Management of Patients With Cardiac Arrest Requiring Interfacility Transport: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

People who experience out-of-hospital cardiac arrest often require care at a regional center for continued treatment after resuscitation, but many do not initially present to the hospital where they will be admitted. For patients who require interfacility transport after cardiac arrest, the decision to transfer between centers is complex and often based on individual clinical characteristics, resources at the presenting hospital, and available transport resources. Once the decision has been made to transfer a patient after cardiac arrest, there is little direct guidance on how best to provide interfacility transport. Accepting centers depend on transferring emergency departments and emergency medical services professionals to make important and nuanced decisions about postresuscitation care that may determine the efficacy of future treatments. The consequences of early care are greater when transport delays occur, which is common in rural areas or due to inclement weather. Challenges of providing interfacility transfer services for patients who have experienced cardiac arrest include varying expertise of clinicians, differing resources available to them, and nonstandardized communication between transferring and receiving centers. Although many aspects of care are insufficiently studied to determine implications for specific out-of-hospital treatment on outcomes, a general approach of maintaining otherwise recommended postresuscitation care during interfacility transfer is reasonable. This includes close attention to airway, vascular access, ventilator management, sedation, cardiopulmonary monitoring, antiarrhythmic treatments, blood pressure control, temperature control, and metabolic management. Patient stability for transfer, equity and inclusion, and communication also must be considered. Many of these aspects can be delivered by protocol-driven care.

Organ Donation After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.

AIM OF THE REVIEW: Improving rates of organ donation among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who do not survive is an opportunity to save countless lives. The objectives of this scientific statement were to do the following: define the opportunity for organ donation among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; identify challenges and opportunities associated with organ donation by patients with cardiac arrest; identify strategies, including a generic protocol for organ donation after cardiac arrest, to increase the rate and consistency of organ donation from this population; and provide rationale for including organ donation as a key clinical outcome for all future cardiac arrest clinical trials and registries. METHODS: The scope of this International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation scientific statement was approved by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation board and the American Heart Association, posted on ILCOR.org for public comment, and then assigned by section to primary and secondary authors. A unique literature search was completed and updated for each section. RESULTS: There are a number of defining pathways for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to become organ donors; however, modifications in the Maastricht classification system need to be made to correctly identify these donors and to report outcomes with consistency. Suggested modifications to the minimum data set for reporting cardiac arrests will increase reporting of organ donation as an important resuscitation outcome. There are a number of challenges with implementing uncontrolled donation after cardiac death protocols, and the greatest impediment is the lack of legislation in most countries to mandate organ donation as the default option. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation has the potential to increase organ donation rates, but more research is needed to derive neuroprognostication rules to guide clinical decision-making about when to stop extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and to evaluate cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: All health systems should develop, implement, and evaluate protocols designed to optimize organ donation opportunities for patients who have an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and failed attempts at resuscitation.

The Effect of Time to Treatment With Antiarrhythmic Drugs on Survival and Neurological Outcomes in Shock Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

OBJECTIVES: Examining the association of time to treatment (drug or placebo) with survival to hospital discharge and neurologic outcome. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Amiodarone, Lidocaine, Placebo randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Emergency medical services enrolled patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) at multiple North American sites. PATIENTS: Adults with nontraumatic OHCA and an initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia refractory to at least one defibrillation attempt were included. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used logistic regression to examine the association of time to treatment with survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurologic status at discharge (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 3) for the three treatment groups including an interaction term between treatment and time to treatment to determine the effect of time on treatment effects. Time to treatment data were available for 2,994 out of 3,026 patients (99%). The proportion of patients who survived to hospital discharge decreased as time to drug administration increased, in amiodarone (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.93 per min), lidocaine (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.91-0.96), and placebo (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.93). Comparing amiodarone to placebo, there was improved survival at all times of drug administration (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.05-1.65). Comparing lidocaine to placebo, survival was not different with shorter times to drug administration (< 11 min), whereas survival was higher with lidocaine at longer times to drug administration with an interaction between treatment effect and time to treatment (p = 0.048). Survival with good neurologic outcome showed similar results for all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Survival and favorable neurologic outcomes decreased with longer times to drug administration. Amiodarone improved survival at all time points whereas lidocaine improved survival only at later time points, compared with placebo.

Epinephrine for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials evaluating epinephrine for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. DATA SOURCES: The search included MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ovid Evidence-Based Medicine, clinical trial registries, and bibliographies. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials that compared the current standard dose of epinephrine to placebo, high or low dose epinephrine, any other vasopressor alone or in combination were screened by three independent reviewers. DATA EXTRACTION: Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials that compared the current standard dose of epinephrine to placebo, high or low dose epinephrine, any other vasopressor alone or in combination were screened by three independent reviewers. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 17 trials (21,510 patients) were included; seven were judged to be at high risk of bias. Compared to placebo, pooled results from two trials showed that standard dose of epinephrine increased return of spontaneous circulation (risk ratio, 3.09; 95% CI, 2.82-3.89), survival to hospital admission (risk ratio, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.68-3.72), and survival to discharge (risk ratio, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.11-1.86). The largest placebo-controlled trial showed that standard dose of epinephrine also improved survival at 30 days and 3 months but not neurologic outcomes, standard dose of epinephrine decreased return of spontaneous circulation (risk ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98) and survival to admission (risk ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99) when compared with high dose epinephrine. There were no differences in outcomes between standard dose of epinephrine and vasopressin alone or in combination with epinephrine. CONCLUSIONS: Largely based on one randomized controlled trial, standard dose of epinephrine improved overall survival but not neurologic outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients compared with placebo. There is a paucity of trials with meaningful patient outcomes; future epinephrine trials should evaluate dose and method of delivery on long-term survival, neurologic function, and quality of life after cardiac arrest.

Screening strategies to identify sepsis in the prehospital setting: a validation study.

BACKGROUND: In the prehospital setting, differentiating patients who have sepsis from those who have infection but no organ dysfunction is important to initiate sepsis treatments appropriately. We aimed to identify which published screening strategies for paramedics to use in identifying patients with sepsis provide the most certainty for prehospital diagnosis. METHODS: We identified published strategies for screening by paramedics through a literature search. We then conducted a validation study in Alberta, Canada, from April 2015 to March 2016. For adult patients (≥ 18 yr) who were transferred by ambulance, we linked records to an administrative database and then restricted the search to patients with infection diagnosed in the emergency department. For each patient, the classification from each strategy was determined and compared with the diagnosis recorded in the emergency department. For all strategies that generated numeric scores, we constructed diagnostic prediction models to estimate the probability of sepsis being diagnosed in the emergency department. RESULTS: We identified 21 unique prehospital screening strategies, 14 of which had numeric scores. We linked a total of 131 745 eligible patients to hospital databases. No single strategy had both high sensitivity (overall range 0.02-0.85) and high specificity (overall range 0.38-0.99) for classifying sepsis. However, the Critical Illness Prediction (CIP) score, the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and the Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score predicted a low to high probability of a sepsis diagnosis at different scores. The qSOFA identified patients with a 7% (lowest score) to 87% (highest score) probability of sepsis diagnosis. INTERPRETATION: The CIP, NEWS and qSOFA scores are tools with good predictive ability for sepsis diagnosis in the prehospital setting. The qSOFA score is simple to calculate and may be useful to paramedics in screening patients with possible sepsis.

Classification versus Prediction of Mortality Risk using the SIRS and qSOFA Scores in Patients with Infection Transported by Paramedics.

