Diagnosis of advanced cervical cancer, missed opportunities?

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is common worldwide. Despite the existence of primary and secondary prevention strategies, the survival rate is decreasing in France due to an increasing proportion of advanced-stage cancer. Our objective was to determine the factors associated with a diagnosis of cervical cancer at advanced stages in an urban population in France. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on all consecutive records of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer between January 2006 and December 2018 in a single center in Paris. The data collected were demographic characteristics, medical and gynecological history, circumstances of diagnosis, diagnostic and therapeutic management. The patients were divided into two groups according to the FIGO 2018 stage at diagnosis: group A stages IA1 to IB2 and group B advanced stages IB3 to IVB. RESULTS: Among 96 patients who were diagnosed with cervical cancer, 25 (26%) were in group A and 71 (74%) in group B. Women in group B had less frequently received regular gynecological care than in group A (36% vs 84.2%, p < 0.001) and fewer had Pap test screening in the previous 3 years (30.4% vs 95.0%, p < 0.001). Parity greater than 3 was more frequent in group B (69.6% vs 42.9%, p = 0.031). The diagnosis was made during a routine examination or cervical smear in only 9.23% and 16.18% respectively in group B, versus 60% of cases in 45.82% of cases in group A (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003). Vaginal bleeding was observed in 85.29% in group B versus 36% in group A (p < 0.001). Histological type was squamous cell carcinoma 87.32% of group B and 56% of group A (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of cervical cancers at advanced stages occurred mostly in women who did not benefit from the recommended screening. Universal access to screening is necessary for the prevention and early treatment of cervical cancer.

Impact of Crohn's disease on obstetrical management.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) may have perineal lesions or a history of anorectal surgery that raise concerns about complications during delivery resulting in a discussion of cesarean section. Our objective was to study the impact of CD on the mode of delivery. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective study between 2005 and 2019 of the pregnancy outcomes of patients with CD. The primary endpoint was the performance of a cesarean section for a reason related to CD. RESULTS: Among 76 consecutive pregnancies, 19 patients underwent CD-related cesarean section (25%). The main element associated with scheduling a cesarean section was the existence of perineal involvement in 94.7% of cases, compared to 12.3% in the rest of the CD population (p<0.05). The perineal lesions most often involved were fistulas (47.4% versus 1.7%; p = 0.042). There was a history of perineal surgery in 78.9% of cases in the cesarean group vs 10,5% (p < 0.05) and a history of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in 10.5% of cases vs. 0 (p = 0.047). In women who gave birth vaginally, there were 17.9% episiotomy and one case of OASI (2.6%). CONCLUSION: The factors that influenced the choice of delivery route were perineal damage, history of perineal surgery and history of OASI.

Vaginal cervico-isthmic cerclage versus McDonald cerclage in women with a previous failure of prophylactic cerclage: A retrospective study.

AIM: Compare preterm births before 30 weeks of gestation in women with a previous failed McDonald cerclage that benefit from another McDonald cerclage (or simplified Shirodkar cerclage) or a vaginal cervico-isthmic cerclage. METHODS: Women with a cerclage performed at the end of the first trimester of a singleton pregnancy with a previous failed prophylactic McDonald cerclage were included in this mutlicenric study involving four teaching hospitals. Comparisons between groups were done using a chi square test and a student t-test. RESULTS: We enrolled130 women, 85 in the vaginal cervico-isthmic cerclage group and 45 in the classic cerclage group. There was no significant difference in the rate of delivery after 30 weeks of gestation (92 versus 93% p=0.75). However in the cervico isthmic cerclage, women were significantly older, presented more late foetal loss and fewer live children in the cervico-isthmic cerclage group. Rate of antenatal hospitalization andantenatal corticotherapy were significantly higher in the classic cerclage group (69% versus 46%, p<0.05 and 56% versus 29%, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Rate of delivery before 30 weeks of gestation was not significantly different between the two groups, but women in the vaginal cervico-isthmic cerclage group seem to be at higher risk for late foetal loss or premature delivery. This procedure generates less threatened premature delivery, thus, less hospitalization and antenatal corticotherapy. These arguments are important for women with previous pregnancy loss.

Predictive factors for failure of pelvic arterial embolization for postpartum hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of pelvic embolization in women with postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and to determine factors associated with embolization failure. METHODS: In a retrospective observational study, data were analyzed from 98 consecutive women who underwent pelvic embolization for intractable PPH between January 2007 and November 2009 at Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France. Women with persistent PPH despite pelvic embolization were compared with women who had cessation of hemorrhage and attained hemodynamic stability. RESULTS: Among the 98 women, 66 (67.3%) had been transferred from another hospital after delivery. Pelvic arterial embolization failed to control PPH in 8 (8.2%) women. On univariate analysis, factors significantly associated with embolization failure were the presence of placenta accreta (P<0.005), hemoglobin level (P<0.05), prothrombin time (P<0.04), fibrinogen level (P<0.03), red blood transfusion (P<0.02), number of packed red blood cell units transfused (P<0.05), and fresh-frozen plasma transfusion (P<0.02). Hospital-to-hospital transfer with a notable time interval between delivery and embolization was not associated with increased risk of failure. CONCLUSION: Predictive factors significantly associated with failed pelvic arterial embolization were the presence of placenta accreta, biologic factors, and transfusional factors. Delay due to inter-hospital transfer did not affect the outcome of embolization.