Comparison of lumen-apposing metal stents versus double-pigtail plastic stents for infected necrotising pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVE: Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are believed to clinically improve endoscopic transluminal drainage of infected necrosis when compared with double-pigtail plastic stents. However, comparative data from prospective studies are very limited. DESIGN: Patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis, who underwent an endoscopic step-up approach with LAMS within a multicentre prospective cohort study were compared with the data of 51 patients in the randomised TENSION trial who had been assigned to the endoscopic step-up approach with double-pigtail plastic stents. The clinical study protocol was otherwise identical for both groups. Primary end point was the need for endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy. Secondary end points included mortality, major complications, hospital stay and healthcare costs. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were treated with LAMS in 16 hospitals during 27 months. The need for endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy was 64% (n=34) and was not different from the previous trial using plastic stents (53%, n=27)), also after correction for baseline characteristics (OR 1.21 (95% CI 0.45 to 3.23)). Secondary end points did not differ between groups either, which also included bleeding requiring intervention-5 patients (9%) after LAMS placement vs 11 patients (22%) after placement of plastic stents (relative risk 0.44; 95% CI 0.16 to 1.17). Total healthcare costs were also comparable (mean difference -€6348, bias-corrected and accelerated 95% CI -€26 386 to €10 121). CONCLUSION: Our comparison of two patient groups from two multicentre prospective studies with a similar design suggests that LAMS do not reduce the need for endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy when compared with double-pigtail plastic stents in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis. Also, the rate of bleeding complications was comparable.

Continuous monitoring of colonoscopy performance in the Netherlands: first results of a nationwide registry.

BACKGROUND: To optimize colonoscopy quality, several performance measures have been developed. These are usually assessed without distinction between the indications for colonoscopy. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of linking two national registries (one for colonoscopy and one for adverse events of gastrointestinal endoscopies in the Netherlands), and to describe the results of colonoscopy quality per indication. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted with prospectively collected data of the Dutch Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Audit (DGEA) and the Dutch Registration of Complications in Endoscopy (DRCE). Data between 01-01-2016 and 01-01-2019 were analyzed. To calculate adverse event rates, data were linked at the level of endoscopy service. RESULTS: During the 3-year study period, 266 981 colonoscopies were recorded in DGEA. Of all indications, cecal intubation rate was highest in fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive screening colonoscopies (97.1 %), followed by surveillance (93.2 %), diagnostic (90.7 %), and therapeutic colonoscopies (83.1 %). The highest rate of adequate bowel preparation was observed in FIT-positive screening colonoscopies (97.1 %). A total of 1540 colonoscopy-related adverse events occurred (0.58 % of all colonoscopies). Bleeding and perforation and rates were highest for therapeutic (1.56 % and 0.51 %, respectively) and FIT-positive screening (0.72 % and 0.06 %, respectively) colonoscopies. The colonoscopy-related mortality was 0.006 %. CONCLUSION: This study describes the first results of the Dutch national colonoscopy registry, which was successfully linked to data from the national registry for adverse events of gastrointestinal endoscopies. In this large dataset, performance varied between indications. Our results emphasize the importance of defining benchmarks per indication in future guidelines.

Dutch Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Audit: automated extraction of colonoscopy data for quality assessment and improvement.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The importance of having quality assessment, assurance, and improvement tools in health care is increasingly recognized. However, the additional associated administration burden progressively interferes with the structural implementation and adoption of such tools, especially when it concerns high-volume procedures such as colonoscopies. The development of the Dutch Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Audit (DGEA), a registry with automated extraction of colonoscopy quality data, and its first results are described. METHODS: In close cooperation with commercial endoscopy reporting systems and a national histopathology database, healthcare professionals performing colonoscopies initiated a quality registry that extracts data from its core hospital resource or histology database without manual interference of the healthcare providers. Data extracted consisted of patient age, gender, indication of the colonoscopy, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Boston Bowel Preparation Score, and cecal intubation; for the colonoscopy after a positive fecal immunochemical test in the colorectal cancer screening program, other data were polyp detection rate, which was available for all 48 hospitals or endoscopy centers, and adenoma detection rate, which was available for 26 hospitals or endoscopy centers. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2016 and March 31, 2019, 48 hospitals or endoscopy centers voluntarily participated in the DGEA, and 275,017 unique patients with 313,511 colonoscopies were registered. Overall missing values were limited to <1%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that it is feasible to deploy a quality registry collecting uniform data without additional administration burden for healthcare professionals.

Radiological Position and Clinical Outcome of Preoperative Self-Expanding Metal Stents for Obstructing Colonic Cancer: A Single-Centre Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative placement of self-expanding metal stents is used in patients with obstructing colon carcinoma to prevent an emergency operation. The perceived benefits remain the subject of discussion. The data-evaluating function and complications of stents in relation to radiological position are limited. METHODS: Patients receiving a preoperative stent between 2003 and 2013 were retrospectively analysed in this single-centre study. We analysed radiological deployment, eccentricity and angulation of the stent directly after placement. Endpoints were clinical success (resolution of ileus), complications needing non-elective surgery (blow-out, perforation, persistent ileus, dislocation) and other complications (bleeding, infiltrate). Associations were corrected for other potential influences. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included. In 22 patients (26.8%), the stent was placed proximal to the splenic flexure. Clinical success was present in 85.4%. Twenty-two patients (26.8%) had a complication of which 16 (19.5%) underwent urgent surgery for insufficient functioning of the stent; there were two blow-outs (2.4%). A more symmetrically placed stent was associated with clinical success (p = 0.042), with large overlap between groups. However, no association was found with non-elective surgery or complications. Also, angulation and deployment were unassociated with these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We could not establish an association between symmetry, angulation or deployment of self-expandable colonic stents with clinical success and complications.

Hyoscine N-butylbromide does not improve polyp detection during colonoscopy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is used for the detection of neoplastic polyps, although a significant miss rate has been reported. Limited data suggest that the administration of the antispasmodic hyoscine N-butylbromide during colonoscopy improves polyp detection. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the use of 20 mg hyoscine N-butylbromide intravenously during colonoscopy improves polyp detection or removal. DESIGN: A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, clinical trial. SETTING: Nonacademic teaching hospital. PATIENTS: This study involved 674 patients who were routinely referred and accepted for either diagnostic or screening colonoscopy. INTERVENTION: Intravenous injection of either 1 mL hyoscine N-butylbromide (n = 340) or 0.9% NaCl solution (n = 334) when withdrawal was started. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and the advanced lesion detection rate (ALDR), 5% trimmed mean number of polyps, mean withdrawal time. RESULTS: The cecal intubation rate was 96%. The PDR, ADR, and ALDR were 56% versus 60%, 30% versus 31%, and 14% versus 14% in the hyoscine N-butylbromide and placebo groups, respectively (all P values > .25). The means of the total number of detected, removed, and harvested polyps per patient were 1.13 versus 1.21, 1.03 versus 1.06, and 0.89 versus 0.89 in the hyoscine N-butylbromide and placebo groups, respectively (all P values > .37). Mean withdrawal time was 561 versus 584 seconds in the hyoscine N-butylbromide and placebo groups, respectively (P = .34). Multivariate analysis demonstrated no effect of hyoscine N-butylbromide on the investigated parameters. LIMITATIONS: Only experienced colonoscopists participated in the study. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence to support the use of hyoscine N-butylbromide during withdrawal of the colonoscope to improve polyp detection or removal. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN25405865.).

[A woman with chest pain]. / Een vrouw met pijn op de borst.

A 62-year-old Turkish woman presented at the emergency department with severe chest pain caused by a large, submucosal oesophageal haematoma.