Objective: Identifying patients with sepsis in the prehospital setting is an important opportunity to increase timely care. When assessing clinical tools designed for paramedic sepsis identification, predicted risk may provide more useful information to support decision-making, compared to traditional estimates of classification accuracy (i.e., sensitivity and specificity). We sought to contrast classification accuracy versus predicted risk of a modified version of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome score (i.e., excluding white blood cell measure which is often unavailable to paramedics; mSIRS) and quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) for determining mortality risk among patients with infection transported by paramedics. Methods: A one-year cohort of patients with infections transported to the Emergency Department (ED) by paramedics was linked to in-hospital administrative databases. Scores were calculated using the first reported vital sign measure for each patient. We calculated sensitivity and specificity of mSIRS and qSOFA for classifying hospital mortality at different score thresholds, and estimated discrimination (using the C-statistic) and calibration (using calibration curves). Regression models for predicting hospital mortality were constructed using the mSIRS or qSOFA scores for each patient as the predictor. Results: A total of 10,409 patients with infection who were transported by paramedics were successfully linked, with an overall mortality rate of 9.2%. The mSIRS score had higher sensitivity estimates than qSOFA for classifying hospital mortality at all thresholds (mSIRS ≥ 1: 0.83 vs. qSOFA≥ 1: 0.80, mSIRS ≥ 3: 0.11 vs. qSOFA ≥ 3: 0.08), but the qSOFA score had better discrimination (C-statistic qSOFA: 0.72 vs. mSIRS: 0.63) and calibration. The risk of hospital mortality predicted by the mSIRS score ranged from 8.0 to 19% across score values, whereas the risk predicted by the qSOFA score ranged from 10 to 51%. Conclusion: Assessing the predicted risk for the mSIRS and qSOFA scores instead of classification accuracy reveals that the qSOFA score provides more information to clinicians about a patient's mortality risk, supporting its use in clinical decision-making.

Assessing Severity of Illness in Patients Transported to Hospital by Paramedics: External Validation of 3 Prognostic Scores.

Introduction: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are the first healthcare contact for the majority of severely ill patients. Physiologic measures collected by EMS, when incorporated into a prognostic score, may provide important information on patient illness severity. This study compares the predictive ability of 3 common prognostic scores for predicting clinical outcomes in EMS patients. Methods: Discrimination and calibration for predicting the primary outcome of hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes of 2-day mortality and ED disposition, were assessed for each of the scores using a one-year cohort of patients transported to hospital by EMS in Alberta, Canada. For each score, binary logistic regression was used to predict hospital mortality and 2-day mortality and ordinal logistic regression was used to predict ED disposition. Discrimination for each outcome was assessed using C-statistics, and calibration was assessed using calibration curves comparing predicted versus observed outcomes. Results: The Critical Illness Prediction [CIP], Modified Early Warning Score [MEWS], and National Early Warning Score [NEWS] were compared using 121,837 adult patients who were transported by paramedics. All scores had good discrimination for hospital mortality (C-statistic CIP: 0.79, MEWS: 0.71, NEWS: 0.78) and 2-day mortality (CIP:0.85, MEWS: 0.80, NEWS:0.85) but only moderate discrimination for ED disposition (CIP: 0.68, MEWS: 0.61, NEWS: 0.66). Calibration was reliable for hospital mortality in all scores but over-predicted risk for 2-day mortality at higher scores. Overall, the CIP score had the best discrimination, good calibration, and the greatest range of predicted probabilities (0.01 at a CIP score of 0 to 0.92 at a CIP score of 8) for hospital mortality. Conclusions: Prognostic scores using physiologic measures assessed by paramedics have good predictive ability for hospital mortality. These scores, particularly the CIP score, may be considered as a tool for mortality risk stratification or as a general measure of illness severity for patients included in EMS studies.

Strategy to Identify Paramedic Transported Sepsis Cases in an Emergency Department Administrative Database.

Background: To evaluate a new strategy for identifying sepsis in Emergency Department (ED) patients that combines administrative diagnosis codes with clinical information from the point of first contact. Methods: This study linked clinical data from adult patients transported by a provincial Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system to ED and inpatient administrative databases. Sepsis cases were identified by searching ED databases for diagnosis codes consistent with infection and organ dysfunction. Organ dysfunction was further assessed using a partial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score derived from EMS clinical information. Reliability was evaluated by comparing patients' ED diagnosis codes (ICD-10CA) to their inpatient diagnosis codes; criterion validity by comparing cases classified by the new strategy to an existing inpatient administrative algorithm; and construct validity by assessing for clinical characteristics typically associated with sepsis (e.g., mortality). Results: A total of 43,297 patients were included. ED infection codes were more reliable for classifying patients with infection than using ED sepsis codes alone (proportion of agreement with inpatient codes 79% vs. 74%; p-value < 0.001). The novel strategy requiring the presence of an infection code and either an organ dysfunction code or 2 or more SOFA points from EMS clinical information identified 1,379 more ED patients as having sepsis than the inpatient algorithm. These patients had high mortality supporting construct validity. Conclusions: Incorporation of a broader range of diagnostic codes and linking to an electronic database to obtain initial clinical information for the assessment of organ dysfunction improves reliability, criterion, and construct validity for identifying sepsis in ED patients.

What Is the Financial Impact of Orthopaedic Sequelae of Intravenous Drug Use on Urban Tertiary-care Centers?

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic sequelae such as skin and soft-tissue abscesses are frequent complications of intravenous drug use (IVDU) and comprise many of the most common indications for emergency room visits and hospitalizations within this population. Urban tertiary-care and safety-net hospitals frequently operate in challenging economic healthcare environments and are disproportionately tasked with providing care to this largely underinsured patient demographic. Although many public health initiatives have been instituted in recent years to understand the health impacts of IVDU and the spreading opioid epidemic, few efforts have been made to investigate its economic impact on healthcare systems. The inpatient treatment of orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU is a high-cost healthcare element that is critically important to understand within the current national context of inflationary healthcare costs. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What were the total healthcare costs incurred and total hospital reimbursements received in the treatment of extraspinal orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU? (2) What were the total healthcare costs incurred and total hospital reimbursements received in the treatment of spinal orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU? (3) How did patient insurance status effect the economic burden of orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU? METHODS: An internal departmental record of all successive patients requiring inpatient treatment of orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU was initiated at Boston Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA) in 2012 and MetroHealth Medical Center (Cleveland, OH, USA) in 2015. A total of 412 patient admissions between 2012 to 2017 to these two safety-net hospitals (n = 236 and n = 176, respectively) for orthopaedic complications of IVDU were included in the study. These sequelae included cellulitis, cutaneous abscess, bursitis, myositis, tenosynovitis, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, and epidural abscess. Patients were included if they were older than 18 years of age, presented to the emergency department for management of a musculoskeletal infection secondary to IVDU, and required inpatient orthopaedic treatment during their admission. Exclusion criteria included all patients presenting with a musculoskeletal infection not directly secondary to active IVDU. Patients presenting with an epidural abscess (Boston Medical Center, n = 36) were evaluated separately to explore potential differences in costs within this subgroup. A robust retrospective financial analysis was performed using internal financial databases at each institution which directly enumerated all true hospital costs associated with each patient admission, independent of billed hospital charges. All direct, indirect, variable, and fixed hospital costs were individually summed for each hospitalization, constituting a true "bottom-up" micro-costing approach. Labor-based costs were calculated through use of time-based costing; for instance, the cost of nursing labor care associated with a patient admission was determined through ascription of the median hospital cost of a registered nurse within that department (that is, compensation for salary plus benefits) to the total length of nursing time needed by that patient during their hospitalization. Primary reimbursements reflected the true monetary value received by the study institutions from insurers and were determined through the total adjusted payment for each inpatient admission. All professional fees were excluded. A secondary analysis was performed to assess the effect of patient insurance status on hospital costs and reimbursements for each patient admission. RESULTS: The mean healthcare cost incurred for the treatment of extraspinal orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU was USD 9524 ± USD 1430 per patient admission. The mean hospital reimbursement provided for the treatment of these extraspinal sequelae was USD 7678 ± USD 1248 per patient admission. This resulted in a mean financial loss of USD 1846 ± USD 1342 per patient admission. The mean healthcare cost incurred at Boston Medical Center for the treatment of epidural abscesses secondary to IVDU was USD 44,357 ± USD 7384 per patient. Hospital reimbursements within this subgroup were highly dependent upon insurance status. The median (range) reimbursement provided for patients possessing a unique hospital-based nonprofit health plan (n = 4) was USD 103,016 (USD 9022 to USD 320,123), corresponding to a median financial gain of USD 24,904 (USD 2289 to USD 83,079). However, the mean reimbursement for all other patients presenting with epidural abscesses (n = 32) was USD 30,429 ± USD 5278, corresponding to a mean financial loss of USD 5768 ± USD 4861. A secondary analysis demonstrated that treatment of extraspinal orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU for patients possessing Medicaid insurance (n = 309) resulted in a financial loss of USD 2813 ± USD 1593 per patient admission. Conversely, treatment of extraspinal orthopaedic sequelae for patients possessing non-Medicaid insurance (n = 67) generated a mean financial gain of USD 2615 ± USD 1341 per patient admission. CONCLUSIONS: Even when excluding all professional fees, the inpatient treatment of orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU resulted in substantial financial losses driven primarily by high proportions of under- and uninsured people within this patient population. These financial losses may be unsustainable for medical centers operating in challenging economic healthcare landscapes. The development of novel initiatives and support of existing programs aimed at mitigating the health-related and economic impact of IVDU must remain a principal priority of healthcare providers and policymakers in coming years. Advocacy for the expansion of Medicaid accountable care organizations and national syringe service programs (SSPs), and the development of specialized outpatient wound and abscess clinics at healthcare centers may help to substantially alleviate the economic burden of the orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level, IV, economic and decision analyses.

Study of the Effects of Epinephrine on Cerebral Oxygenation and Metabolism During Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation by Hyperspectral Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.

OBJECTIVES: Epinephrine is routinely administered to sudden cardiac arrest patients during resuscitation, but the neurologic effects on patients treated with epinephrine are not well understood. This study aims to assess the cerebral oxygenation and metabolism during ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and epinephrine administration. DESIGN: To investigate the effects of equal dosages of IV epinephrine administrated following sudden cardiac arrest as a continuous infusion or successive boluses during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, we monitored cerebral oxygenation and metabolism using hyperspectral near-infrared spectroscopy. SETTINGS: A randomized laboratory animal study. SUBJECTS: Nine healthy pigs. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Our study showed that although continuous epinephrine administration had no significant impact on overall cerebral hemodynamics, epinephrine boluses transiently improved cerebral oxygenation (oxygenated hemoglobin) and metabolism (cytochrome c oxidase) by 15% ± 6.7% and 49% ± 18%, respectively (p < 0.05) compared with the baseline (untreated) ventricular fibrillation. Our results suggest that the effects of epinephrine diminish with successive boluses as the impact of the third bolus on brain oxygen metabolism was 24.6% ± 3.8% less than that of the first two boluses. CONCLUSIONS: Epinephrine administration by bolus resulted in transient improvements in cerebral oxygenation and metabolism, whereas continuous epinephrine infusion did not, compared with placebo. Future studies are needed to evaluate and optimize the use of epinephrine in cardiac arrest resuscitation, particularly the dose, timing, and mode of administration.

The Association of the Average Epinephrine Dosing Interval and Survival With Favorable Neurologic Status at Hospital Discharge in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: For patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the recommended dosing interval of epinephrine is 3 to 5 minutes, but this recommendation is based on expert opinion without data to guide optimal management. We seek to evaluate the association between the average epinephrine dosing interval and patient outcomes. METHODS: In a secondary analysis of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium continuous chest compression trial, we identified consecutive patients treated with greater than or equal to 2 doses of epinephrine. We defined average epinephrine dosing interval as resuscitation duration after the first dose of epinephrine divided by the total administered epinephrine, and categorized the dosing interval in minutes as less than 3, 3 to less than 4, 4 to less than 5, and greater than or equal to 5. We fit a logistic regression model to estimate the association of the average epinephrine dosing interval category with survival with favorable neurologic status (modified Rankin Scale score ≤3) at hospital discharge. RESULTS: We included 15,909 patients (median age 68 years [interquartile range 56 to 80 years], 35% women, 13% public location, 46% bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and 19% initial shockable rhythm). The median epinephrine dosing interval was 4.3 minutes (interquartile range 3.5 to 5.3 minutes). Survival with favorable neurologic status occurred in 4.7% of patients. Compared with the reference dosing interval of less than 3 minutes, longer epinephrine dosing intervals were associated with lower survival with favorable neurologic status: dosing interval 3 to less than 4 minutes, adjusted odds ratio 0.44 (95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.60); 4 to less than 5 minutes, adjusted odds ratio 0.26 (95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.36); and greater than or equal to 5 minutes, adjusted odds ratio 0.21 (95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.30). CONCLUSION: In this out-of-hospital cardiac arrest series, a shorter average epinephrine dosing interval was associated with improved survival with favorable neurologic status.

Intraosseous Vascular Access Is Associated With Lower Survival and Neurologic Recovery Among Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We seek to determine the effect of intraosseous over intravenous vascular access on outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: This secondary analysis of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Prehospital Resuscitation Using an Impedance Valve and Early Versus Delayed (PRIMED) study included adult patients with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests treated during 2007 to 2009, excluding those with any unsuccessful attempt or more than one access site. The primary exposure was intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access. The primary outcome was favorable neurologic outcome on hospital discharge (modified Rankin Scale score ≤3). We determined the association between vascular access route and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcome with multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, initial emergency medical services-recorded rhythm (shockable or nonshockable), witness status, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, use of public automated external defibrillator, episode location (public or not), and time from call to paramedic scene arrival. We confirmed the results with multiple imputation, propensity score matching, and generalized estimating equations, with study enrolling region as a clustering variable. RESULTS: Of 13,155 included out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 660 (5.0%) received intraosseous vascular access. In the intraosseous group, 10 of 660 patients (1.5%) had favorable neurologic outcome compared with 945 of 12,495 (7.6%) in the intravenous group. On multivariable regression, intraosseous access was associated with poorer out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival (adjusted odds ratio 0.24; 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.46). Sensitivity analyses revealed similar results. CONCLUSION: In adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients, intraosseous vascular access was associated with poorer neurologic outcomes than intravenous access.

Cerebral Hemodynamics and Metabolism During Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Using Hyperspectral Near Infrared Spectroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Maintaining cerebral oxygen delivery and metabolism during cardiac arrest (CA) through resuscitation is essential to improve the survival rate while avoiding brain injury. The effect of CA and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on cerebral and muscle oxygen delivery and metabolism is not clearly quantified.Methods and Results:A novel hyperspectral near-infrared spectroscopy (hNIRS) technique was developed and evaluated to measure cerebral oxygen delivery and aerobic metabolism during ventricular fibrillation (VF) CA and CPR in 14 pigs. The hNIRS parameters were measured simultaneously on the dura and skull to investigate the validity of non-invasive hNIRS measurements. In addition, we compared the hNIRS data collected simultaneously on the brain and muscle. Following VF induction, oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2) declined with a 9.9 s delay and then cytochrome-c-oxidase (Cyt-ox) decreased on average 4.4 s later (P<0.05). CPR improved cerebral metabolism, which was reflected by an average 0.4 µmol/L increase in Cyt-ox, but had no significant effect on HbO2, deoxygenated hemoglobin (HHb) and tissue oxygen saturation (tSO2). Cyt-ox had greater correlation with HHb than HbO2. Muscle metabolism during VF and CPR was significantly different from that of the brain. The total hemoglobin concentration (in the brain only) increased after ~200 s of untreated CA, which is most likely driven by cerebral autoregulation through vasodilation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, hNIRS showed consistent measurements of hemodynamics and metabolism during CA and CPR.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in high-rise buildings: delays to patient care and effect on survival.

