Metacognition, social cognition, and mentalizing in psychosis: are these distinct constructs when it comes to subjective experience or are we just splitting hairs?

Research using the integrated model of metacognition has suggested that the construct of metacognition could quantify the spectrum of activities that, if impaired, might cause many of the subjective disturbances found in psychosis. Research on social cognition and mentalizing in psychosis, however, has also pointed to underlying deficits in how persons make sense of their experience of themselves and others. To explore the question of whether metacognitive research in psychosis offers unique insight in the midst of these other two emerging fields, we have offered a review of the constructs and research from each field. Following that summary, we discuss ways in which research on metacognition may be distinguished from research on social cognition and mentalizing in three broad categories: (1) experimental procedures, (2) theoretical advances, and (3) clinical applications or indicated interventions. In terms of its research methods, we will describe how metacognition makes a unique contribution to understanding disturbances in how persons make sense of and interpret their own experiences within the flow of life. We will next discuss how metacognitive research in psychosis uniquely describes an architecture which when compromised - as often occurs in psychosis - results in the loss of persons' sense of purpose, possibilities, place in the world and cohesiveness of self. Turning to clinical issues, we explore how metacognitive research offers an operational model of the architecture which if repaired or restored should promote the recovery of a coherent sense of self and others in psychosis. Finally, we discuss the concrete implications of this for recovery-oriented treatment for psychosis as well as the need for further research on the commonalities of these approaches.

Measuring disorganized speech in schizophrenia: automated analysis explains variance in cognitive deficits beyond clinician-rated scales.

BACKGROUND: Conveying information cohesively is an essential element of communication that is disrupted in schizophrenia. These disruptions are typically expressed through disorganized symptoms, which have been linked to neurocognitive, social cognitive, and metacognitive deficits. Automated analysis can objectively assess disorganization within sentences, between sentences, and across paragraphs by comparing explicit communication to a large text corpus. METHOD: Little work in schizophrenia has tested: (1) links between disorganized symptoms measured via automated analysis and neurocognition, social cognition, or metacognition; and (2) if automated analysis explains incremental variance in cognitive processes beyond clinician-rated scales. Disorganization was measured in schizophrenia (n = 81) with Coh-Metrix 3.0, an automated program that calculates basic and complex language indices. Trained staff also assessed neurocognition, social cognition, metacognition, and clinician-rated disorganization. RESULTS: Findings showed that all three cognitive processes were significantly associated with at least one automated index of disorganization. When automated analysis was compared with a clinician-rated scale, it accounted for significant variance in neurocognition and metacognition beyond the clinician-rated measure. When combined, these two methods explained 28-31% of the variance in neurocognition, social cognition, and metacognition. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrated how automated analysis can highlight the specific role of disorganization in neurocognition, social cognition, and metacognition. Generally, those with poor cognition also displayed more disorganization in their speech-making it difficult for listeners to process essential information needed to tie the speaker's ideas together. Our findings showcase how implementing a mixed-methods approach in schizophrenia can explain substantial variance in cognitive processes.

Metacognitive reflection and insight therapy (MERIT) for patients with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Impaired metacognition is associated with difficulties in the daily functioning of people with psychosis. Metacognition can be divided into four domains: Self-Reflection, Understanding the Other's Mind, Decentration, and Mastery. This study investigated whether Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT) can be used to improve metacognition. METHODS: This study is a randomized controlled trial. Patients in the active condition (n = 35) received forty MERIT sessions, the control group (n = 35) received treatment as usual. Multilevel intention-to-treat and completers analyses were performed for metacognition and secondary outcomes (psychotic symptomatology, cognitive insight, Theory of Mind, empathy, depression, self-stigma, quality of life, social functioning, and work readiness). RESULTS: Eighteen out of 35 participants finished treatment, half the drop-out stemmed from therapist attrition (N = 5) or before the first session (N = 4). Intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated that in both groups metacognition improved between pre- and post-measurements, with no significant differences between the groups. Patients who received MERIT continued to improve, while the control group returned to baseline, leading to significant differences at follow-up. Completers analysis (18/35) showed improvements on the Metacognition Assessment Scale (MAS-A) scales Self Reflectivity and metacognitive Mastery at follow-up. No effects were found on secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: On average, participants in the MERIT group were, based on MAS-A scores, at follow-up more likely to recognize their thoughts as changeable rather than as facts. MERIT might be useful for patients whose self-reflection is too limited to benefit from other therapies. Given how no changes were found in secondary measures, further research is needed. Limitations and suggestions for future research are discussed.

[Metacognition in psychotic disorders: from concepts to intervention]. / Metacognitie bij psychotische stoornissen: van concept naar interventie.

BACKGROUND: Persons with a psychotic disorder commonly experience difficulties with what is considered to be metacognitive capacity. In this article we discuss several definitions of this concept, the measurement instruments involved and the clinical interventions that target this concept. AIM: To present a review of various frequently used definitions of metacognition and related concepts and to describe the measurement instruments involved and the treatment options available for improving the metacognitive capacity of persons with a psychotic disorder. METHOD: We present an overview of several definitions of metacognition in psychotic disorders and we discuss frequently used measurement instruments and treatment options. The article focuses on recent developments in a model devised by Semerari et al. The measurement instrument involved (Metacognition Assessment Scale - A) is discussed in terms of it being an addition to existing methods. RESULTS: On the basis of the literature it appears that metacognition and related concepts are measurable constructs, although definitions and instruments vary considerably. The new conceptualisation of social information processing also leads to the development of a new form of psychotherapy that aims to help patients suffering from psychotic disorders to improve metacognitive capacity. CONCLUSION: There seems to be evidence that metacognitive abilities are a possible target for treatment, but further research is needed.

[A group cognitive behavioral intervention for people registered in supported employment programs: CBT-SE]. / Une intervention cognitive comportementale de groupe pour les personnes suivies dans le cadre d'un programme de soutien en emploi (TCC-SE).

INTRODUCTION: Supported employment programs are highly effective in helping people with severe mental illness obtain competitive jobs quickly. However, job tenure is often a problem for many. Of the various obstacles to job tenure documented, dysfunctional beliefs regarding the workplace and one's own abilities has been proposed as a therapeutic target. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is threefold: (1) to describe the development and the content of a novel group cognitive behavioral intervention designed to increase job tenure for people receiving supported employment services; (2) to present the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention; and (3) to investigate some preliminary data regarding employment outcomes. A group CBT intervention offered during 8 sessions over the course of one month, in order to respect the rapid job search principle of IPS (individual placement and support), was developed. The content was tailored to facilitate the learning of skills specific to the workplace, such as recognizing and managing one's stressors at work, determining and modifying dysfunctional thoughts (e.g. not jumping to conclusions, finding alternatives, seeking facts), overcoming obstacles (e.g. problem solving), improving one's self-esteem as a worker (recognizing strengths and qualities), dealing with criticism, using positive assertiveness, finding coping strategies (for symptoms and stress) to use at work, negotiating work accommodations and overcoming stigma. A trial is currently underway, with half the participants receiving supported employment as well as CBT-SE and the other half receiving only supported employment. METHODS: A subsample of the first 24 participants having completed the 12-month follow-up were used for the analyses, including 12 having received at least 3 sessions out of the 8 group sessions and 12 receiving only supported employment. Feasibility and acceptability were determined by the group therapists' feedback, the participants' feedback as well as attendance to group sessions. The work outcomes looked at with the preliminary sample only included the 12-month follow-up and involved: obtaining a competitive job, number of hours worked per week as well as number of weeks worked at the same job (>24hours). RESULTS: In terms of feasibility and acceptability, therapists and participants all mentioned appreciating the group, finding it useful and helpful, some even mentioning feeling grateful to have had the opportunity to receive the intervention. The only negative feedback received pertained to the frequency of the meetings, which could be brought down to one meeting per week of two hours instead of two one-hour sessions per week. Participation was very good, with the average number of sessions attended being of 6/8. In terms of work outcomes, 50 % of all participants in both conditions found competitive work. Out of those working competitively, the number of participants working more than 24hours per week at the 12-month follow-up was higher in the CBT-SE group compared to the control condition (75 % vs. 50 %). Similarly, there was a trend towards the number of consecutive weeks worked at the same job being slightly superior at the 12-month follow-up for those who had received the CBT-SE intervention (22.5 weeks vs. 18.3 weeks). DISCUSSION: The preliminary results support previous studies where on average 50 % of people registered in supported employment programs obtain competitive work. We confirmed that the intervention was feasible and acceptable. Preliminary data suggest that the CBT-SE intervention might help people with severe mental illness use skills and gain the needed confidence enabling them to work longer hours and consecutive weeks. These results should be considered with caution given that only 24 participants were looked at whereas the final sample size will be of 160 participants. Nonetheless, these preliminary results are promising. Furthermore, additional information regarding the impact of the CBT-SE intervention on the capacity to overcome obstacles at work, self-esteem as a worker, as well as other work-related variables have been collected but have not been investigated here. Once the study is completed, the results should enlighten us regarding the usefulness of offering CBT-SE not only in terms of work outcomes but also in improving various psychosocial domains linked to workplace satisfaction.

