Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Ann Surg ; 269(5): 827-835, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30252681

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare, in a phase 3, prospective, randomized, multi-center clinical trial functional outcome of reconstruction procedures following total mesorectal excision (TME). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Intestinal continuity reconstruction following TME is accompanied by postoperative defecation dysfunctions known as "anterior resection syndrome." Commonly used reconstruction techniques are straight colorectal anastomosis (SCA), colon J -pouch (CJP), and side-to-end anastomosis (SEA). Comparison of their functional outcomes in prospective, randomized, multi-center studies, including long-term assessments, is lacking. METHODS: Patients requiring TME for histologically proven rectal tumor, with or without neoadjuvant treatment, age ≥ 18 years, normal sphincter function without history of incontinence, any pretreatment staging or adenoma, expected R0-resection, were randomized for standardized SCA, CJP, or SEA procedures. Primary endpoint was comparison of composite evacuation scores 12 months after TME. Comparison of composite evacuation and incontinence scores at 6, 18 and 24 months after surgery, morbidity, and overall survival represented secondary endpoints. Analysis was based on "per protocol" (PP) population, fully complying with trial requirements, and intention-to treat (ITT) population. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-six patients from 15 hospitals were randomized. PP population included 257 patients (JCP = 63; SEA = 95; SCA = 99). Composite evacuation scores of PP and ITT populations did not show statistically significant differences among the 3 groups at any time point. Similarly, composite incontinence scores for PP and ITT populations showed no statistically significant difference among the 3 trial arms at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: Within boundaries of investigated procedures, surgeons in charge may continue to perform reconstruction of intestinal continuity following TME at their technical preference.


Asunto(s)
Colon/cirugía , Reservorios Cólicos , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Suiza , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 26(11): 3568-3576, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31228136

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Functional outcomes of different reconstruction techniques have an impact on patients' quality of life (QoL), but information on long-term QoL is lacking. We compared QoL among three reconstruction techniques after total mesorectal excision (TME). METHODS: Quality of life was assessed within a randomized, multicenter trial comparing rectal surgery using side-to-end anastomosis (SEA), colon J-pouch (CJP), and straight colorectal anastomosis (SCA) by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal scale (FACT-C) before randomization and every 6 months up to 2 years post-TME. The primary QoL endpoint was the change in the Trial Outcome Index (TOI), including the FACT-C subscales of physical and functional well-being and colorectal cancer symptoms (CSS), from baseline to month 12. Pair-wise comparisons of changes from baseline (presurgery) to each timepoint between the three arms were analyzed by Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: For the QoL analysis, 257 of 336 randomized patients were in the per protocol evaluation (SEA = 95; CJP = 63; SCA = 99). Significant differences between the reconstruction techniques were found for selected QoL scales up to 12 months, all in favor of CJP. Patients with SEA or SCA reported a clinically relevant deterioration for TOI and CSS at 6 months, those with SCA for CSS also at 12 months after TME. Patients with CJP remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Although the three reconstruction techniques differ in their effects on QoL at months 6 and 12, these differences did not persist over the whole observation period of 24 months. Patients with a colon J-pouch may benefit with respect to QoL in the short-term.


Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Reservorios Cólicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida , Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Recto/patología
3.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 32(1): 57-74, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27714521

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate in a multicenter cohort study the radicality of colorectal cancer resections, to assess the oncosurgical quality of colorectal specimens, and to compare the performance between centers. METHODS: One German and nine Swiss hospitals agreed to prospectively register all patients with primary colorectal cancer resected between September 2001 and June 2005. The median number of eligible patients with one primary tumor included per center was 95 (range 12-204). RESULTS: The following variations of median values or percentages between centers were found: length of bowel specimen 20-39 cm (25.8 cm), maximum height of mesocolon 6.5-12.5 cm (9.0 cm), number of examined lymph nodes 9-24 (16), distance to nearer bowel resection margin in colon cancer 4.8-12 cm (7 cm), and in rectal cancer 2-3 cm (2.5 cm), central ligation of major artery 40-97 % (71 %), blood loss 200-500 ml (300 ml), need for perioperative blood transfusion 5-40 % (19 %), tumor opened during mobilization 0-11 % (5 %), T4-tumors not en-bloc resected 0-33 % (4 %), inadvertent perforation of mesocolon/mesorectum 0-8 % (4 %), no-touch isolation technique 36-86 % (67 %), abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer 0-30 % (17 %), rectal cancer specimen with circumferential margin ≤1 mm 0-19 % (10 %), in-hospital mortality 0-6 % (2 %), anastomotic leak or intra-abdominal abscess 0-17 % (7 %), re-operation 0-17 % (8 %). CONCLUSION: In colorectal cancer, surgery considerable variations between different centers were found with regard to radicality and oncosurgical quality, suggesting a potential for targeted improvement of surgical technique.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Tratamiento de Urgencia , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias del Recto/epidemiología , Suiza/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
5.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 4: 57, 2009 Oct 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19860925

RESUMEN

Abrikossoff tumors are a rare tumor entity. The complication of a hemothorax has not been described in the literature so far. A 24-year-old patient presented with repeated hemoptysis and right thoracic pain. The initial CT-scan revealed a solid tumor mass in the right lower bronchus. After further diagnostics, the patient was discharged and surgical intervention was planned. He was readmitted 4 days after discharge with a spontaneous hemothorax. After the right lower lobectomy and an uneventful course the patient recovered well.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Bronquios/cirugía , Tumor de Células Granulares/cirugía , Hemotórax/cirugía , Neumonectomía/métodos , Biopsia/métodos , Neoplasias de los Bronquios/diagnóstico por imagen , Broncoscopía , Tumor de Células Granulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Tumor de Células Granulares/patología , Hemotórax/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Radiografía , Reoperación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA