Versatility of percutaneous pedicular screw fixation in metastatic spine tumor surgery: a prospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Posterior percutaneous spinal fixation (PPSF) has evolved to address the problems associated with metastatic spinal disease (MSD). This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and spectrum of application of PPSF in the management of MSD, highlighting its clinical advantages. METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients with MSD treated with PPSF in our institution from January 2011 to June 2014 were studied. After a multidisciplinary assessment, all patients were considered for surgical intervention due to clinical presentation of either neural deficit, skeletal instability, or both. Some of these patients belonged to the poor prognostic category based on survival prognostic scoring systems. The patients were categorized into seven groups depending on the modality of PPSF used. Demographic data, operative details, and clinical outcomes were investigated for each category and compared pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: The median age was 60 years (range 49-78 years). Generally, all patients either maintained or improved their neurological status and achieved pain alleviation. Ambulatory status and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores were improved using any modality of PPSF. The pure-stabilization group had the lowest amount of mean blood loss, shortest operative time, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, while the long-construct group was observed to have the greatest amount of blood loss, and longest operative time and ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with MSD, even with predicted poor prognosis on survival prognostic scoring systems, it is possible to improve functional outcomes and quality of life with PPSF, keeping surgical morbidity to a minimum. PPSF allows patients with pure spinal instability to be addressed successfully with least morbidity.

The long and short of cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fracture.

INTRODUCTION: Pertrochanteric fractures after low-energy trauma are common among osteoporotic patients. Although the use of intramedullary devices to treat such fractures is becoming increasingly popular, there is a paucity of data comparing the outcomes of the use of short cephalomedullary nails (SCN) with the use of long cephalomedullary nails (LCN). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of treatment using LCN with treatment using SCN for patients with osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of 64 patients with osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures who were treated with either LCN or SCN and had a minimum follow-up of one year was performed. Primary outcome measures include complications, revision surgeries and union rates. Secondary outcome measures include duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and ambulatory and mortality status at one year. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the clinical and functional outcomes of the patients who were treated with LCN and those who were treated with SCN. However, there was a higher incidence of heterotopic ossification in the latter group, and a slightly greater average estimated blood loss and duration of surgery in the former group. Patients treated with LCN tended to be more osteoporotic. CONCLUSION: Our study found no significant difference in terms of complications, revision surgeries, union rates and ambulatory status between the patients who were treated with LCN and those who were treated with SCN. Both LCN and SCN provided safe and reliable outcomes in the treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures.

Cemented hemiarthroplasty in traumatic displaced femoral neck fractures and deep vein thrombosis: is there really a link?

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly can be treated with cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty with good outcomes. Earlier studies reported a higher incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with cemented prostheses in elective total hip or knee arthroplasty. In addition, the hypercoagulable state after a traumatic femoral neck fracture and possible thrombogenic properties of bone cement could put these patients at greater risk for thromboembolism. We aimed to compare the incidence of DVT and progression to pulmonary embolism (PE) or mortality in cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty. METHODS: The data of 271 patients treated with cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty after a traumatic displaced femoral neck fracture was retrospectively analysed for the incidence of DVT. The level of thrombosis, progression to PE and mortality were compared. RESULTS: There were 133 (49.1%) patients with cemented hemiarthroplasty, while 138 (50.9%) had uncemented hemiarthroplasty. The patients had an average age of 76.6 (range 53-99) years and 11 (4.1%) patients had DVT. There were no significant differences in development of DVT, level of thrombosis, PE and mortality regardless of whether a cemented or an uncemented prosthesis was used. CONCLUSION: Cemented hemiarthroplasty is not associated with higher risks of DVT, PE or mortality in patients with traumatic displaced femoral neck fracture. Cemented prostheses can be safely used for this group of patients.