Social cognition and metacognition in schizophrenia: evidence of their independence and linkage with outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Research suggests that many with schizophrenia experience deficits in the ability to make discrete judgments about the thoughts and feelings of others as well as to form larger integrated representations of themselves and others. Little is known about whether these difficulties may be distinguished from one another and whether they are linked with different outcomes. METHOD: We administered three assessments of social cognition which tapped the ability to identify emotions and intentions and two metacognitive tasks which called for the formation of more integrated and flexible representations of the self and others. We additionally assessed symptoms, social functioning and neurocognition. Participants were 95 individuals with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. RESULTS: A principle components analysis followed by a varimax rotation revealed two factors which accounted for 62% of the variance. The first factor was comprised of the three social cognition tests and the second of two tasks that tapped the ability to create representations of oneself and others which integrate more discreet information. The first factor was uniquely correlated with negative symptoms, and the second was uniquely correlated with social function. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that deficits in social cognition and metacognition represent different forms of dysfunction in schizophrenia.

Narrative enhancement and cognitive therapy (NECT) to improve social functioning in people with serious mental illness: study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Self-stigma is highly prevalent in serious mental illness (SMI) and is associated with poorer clinical and functional outcomes. Narrative enhancement and cognitive therapy (NECT) is a group-based intervention combining psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring and story-telling exercises to reduce self-stigma and its impact on recovery-related outcomes. Despite evidence of its effectiveness on self-stigma in schizophrenia-related disorders, it is unclear whether NECT can impact social functioning. METHODS: This is a 12-centre stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial of NECT effectiveness on social functioning in SMI, compared to treatment as usual. One hundred and twenty participants diagnosed with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or borderline personality disorder will be recruited across the 12 sites. The 12 centres participating to the study will be randomized into two groups: one group (group 1) receiving the intervention at the beginning of the study (T0) and one group (group 2) being a control group for the first 6 months and receiving the intervention after (T1). Outcomes will be compared in both groups at T0 and T1, and 6-month and 12-month outcomes for groups 1 and 2 will be measured without a control group at T2 (to evaluate the stability of the effects over time). Evaluations will be conducted by assessors blind to treatment allocation. The primary outcome is personal and social performance compared across randomization groups. Secondary outcomes include self-stigma, self-esteem, wellbeing, quality of life, illness severity, depressive symptoms and personal recovery. DISCUSSION: NECT is a promising intervention for reducing self-stigma and improving recovery-related outcomes in SMI. If shown to be effective in this trial, it is likely that NECT will be implemented in psychiatric rehabilitation services with subsequent implications for routine clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03972735 . Trial registration date 31 May 2019.

Measuring empathy in schizophrenia: The Empathic Accuracy Task and its correlation with other empathy measures.

INTRODUCTION: Empathy is an interpersonal process impaired in schizophrenia. Past studies have mainly used questionnaires or performance-based tasks with static cues to measure cognitive and affective empathy. We used the Empathic Accuracy Task (EAT) designed to capture dynamic aspects of empathy by using videoclips in which perceivers continuously judge emotionally charged stories. We compared individuals with schizophrenia with a healthy comparison group and assessed correlations among EAT and three other commonly used empathy measures. METHOD: Patients (n = 92) and a healthy comparison group (n = 42) matched for age, gender and education completed the EAT, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy and Faux Pas. Differences between groups were analyzed and correlations were calculated between empathy measurement instruments. RESULTS: The groups differed in EAT performance, with the comparison group outperforming patients. A moderating effect was found for emotional expressivity of the target: while both patients and the comparison group scored low when judging targets with low expressivity, the comparison group performed better than patients with more expressive targets. Though there were also group differences on the empathy questionnaires, EAT performance did not correlate with questionnaire scores. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with schizophrenia benefit less from the emotional expressivity of other people than the comparison group, which contributes to their impaired empathic accuracy. The lack of correlation between the EAT and the questionnaires suggests a distinction between self-report empathy and actual empathy performance. To explore empathic difficulties in real life, it is important to use instruments that take the interpersonal perspective into account.

The association between metacognitive abilities and outcome measures among people with schizophrenia: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Deficits in metacognition are one of the major causes of the difficulties experienced by individuals with schizophrenia. Studies have linked these deficits to symptom exacerbation and deterioration in psychosocial functioning. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to examine the extensive existing literature regarding metacognitive deficits among persons with schizophrenia; a further aim was to assess the extent to which metacognitive abilities are linked to outcome measures of symptoms and psychosocial functioning. METHOD: We conducted a systematic literature search of studies examining the relationship between metacognitive abilities and outcome measures among people with schizophrenia. We then analyzed the data using a random-effects meta-analytic model with Cohen's d standardized mean effect size. RESULTS: Heterogeneity analyses (k=32, Cohen's d=-.12, 95% CI.-1.92 to 1.7) produced a significant Q-statistic (Q=456.89) and a high amount of heterogeneity, as indicated by the I2 statistic (93.04%), suggesting that moderator analyses were appropriate. As hypothesized, measure type moderated the metacognitive deficit with homogenous effect for psychosocial functioning measures (Q=9.81, I2=19.47%, d=.94. 95% CI .58 to 1.2) and symptoms (Q=19.87, I2=0%, d=-1.07, 95% CI -1.18 to -.75). Further analysis found homogenous effects for MAS-A subscales as well as PANSS factors of symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis results illustrated a significant association between metacognitive deficits and both symptomatic and psychosocial functioning measures. These links suggest that the associations between metacognitive abilities and symptomatic outcomes are different from those between metacognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning measures. Intriguing hypotheses are raised regarding the role that metacognitive abilities play in both symptoms and psychosocial functioning measures of people diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Effects on cognitive and clinical insight with the use of Guided Self-Determination in outpatients with schizophrenia: A randomized open trial.

Poor insight has a negative impact on the outcome in schizophrenia; consequently, poor insight is a logical target for treatment. However, neither medication nor psychosocial interventions have been demonstrated to improve poor insight. A method originally designed for diabetes patients to improve their illness management, Guided Self-Determination (GSD), has been adapted for use in patients with schizophrenia (GSD-SZ). The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect on insight of GSD-SZ as a supplement to treatment as usual (TAU) as compared to TAU alone in outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia. The design was an open randomized trial. The primary hypothesis was cognitive insight would improve in those patients who received GSD-SZ+TAU as assessed by the BCIS. We additionally explored whether the intervention led to changes in clinical insight, self-perceived recovery, self-esteem, social functioning and symptom severity. Assessments were conducted at baseline, and at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. Analysis was based on the principles of intention to treat and potential confounders were taken into account through applying a multivariate approach. A total of 101 participants were randomized to GSD-SZ+TAU (n=50) or to TAU alone (n=51). No statistically significant differences were found on the cognitive insight. However, at 12-month follow-up, clinical insight (measured by G12 from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale), symptom severity, and social functioning had statistically significantly improved in the intervention group as compared to the control group. "Improving insight in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia", NCT01282307, http://clinicaltrials.gov/.

Self-Appraisal of Illness Questionnaire (SAIQ): relationship to researcher-rated insight and neuropsychological function in schizophrenia.

