Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 18(1): 533, 2017 Dec 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29246142

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent chronic joint disease in China. The aim of this study was to examine the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and knee OA in a population-based Chinese study. METHODS: Data included in this analysis is from a cross-sectional study, i.e., the Xiangya Hospital Health Management Center Study. MetS was diagnosed according to the criteria defined by the Chinese Diabetes Society. Radiographic knee OA was defined as changes equivalent to Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade 2 or above at least one side. Associations between MetS and its components with OA were evaluated by conducting multivariable adjusted logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 5764 participants were included in the present study. The unadjusted OR (1.27, 95%CI: 1.10-1.47, P = 0.001), age-sex adjusted OR (1.17, 95%CI: 1.01-1.36, P = 0.041) and multivariable adjusted OR (1.17, 95%CI: 1.01-1.36, P = 0.043) all suggested a positive association between MetS and knee OA. Besides, its components (e.g., overweight, hypertension and dyslipidemia) were also associated with the prevalence of radiographic knee OA respectively, after adjusting for some confounding factors. In addition, with the accumulation of MetS components, the prevalence of knee OA increased. Furthermore, MetS as a whole was associated with the prevalence of knee osteophyte (OSP) (OR = 1.72, 95%CI: 1.42-2.09, P < 0.001), but not joint space narrowing (JSN) (OR = 1.06, 95%CI: 0.91-1.23, P = 0.449). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study indicated that there was a positive association between the prevalence of MetS and knee OA. However, MetS as a whole was associated with the higher prevalence of knee OSP, but not JSN, which should shed light on our understanding the association between MetS and OA.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia/metabolismo , Síndrome Metabólico/sangre , Síndrome Metabólico/epidemiología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/sangre , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólico/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico
2.
Arthroscopy ; 33(6): 1248-1259.e4, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28302427

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the associations of medial tibial plateau slope (MTPS), lateral tibial plateau slope (LTPS), and coronal tibial plateau slope (CTPS) with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury both in the general population and in different gender subgroups. METHODS: PubMed, Ovid, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched through from inception to August 31, 2016. Observational studies reporting associations of MTPS/LTPS/CTPS with ACL injury were retrieved for analysis. Either a fixed- or random-effects model was used to calculate the overall standardized mean difference (SMD). Reviews, meeting abstracts, cadaver or animal studies, and other studies without disclosing full text were excluded in this study. RESULTS: A total of 29 studies were included. Subjects with ACL injury exhibited a significant increase in MTPS (SMD: 0.34 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18, 0.49]; P < .0001) and LTPS (SMD: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.30, 0.68]; P < .00001), but not in the CTPS (SMD: 0.09 [95% CI: -0.10, 0.27]; P = .36), compared with controls. Meanwhile, significant differences in MTPS and LTPS were observed in the male subgroup (SMD: 0.41 [95% CI: 0.20, 0.62]; P = .0001 and SMD: 0.55 [95% CI: 0.26, 0.85]; P = .0002, respectively) but not in the female (SMD: 0.31 [95% CI: -0.02, 0.64]; P = .06 and SMD: 0.26 [95% CI: -0.04, 0.56]; P = .09, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis showed that the increases in MTPS and LTPS were overall risk factors of ACL injury. However, these slopes would only be considered as "at risk" for males, but not for females. In addition, it was also proved that CTPS was not a risk factor of ACL injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, meta-analysis of Level II and III studies.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/patología , Tibia/patología , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico por imagen , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Tibia/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA