Prevalence of homologous recombination biomarkers in multiple tumor types: an observational study.

Aim: To determine the prevalence of deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and in 13 genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR), the prevalence of genomic loss of heterozygosity and the allelic and hereditary status of BRCA1, BRCA2 and other HRR gene mutations in multiple solid tumor types. Patients & methods: This was a retrospective observational study of patients with an advanced/metastatic diagnosis in one of 15 solid tumor types, who were identified in a real-world clinico-genomic database. Results: Tumor tissue samples from 9457 patients were analyzed, among which 4.7% had known or suspected deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations. The prevalence (range) of mutations in HRR genes was 13.6% (2.4%-26.0%) and genomic loss of heterozygosity ≥16% was 20.6% (2.6-34.4%) across all tumor types. Conclusion: The prevalence of mutations varied significantly depending on the type of tumor.

The integrity of the human genome is maintained via multiple pathways of DNA repair, one of the most important of which is homologous recombination repair (HRR), which uses a sister chromatid as a template for high-fidelity restoration of altered DNA sequences. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of deleterious mutations, i.e., changes in the genetic code that interfere with proper cellular function, in the breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 and in 13 other genes involved in HRR in various types of solid tumors in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer. The researchers found that 4.7% of tumor samples had BRCA1/2 mutations, 13.6% had mutations in any of the HRR genes and 20.6% had genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH) of at least 16% i.e., loss of sections of chromosomes affecting 16% or more of the genome. BRCA1/2 mutations were most common in ovarian cancer (13.1%), prostate cancer (9.3%), breast cancer (8.2%) and pancreatic cancer (4.9%). Prevalence for mutations in HRR genes ranges from 2.4 to 26.0% and gLOH ≥16% ranged from 2.6 to 34.4% depending on the tumor type. In conclusion, the prevalence of mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes, HRR genes and gLOH ≥16% varied widely across 15 tumor types.

Biomarker Testing Journey Among Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors and Treatment Patterns by Homologous Recombination Repair Status: A Clinico-Genomic Database Study.

INTRODUCTION: Defects in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway can include mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCAm) and other HRR genes (HRRm). These mutations are associated with a homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) phenotype. We evaluated testing journey and treatment patterns by BRCAm, HRRm, and HRD status in a real-world dataset. METHODS: Deidentified data for patients who had undergone comprehensive genomic profiling using FoundationOne®CDx were collected through December 31, 2020, from a real-world multi-tumor clinico-genomic database (CGDB) capturing data from clinics in the United States. Patients eligible for inclusion in this analysis had a confirmed diagnosis with advanced or metastatic disease between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, for 1 of 15 solid tumor types. Objectives were to evaluate patient treatment patterns by BRCAm, HRRm, and HRD status and to describe the timing of when (throughout disease course) comprehensive genomic profiling was performed. RESULTS: Among 9457 patients included in the overall population with evaluable biomarker status, 7856 (83.1%) received ≥ 1 systemic therapy. Among the 7856 patients who received systemic therapy, 2324 (30.0%) underwent testing before first-line therapy, 4114 (52.4%) were tested after receiving first-line therapy and before receiving subsequent therapy (if any), 970 (12.3%) were tested after second-line therapy and before receiving subsequent therapy (if any), and 447 (5.7%) patients underwent testing after receiving third-line therapy. A higher proportion of patients with BRCAm, HRRm, or HRD-positive status were treated with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors across all lines of therapy. There was no evidence of a meaningful difference in the proportion of patients who received other treatment (including chemotherapy and immunotherapy) by BRCAm, HRRm, or HRD status. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients from this real-world dataset underwent FoundationOne®CDx testing after initiation of first-line treatment. Testing appeared to influence treatment patterns, with a higher proportion of patients with BRCAm, HRRm, and HRD-positive disease receiving PARP inhibitors.

Targeting NRAS via miR-1304-5p or farnesyltransferase inhibition confers sensitivity to ALK inhibitors in ALK-mutant neuroblastoma.

Targeting Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is a promising therapeutic strategy for aberrant ALK-expressing malignancies including neuroblastoma, but resistance to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK TKI) is a distinct possibility necessitating drug combination therapeutic approaches. Using high-throughput, genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screens, we identify miR-1304-5p loss as a desensitizer to ALK TKIs in aberrant ALK-expressing neuroblastoma; inhibition of miR-1304-5p decreases, while mimics of this miRNA increase the sensitivity of neuroblastoma cells to ALK TKIs. We show that miR-1304-5p targets NRAS, decreasing cell viability via induction of apoptosis. It follows that the farnesyltransferase inhibitor (FTI) lonafarnib in addition to ALK TKIs act synergistically in neuroblastoma, inducing apoptosis in vitro. In particular, on combined treatment of neuroblastoma patient derived xenografts with an FTI and an ALK TKI complete regression of tumour growth is observed although tumours rapidly regrow on cessation of therapy. Overall, our data suggests that combined use of ALK TKIs and FTIs, constitutes a therapeutic approach to treat high risk neuroblastoma although prolonged therapy is likely required to prevent relapse.