The Self-Appraisal of Illness Questionnaire (SAIQ) is a self-report instrument designed to assess attitudes toward mental illness among persons receiving psychiatric treatment. This instrument was developed for use in community settings, adapted closely from the Patient's Experience of Hospitalization questionnaire. In order to examine the validity of the SAIQ, a factor analysis was first conducted on the items of this instrument in a sample of 59 outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective illness. Three factors emerged: Need for Treatment, Worry, and Presence/Outcome of Illness. Next, to examine the concurrent validity of these three SAIQ subscales, they were correlated with researcher rated insight scales and neuropsychological tests. Results indicated that the Need for Treatment and Presence/Outcome subscales were significantly correlated with both researcher-rated insight scales and with neuropsychological tests of executive functioning. The Worry subscale was not associated with either researcher-rated insight scales or neuropsychological tests. It was concluded that the Need for Treatment and Presence/Outcome subscales may be used in combination as a brief screening instrument for clients with schizophrenia receiving outpatient psychiatric treatment who may be at risk for treatment non-compliance due to a lack of insight into illness.

Clinical benefits of paid work activity in schizophrenia: 1-year followup.

In a previous article in the Schizophrenia Bulletin (Vol. 22, No. 1, 1996), we presented findings of a study on the clinical and rehabilitative effects of work activity on 150 subjects diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Subjects were randomly assigned to either a Pay ($3.40/hr) or No-Pay group and given 6-month work placements in a Department of Veterans Affairs medical center. At the 5-month followup, Pay subjects had worked more hours and earned more money (from any employment) than No-Pay subjects. Pay subjects also had significantly greater improvement in symptoms and lower rehospitalization rates. Clinical improvement was closely linked to amount of participation. We concluded that pay increased participation. The current study examined clinical and rehabilitative outcomes at 1-year followup, 6 months after the conclusion of the work program. Results indicated that the Pay subjects had a significant decrease in work activity once they had completed the work program. However, 75 percent of those who had fully participated in the program continued working during the subsequent 6 months, either as volunteers or for pay. Clinical outcomes for subjects in the Pay condition were attenuated at 1-year followup but still significantly better than for subjects in the No-Pay condition. More than 40 percent of participants continued to be "much improved" on total symptoms, and more than 50 percent were "much improved" on positive symptoms. Discussion focuses on the importance and limitations of work for pay as a clinical intervention and concludes that continuous work services are necessary and beneficial for many people with schizophrenia.

Clinical benefits of paid work activity in schizophrenia.

Although indirect support can be found for the clinical benefits of work, it has not been studied in randomized designs, nor have critical variables been manipulated. One such variable is pay incentive. The authors present a study of 150 subjects with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were randomized into Pay ($3.40/hour) and No-Pay conditions and offered 6-month work placements within a Department of Veterans Affairs medical center. Subjects participated in a work-related support group and were evaluated weekly on symptom measures. Results indicated that Pay subjects worked more hours and earned more money than No-Pay subjects. Pay subjects showed more total symptom improvement at followup, and more improvement, particularly on positive and emotional discomfort symptoms. They also had a significant lower rate of rehospitalization than No-Pay subjects. Participation in work activity was closely associated with symptom improvement. Participators showed more total symptom improvement at followup than partial participators or nonparticipators, and more improvement, particularly on positive, hostility, and emotional discomfort symptoms. We concluded that pay increased participation and that, in this study, participation in work activity was primarily responsible for symptom reduction.

Personality and psychosocial dysfunction in schizophrenia: the association of extraversion and neuroticism to deficits in work performance.

Research on vocational dysfunction in schizophrenia has as yet only examined associated features of illness. We hypothesized that personality variables may be also associated with work function. We reasoned that higher levels of extraversion and neuroticism would predict poor function by virtue of the social support seeking and passive/avoidant coping styles associated with each. To test this, multiple regressions were conducted in which measures of extraversion and neuroticism predicted work performance among 43 subjects with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Higher levels of extraversion and neuroticism significantly predicted poorer function, accounting for between 7% and 27% of the variance in global cooperativeness, work quality, work habits and personal presentation measures of work behavior. The potential importance of assessing personality in rehabilitation is discussed.

Concurrent validity of the cognitive component of schizophrenia: relationship of PANSS scores to neuropsychological assessments.

Cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia may represent a separate component of the disorder that is distinct from positive or negative syndromes. In a previous study, we reported a factor analysis of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) that revealed five components, one of which we labeled the Cognitive component. In the present study, we explored the validity of the PANSS Cognitive component by examining correlations between neuropsychological measures and the five factor-analytically derived PANSS scores for 147 subjects with diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Higher scores on the PANSS Cognitive component were significantly correlated with poorer performance on all neuropsychological tests, including the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), the Digit Symbol Substitution Task, the Slosson Intelligence Test, and the Gorham Proverbs Test. Multiple regression revealed that these test scores explained 37% of the variance in the Cognitive component score. Neuropsychological tests have very limited associations with the other PANSS components. These results suggest that the Cognitive component of the PANSS is a valid measure of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, and they support the hypothesis that Cognitive impairment is a distinctive feature of schizophrenia independent of positive and negative syndromes.

Five-component model of schizophrenia: assessing the factorial invariance of the positive and negative syndrome scale.

A five-component model of schizophrenia has been presented by Kay and Sevy based upon an analysis of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Kay and Sevy found factorial validity for negative and positive syndromes, and they identified excitement, depressive, and cognitive components as well. They suggested that subtypes and syndromes can be mapped along dimensions presented in their model. The present study compares the five-component solution for a new sample of 146 subjects to a reanalysis of the Kay and Sevy data. Despite divergent demographic characteristics, the two samples produce similar dimensions. Correlations of component loadings and subject scores as well as confirmatory factor analysis are presented. Discussion focuses on points of agreement and important differences in the symptoms assigned to each component. How the dimensions relate to rationally derived models of positive and negative syndromes is reviewed, and implications for subtyping and other methods of examining the heterogeneity of schizophrenia are considered.

Emotional discomfort and impairments in verbal memory in schizophrenia.

Research has demonstrated that impairments in verbal memory in schizophrenia are linked with psychosocial deficits. Less is known, however, about their relationship to clinical features of illness. This study explores the hypothesis that impairments in verbal memory, particularly forms of memory requiring deeper levels of encoding, are uniquely linked to symptoms of dysphoria or emotional discomfort. Accordingly, we examined the association between concurrent measures of symptoms and verbal memory for 84 subjects with schizophrenia. Measures of positive, negative, cognitive, excitement and emotional discomfort symptoms were derived from factor scores of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Verbal memory was assessed using two tests requiring relatively superficial levels of encoding: The Hopkins Verbal Memory Test and the Digit Span subtest; and one test requiring deeper levels of encoding: the Logical Memory subtests I and II. As predicted, multiple regressions controlling for age, education and attention revealed that poorer performance on Logical Memory was strongly associated with greater levels of emotional discomfort (R(2)=0.22 and 0.25, respectively) while performance on the Hopkins test was related to cognitive symptoms scores (R(2)=0.08 and 0.09, respectively). Implications for the conceptualization of verbal memory deficits in schizophrenia are discussed.

Psychiatric symptoms and work performance among persons with severe mental illness.

The study examined the relationship between psychiatric symptoms and work performance for 61 subjects with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who participated in a work rehabilitation program. Symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) to predict performance on the Work Personality Profile at three and 13 weeks of the program. Twenty-seven percent of the variance in work performance measures could be explained by symptom components measured by the PANSS, including the cognitive, negative, and hostility components, but the positive component did not predict work performance. Ratings of symptoms done concurrently with ratings of work performance were more powerful predictors than ratings of symptoms done at three and 13 weeks before ratings of work performance.

Childhood sexual trauma and psychosocial functioning in adults with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the association between sexual abuse in childhood and the severity of psychosocial deficits in adults with schizophrenia. METHODS: The Quality of Life Scale, which assesses current interpersonal and work function, and the NEO personality inventory, which assesses personality dimensions relevant to social functioning, were administered to 54 individuals who had been diagnosed as having schizophrenia. Nineteen of the individuals reported having been sexually abused as children, and 35 reported no history of abuse. RESULTS: A multiple analysis of variance indicated that there were differences between the group of individuals who had a history of sexual trauma and the group that did not. Subsequent univariate analysis of variance indicated that the individuals with a history of abuse had poorer current role functioning and fewer of the basic psychological building blocks necessary for sustaining intimacy. They also demonstrated higher levels of neuroticism, which is a measure of vulnerability to emotional turmoil. The two groups did not differ in frequency of interpersonal contacts or level of extroversion. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual abuse in childhood is associated with poorer psychosocial functioning in adults with schizophrenia.