Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 51(5): 1465-73, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23447638

RESUMEN

Prospective hospital-based surveillance for Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) was conducted in Barcelona (Spain) to describe the epidemiology of this condition and investigate the risk factors for an unfavorable outcome. All patients diagnosed with CDAD during 2009 were included. Using logistic regression modeling, we analyzed the potential risk factors associated with recurrent and complicated CDAD, defined as a need for colectomy or death within 30 days. There were 365 episodes of CDAD, yielding an incidence of 22.5 cases/10(5) person-years, 1.22 cases/10(3) hospital discharges, and 1.93 cases/10(4) patient-days. The main PCR ribotypes identified were 241 (26%), 126 (18%), 078 (7%), and 020 (5%). PCR ribotype 027 was not detected. Among the 348 cases analyzed, 232 (67%) patients were cured, 63 (18%) had a recurrence of CDAD, and 53 (15%) developed complicated CDAD. Predictors of complicated CDAD were continued use of antibiotics following CDAD diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 2.009; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.012 to 3.988; P = 0.046), Charlson comorbidity index score (OR, 1.265; 95% CI, 1.105 to 1.449; P = 0.001), and age (OR, 1.028; 95% CI, 1.005 to 1.053; P = 0.019). A leukocyte count of >15 × 10(3) cells/ml (OR, 2.277; 95% CI, 1.189 to 4.362; P = 0.013), continuation of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use after CDAD diagnosis (OR, 2.168; 95% CI, 1.081 to 4.347; P = 0.029), and age (OR, 1.021; 95% CI, 1.001 to 1.041; P = 0.036) were independently associated with higher odds of recurrence. The incidence of CDAD in Barcelona during 2009 was on the lower end of the previously described range for all of Europe. Our analysis suggests that the continuation of non-C. difficile antibiotics and use of PPIs in patients diagnosed with CDAD are associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/clasificación , Infecciones por Clostridium/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas , Toxinas Bacterianas , Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Colectomía , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Diarrea/epidemiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Enterotoxinas , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , España/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Injury ; 47(4): 872-6, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26857632

RESUMEN

In patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) secondary to proximal femur fracture, acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most important complications. We have detected an increased risk of PJI in chronic institutionalized patients (CIPs), and a higher number of early postoperative infections are caused by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), not covered by the current prophylaxis (cefazolin in noninstitutionalized patients (NIPs) and cotrimoxazole in CIPs). We sought to compare infection characteristics between NIPs and CIPs, analyzing predisposing factors, causative pathogens, and antibiotic prophylaxis-related microbiological characteristics. We performed a retrospective review of our prospective institutional database to identify all patients consecutively admitted for HHA to treat proximal femur fracture at our centre between 2011 and 2013. PJI was diagnosed in 21 of 381 (5.51%) patients, with 10 of 105 (9.52%) in the CIP group and 11 of 276 (3.99%) in the NIP group, and statistical significance was achieved. GNB accounted for PJI in 14 (66.67%) patients. We detected a single case of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in the NIP group. We confirm a higher risk of acute PJI among institutionalized patients, commonly caused by Gram-negative microorganisms, which are not covered by the current prophylaxis. New prophylactic strategies should be investigated in order to reduce this problem.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/prevención & control , Hemiartroplastia , Institucionalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/microbiología , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Hemiartroplastia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , España , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA