locked BHMMTs. Radiological outcomes were also evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 37 patients with 11 cases of irreducible BHMMT and 26 cases of reducible but unstable chronic BHMMT who underwent operations between 2011 and 2016. Posterior arthroscopy was performed after temporary meniscus fixation using a provisional needle fixation technique. After the posterior repair with vertical mattress sutures was completed using an all-inside technique, the classic outside-in technique was performed for the anterior third of the meniscus. The Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Tegner activity scores were obtained from all patients before surgery and at the latest follow-up. Radiological evaluations were performed using MRI before surgery and at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2016, a total of 37 consecutive patients with irreducible and chronic BHMMTs underwent surgery. The average postoperative follow-up was 7.2 ± 1.4 years (mean ± SD). Postoperative Lysholm (89.57 ± 2.7) and IKDC (87.22 ± 3.2) scores improved significantly at the last follow-up when compared with the pre-operative scores (38.44 ± 4.5 and 23.52 ± 7.8, respectively). According to the Tegner activity scale, patients' postoperative activity levels remained unchanged compared to preoperative levels at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Posterior knee arthroscopy with the all-inside posterior suture and inside-out anteromedial suture technique presented in this study yielded excellent clinical outcomes when used to repair chronic irreducible or unstable BHMMTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de la Rodilla , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/cirugía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugía , Artroscopía/métodosRESUMEN
Meniscal root repairs are susceptible to unrecoverable loosening that may displace the meniscus from the initial position reduced during surgery. Despite this, the effects of a loosened meniscal root repair on knee mechanics are unknown. We hypothesized that anatomic root repairs without loosening would restore knee mechanics to the intact condition better than loosened anatomic root repairs, but that loosened repairs would restore mechanics better than untreated meniscal root tears. Finite element knee models were used to evaluate changes in cartilage and meniscus mechanics due to repair loosening. The mechanical response from loosened anatomic root repairs was compared to anatomic repairs without loosening and untreated root tears. All conditions were evaluated at three flexion angles, 0 deg, 30 deg, and 60 deg, and a compressive force of 1000 N to simulate return-to-activity loading. The two-simple suture method was represented within the models to simulate posteromedial meniscal root repairs and the loosening of repairs was derived from previous biomechanical experimental data. Loosening decreased hoop stresses throughout the meniscus, increased posterior extrusion, and shifted loading through the meniscus-cartilage region to the cartilage-cartilage region compared to the anatomic root repair without loosening. Despite differences between repairs and loosened repairs, the changes from loosened repairs more closely resembled the anatomic repair without loosening than the untreated root repair condition. Therefore, meniscal root repairs are susceptible to loosening that will prevent a successful initial repair from remaining in the intended position and will alter cartilage and meniscus mechanics, although repairs that loosen appear better than leaving tears untreated.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Traumatismos de la Rodilla , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Análisis de Elementos Finitos , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugíaRESUMEN
The anterolateral complex (ALC) of the knee has received renewed research interest because of the potential role of this anatomic region in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear biomechanics and surgical treatment outcomes. The primary structures of the ALC include the iliotibial band deep (Kaplan) fibers, the anterolateral ligament (ALL), and the capsulo-osseous layer (COL) of the iliotibial band, although there remains disagreement on the precise anatomic locations and biomechanical relevance of these structures. Sectioning studies in the ACL-deficient knee have revealed a contribution of the ALC in restraining tibial internal rotation and anterior translation. Biomechanical studies have revealed a potential role for lateral extra-articular reconstruction as an augmentation to ACL reconstruction in knees with combined ACL and ALC sectioning. Clinical studies have reported a reduced ACL reconstruction failure rate with both ALL reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodesis procedures.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Inestabilidad de la Articulación , Tenodesis , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Cadáver , Humanos , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Tenodesis/métodosRESUMEN
Meniscal tear patterns associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, such as root tears and ramp lesions are common but less easily recognized on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with a complete radial tear or a locked bucket-handle tear. Timely treatment of these tears improves outcomes in the setting of ACL reconstruction. While physical examination does not enable a definitive diagnosis of meniscal root tears and ramp lesions, high-grade laxity, including a 3+ Lachman and 3+ pivot shift, should raise suspicions for these tear patterns. MRI allows visualization of both root tears and ramp lesions, although the gold standard for diagnosis is probing at the time of arthroscopy due to a high false-negative rate on MRI. Up to 17% of patients with an ACL tear have a lateral meniscal root tear; a contact mechanism and increased posterior slope are both associated with a greater incidence of lateral meniscal root tears and these are repaired with a tunnel technique. Meniscal ramp lesions occur in up to 41% of patients with ACL tears due to a contact mechanism, and we prefer repair with an inside-out technique. More than 60% of complete radial meniscal tears occur in the setting of ACL tears and are preferentially repaired with a hashtag technique for minimally separated tears and a 2-tunnel technique combined with an inside-out repair for more severe tears. Bucket-handle tears are more common in the setting of chronic ACL deficiency; concurrent with ACL reconstruction urgent meniscal repair with an inside-out technique is the gold standard, which allows for precise approximation of the tear with multiple points of fixation for improved biomechanical performance. It is critical to identify and treat these tears during ACL reconstruction because of their role as secondary stabilizers and for long-term chondral protection.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/epidemiología , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Humanos , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To obtain a comprehensive list of pathologies that cause increased anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) forces and pathologic knee kinematics to evaluate for in both primary and revision ACL reconstruction to decrease the risk of subsequent graft overload. METHODS: An electronic search was performed in the Embase and MEDLINE databases for the period between January 1, 1990, and December 10, 2020. All articles investigating medial and lateral meniscal injury, (postero)lateral corner injury, (postero)medial corner/medial collateral ligament injury, valgus alignment, varus alignment, and tibial slope in relation to ACL (graft) force and knee kinematics were included. RESULTS: Data of 43 studies were included. The studies reported that high-volume medial and lateral meniscectomies, peripheral meniscus tears, medial meniscus ramp tears, lateral meniscus root tears, posterolateral corner injuries, medial collateral ligament tears, increased tibial slope, and valgus and varus alignment were reported to have a significant impact on ACL (graft) force and related knee kinematics. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review on biomechanical cadaver studies provides a rationale to systematically identify and treat pathologies in ACL-injured knees, because when undiagnosed or left untreated, these specific concomitant pathologies could lead to ACL graft overload in both primary and revision ACL-reconstructed knees. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: it is necessary that orthopaedic surgeons who treat ACL-injured knees understand the surgically relevant biomechanical consequences of additional pathologies and use this knowledge to optimize treatment in ACL-injured patients.