BACKGROUND: The increasing number of people living in high-rise buildings presents unique challenges to care and may cause delays for 911-initiated first responders (including paramedics and fire department personnel) responding to calls for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We examined the relation between floor of patient contact and survival after cardiac arrest in residential buildings. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study using data from the Toronto Regional RescuNet Epistry database for the period January 2007 to December 2012. We included all adult patients (≥ 18 yr) with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of no obvious cause who were treated in private residences. We excluded cardiac arrests witnessed by 911-initiated first responders and those with an obvious cause. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine the effect on survival of the floor of patient contact, with adjustment for standard Utstein variables. RESULTS: During the study period, 7842 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest met the inclusion criteria, of which 5998 (76.5%) occurred below the third floor and 1844 (23.5%) occurred on the third floor or higher. Survival was greater on the lower floors (4.2% v. 2.6%, p = 0.002). Lower adjusted survival to hospital discharge was independently associated with higher floor of patient contact, older age, male sex and longer 911 response time. In an analysis by floor, survival was 0.9% above floor 16 (i.e., below the 1% threshold for futility), and there were no survivors above the 25th floor. INTERPRETATION: In high-rise buildings, the survival rate after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was lower for patients residing on higher floors. Interventions aimed at shortening response times to treatment of cardiac arrest in high-rise buildings may increase survival.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and beyond: the need to improve real-time feedback and physiologic monitoring.

High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to improve survival outcomes after cardiac arrest. The current standard in studies evaluating CPR quality is to measure CPR process measures-for example, chest compression rate, depth, and fraction. Published studies evaluating CPR feedback devices have yielded mixed results. Newer approaches that seek to optimize CPR by measuring physiological endpoints during the resuscitation may lead to individualized patient care and improved patient outcomes.

Chest compression rates and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation recommend a chest compression rate of at least 100 compressions/min. A recent clinical study reported optimal return of spontaneous circulation with rates between 100 and 120/min during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, the relationship between compression rate and survival is still undetermined. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Data is from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Prehospital Resuscitation IMpedance threshold device and Early versus Delayed analysis clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by emergency medical service providers. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS MAIN RESULTS: Data were abstracted from monitor-defibrillator recordings for the first five minutes of emergency medical service cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Multiple logistic regression assessed odds ratio for survival by compression rate categories (<80, 80-99, 100-119, 120-139, ≥140), both unadjusted and adjusted for sex, age, witnessed status, attempted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, location of arrest, chest compression fraction and depth, first rhythm, and study site. Compression rate data were available for 10,371 patients; 6,399 also had chest compression fraction and depth data. Age (mean±SD) was 67±16 years. Chest compression rate was 111±19 per minute, compression fraction was 0.70±0.17, and compression depth was 42±12 mm. Circulation was restored in 34%; 9% survived to hospital discharge. After adjustment for covariates without chest compression depth and fraction (n=10,371), a global test found no significant relationship between compression rate and survival (p=0.19). However, after adjustment for covariates including chest compression depth and fraction (n=6,399), the global test found a significant relationship between compression rate and survival (p=0.02), with the reference group (100-119 compressions/min) having the greatest likelihood for survival. CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for chest compression fraction and depth, compression rates between 100 and 120 per minute were associated with greatest survival to hospital discharge.

Revisiting the "Golden Hour": An Evaluation of Out-of-Hospital Time in Shock and Traumatic Brain Injury.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We evaluate patients with shock and traumatic brain injury who were previously enrolled in an out-of-hospital clinical trial to test the association between out-of-hospital time and outcome. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of patients with shock and traumatic brain injury who were aged 15 years or older and enrolled in a Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium out-of-hospital clinical trial by 81 emergency medical services agencies transporting to 46 Level I and II trauma centers in 11 sites (May 2006 through May 2009). Inclusion criteria were systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 70 mm Hg or systolic blood pressure 71 to 90 mm Hg with pulse rate greater than or equal to 108 beats/min (shock cohort) and Glasgow Coma Scale score less than or equal to 8 (traumatic brain injury cohort); patients meeting both criteria were placed in the shock cohort. Primary outcomes were 28-day mortality (shock cohort) and 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score less than or equal to 4 (traumatic brain injury cohort). RESULTS: There were 778 patients in the shock cohort (26% 28-day mortality) and 1,239 patients in the traumatic brain injury cohort (53% 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score ≤4). Out-of-hospital time greater than 60 minutes was not associated with worse outcomes after accounting for important confounders in the shock cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 2.62) or traumatic brain injury cohort (aOR 0.77; 95% CI 0.51 to 1.15). However, shock patients requiring early critical hospital resources and arriving after 60 minutes had higher 28-day mortality (aOR 2.37; 95% CI 1.05 to 5.37); this finding was not observed among a similar traumatic brain injury subgroup. CONCLUSION: Among out-of-hospital trauma patients meeting physiologic criteria for shock and traumatic brain injury, there was no association between time and outcome. However, the subgroup of shock patients requiring early critical resources and arriving after 60 minutes had higher mortality.

Targeted temperature management processes and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational cohort study*.

OBJECTIVES: Targeted temperature management has been shown to improve survival with good neurological outcome in patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The optimal approach to inducing and maintaining targeted temperature management, however, remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to evaluate these processes of care with survival and neurological function in patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. DESIGN: An observational cohort study evaluating the association of targeted temperature management processes with survival and neurological function using bivariate and generalized estimating equation analyses. SETTING: Thirty-two tertiary and community hospitals in eight urban and rural regions of southern Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS: Consecutive adult (≥ 18 yr) patients admitted between November 1, 2007, and January 31, 2012, and who were treated with targeted temperature management following nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS: Evaluate the association of targeted temperature management processes with survival and neurologic function using bivariate and generalized estimating equation analyses. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 5,770 consecutive out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients, of whom 747 (12.9%) were eligible and received targeted temperature management. Among patients with available outcome data, 365 of 738 (49.5%) survived to hospital discharge and 241 of 675 (35.7%) had good neurological outcomes. After adjusting for the Utstein variables, a higher temperature prior to initiation of targeted temperature management was associated with improved neurological outcomes (odds ratio, 1.27 per °C; 95% CI, 1.08-1.50; p = 0.004) and survival (odds ratio, 1.26 per °C; 95% CI, 1.09-1.46; p = 0.002). A slower rate of cooling was associated with improved neurological outcomes (odds ratio, 0.74 per °C/hr; 95% CI, 0.57-0.97; p = 0.03) and survival (odds ratio, 0.73 per °C/hr; 95% CI, 0.54-1.00; p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: A higher baseline temperature prior to initiation of targeted temperature management and a slower rate of cooling were associated with improved survival and neurological outcomes. This may reflect a complex relationship between the approach to targeted temperature management and the extent of underlying brain injury causing impaired thermoregulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

Association of out-of-hospital advanced airway management with outcomes after traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock in the ROC hypertonic saline trial.

OBJECTIVE: Prior studies suggest adverse associations between out-of-hospital advanced airway management (AAM) and patient outcomes after major trauma. This secondary analysis of data from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Hypertonic Saline Trial evaluated associations between out-of-hospital AAM and outcomes in patients suffering isolated severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) or haemorrhagic shock. METHODS: This multicentre study included adults with severe TBI (GCS ≤8) or haemorrhagic shock (SBP ≤70 mm Hg, or (SBP 71-90 mm Hg and heart rate ≥108 bpm)). We compared patients receiving out-of-hospital AAM with those receiving emergency department AAM. We evaluated the associations between airway strategy and patient outcomes (28-day mortality, and 6-month poor neurologic or functional outcome) and airway strategy, adjusting for confounders. Analysis was stratified by (1) patients with isolated severe TBI and (2) patients with haemorrhagic shock with or without severe TBI. RESULTS: Of 2135 patients, we studied 1116 TBI and 528 shock; excluding 491 who died in the field, did not receive AAM or had missing data. In the shock cohort, out-of-hospital AAM was associated with increased 28-day mortality (adjusted OR 5.14; 95% CI 2.42 to 10.90). In TBI, out-of-hospital AAM showed a tendency towards increased 28-day mortality (adjusted OR 1.57; 95% CI 0.93 to 2.64) and 6-month poor functional outcome (1.63; 1.00 to 2.68), but these differences were not statistically significant. Out-of-hospital AAM was associated with poorer 6-month TBI neurologic outcome (1.80; 1.09 to 2.96). CONCLUSIONS: Out-of-hospital AAM was associated with increased mortality after haemorrhagic shock. The adverse association between out-of-hospital AAM and injury outcome is most pronounced in patients with haemorrhagic shock.